LOHS

LOHS
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:社区获得性肺炎(CAP)是导致住院的主要原因之一,并对医疗保健的经济负担产生重大影响。这项研究的目的是确定与住院时间(LOHS)相关的因素,因CAP入院的患者的再住院率和死亡率。
    方法:对2019年1月至2019年12月期间到瑞士公立医院就诊的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。进行零截断负二项和多变量逻辑回归分析以评估危险因素。
    结果:共分析了300例患者(中位数为78岁,IQR[67.56,85.50]和53%的男性),平均LOHS为7天(IQR[5.00,9.00])。在300名患者中,31.6%(97/300)在6个月内再次住院,2.7%(8/300)在30天内死亡,11.7%(35/300)在1年内死亡。结果显示,性别(IRR=0.877,95%CI=0.776-0.992,p值=0.036),年龄(IRR=1.007,95%CI=1.002-1.012,p值=0.003),qSOFA评分(IRR=1.143,95%CI=1.049-1.246,p值=0.002)和非典型肺炎(IRR=1.357,95%CI=1.012-1.819,p值=0.04)可预测LOHS。糖尿病(OR=2.149,95%CI=1.104-4.172,p值=0.024),较高的qSOFA评分(OR=1.958,95%CI=1.295-3.002,p值=0.002)和出院后康复(OR=2.222,95%CI=1.017-4.855,p值=0.044)与在6个月内再次住院的机会较高相关,而30天内和1年内死亡率均与年龄(OR=1.248,95%CI=1.056-1.562,p值=0.026和OR=1.073,95%CI=1.025-1.132,p值=0.005)和是否存在癌症诊断(OR=32.671,95%CI=4.787-369.1,p值=0.001和OR=4.408-1.68,95%CI=2,p=
    结论:这项研究确定了LOHS的常规预测因子,CAP患者的再住院和死亡率,这可以进一步增进我们对CAP的理解,从而改善患者管理,出院计划和住院费用。
    BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) represents one of the leading causes of hospitalization and has a substantial impact on the financial burden of healthcare. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with the length of hospital stay (LOHS), rehospitalization and mortality of patients admitted for CAP.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with patients presenting to a Swiss public hospital between January 2019 and December 2019. Zero-truncated negative binomial and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess risk factors.
    RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were analyzed (median 78 years, IQR [67.56, 85.50] and 53% males) with an average LOHS of 7 days (IQR [5.00, 9.00]). Of the 300 patients, 31.6% (97/300) were re-hospitalized within 6 months, 2.7% (8/300) died within 30 days and 11.7% (35/300) died within 1 year. The results showed that sex (IRR = 0.877, 95% CI = 0.776-0.992, p-value = 0.036), age (IRR = 1.007, 95% CI = 1.002-1.012, p-value = 0.003), qSOFA score (IRR = 1.143, 95% CI = 1.049-1.246, p-value = 0.002) and atypical pneumonia (IRR = 1.357, 95% CI = 1.012-1.819, p-value = 0.04) were predictive of LOHS. Diabetes (OR = 2.149, 95% CI = 1.104-4.172, p-value = 0.024), a higher qSOFA score (OR = 1.958, 95% CI = 1.295-3.002, p-value = 0.002) and rehabilitation after discharge (OR = 2.222, 95% CI = 1.017-4.855, p-value = 0.044) were associated with a higher chance of being re-hospitalized within 6 months, whereas mortality within 30 days and within one year were both associated with older age (OR = 1.248, 95% CI = 1.056-1.562, p-value = 0.026 and OR = 1.073, 95% CI = 1.025-1.132, p-value = 0.005, respectively) and the presence of a cancer diagnosis (OR = 32.671, 95% CI = 4.787-369.1, p-value = 0.001 and OR = 4.408, 95% CI = 1.680-11.43, p-value = 0.002, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study identified routinely available predictors for LOHS, rehospitalization and mortality in patients with CAP, which may further advance our understanding of CAP and thereby improve patient management, discharge planning and hospital costs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一种非常普遍的慢性肺病,对全世界的个人和医疗保健系统具有重大影响。这项研究旨在确定预测住院时间(LOHS)的因素,一年死亡率,COPD急性加重(AECOPD)患者在6个月内再次住院。一项回顾性队列研究使用了2019年1月至2020年2月期间瑞士地区综合医院收治的170名患者的数据进行。入院时测量的社会人口统计学和健康相关变量被分析为潜在的预测因子。进行多变量零截断负二项和逻辑回归分析以评估LOHS(主要终点)的危险因素,死亡率,再住院。结果表明,补充氧气的指标是LOHS的唯一重要预测指标。在逻辑回归分析中,年龄较大,COPD严重程度阶段GOLDIII和IV,活动性癌症和心律失常与较高的死亡率相关,而出院后康复与较低的死亡率相关。关于再住院没有显著关联。这项研究确定了LOHS和死亡率的常规预测因子,这可以进一步促进我们对AECOPD的理解,从而改善患者管理,排放规划,医院费用。住院后康复对降低死亡率的保护作用值得进一步确认,并可能改善AECOPD患者的综合管理。
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a highly prevalent chronic lung disease that has a significant impact on individuals and healthcare systems worldwide. This study aimed to identify factors that predict the length of a hospital stay (LOHS), one-year mortality, and rehospitalization within 6 months in patients admitted for acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD). A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from 170 patients admitted to a district general hospital in Switzerland between January 2019 and February 2020. Sociodemographic and health-related variables measured at admission were analyzed as potential predictors. Multivariable zero-truncated negative binomial and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the risk factors for LOHS (primary endpoint), mortality, and rehospitalization. The results show that an indication for oxygen supplementation was the only significant predictor of LOHS. In the logistic regression analysis, older age, COPD severity stages GOLD III and IV, active cancer and arrhythmias were associated with higher mortality, whereas rehabilitation after discharge was associated with lower mortality. There were no significant associations regarding rehospitalization. This study identified routinely available predictors for LOHS and mortality, which may further advance our understanding of AECOPD and thereby improve patient management, discharge planning, and hospital costs. The protective effect of rehabilitation after hospitalization regarding lower mortality warrants further confirmation and may improve the comprehensive management of patients with AECOPD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺栓塞(PE)不仅是威胁生命的疾病,而且是具有重大经济负担的公共卫生问题。该研究的目的是确定预测住院时间(LOHS)的因素,包括初级保健的作用。因PE入院后6个月内的死亡率和再住院率.
    对2018年11月至2020年10月期间到瑞士一家公立医院就诊并确诊为PE的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。进行多变量logistic和零截断负二项回归分析以评估死亡率的危险因素。再次住院和LOHS。初级护理变量包括患者是否由其全科医生(GP)送往急诊科,以及是否建议出院后进行GP随访评估。进一步分析变量为肺栓塞严重程度指数(PESI)评分,实验室值,合并症,和病史。
    共分析了248例患者(中位数73岁,51.6%为女性)。患者平均住院5天(IQR3-8)。总之,这些患者中有5.6%在医院死亡,1.6%在30天内死亡(全因死亡率),21.8%在6个月内再次住院。除了较高的PESI分数,我们发现,血清肌钙蛋白升高的患者,以及糖尿病患者的住院时间明显更长。死亡的重要危险因素是NT-proBNP和PESI评分升高。Further,高PESI评分和LOHS与6个月内再次住院相关.由全科医生送往急诊科的PE患者没有表现出改善的结果。全科医生的随访对再次住院没有显著影响。
    定义与PE患者LOHS相关的因素具有临床意义,可能有助于临床医生在这些患者的管理中分配足够的资源。除PESI评分外,血清肌钙蛋白和糖尿病可能是LOHS的预后用途。在这项单中心队列研究中,PESI评分不仅是死亡率的有效预测工具,也是6个月内再住院等长期结局的有效预测工具。
    UNASSIGNED: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is not only a life-threatening disease but also a public health issue with significant economic burden. The aim of the study was to identify factors-including the role of primary care-that predict length of hospital stay (LOHS), mortality and re-hospitalization within 6 months of patients admitted for PE.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with patients presenting to a Swiss public hospital with PE diagnosed at the hospital between November 2018 and October 2020. Multivariable logistic and zero-truncated negative binomial regression analyses were performed to assess risk factors for mortality, re-hospitalization and LOHS. Primary care variables encompassed whether patients were sent by their general practitioner (GP) to the emergency department and whether a GP follow-up assessment after discharge was recommended. Further analyzed variables were pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI) score, laboratory values, comorbidities, and medical history.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 248 patients were analyzed (median 73 years and 51.6% females). On average patients were hospitalized for 5 days (IQR 3-8). Altogether, 5.6% of these patients died in hospital, and 1.6% died within 30 days (all-cause mortality), 21.8% were re-hospitalized within 6 months. In addition to high PESI scores, we detected that, patients with an elevated serum troponin, as well as with diabetes had a significantly longer hospital stay. Significant risk factors for mortality were elevated NT-proBNP and PESI scores. Further, high PESI score and LOHS were associated with re-hospitalization within 6 months. PE patients who were sent to the emergency department by their GPs did not show improved outcomes. Follow-up with GPs did not have a significant effect on re-hospitalization.
    UNASSIGNED: Defining the factors that are associated with LOHS in patients with PE has clinical implications and may help clinicians to allocate adequate resources in the management of these patients. Serum troponin and diabetes in addition to PESI score might be of prognostic use for LOHS. In this single-center cohort study, PESI score was not only a valid predictive tool for mortality but also for long-term outcomes such as re-hospitalization within 6 months.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号