Time spent in the operating room is valuable to both surgeons and patients. One of the biggest rate-limiting factors when it comes to arthrodesis procedures of the foot and ankle is cartilage removal and joint preparation. Power instrumentation in joint preparation provides an avenue to decrease joint preparation time, thus decreasing operating room time and costs. Arthrodesis of 47 joints (n) from 27 patients were included. Power rasp joint preparation in 26 joints was compared to traditional osteotome and curette joint preparation in 21 joints in both time (seconds), cost (total operating room time cost per minute), and union rate. The overall mean joint preparation time using power rasp for the subtalar joint was 268.3 seconds, talonavicular joint 212.3 seconds, calcaneocuboid joint 142.6 seconds, 1st TMT 107.2 seconds. Mean joint preparation time using traditional method for subtalar joint 509.8 seconds, talonavicular joint 393.0 seconds, calcaneocuboid joint 400.0 seconds, 1st TMT 319.6 seconds. Mean cost of joint preparation using power rasp for subtalar joint $165.47, talonavicular joint $130.89, calcaneocuboid joint $87.94, 1st TMT $66.11. Mean cost of joint preparation using traditional techniques for subtalar joint $314.34, talonavicular joint $242.35, calcaneocuboid joint $246.67, 1st TMT $197.33. Overall union rate was 98% (1 asymptomatic non-union). Increasing efficiency in the operating room is vital to every surgeon\'s practice. Power rasp joint preparation is a viable option to increase efficiency and decrease operative time, this study shows no statistically significant differences in union rate, with comparable rates to existing literature.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare different fixation methods to achieve Tarsometatarsal joint I (TMT-1) arthrodesis in patients with hallux valgus regarding radiographic correction, complication profile, and clinical outcomes.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis included primary literature results of evidence level 1 to 3 studies in German and English. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established and applied, along with parameters suitable for comparison of data.
RESULTS: 16 studies with a total of 1176 participants met the inclusion criteria for this analysis. Twelve evaluation criteria were compared among 3 fixation techniques; comprised of a screw-only, dorsomedial plating- and plantar plating cohort. There was no statistical difference in deformity correction (both intermetatarsal- and hallux valgus angle), or AOFAS score between the cohorts. The complication rate was 13% in the plantar-, 19.5% in the dorsomedial-, and 24.5% in the screw cohort. Nonunion was seen in 0.7% of participants in the plantar, 1.4% in the dorsomedial, and 5.3% in the screw group. The time until complete weightbearing correlated positively with the development of nonunion, with a coefficient of 0.376 (P = .009). Hardware removal was performed in 11.8% of patients in the dorsomedial cohort, 7.7% in the screw cohort, and 3.6% in the plantar cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of meta-analysis of heterogeneous studies, plantar plating facilitated early weightbearing and patient mobilization compared to the other fixation methods, while carrying the lowest nonunion, hardware removal, and general complication risk. However, owing to the relatively small number of patients in the plantar plating group, more work is necessary to elucidate the benefits of plantar plating for a first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis. Development of complications appears to be largely dependent on the fixation model, rather than patient mobilization alone.Level of Evidence: 3.

BACKGROUND: Hallux valgus (HV) is a common foot pathology. Severe HV in the presence of Tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ) instability is often managed with arthrodesis of the 1st TMTJ. There are concerns regarding non-union and malunion (particularly the early loss of inter-metatarsal angle correction before complete arthrodesis). We report our medium-term results of a small series of patients that underwent an evolved surgical technique utilising orthogonal staples and a transverse suture button fixation to address biomechanical concerns with traditional Lapidus arthrodesis.
METHODS: A retrospective study of a consecutive series of patients who underwent this surgical technique between February 2017 and May 2022. Clinical outcomes were validated through Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMS); EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) and Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaires (MOXFQ). Radiographic parameters (hallux valgus (HVA), intermetatarsal (IMA), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA)) were assessed. Union of the arthrodesis and complications were recorded.
RESULTS: During the study period, 9 feet underwent the procedure. Radiographic data was available for all nine and PROMS data for seven (77.8%). Significant improvement occurred in all radiographic deformity parameters at mean 6-month follow-up. Mean ± standard deviation correction calculated preoperatively as HVA 40.2°, IMA 19.3° and DMAA 15.8°, corrected to HVA 15.4°, IMA 5.8° and DMAA 5.9° postoperatively. (HVA; P < 0.001, IMA; P < 0.001, DMAA; P < 0.001) Clinical PROMs at mean follow-up of 2 years were MOXFQ 34.4 ± 25.2, EQ-5D-5 L 0.819 ± 0.150 and VAS pain 13.6 ± 13.6. There were no cases of non-union, Tibialis anterior tendon irritation or hallux varus. Complications included first MTPJ stiffness in one case and CRPS and dorsiflexion malunion of the first ray in another patient.
CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study of the procedure used in this series confirm this is a safe surgical technique to address severe HV with a low rate of non-union and significant radiographic improvements. A larger patient dataset is needed to evaluate this procedure robustly.

Historically, 2-dimensional radiographic study techniques have been used to classify deformity and guide treatment of hallux valgus deformities in the transverse plane. Recently, a triplanar hallux abducto valgus classification system was proposed. The key elements of this classification system are the pathologic alignments in 3 anatomic planes. The triplanar hallux abducto valgus classification system is intended to clarify the deformity and apply a triplanar anatomic algorithm for treatment. To our knowledge, this classification system has not been validated. Our objective was to assess reliability of the triplanar hallux valgus classification system. Patients with hallux abducto valgus were identified from a foot and ankle registry. Digital radiographs were assembled in a digital slide presentation. The eligibility criteria required complete radiographic studies and represented varying degrees of hallux abducto valgus. The reviewers included 3 board-certified, fellowship-trained orthopedic foot and ankle surgeons. Each reviewer independently classified the hallux abducto valgus deformity for a total of 75 observations. After an 8-week washout period, the order of the hallux abducto valgus cases was randomized in the digital slide presentation and redistributed to the reviewers. The average kappa value from 3 readers was 0.241 with 95% CI (0.093-0.374), indicating a fair agreement. The inter-reader agreement was 0.046 with 95% CI (-0.041 to 0.112), showing poor agreement between readers. Our results indicate the triplanar hallux abducto valgus is not a reliable classification system. While this is the first known triplanar hallux abducto valgus classification system, it lacks prognostic value and reliability.

The modified Lapidus arthrodesis is a standard procedure to correct middle to severe hallux valgus (HV) deformities. Recently, minimally invasive techniques of first metatarsocuneiform joint (MCJ) resection using a Shannon burr were described. The primary goal of this study is to compare the anatomical efficacy and safety of first MCJ resection using a straight 2 × 13-mm Shannon burr and minimally invasive technique (MIS) vs an open technique using an oscillating saw.
Ten pairs of fresh frozen cadaveric feet were randomly assigned to open or MIS first MCJ resection with subsequent systematic dissection. For the MIS procedure, a dorsomedial approach was used and for the open procedure a medioplantar approach was used. Cartilage removal was investigated by analyzing standardized scaled photographs of the resected articular surfaces with ImageJ software. Nearby structures at risk were analyzed for iatrogenic violation: tibialis anterior (TA), extensor hallucis longus (EHL) and peroneus longus (PL) tendons, and the Lisfranc ligament complex (LLC).
In the MIS group, the median cartilage resection was 85.9% at the cuneiform and 85.6% at the metatarsal bone compared to 100% cartilage resection in open technique (P < .01). Iatrogenic damage of the LLC, EHL, and TA tendons was not found in any group. The PL tendon was thinned out (<25% of tendon thickness) in 4 cases (40%) in the open group and in 1 case (10%) in the MIS group. A safe zone of 3.0 mm between the articular surface of the cuneiform bone and the LLC was identified, which can be resected without putting the LLC at risk when performing lateral-based wedge resections.
In this cadaver study with the procedures performed by an experienced foot and ankle surgeon, and using 2 different surgical approaches, we found general parity between the Shannon burr MIS technique vs oscillating saw open technique techniques with more risk to the PL with our open technique and approximately 15% less cartilage resection with our MIS technique.
Level V, cadaver study.

UNASSIGNED: The modified Lapidus (ML) is a powerful procedure for correction of hallux valgus (HV) with emerging techniques. Studies considering patient-reported outcomes, radiographic measures, complications, and implant costs are currently limited.
UNASSIGNED: Retrospective cohort with prospectively collected Patient Reported Outcome Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) scores, radiographic parameters (intermetatarsal angle, IMA; hallux valgus angle, HVA; and tibial sesamoid position, TSP), complications, and total operative time and implant costs were reviewed from 2014 to 2019.
UNASSIGNED: Seventy-three feet (68 patients) underwent bunion correction by ML with lag-screw fixation. Median age was 55.8 years (IQR 45.6, 53.9), 4 of 73 (5.5%) were male, 11 of 73 (15.1%) were smokers, and 15 of 73 (20.6%) were diabetic (median HbA1c 6.4% [IQR 6.0, 7.4], none insulin dependent, 5 of 15 with neuropathy). Complications included 6 of 73 (8.2%) wound issues resolved with topical or oral treatment, 9 of 73 (12.3%) painful or broken hardware requiring hardware removal. Two of 73 (2.7%) had persistent pain despite union. One of 73 (1.4%) was overcorrected and required first MTP arthrodesis. Of 3 nonunions (2.7%), 1 resolved with corrected hypothyroidism, 1 was asymptomatic and required no treatment, 1 had a hallux valgus recurrence and sought revision surgery elsewhere. Preoperative radiographic angles were HVA 35 degrees, IMA 14 degrees which improved at final postoperative follow up to HVA 10 degrees, IMA 6 degrees. Tibial sesamoid position improved from 6.05 ± 1.00 to 2.22 ± 1.38. Thirty-two patients had preoperative and 42 had 1-year postoperative outcomes. PROMIS-PF (51% collection rate) was 43 (IQR 37,52) preoperatively, 37 (31, 39) at 6 weeks, 46 (42, 51) at 3 months, and 49 (41, 53) at >360 days postoperatively. The drop in PROMIS-PF between preoperative and 6 weeks and the rise from 6 weeks to 3 months were statistically significant. Pre- and postoperative PROMIS-PF scores were not significantly different. Implant cost averaged US$146.
UNASSIGNED: We report low complication rates and costs with high patient postoperative functional and radiographic outcomes. PROMIS-PF decreased acutely postoperatively but recovered and maintained high levels by 3 months postoperatively.
UNASSIGNED: Level IV, case series.

BACKGROUND: The tarsometatarsal 1 arthrodesis is an adequate treatment for moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity and instability of the first ray. Plantar plating arthrodesis has been shown to provide better mechanical stability and fewer postoperative complications than screw fixation or medial plating. The medio-plantar plate is a new plate design for Lapidus arthrodesis. It could combine the biomechanical advantages of the plantar plate and the anatomical overview of a medial plate. However, the implanted material can cause irritation of the tibialis anterior, which in some cases may require removal of the material. The purpose of this study was to examine the possibility of tendon irritation following medio-plantar first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis using cadaveric specimens.
METHODS: The study involved the simulated surgical procedure of medio-plantar plate arthrodesis on 30 lower extremities. After the plates were fixed, a thorough examination of the feet was conducted to assess any tendon irritation and to determine a recommendation for placement of the medio-plantar plate based on the Olewnik classification.
RESULTS: Irritation of the tibialis anterior tendon components with the medio-plantar plate depends mainly on the anatomic norm variant, classified according to Olewnik et al. A medio-plantar plate is particularly recommended in TA tendon Olewnik type 3 and type 5. The positioning of a medio-plantar plate in Olewnik type 1 and type 2 tendons depends on the anatomic fit of the medio-plantar plate and the bony configuration of the TMT 1 joint. A large portion of the TA tendon must be detached, so a different plate design may be preferred in these patients.
CONCLUSIONS: TMT 1 arthrodesis with medio-plantar plating of the first tarsometatarsal joint should be performed considering the anatomic TA tendon variations.
METHODS: Level V, Expert Opinion includes Case Reports and Technique Tips.

OBJECTIVE: Based on the tripod concept of load distribution, our study aimed to evaluate whether a slight extension of first metatarsal (M1) that may occur after the Lapidus procedure (LP) could alter the radiographic measurements of the hindfoot and influence clinical and functional outcomes.
METHODS: Twenty-five patients (27 feet) were reviewed. Hindfoot radiographic analysis was based on seven measurements. Clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated with self-reported questionnaires. Transfer metatarsalgia was also assessed. Correlation analysis was performed according to variations of the studied variables.
RESULTS: The average extension of the M1 was 4.26 degrees (p < 0.001). None of the hindfoot radiographic measurements changed significantly (p = 0.13, p = 0.50, p = 0.19, p = 0.70, p = 0.11, p = 0.36, p = 0.83). Patients improved on most questionnaires (p < 0.001). None presented transfer metatarsalgia. No correlation between M1 extension and clinical and functional outcomes was found.
CONCLUSIONS: Possibly there is a tolerance of M1 extension in which it does not alter the radiographic measurements of the hindfoot, overload the lesser metatarsals, or compromise clinical and functional outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Recurrence after surgical correction of hallux valgus may be related to coronal rotation of the first metatarsal. The scarf osteotomy is a commonly used procedure for correcting hallux valgus but has limited ability to correct rotation. Using weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT), we aimed to measure the coronal rotation of the first metatarsal before and after a scarf osteotomy, and correlate these to clinical outcome scores.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 16 feet (15 patients) who had a WBCT before and after scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus correction. On both scans, hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and anteroposterior/lateral talus-first metatarsal angle were measured using digitally reconstructed radiographs. Metatarsal pronation angle (MPA), alpha angle, sesamoid rotation angle, and sesamoid position were measured on standardized coronal WBCT slices. Preoperative and postoperative (12 mo) clinical outcome scores (Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire and Visual Analogue Scores) were captured.
RESULTS: Mean HVA was 28.6 ± 10.1° preoperatively and 12.1 ± 7.7° postoperatively (P < .001). Mean IMA was 13.7 ± 3.8° preoperatively and 7.5 ± 3.0° postoperatively (P < .001). Before and after surgery, there were no significant differences in MPA (11.4 ± 7.7 and 11.4 ± 9.9°, respectively; P = .75) or alpha angle (10.9 ± 8.0 and 10.7 ± 13.1°, respectively; P = .83). There were significant improvements in sesamoid rotation angle (SRA) (26.4 ± 10.2 and 15.7 ± 10.2°, respectively; P = .03) and sesamoid position (1.4 ± 1.0 and 0.6 ± 0.6, respectively; P = .04) after a scarf osteotomy. There were significant improvements in all outcome scores after surgery. Poorer outcome scores correlated with greater postoperative MPA and alpha angles (r = .76 (P = .02) and .67 (P = .03), respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: A scarf osteotomy does not correct first metatarsal coronal rotation, and worse outcomes are linked to greater postoperative metatarsal rotation. Rotation of the metatarsal needs to be measured and considered when planning hallux valgus surgery. Further work was needed to compare postoperative outcomes with rotational osteotomies and modified Lapidus procedures when addressing rotation.Level of Evidence: 4.

Lapidus first tarsometatarsal (TMT) arthrodesis gained popularity for its ability to correct large deformities especially in cases of medial column instability. Despite solid first TMT fusion, instability between the first and second columns can result in loss of intermetatarsal (IM) angle correction over time. A \"spot weld\" or fusion between the first and second metatarsal may improve maintenance of correction. This retrospective study reviewed cases of Lapidus arthrodesis with first to second metatarsal base screw fixation for maintenance of IM correction and determine whether a \"spot weld\" is predictive of maintenance. A total of 90 cases (77 patients) performed by a single surgeon met inclusion with average follow-up of 309 days. First TMT fusion occurred in 87/90 (96.7%) cases with 76 dorsal plate, 10 dorsal staple, and 4 all screws. No incidence of complications related to the 1-2 screw was noted. Mean preoperative IM 1-2 angle 14.90°, mean correction to 6.22° post-operative and final maintained correction at 7.10°, mean loss of correction 0.87°. There were \"spot welds\" in 65/90 (72.2%) with mean loss of 0.48° versus loss of 1.88° in \"no spot weld\" subgroup (p < .001). Cases with no spot weld and screw lucency lost 2.25° (p < .001). Loss of IM 1-2 correction can occur due to first and second ray intra-column instability even in cases of solid first TMT arthrodesis. Incorporating a completed \"spot weld\" with bone grafting and first to second metatarsal screw was found to maintain correction with minimal loss (0.87°).