This study explores how patient\'s laboratory result are accessed in pediatric emergency departments. The rapid turnaround of laboratory results and their timely access by the medical team are crucial for effective patient management and care decision-making. This study revealed a systematic access prioritization to the Electronic Health Record, led by physicians, followed by nurses, and then other healthcare staff Despite efforts to streamline access through computerized laboratory results, optimized laboratory turnaround time and integration of final results into the electronic health record remain key challenges. Delays in accessing analysis results issued by the central hospital laboratory are consistently experienced across various laboratory types, indicating broader systemic workflow issues rather than inefficiencies specific to individual laboratories.

BackgroundA new respiratory virus surveillance platform, based on nationwide hospital laboratory data, was established in Israel during the COVID-19 pandemic.AimWe aimed to evaluate the performance of this platform with respect to the detection of influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) from week 36 in 2020 to week 15 in 2023, and how it fits with the World Health Organization (WHO) mosaic surveillance framework.MethodsData of respiratory samples from hospitalised patients sent for laboratory confirmation of influenza virus or RSV from 25 general hospital laboratories nationwide were collected. We analysed the weekly number and percentage of samples positive for influenza virus or RSV vis-à-vis SARS-CoV-2 activity and compared data from the new surveillance platform with existing surveillance platforms. Using data in the new surveillance platform, we analysed early stages of a 2021 out-of-season RSV outbreak and evaluated the capabilities of the new surveillance system with respect to objectives and domains of the WHO mosaic framework.ResultsThe new hospital-laboratory surveillance platform captured the activity of influenza virus and RSV, provided crucial data when outpatient sentinel surveillance was not operational and supported an out-of-season RSV outbreak investigation. The new surveillance platform fulfilled important objectives in all three domains of the mosaic framework and could serve for gathering additional information to fulfil more domain objectives.ConclusionThe new hospital laboratory surveillance platform provided essential data during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond, fulfilled important domain objectives of the mosaic framework and could be adapted for the surveillance of other viruses.

UNASSIGNED: laboratory errors mostly emerge from the pre-analytical phase, mainly those related to collection, handling, transportation, and storage of diagnostic specimens. Specimen rejection due to improper sample collection, may lead to poor patient outcomes, such as incorrect diagnosis, inappropriate treatment, and death. This study aimed to assess the specimen rejection rate and associated factors among referred specimens at Debre Markos Referral Hospital.
UNASSIGNED: a prospective cross-sectional study design was applied from January 2020 to April 2020 to investigate specimen rejection rate and associated factors among referred specimens. The study population was all laboratory specimens referred for viral load, CD4 count, gene expert, and early infant diagnosis to the Debre Markos Referral Hospital laboratory. The statistical analysis was done with Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 20.0 software.
UNASSIGNED: of the total of 2750 specimens submitted to the laboratory from January 2020 to April 2020, 37 (1.34%) specimens were rejected due to different reasons like insufficient volume, hemolysis, and an inappropriate specimen container. Specimen collector training status and experience had a significant association with the specimen rejection rate.
UNASSIGNED: the results of our study show that the specimen rejection rate among referred specimens was high, indicating that more interventions are required to decrease the specimen rejection rate.

暂无摘要。

Formaldehyde, a known carcinogenic compound, is commonly used in various medical settings. The objective of this study was to assess the carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks associated with occupational exposure to formaldehyde. This study was conducted in the pathology labs of four hospitals in Tehran. Cancer and non-cancer risks were evaluated using the quantitative risk assessment method proposed by the United States environmental protection agency (USEPA), along with its provided database known as the integrated risk information system (IRIS). Respiratory symptoms were assessed using the American thoracic society (ATS) questionnaire. The results indicated that 91.23% of exposure levels in occupational groups exceed the NIOSH standard of 0.016 ppm. Regarding carcinogenic risk, 41.03% of all the studied subjects were in the definite carcinogenic risk range (LCR > 10-4), 23.08% were in the possible carcinogenic risk range (10-5 < LCR < 10-4), and 35.90% were in the negligible risk range (LCR < 10-6). The highest index of occupational carcinogenesis was observed in the group of lab technicians with a risk number of 3.7 × 10-4, followed by pathologists with a risk number of 1.7 × 10-4. Furthermore, 23.08% of the studied subjects were within the permitted health risk range (HQ < 1.0), while 76.92% were within the unhealthy risk range (HQ > 1.0). Overall, the findings revealed significantly higher carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks among lab technicians and pathologists. Therefore, it is imperative to implement control measures across various hospital departments to mitigate occupational formaldehyde exposure levels proactively. These findings can be valuable for policymakers in the health sector, aiding in the elimination or reduction of airborne formaldehyde exposure in work environments.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the implementation of proficiency testing in the northwest Ethiopian government comprehensive specialized hospital laboratories, with a focus on identifying and understanding the challenges encountered during their participation in the external quality assessment scheme.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 3 comprehensive specialized hospitals in northwest Ethiopia, analyzing 41 documented laboratory test parameters from 2020 to 2022. In addition, face-to-face, in-depth interviews were carried out to identify the major challenges the participating institutions faced.
RESULTS: The study covered a total of 41 tests across 9 cycles. Overall, proper implementation of proficiency testing was observed in 59.3% of the tests, with 61.8% maintaining consistent implementation status over 3 consecutive years. In addition, the overall performance of the laboratory was 54.3%, with a 68.7% participation rate. The predominantly identified challenges included the lack of participation, insufficient reagents and supplies, inadequacy of suitable proficiency testing materials, equipment malfunction and downtime, lack of management support, insufficient budget, and inadequate training and awareness.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study highlight the ineffective implementation of proficiency testing. Contributing factors include personnel issues, equipment and supplies challenges, managerial shortcomings, difficulties with proficiency testing providers, budgetary constraints, and a lack of training and motivation.

Critical test results in clinical laboratories are crucial for timely patient care, serving as indicators of potentially life-threatening conditions. Despite their importance, a notable heterogeneity in management practices exists globally. This study investigates the current practices of managing critical results at Danish clinical biochemistry laboratories and identifies areas prone for improvement. A comprehensive online survey was distributed to all 21 Danish clinical biochemistry laboratories regarding their critical result management, including documentation practices, critical limit selection, and quality assurance measures. A total of 17 laboratories (81%) responded. The answers revealed a generally uniform approach to managing critical results, with all laboratories having 24-h reporting, local instructions and using the telephone as communication channel. However, variations were noted in documentation practices and critical limit selection. Notably, 23.5% of the laboratories reported that one out of every ten critical results was not reported, indicating a significant risk of delayed critical results. This is further complicated by the limited use of predefined timeframes for reporting and also, only few laboratories actively monitored response times. The findings emphasize the need for more standardized documentation and evaluation practices to align with international standards and to enhance patient safety. While the laboratories showed a commitment to standardized procedures, the study emphasizes the necessity of a National or Nordic guideline to supplement the ISO 15189:2022. This study is a step towards optimizing critical result management, not only in Danish clinical biochemistry laboratories but also across various laboratory specialties, thereby improving overall laboratory quality, efficiency, and patient safety.

Potassium testing is an essential test in emergency medicine. Turnaround time (TAT) is the time between specimen receipt by the laboratory and the release of the test report. A brief in-laboratory TAT increases emergency department effectiveness. Optimizing processes to shorten TAT using other tools requires extensive time, resources, training, and support. Therefore, we aimed to find a convenient way to shorten TAT, identify risk factors affecting the timeliness of emergency potassium test reporting, and verify the intervention\'s effects. The dependent variable was emergency potassium reporting time > 30 or < 30 min. Logistic analysis was performed on monitorable factors, such as sex, age, potassium results, number of items, specimen processing time (including centrifugation and time before specimen loading), critical value ratio, instrument status, shift where the report was issued, specimen status, and work experience, as independent variables. In the multivariate analysis, work experience, instrument failure rate, and specimen processing time were risk factors for emergency blood potassium reporting exceeding 30 min. Improvement measures were implemented, significantly decreasing the timeout rate for acute potassium reporting. Our study confirms the usefulness of logistics in reducing the time required to report potassium levels in the emergency department, providing a new perspective on quality management.

OBJECTIVE: The health sector contributes to climate disruption through greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It accounts for 8% to 10% of France\'s GHG emissions. Although the medical community has been alerted to the problem, more data are needed. This study aimed to determine the carbon footprint of a surgical pathology laboratory.
METHODS: The study was conducted in the surgical pathology laboratory at Saint Vincent hospital (Lille) in 2021. It represented 17,242 patient cases corresponding to 54,124 paraffin blocks. The 17 staff members performed cytology, immunohistochemistry, and in situ hybridization. The study included all inputs, capital equipment, freight, travel, energy consumption, and waste. Carbon emission factors were based on the French Agence De l\'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l\'Energie database.
RESULTS: In 2021, the pathology laboratory\'s carbon footprint was 117 tons of CO2 equivalent (t CO2e), corresponding to 0.5% of Saint Vincent hospital\'s total emissions. The most significant emissions categories were inputs (60 t CO2e; 51%), freight associated with inputs (24 t CO2e; 20%), and travel (14 t CO2e; 12%). Waste and energy generated 10 t CO2e (9%) and 9 t CO2e (8%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The pathology laboratory\'s carbon footprint was equivalent to the yearly carbon impact of 11 French inhabitants. This footprint is dominated by inputs and associated freight. This suggests an urgent need to develop ecodesign and self-sufficiency in our routine practices.

OBJECTIVE: Accurate laboratory diagnosis is essential for effective patient care, but the rejection of specimens within laboratories can have serious consequences.
METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted from September to November 2021 at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital laboratory. Two years of laboratory data were collected from laboratory log books and analyzed to determine trends in specimen rejection rates and identify potential reasons for those rejections.
RESULTS: We analyzed 114,439 specimens, of which 786 (0.70%) were rejected. The hematology service exhibited the highest rejection rate, at 273 (0.2%). The main reasons for specimen rejection were specimens without requests or requests without specimens (40.2%), poor smear preparation (12.3%), clotted specimens (11.3%), and labeling problems (8.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: This study emphasized a significant incidence of specimen rejection, particularly in the hematology laboratory, underscoring the need for immediate implementation of corrective actions and preventive measures. Furthermore, conducting comprehensive larger-scale studies is recommended to deepen our understanding of and investigate the specific factors contributing to specimen rejection in greater detail.