BackgroundVancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are increasing in Denmark and Europe. Linezolid and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (LVRE) are of concern, as treatment options are limited. Vancomycin-variable enterococci (VVE) harbour the vanA gene complex but are phenotypically vancomycin-susceptible.AimThe aim was to describe clonal shifts for VRE and VVE in Denmark between 2015 and 2022 and to investigate genotypic linezolid resistance among the VRE and VVE.MethodsFrom 2015 to 2022, 4,090 Danish clinical VRE and VVE isolates were whole genome sequenced. We extracted vancomycin resistance genes and sequence types (STs) from the sequencing data and performed core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) analysis for Enterococcus faecium. All isolates were tested for the presence of mutations or genes encoding linezolid resistance.ResultsIn total 99% of the VRE and VVE isolates were E. faecium. From 2015 through 2019, 91.1% of the VRE and VVE were vanA E. faecium. During 2020, to the number of vanB E. faecium increased to 254 of 509 VRE and VVE isolates. Between 2015 and 2022, seven E. faecium clusters dominated: ST80-CT14 vanA, ST117-CT24 vanA, ST203-CT859 vanA, ST1421-CT1134 vanA (VVE cluster), ST80-CT1064 vanA/vanB, ST117-CT36 vanB and ST80-CT2406 vanB. We detected 35 linezolid vancomycin-resistant E. faecium and eight linezolid-resistant VVEfm.ConclusionFrom 2015 to 2022, the numbers of VRE and VVE increased. The spread of the VVE cluster ST1421-CT1134 vanA E. faecium in Denmark is a concern, especially since VVE diagnostics are challenging. The finding of LVRE, although in small numbers, ia also a concern, as treatment options are limited.

BACKGROUND: With the steady increase of antibiotic resistance, several strategies have been proposed in the scientific community to overcome the crisis. One of many successful strategies is the re-evaluation of known compounds, which have been early discarded out of the pipeline, with state-of-the-art know-how. Xanthoepocin, a polyketide widespread among the genus Penicillium with an interesting bioactivity spectrum against gram-positive bacteria, is such a discarded antibiotic. The purpose of this work was to (i) isolate larger quantities of this metabolite and chemically re-evaluate it with modern technology, (ii) to explore which factors lead to xanthoepocin biosynthesis in P. ochrochloron, and (iii) to test if it is beside its known activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), also active against linezolid and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (LVRE)-a very problematic resistant bacterium which is currently on the rise.
RESULTS: In this work, we developed several new protocols to isolate, extract, and quantify xanthoepocin out of bioreactor batch and petri dish-grown mycelium of P. ochrochloron. The (photo)chemical re-evaluation with state-of-the-art techniques revealed that xanthoepocin is a photolabile molecule, which produces singlet oxygen under blue light irradiation. The intracellular xanthoepocin content, which was highest under ammonium-limited conditions, varied considerably with the applied irradiation conditions in petri dish and bioreactor batch cultures. Using light-protecting measures, we achieved MIC values against gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which were up to 5 times lower than previously published. In addition, xanthoepocin was highly active against a clinical isolate of linezolid and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (LVRE).
CONCLUSIONS: This interdisciplinary work underlines that the re-evaluation of known compounds with state-of-the-art techniques is an important strategy in the combat against multiresistant bacteria and that light is a crucial factor on many levels that needs to receive more attention. With appropriate light protecting measures in the susceptibility tests, xanthoepocin proved to be a powerful antibiotic against MRSA and LVRE. Exploring the light response of other polyketides may be pivotal for re-introducing previously discarded metabolites into the antibiotic pipeline and to identify photosensitizers which might be used for (antimicrobial) photodynamic therapies.

The emergence and spread of linezolid and combined linezolid/vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium (LVRE) is a major therapeutic challenge. Due to the unavailability of standardized selective culture media for LVRE screening, the detection of LVRE is laborious and costly. Systematic data on LVRE prevalence are scarce, and therefore, supportive evidence for the correct implementation of preemptive strategies is lacking.
We investigated the prevalence of LVRE in a vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) endemic area in Germany in admission screening of high-risk patients for multidrug-resistant organisms to assess the necessity of LVRE screening.
We performed phenotypic testing for linezolid susceptibility in all patients (n = 2572) admitted to our hospital in the months of January, April, July and October 2018 with a positive VRE culture in their rectal admission screening swab. Eight isolates from seven patients with LVRE colonization were characterized by whole genome sequencing.
Twenty-eight percent (712/2572) of screened patients were colonized by VRE. Seventy percent (497/712) of the isolates were available for testing and whole genome sequencing. A total of 1.4% (7/497) of VRE were LVRE, predominantly due to mutations of 23S rRNA. optrA, poxtA or cfr genes were not detected. Patients with LVRE colonization did not develop LVRE infections during their stay.
LVRE prevalence was low, and there was no evidence for the dissemination of linezolid resistance genes. Due to the low prevalence and the low risk of infection due to endogenous LVRE, we do not see the immediate necessity to introduce routine LVRE screening in our hospital.