Laparoscopy is widely recognized as a procedure of choice for gynaecological surgery. Myomectomy and hysterectomy are the most frequently performed surgical procedures in gynaecology. A morcellator is often used in myomectomies or subtotal hysterectomies, but morcellation may cause rare complications, such as parasitic iatrogenic myoma or adenomyoma. To improve patient counselling, proper risk estimation as well as risk factor identification should be acknowledged. This article aimed to review the literature on parasitic myoma and adenomyoma and to compare these diseases in terms of clinical, surgical, and prognostic factors. All published literature (case series and case reports) on iatrogenic myoma and adenomyoma was reviewed using PubMed/MEDLINE and ScienceDirect resources. Despite both conditions having an iatrogenic origin, iatrogenic parasitic myoma and adenomyoma are two different entities in terms of clinical manifestations as well as intraoperative particularities, with a common point: iatrogenic complication. A possible solution to avoid these iatrogenic complications is by using in-bag morcellation or switching to another surgical procedure (e.g., a vaginal or abdominal approach). It is concluded that parasitic myoma and iatrogenic adenomyoma are two different iatrogenic morcellator-related complications. In patients with a history of uterus or myoma morcellation who report pelvic symptoms, iatrogenic parasitic myoma or adenomyoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the practices of laparoscopic specimen retrieval among Gynaecologists in the United Kingdom and to determine any variation in practice. A survey of Consultant Gynaecologist members of the British Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (BSGE) was conducted using Survey Monkey™. Of the 460 registered consultants, 187 (40%) responded to the questionnaire. Sixty-two percent (62%) of the respondents considered themselves to be advanced laparoscopic surgeons whilst 34% considered themselves to be intermediate laparoscopic surgeons. The umbilical port was the most commonly used port for specimen retrieval and it was used to remove 49% of ectopic pregnancies, 43% of ovarian cysts and 43% of endometrioma. Most respondents would not insert an extra port or extend the existing port just for the retrieval of a specimen. The level of laparoscopic experience and the gender did not affect the method of specimen retrieval in cases of ectopic pregnancies, endometrioma and ovarian cysts (p value >.05, not significant). The majority of respondents used power morcellation for a laparoscopic myomectomy (85% of respondents) and laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy (93% of respondents), despite the recent concerns surrounding power morcellation. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? There is a paucity of literature regarding laparoscopic specimen retrieval in gynaecology. In view of recent controversy pertaining to the potential upstaging of leiomyosarcoma with morcellation, other methods of specimen retrieval are gaining an importance. What do the results of this study add? This study shows that the umbilical port is the most commonly used port for specimen retrieval among UK gynaecologists and that most gynaecologists would not insert an additional port purely for specimen retrieval. Most respondents would still use power morcellation for a laparoscopic myomectomy and subtotal hysterectomy, despite the recent concerns over morcellation and its safety. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This paper demonstrates the need for development of a database of morcellation practices to enable analysis of both benefits and potential adverse outcomes. This paper will also encourage future research and the audit of specimen retrieval.

UNASSIGNED: After the U. S. Food and Drug Administration\'s recommendation against the use of power morcellation for tissue extraction in minimally invasive hysterectomy, the number of procedures completed laparoscopically declined in favor of open surgery laparotomy. We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing perioperative and long-term outcomes, including complications associated with laparoscopic hysterectomy before and after the FDA recommendation.
UNASSIGNED: We included procedures performed in Danish government hospitals (GHs) and a hospital specializing in minimally invasive gynecological surgery (MIGS). Different types of hysterectomy over the period from January 2011 through May 2016 were examined.
UNASSIGNED: Hysterectomies were analyzed from GHs (n = 21,495) and from a hospital specializing in MIGS (n = 749). In the GHs, we found a decrease in open hysterectomy from 40% in 2011 to 20% in 2016. In the MIGS hospital, 4 of 749 (0.05%) open hysterectomies were performed during the 6 years; however, there was a change in operative technique. After the FDA recommendation, there was a shift from laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy (LSH) to total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) from 32% in 2011 to 82% by May 2016. Containment bags were used in LSH and large-uterus TLH after the 2014 advisory. Significantly more complications occurred in the GHs than in the MIGS hospital: 3224/21,495 (15%) vs 53/749 (7.0%), respectively.
UNASSIGNED: The rate of minimally invasive hysterectomies continues to increase. However, after 2014, many of the morcellation techniques have been replaced by a minilaparotomy to extract the uterus at the end of surgery, compared to the use of the contained morcellation in 100% of cases in the MIGS hospital. There was a major difference in complication rates between the hospitals that is partly explainable by the challenge in training residents and the low operative volume of surgeons in GHs.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the surgical outcomes of single port access laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy (LSH) using in-bag manual morcellation and evaluate the feasibility of this procedure.
METHODS: Thirty patients with symptomatic leiomyoma or adenomyosis were enrolled. A 2-cm transverse incision was made at the umbilicus and single port apparatus (LagiPort) was applied. After dissection of vesicouterine peritoneum from the uterus, the uterine ligaments and vessels were secured and transected by Gyrus PK cutting forceps. Cervical amputation at the level of internal os was made by SupraLoop (Karl Storz). The uterine corpus was put into an Endobag before morcellation. The opening of Endobag was exteriorized from the umbilical incision and the uterine corpus was removed in a contained manner by manual morcellation with a scalpel.
RESULTS: This procedure was successfully performed on all patients. Neither laparotomic conversion nor additional port was needed. The mean age and mean BMI of the patients were 43.63 years and 24.02 kg/㎡. The mean operative time was 148 min and the estimated blood loss in most patients was less than 150 ml. The median weight of uterine corpus was 214 g. No intraoperative complications occurred in any patient. One patient was diagnosed with unexpected endometrioid adenocarcinoma FIGO grade 1 postoperatively. One patient reported cyclic bleeding and underwent a transvaginal trachelectomy 17 months later.
CONCLUSIONS: Single port access LSH using contained manual morcellation represents a safe and feasible alternative to conventional LSH using open power morcellation.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the perioperative outcomes, safety, and patient acceptance of single-port access laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy (SPAL-SH) in comparison with conventional multiport access laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy (MPAL-SH).
METHODS: Case-control study. Canadian Task Force Classification II-2.
METHODS: The study was conducted at university hospitals in Cagliari, Italy, and Rouen, France.
METHODS: Sixty-one women with metrorrhagia, abnormal uterine bleeding with uterine myomas, or symptomatic adenomyosis were included in the study.
METHODS: Thirty-one patients underwent SPAL-SH, and 30 patients underwent conventional MPAL-SH.
RESULTS: We analyzed the data to compare the outcomes of SPAL-SH versus MPAL-SH. Patients in the SPAL-SH group had longer operative times than those in the MPAL-SH group (p < .001) but shorter hospital stays (p < .001). Postoperative pain immediately after surgery, after 6 hours, and after 24 hours were lower in the SPAL-SH group (p < .001). The SPAL-SH group reported significantly higher cosmetic satisfaction at 1, 4, and 24 weeks after surgery (p < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that SPAL-SH is a feasible and safe alternative to standard MPAL-SH in selected patients. Ongoing refinement of the surgical technique and instrumentation is likely to expand its role in gynecologic surgery in the future. In addition, SPAL-SH has a definite benefit in relation to body image and cosmesis.

The first subtotal abdominal hysterectomy was described by Charles Clay in 1843, and the first laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy (LSH) was described by Semm [1] in 1991. Whether to retain or remove the cervix remains controversial, with surgeons citing sexual satisfaction and prevention of pelvic organ prolapse as indicators for retention [2]. Because the only absolute indication for cervical removal is malignancy or its precursors, debate has continued as to the optimum surgical approach to hysterectomy for other indications. The evidence obtained from evaluating the effects of retaining the cervix, via any surgical approach, on sexual, urinary, and bowel function remains controversial [3-11]. The literature evaluating LSH is limited, and only 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including 342 women, have reported psychologic outcomes, complications, and additional cervical procedures [4,12,13]. For the abdominal equivalent, there are 9 RCTs, including 1553 women, and a Cochrane review reported few important differences between the 2 approaches [8]. No such comparative data are available for LSH. This practice guideline will evaluate the evidence for LSH. This report was developed under the direction of the Practice Committee of the AAGL as a service to their members and other practicing clinicians.

Laparoscopic subtotal/supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) is a surgical option when hysterectomy is indicated. Proponents of LSH suggest possible advantages including reduced recovery time, decreased risk of pelvic organ prolapse, and decreased risk of organ damage, in particular to the urinary tract. Opponents of LSH have suggested that the future risk of cervical malignancy, the possibility of ongoing cyclical bleeding, limited morbidity due to total laparoscopic hysterectomy, and similar clinical outcomes render this approach unnecessary. One study compared LSH with laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a randomized controlled trial that reported psychologic and sexual outcomes; however, no clinical data were published. The present review outlines techniques for subtotal hysterectomy and critically appraises the available evidence for outcomes including operative data, short- and long-term complications, and functional outcomes.