暂无摘要。

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is an immunomodulator used in dermatology and rheumatology. Side effects may be observed on routine monitoring studies before they become clinically apparent. The goal of this retrospective chart review was to assess laboratory abnormalities in dermatologic and rheumatologic patients taking HCQ. Medical records of patients prescribed HCQ were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, reported side effects, and parameters on baseline and follow-up complete blood count (CBC) and comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) were recorded and graded. Laboratory abnormalities were considered severe if they were grade 3 or greater according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 and persistent if they continued beyond subsequent laboratory testing. Of 646 eligible charts, 289 had monitoring studies for review. There were 35 severe (grade 3 or 4, 35/289; 12%) adverse events that developed, as noted on CBC or CMP. Of these 35 severe adverse events, 25 self-corrected on subsequent testing, and 10 (10/289, 3%) across 9 patients were persistent, including glomerular filtration rate, alanine transferase, alkaline phosphatase, glucose, hemoglobin and lymphopenia abnormalities. Of these 10 abnormalities, 7/10 (70%) were unlikely due to hydroxychloroquine use according to the calculated Naranjo score for each patient. Severe laboratory abnormalities while taking hydroxychloroquine are rare, even in a population with a high rate of comorbidities. Among the abnormalities observed, the majority of them (70%) were likely due to disease progression or a medication other than hydroxychloroquine. CBC and CMP monitoring for the reason of observing abnormalities while on HCQ should be at the discretion of the prescribing physician.

Given the growing number of patients receiving direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), patients requiring rapid neutralization is also increasing in case of major bleedings or urgent surgery/procedures. Idarucizumab is commercialized as a specific antidote to dabigatran while andexanet alfa has gained the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency approval as an oral anti-factor Xa inhibitors antidote. Other antidotes or hemostatic agents are still under preclinical or clinical development, the most advanced being ciraparantag. DOAC plasma levels measurement allows to appropriately select patient for antidote administration and may prevent unnecessary prescription of expensive molecules in some acute clinical settings. However, these tests might be inconclusive after some antidote administration, namely andexanet alfa and ciraparantag. The benefit of laboratory monitoring following DOAC reversal remains unclear. Here, we sought to provide an overview of the key studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of DOAC reversal using the most developed/commercialized specific antidotes, to discuss the potential role of the laboratory monitoring in the management of patients receiving DOAC specific antidotes and to highlight the areas that deserve further investigations in order to establish the exact role of laboratory monitoring in the appropriate management of DOAC specific antidotes.

A universal calibrator for the determination of all anti-Xa inhibitors would support laboratory processes. We aimed to test the clinical performance of an anti-Xa assay utilizing a universal edoxaban calibrator to determine clinically relevant concentrations of all anti-Xa inhibitors. Following a pilot study, we enrolled 553 consecutive patients taking rivaroxaban, edoxaban, or apixaban from nine study centers in a prospective cross-sectional study. The Technochrom® anti-Xa assay was conducted using the Technoview® edoxaban calibrator. Using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), anti-Xa inhibitor drug concentrations were determined. Sensitivities and specificities to detect three clinically relevant drug concentrations (30 µgL-1, 50 µgL-1, 100 µgL-1) were determined. Overall, 300 patients treated with rivaroxaban, 221 with apixaban, and 32 with edoxaban were included. The overall correlation coefficient (rs) was 0.95 (95% CI 0.94, 0.96). An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.96 for 30 µgL-1, 0.98 for 50 µgL-1, and 0.99 for 100 µgL-1 was found. The sensitivities were 92.3% (95% CI 89.2, 94.6), 92.7% (89.4, 95.1), and 94.8% (91.1, 97.0), respectively (specificities 82.2%, 93.7%, and 94.4%). In conclusion, the clinical performance of a universal, edoxaban-calibrated anti-Xa assay was solid and most drug concentrations were predicted correctly.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) represent a new generation of drugs that have been increasingly used in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic states. According to the mechanism of anticoagulant action, DOACs are divided into two groups: direct inhibitors of thrombin (dabigatran) and direct inhibitors of activated factor X (FXa) (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, betrixaban). Compared to the vitamin K antagonists, DOACs are superior in terms of onset of action, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties and fixed daily dose without the need for routine coagulation monitoring. Despite these advantages, there are clinical conditions in which laboratory measurement of DOACs should be performed. Although DOACs have an impact on screening haemostasis assays (prothrombin time, PT; activated partial thromboplastin time, aPTT; and thrombin time, TT), these tests are not appropriate for quantifying drug levels. Therefore, specific quantitative methods (LC-MS/MS as a gold standard method for all DOACs, coagulometric and chromogenic assays for dabigatran, and chromogenic anti-Xa assays with drug-specific calibrators for inhibitors of FXa) should only be used for determination of DOACs concentration. The aim of this review is to present all aspects of laboratory assessment of DOACs, including pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical factors in the overall testing process with a special accent on the available specific quantitative methods for measurement of DOACs in circulation.

The World Health Organization estimates that the world\'s population over 60 years of age will nearly double in the next 30 years. This change imposes increasing demands on health and social services with increased disease burden in older people, hereafter defined as people aged 60 years or more. An older population will have a greater incidence of cardiovascular disease partly due to higher levels of blood fibrinogen, increased levels of some coagulation factors, and increased platelet activity. These factors lead to a hypercoagulable state which can alter haemostasis, causing an imbalance in appropriate coagulation, which plays a crucial role in the development of cardiovascular diseases. These changes in haemostasis are not only affected by age but also by gender and the effects of hormones, or lack thereof in menopause for older females, ethnicity, other comorbidities, medication interactions, and overall health as we age. Another confounding factor is how we measure fibrinogen and coagulation through laboratory and point-of-care testing and how our decision-making on disease and treatment (including anticoagulation) is managed. It is known throughout life that in normal healthy individuals the levels of fibrinogen and coagulation factors change, however, reference intervals to guide diagnosis and management are based on only two life stages, paediatric, and adult ranges. There are no specific diagnostic guidelines based on reference intervals for an older population. How ageing relates to alterations in haemostasis and the impact of the disease will be discussed in this chapter. Along with the effect of anticoagulation, laboratory testing of fibrinogen and coagulation, future directions, and implications will be presented.

Patients receiving biologic therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) require routine laboratory monitoring to ensure the safety and efficacy of therapy. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to evaluate the implementation of a dashboard to prevent treatment gaps by prospectively identifying patients with IBD and outdated laboratory results receiving biologics.
We performed a pre/post analysis of dashboard implementation to assess the number of patients with overdue laboratory work resulting in treatment gaps. The dashboard combined data from the electronic health record (EHR) and pharmacy claims database to identify patients on a biologic with laboratory tests (white blood cell count, liver transaminases, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) completed 5 or more months ago and/or a tuberculosis screen completed 11 or more months ago. After implementation, specialty pharmacists reviewed the dashboard and communicated via EHR if a new prescription and laboratory tests were needed. Messages were sent 4 weeks in advance of the next refill-eligible date. Mixed methods were used for analysis of qualitative data, including surveys, and quantitative data, assessing treatment gap length.
A total of 40 patients who had outdated laboratory values and required a new prescription (15 before dashboard implementation and 25 after implementation) were included in the analysis. The frequency of a treatment gap decreased from 80% (n = 12) in the preimplementation phase to 32% (n = 8) in the postimplementation phase. The median gap length was shorter after dashboard implementation, decreasing from 21 days (range, 3-97 days) to 11 days (range, 2-23 days).
Utilization of a quality measures dashboard decreased treatment gaps in patients with IBD receiving biologic therapy. Integrated specialty pharmacists are uniquely positioned to monitor adherence to laboratory monitoring parameters for patients on biologics.

Regular measurement of fibrinogen as dose guidance in catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) for acute limb ischaemia (ALI) has recently been dropped from European guidelines based on inconsistent literature. This study aimed to determine whether low fibrinogen levels and high activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) are associated with an increased major bleeding risk during CDT.
All consecutive patients treated with CDT for ALI in two Dutch hospitals between January 2004 and April 2021 were analysed retrospectively. Patients were treated with two dosing regimens (low dose: 50 000 IU/hour; high dose: 100 000 IU/hour) of urokinase and, after 2018, with a single low dose regimen of alteplase (rtPA) due to urokinase manufacturing problems. The incidence of major bleeding and associated APTT and fibrinogen levels were reviewed from patient charts.
Of the 443 included cases, 277 underwent CDT with urokinase and 166 with rtPA. The incidence of major bleeding in the whole cohort was 7%. Patients with a fibrinogen levels < 1.0 g/L developed more major bleeding than those in whom the fibrinogen level did not drop below 1.0 g/L (15% vs. 6%; p = .041). Systemic heparinisation during CDT or high (> 80 seconds) APTT were not significantly associated with major bleeding. Angiographic success (47% vs. 72%; p = .003) and 30 day amputation free survival (53% vs. 82%; p < .001) were lower for cases with major bleeding. Older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 - 1.11), cardiac history (OR 3.35, 95% CI 1.39 - 8.06), high dose regimens (≥ 75 000 IU/hour urokinase; OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.18 - 6.04), and fibrinogen values < 1.0 g/L (OR 5.59, 95% CI 1.98 - 15.77) were independent predictors for major bleeding during CDT.
High dose thrombolytic regimens and fibrinogen levels of ≤ 1.0 g/L are associated with more major bleeding during thrombolytic therapy. Major bleeding significantly worsened the clinical outcome. A prospective comparative study is needed to assess the benefit of monitoring fibrinogen levels.

OBJECTIVE: There is scant research about laboratory monitoring in people taking conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) for rheumatic disease. Our objective was to conduct a scoping study to assess the range of current attitudes and the variation in practice of laboratory monitoring of csDMARDs by rheumatologists and trainees.
METHODS: Australian and overseas rheumatologists or trainees were invited through newsletter, Twitter and personal e-mail, to complete an anonymous online survey between 1 February and 22 March 2021. Questions focused on laboratory tests requested by csDMARD prescribed, frequency/pattern of monitoring, influence of additional factors and combination therapy, actions in response to abnormal tests, and attitudes to monitoring frequencies. Results were presented descriptively and analysed using linear and logistic regression.
RESULTS: There were 221 valid responses. Most respondents were from Australia (n = 53, 35%) followed by the US (n = 39, 26%), with a slight preponderance of women (n = 84, 56%), ≥ 11 years in rheumatology practice (n = 83, 56%) and in mostly public practice (n = 79, 53%). Respondents had a wide variation in the frequency and scheduling of tests. In general, respondents reported increasing monitoring frequency if patients had numerous comorbidities or if both methotrexate and leflunomide were being taken concurrently. There was a wide variety of responses to abnormal monitoring results and 27 (40%) considered that in general, monitoring tests are performed too frequently.
CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated a wide variation in the frequency of testing, factors that should influence this, and what responses to abnormal test results are appropriate, indicates a likely lack of evidence and the need to define the risks, benefits and costs of different csDMARD monitoring regimens.

BACKGROUND: There are many inefficiencies related to oral chemotherapy (OC) laboratory monitoring and follow-up in the ambulatory clinic setting. Patients with cancer prescribed OC have a higher risk of adverse events when there is inconsistent laboratory test result reporting and follow-up from their oncology provider.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to improve OC laboratory monitoring by identifying potential barriers and opportunities for reliable communication between patients and providers in the outpatient clinical setting.
METHODS: A literature review found 76 articles, of which 15 were selected for review. Six themes were synthesized and discussed.
RESULTS: Healthcare systems use technology, standard pathways, and clear patient-provider communication following laboratory testing to ensure patient safety. Implementing and testing evidence-based solutions and structured frameworks to identify gaps in outpatient laboratory monitoring and follow-up can improve patient satisfaction and safety during OC treatment.