Novel messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines have proven to be effective tools against coronavirus disease 2019, and they have changed the course of the pandemic. However, early reports of mRNA vaccine-induced anaphylaxis resulted in public alarm, contributing toward vaccine hesitancy. Although initial reports were concerning for an unusually high rate of anaphylaxis to the mRNA vaccines, the true incidence is likely comparable with other vaccines. These reactions occurred predominantly in young to middle-aged females, and many had a history of allergies. Although initially thought to be triggered by polyethylene glycol (PEG), lack of reproducibility of these reactions with subsequent dosing and absent PEG sensitization point away from an IgE-mediated PEG allergy in most. PEG skin testing has poor posttest probability and should be reserved for evaluating non-vaccine-related PEG allergy without influencing decisions for subsequent mRNA vaccination. Immunization stress-related response can closely mimic vaccine-induced anaphylaxis and warrants consideration as a potential etiology. Current evidence suggests that many individuals who developed anaphylaxis to the first dose of an mRNA vaccine can likely receive a subsequent dose after careful evaluation. The need to understand these reactions mechanistically remains critical because the mRNA platform is rapidly finding its way into other vaccinations and therapeutics.

UNASSIGNED: To investigate if corneal endothelial cells (CECs) in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) have altered cellular migration compared with normal controls.
UNASSIGNED: Comparative analysis.
UNASSIGNED: Descemet\'s membrane and CECs derived from patients with FECD undergoing endothelial keratoplasty or normal cadaveric donors.
UNASSIGNED: Ex vivo specimens were used for live cell imaging and generation of immortalized cell lines. Live imaging was performed on FECD and normal CECs and on ex vivo specimens transfected with green fluorescent protein. Migration speeds were determined as a function of cellular density using automated cell tracking. Ex vivo specimens were classified as either FECD or normal low cell density (nonconfluent) or high cell density (confluent). Scratch assay was performed on CECs seeded at high confluence to determine migration speed. Genetic analysis from blood samples or CECs was performed to detect a CTG repeat expansion in the TCF4 gene.
UNASSIGNED: Mean cell migration speed.
UNASSIGNED: Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy CECs in low cell density areas displayed increased mean speed (0.391 ± 0.005 μm/minute vs. 0.364 ± 0.005 μm/minute; P < 0.001) and mean maximum speed (0.961 ± 0.010 μm/minute vs. 0.787 ± 0.011 μm/minute; P < 0.001) compared with normal CECs, and increased mean maximum speed (0.778 ± 0.014 μm/minute vs. 0.680 ± 0.011 μm/minute; P < 0.001) in high cell density areas ex vivo. Similarly, FECD CECs displayed increased mean speed compared with normal CECs (1.958 ± 0.020 μm/minute vs. 2.227 ± 0.021 μm/minute vs. 1.567 ± 0.019 μm/minute; P < 0.001) under nonconfluent conditions in vitro. Moreover, FECD CECs also displayed increased mean speed compared with normal CECs under high confluent conditions as detected by scratch assay (37.2 ± 1.1% vs. 44.3 ± 4.1% vs. 70.7 ± 5.2%; P < 0.001). Morphologic analysis showed that FECD CECs displayed an increased fibroblastic phenotype as detected by filamentous-actin labeling.
UNASSIGNED: Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy CECs demonstrated increased migration speed compared with normal CECs. Further investigation into the mechanisms of heightened cell migration in FECD is needed and may provide insight into its pathogenesis, as well as having implications on descemetorhexis without endothelial keratoplasty.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a devastating disease affecting approximately 1 in every 3,500 male births worldwide. Multiple mutations in the dystrophin gene have been implicated as underlying causes of DMD. However, there remains no cure for patients with DMD, and cardiomyopathy has become the most common cause of death in the affected population. Extensive research is under way investigating molecular mechanisms that highlight potential therapeutic targets for the development of pharmacotherapy for DMD cardiomyopathy. In this paper, the authors perform a literature review reporting on recent ongoing efforts to identify novel therapeutic strategies to reduce, prevent, or reverse progression of cardiac dysfunction in DMD.

The primary etiology of a diverse range of cardiomyopathies is now understood to be genetic, creating a new paradigm for targeting treatments on the basis of the underlying molecular cause. This review provides a genetic and etiologic context for the traditional clinical classifications of cardiomyopathy, including molecular subtypes that may exhibit differential responses to existing or emerging treatments. The authors describe several emerging cardiomyopathy treatments, including gene therapy, direct targeting of myofilament function, protein quality control, metabolism, and others. The authors discuss advantages and disadvantages of these approaches and indicate areas of high potential for short- and longer term efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Lipid nanoparticle (LNP) encapsulated self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) is a novel technology formulated as a low dose vaccine against COVID-19.
METHODS: A phase I first-in-human dose-ranging trial of a saRNA COVID-19 vaccine candidate LNP-nCoVsaRNA, was conducted at Imperial Clinical Research Facility, and participating centres in London, UK, between 19th June to 28th October 2020. Participants received two intramuscular (IM) injections of LNP-nCoVsaRNA at six different dose levels, 0.1-10.0μg, given four weeks apart. An open-label dose escalation was followed by a dose evaluation. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were collected for one week from enrolment, with follow-up at regular intervals (1-8 weeks). The binding and neutralisation capacity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody raised in participant sera was measured by means of an anti-Spike (S) IgG ELISA, immunoblot, SARS-CoV-2 pseudoneutralisation and wild type neutralisation assays. (The trial is registered: ISRCTN17072692, EudraCT 2020-001646-20).
RESULTS: 192 healthy individuals with no history or serological evidence of COVID-19, aged 18-45 years were enrolled. The vaccine was well tolerated with no serious adverse events related to vaccination. Seroconversion at week six whether measured by ELISA or immunoblot was related to dose (both p<0.001), ranging from 8% (3/39; 0.1μg) to 61% (14/23; 10.0μg) in ELISA and 46% (18/39; 0.3μg) to 87% (20/23; 5.0μg and 10.0μg) in a post-hoc immunoblot assay. Geometric mean (GM) anti-S IgG concentrations ranged from 74 (95% CI, 45-119) at 0.1μg to 1023 (468-2236) ng/mL at 5.0μg (p<0.001) and was not higher at 10.0μg. Neutralisation of SARS-CoV-2 by participant sera was measurable in 15% (6/39; 0.1μg) to 48% (11/23; 5.0μg) depending on dose level received.
CONCLUSIONS: Encapsulated saRNA is safe for clinical development, is immunogenic at low dose levels but failed to induce 100% seroconversion. Modifications to optimise humoral responses are required to realise its potential as an effective vaccine against SARS-CoV-2.
BACKGROUND: This study was co-funded by grants and gifts from the Medical Research Council UKRI (MC_PC_19076), and the National Institute Health Research/Vaccine Task Force, Partners of Citadel and Citadel Securities, Sir Joseph Hotung Charitable Settlement, Jon Moulton Charity Trust, Pierre Andurand, Restore the Earth.