Amyand\'s hernia (AH) describes the rare instance of a vermiform appendix within an inguinal hernia. Primary appendiceal neoplasms are also rare with the majority of cases being found incidentally during routine histopathology. This case reports the management of a 15-year-old male, who presented to the emergency department with acute appendicitis located within an indirect right inguinal hernia, which was ultimately secondary to a neuroendocrine tumor (NET) with serosal involvement. Intraoperative findings included macroscopic appendicitis with no evidence of perforation. Histopathology returned as a neuroendocrine tumor (pT4) with involved proximal margin and curative treatment was undertaken with a caecectomy which returned no residual malignancy. Key considerations include management options of peritoneal spread within the inguinal canal and recommended management NET in the context of an AH. It is important to understand the varied presentations of common surgical diagnosis such as appendicitis and underlying malignancy should always be considered a differential.

BACKGROUND: The utilisation of laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) in children remains contentious despite the well-recognised advantages of laparoscopic surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in LA and open appendicectomy (OA) when performed by adult general surgeons outside specialist paediatric practice in younger children.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients under the age of 13 who underwent LA for suspected appendicitis over a two-year period was conducted. These were case-matched with an equivalent number of patients who underwent OA during the same period. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent LA during the study period. Patient demographics were statistically equivalent with the OA cohort. A statistically significant longer median operating time (58 vs 49min) was noted in the LA group, but intraoperative outcomes were otherwise comparable. LA, when compared with OA, was associated with a significant improvement in postoperative length of stay (2 vs 3 days, p < 0.001), postoperative complication rate (0% vs 6%, p = 0.01), negative appendicectomy rate (3.9% vs 17.6%, p < 0.001) and 30-day readmission rate (0% vs 5.9%, p = 0.03). No patients in the LA group required conversion to open surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: LA can be safely delivered by adult general surgeons to younger paediatric populations outside the setting of paediatric specialist practice, with statistically significant improvements in postoperative outcomes noted when compared with OA. These findings are of importance in the current healthcare context where adult general surgeons continue to perform the majority of paediatric appendicectomies.

BACKGROUND: Conventional three-access laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) is currently the gold standard treatment, however, Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy (SILA) has been proposed as an alternative. The aim of this systematic review/meta-analysis was to evaluate safety and efficacy of SILA compared with conventional approach.
METHODS: Per PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CLA vs SILA for acute appendicitis. The randomised Mantel-Haenszel method was used for the meta-analysis. Statistical data analysis was performed with the Review Manager software and the risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane \"Risk of Bias\" assessment tool.
RESULTS: Twenty-one studies (RCTs) were selected (2646 patients). The operative time was significantly longer in the SILA group (MD = 7,32), confirmed in both paediatric (MD = 9,80), (Q = 1,47) and adult subgroups (MD = 5,92), (Q = 55,85). Overall postoperative morbidity was higher in patients who underwent SILA, but the result was not statistically significant. In SILA group were assessed shorter hospital stays, fewer wound infections and higher conversion rate, but the results were not statistically significant. Meta-analysis was not performed about cosmetics of skin scars and postoperative pain because different scales were used in each study.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis show that SILA, although associated with fewer postoperative wound infection, has a significantly longer operative time. Furthermore, the risk of postoperative general complications is still present. Further studies will be required to analyse outcomes related to postoperative pain and the cosmetics of the surgical scar.

UNASSIGNED: Acute appendicitis is the most common abdominal surgical emergency in the world and often requires surgical intervention. One of the complications of appendicitis is abscess formation. In rare cases, a localised abscess can occur in the adjacent organs, such as the iliac and psoas muscles. Sacroiliitis occurring secondary to, or concomitant with, acute appendicitis is extremely rare. However, a missed diagnosis of either or both conditions can lead to serious complications, including mortality.
METHODS: A 27-year-old male patient presented to the emergency department with a history of acute severe right hip pain that was aggravated by movement and associated with nausea and vomiting. CT suggested acute uncomplicated appendicitis with no localised contamination. He underwent an emergent laparoscopy which showed mild appendiceal inflammation and appendicectomy was performed. He became septic a few hours after the operation, resulting in admission to the high dependency care unit for close observation. On review the following day, he reported ongoing right hip pain and lower back pain with a new onset inability to weight-bear. An MRI scan was performed which showed features of infection around the right sacroiliac joint and Staphylococcus aureus grew in his blood culture. A diagnosis of acute pyogenic sacroiliitis was then made. The patient was treated with IV antibiotics for a total of four weeks, followed by two weeks of oral antibiotics.
UNASSIGNED: Acute pyogenic sacroiliitis is one of the rarer conditions seen that can mimic the acute abdomen, in this case acute appendicitis. MRI is the best diagnostic modality in sacroiliitis, in comparison to CT for appendicitis. In most cases of acute appendicitis, mixed bacteria including aerobes and anaerobes are seen in the blood culture while staphylococcus aureus is seen mostly in acute pyogenic sacroiliitis. Staphylococcus aureus-induced appendicitis is reported in less than 3.7 % of cases. An early diagnosis of either or both conditions can significantly reduce complications and, more importantly, expedite implementation of appropriate treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: In our case we present a combination acute appendicitis, acute sacroiliitis and staphylococcus aureus septicaemia and provide proof that acute pyogenic sacroiliitis can be a rare complication of acute appendicitis. Thus, a high clinical index of suspicion should be considered in the appropriate clinical scenario.

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common cause of post-operative morbidity. According to the latest report announced by CDC, the SSI accounts for 20% of healthcare-associated infection with a high risk of mortality up to twofold to 11-fold increase with high economic burden for the prolonged hospital stay. Port site infection (PSI) is a subgroup of SSI occurring at the ports of laparoscopy. We tried to determine the efficacy of polyglactin 910 suture coated with triclosan in lowering the rate of PSI in some of the clean-contaminated wound surgeries. This study included 480 individuals eligible for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendicectomy or sleeve operations. Polyglactin 910 sutures coated with triclosan were used in one port site incision while polyglactin 910 sutures were used in the other port sites incisions. In patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendicectomy, the incidence of PSI was significantly lower in the triclosan-coated sutures. In sleeve gastrectomy patients, although a lower number of triclosan-coated sutures developed PSI, there was no statistically significant difference between triclosan and non-triclosan-coated sutures. This study showed that using sutures coated with antiseptics like triclosan has clinical benefits to prevent SSIs in most of the laparoscopic surgeries.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a delay in treatment for patients having pre-operative CT imaging with both intravenous and oral contrast (CTIVO) compared to intravenous contrast alone (CTIV).
A retrospective review of patients who underwent emergency appendicectomy at a single hospital during a two-year period (1/1/2019-31/12/2020) was performed. Demographic details, imaging timing/modality; biochemical markers; American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, anaesthetic induction time; operative report findings; histopathology, peri-operative complications, admission/discharge times were recorded. The Sunshine Appendicitis Grading System (SAGS) score was used for severity of appendicitis.
Pre-operative CT was performed in 294 patients; CTIVO: 159 (54%), CTIV: 135 (46%). Both groups were comparable for age, sex, ASA status and inflammatory markers. The median time from CT request to scanning was longer with CTIVO (CTIVO: 170 min, CTIV: 65 min, P < 0.0001). The median time from CT request to induction of anaesthesia was also longer with CTIVO (CTIVO: 780 minutes, CTIV: 406 min, P < 0.0001). A delay to theatre was not significantly associated with severity of appendicitis (SAGS score). The diagnostic accuracy was not reduced in the CTIV group compared to the CTIVO group.
CTIVO scans significantly delay CT diagnosis and surgical treatment of appendicitis compared to CTIV. Omitting oral contrast does not result in a reduction in diagnostic accuracy for appendicitis.

Introduction Diverticula of the appendix is a rare entity, may be complicated by inflammation/infection, and clinically mimics acute appendicitis. The reported associated risk factors include male gender, Hirschprung\'s disease, cystic fibrosis and adult age, where some reports claim that they are also associated with an increased risk of appendiceal malignancy. Imaging has a place in pre-operative diagnosis, however, most of the cases were diagnosed during a pathological examination after surgery. They are associated with a higher rate of perforation (more than four times compared with classical acute appendicitis). In this review, we present a case series of five patients diagnosed with diverticulitis and one with diverticulosis of the appendix that were managed at a single centre. Our aim is to explore the common clinical, radiological, and intra-operative findings associated with this disease as well as the outcome of management. Materials and methods A total number of six cases of diverticular disease of the appendix diagnosed and managed at Basildon University hospital in the period between 2016 and 2020 were studied. The demographic details and clinical data including presenting symptoms, laboratory results, radiological characteristics, intraoperative findings and histopathological features were analysed. Results The study group included four males and two females, with an age range of 20-84 years. The most common presenting clinical symptoms were right iliac fossa abdominal pain, nausea, anorexia, and diarrhoea. Half of the cases showed a thickened appendix in the pre-operative CT scan. An inflamed or perforated appendix was seen in five cases as well as inflammation of the diverticula. Conclusion Appendiceal diverticulitis is an uncommon pathology that imitates acute appendicitis, and appendicectomy is the standard treatment. Prophylactic appendicectomy is recommended for non-inflamed diverticula - this is due to the potential risk of inflammation, perforation, and the risk of developing an appendiceal neoplasm.

UNASSIGNED: Appendicitis is one of the most common paediatric surgical pathologies seen by paediatric surgeons worldwide. Laparoscopic appendectomy is undertaken for all cases of appendicitis in our institute. Intraperitoneal lavage following appendectomy is the conventional way of managing complicated appendicitis; however, some surgeons debate the efficacy of this practice. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of intraperitoneal lavage versus suction only in children with complicated appendicitis.
UNASSIGNED: Data were collected retrospectively between January 2018 and January 2019. All patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for complex appendicitis were included and divided into two groups, patients who had suction only and those who had lavage and suction. Outcome parameters studied were the length of stay (LOS), number of temperature spikes > 37.7 (TS), operative times (OT) and readmission for intra-abdominal collections. Comparison between the two groups was performed using two sample t-test with unequal variance, significance was set at P < 0.05.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 115 patients were included (lavage n = 52, Suction n = 63). The LOS (P = 0.0054), TS (0.0109), OT (P < 0.0001) were significantly higher in the lavage group compared to the suction-only group. Overall rates of readmission were similar between groups, however, readmission for the confirmed intra-abdominal collection was more common in the lavage group.
UNASSIGNED: Based on our study, it appears that there is no advantage in performing an intraperitoneal lavage for complex appendicitis. It resulted in a prolonged stay, more post-operative TS and longer operative duration. The likelihood of being readmitted with an intra-abdominal collection following a lavage was higher compared to suction only.

Two valid group and saves are commonly required for patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy and laparoscopic hernia repairs preoperatively; however, perioperative blood transfusions are seldom required. This is financially burdensome and frequently leads to delays in theatre lists. We performed a retrospective analysis to investigate blood transfusions performed perioperatively and within 28 days of these procedures.
We used our electronic records to collect data of all laparoscopic appendectomies and laparoscopic hernia repairs between March 2017 and March 2021. Patients of any age undergoing these operations were included. Patients requiring concomitant intra-abdominal surgery or who had incomplete medical records were excluded.
A total of 1891 patients were included, of which 1462 (77.3%) had a laparoscopic appendicectomy versus 429 (22.7%) who had a laparoscopic hernia repair. In all, 3507 group and saves were taken costing £47,398.50. One patient (0.068%) required emergency blood transfusion (4 units of red cells) secondary to major haemorrhage.
Our findings demonstrate that the incidence of perioperative blood transfusions for laparoscopic appendicectomy and laparoscopic hernia repairs is low, challenging the indication for routine preoperative group and saves.

To achieve a competency-based training paradigm, the ability to obtain reliable and valid quantitative assessments of intraoperative performance is required. Through this, weaknesses can be identified and practiced, and competency assessed. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability an objective evaluation tool for assessment of performance in laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA).
A prospective single-blinded observational study design was used. Videos of inexperienced (performed <10 LAs) and experienced (performed >100 LAs) surgeons performing LA surgery were collected. Surgical performance during each recording was rated by two independent, blinded expert surgeons using the LA Rating Scale (LARS) and the modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) scale.
The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for LARS was 0.95 (95%CI 0.83-0.98). The ICC for each step ranged from 0.48 to 0.90, and the test-retest ICC for LARS was 0.91 (95%CI 0.69-0.98). Significant differences (P < 0.001) between median performance scores as rated by LARS were observed between the inexperienced and experienced surgeons. A Spearman\'s correlation coefficient of 0.87 (P < 0.001) was observed between LARS performance scores and modified OSATS scores.
LARS demonstrated excellent inter-rater and test-retest reliability, and construct and concurrent validity and can be used to quantitatively evaluate performance during LA. This can potentially allow specific weaknesses to be identified and improved upon through deliberate practice. Progress can be tracked through re-evaluation and scores of expert surgeons can be used as performance goals for credentialing in LA.