Kidding interval

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    没有关于山羊繁殖性状和体细胞的遗传参数和遗传趋势估计的研究。他们的知识允许优化选择方案。这项研究的目的是估计遗传参数和遗传和表型趋势的年龄在第一次开玩笑(AFK),开玩笑间隔(KIN)和体细胞评分(SCS)。分析是在七个美国山羊品种内进行的,即,努比亚(NU),高山(AL),拉曼查(LM),Toggenburg(TO),Saanen(SA),尼日利亚矮人(ND)和奥伯哈斯利(OB),和一组所有这些品种(AB)。使用限制性最大似然方法和三变量动物模型。使用回归模型估计遗传和表型趋势。AFK的平均值和标准偏差,AB的KIN和SCS为573.6±178.5天,分别为418.8±125.5天和4.67±2.23Log2。AFK的遗传力(h2)和标准误差,AB的KIN和SCS分别为0.28±0.02、0.04±0.02和0.22±0.01。AFK的h2范围为0.15(SA)至0.37(NU),KIN从0.04(AB)到0.10(AL),SCS从0.11(TO)到0.26(LM和ND)。AB的AFK与KIN之间以及AFK与SCS之间的遗传相关性分别为正相关和弱相关(分别为0.07和0.12),但显着(P<0.01)。所有品种的SCS和KIN之间的遗传相关性均显着(P<0.01),范围为-0.15(NU)至0.44(AL)。NU和AL品种中AFK和SCS之间的遗传相关性相似(约0.21)。在SA品种中发现了KIN的正遗传趋势,这导致了连续开玩笑之间的天数增加。NUSCS的遗传趋势,AL和ND品种呈阴性,逐年减少,这对生产者是有利的。这些第一个结果显示了某些美国山羊遗传群体中AFK或KIN与SCSLog2之间的一些有利/不利关系的强度和方向。
    There are no studies regarding the estimation of genetic parameters and genetic trends for reproductive traits and somatic cells in goats. Their knowledge allows optimization of selection schemes. The objective of this study was to estimate genetic parameters and genetic and phenotypic trends for age at first kidding (AFK), kidding interval (KIN) and somatic cell score (SCS). Analyses were conducted within and across seven US goat breeds, namely, Nubian (NU), Alpine (AL), LaMancha (LM), Toggenburg (TO), Saanen (SA), Nigerian Dwarf (ND) and Oberhasli (OB), and a set of all of these breeds (AB). The restricted maximum likelihood methodology and trivariate animal models were used. Genetic and phenotypic trends were estimated using regression models. The average and standard deviation of AFK, KIN and SCS for AB were 573.6 ± 178.5 days, 418.8 ± 125.5 days and 4.67 ± 2.23 Log2, respectively. The heritabilities (h2) and standard errors of AFK, KIN and SCS for AB were 0.28 ± 0.02, 0.04 ± 0.02 and 0.22 ± 0.01, respectively. The h2 ranged from 0.15 (SA) to 0.37 (NU) for AFK, from 0.04 (AB) to 0.10 (AL) for KIN, and from 0.11 (TO) to 0.26 (LM and ND) for SCS. Genetic correlations between AFK and KIN and between AFK and SCS for AB were positive and weak (0.07 and 0.12, respectively) but significant (P < 0.01). Genetic correlations between SCS and KIN were significant (P < 0.01) for all the breeds and ranged from -0.15 (NU) to 0.44 (AL). Genetic correlations between AFK and SCS in the NU and AL breeds were similar (approximately 0.21). A positive genetic trend was found for KIN in the SA breed, which caused an increase in the number of days between consecutive kiddings. The genetic trend of SCS for the NU, AL and ND breeds was negative and decreased annually, which is beneficial for producers. These first results show the intensity and direction of some favorable/unfavorable relationships between AFK or KIN and SCS Log2 in some U.S. goat genetic groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的主要目的是评估生产系统和其他环境/表型因素对初次开玩笑(AFK)年龄的影响,2000年至2019年期间,在49个奶牛场(38个农场密集管理,11个放牧)饲养了19,772只佛罗里达山羊的开玩笑间隔(KI)和多产性。强化的AFK(490.2±0.9天;n=13,345)低于广泛的农场(511.7±2.5天;n=2357;p<0.001),在两个生产系统中,春季最高(533.9±2.7天;n=1932;p<0.001)。平均KI为355.7±0.4天,主要根据干旱时期而变化,开玩笑季节和哺乳次数和开玩笑类型(p<0.01)。生产系统之间的显著相互作用,春季和夏季,集约化农场的干旱期和干旱期最高,山羊的干旱期长达六个月。近年来,两个系统的总体繁殖能力(1.64±0.01)均有所提高,它受到生产系统的影响,但是有不同的模式;所以,在广泛和密集的农场中观察到初产和多产山羊的最高繁殖能力,分别。除此之外,繁殖能力和其他繁殖参数,比如AFK,在过去十年中显著增加,这可能与管理改进有关。除此之外,应考虑年际变化的存在,以比较农场和年份之间的数据,并根据其生产系统和生产目标确定农场的目标。
    The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the production system and other environmental/phenotype factors on age at first kidding (AFK), kidding interval (KI) and prolificacy of 19,772 Florida goats reared between 2000 and 2019 on 49 dairy farms (38 farms intensively managed and 11 extensively managed with grazing). AFK was lower on intensive (490.2 ± 0.9 days; n = 13,345) than on extensive farms (511.7 ± 2.5 days; n = 2357; p < 0.001), and highest during the spring season (533.9 ± 2.7 days; n = 1932; p < 0.001) in both production systems. The average KI was 355.7 ± 0.4 days, mainly varying according to dry period, kidding season and lactation number and kidding type (p < 0.01). A significant interaction between production system, kidding season and dry period was observed with the highest AFK on intensive farms during spring and summer for goats presenting a dry period of up to six months. The overall prolificacy (1.64 ± 0.01) increased in recent years in both systems, and it was affected by the production system, but with different patterns; so, the highest prolificacy of primiparous and multiparous goats was observed on extensive and intensive farms, respectively. Besides that, the prolificacy and other reproductive parameters, such as AFK, significantly increased in the last decade, which could be related to management improvements. Besides that, the existence of inter-annual variations should be considered to compare data between farms and years, and to establish the farms’ objectives according to their production systems and production goals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Reproductive performance is a key determinant for the efficiency of goat production. Regular monitoring of reproductive efficiency is essential to assess management and to avoid financial losses due to poor performance. To allow more objective measurement and comparisons over time, we propose a novel quantitative approach for defining annual reproductive performance by combining common performance indicators into a goat flock index. Commonly used reproductive performance measures were collected from 242 goat flocks in four districts in dryland of Ethiopia between July 2018 and February 2019. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to identify biologically meaningful latent components that explain annual reproductive output (ARO) and annual reproductive wastage (ARW). Together with the remaining annual reproductive performance measures, the ARO and ARW components were included in a PCA to derive an algorithm for a goat annual reproductive performance index (G-ARPI). One component representing variation in kidding interval, PCARO1 and PCARW1 was extracted and normalized to a 10-scale value. The flocks were classified into good performing (15.63%) with index > 8.5, moderately performing (48.21%) with index values ranging from 6.5 to 8.5 and poor performing (36.16%) with index < 6.5. Good performing flocks have higher scores for reproductive output measures, lower scores for reproductive wastage and lower kidding interval. The proposed G-ARPI can be used as an objective tool to compare reproductive performance between management systems, evaluate the costs of poor reproductive management and will be useful for economic models that aim to identify the most cost-efficient intervention option and monitor the impact of interventions. We present here the index for goat production in dryland systems in Ethiopia; the approach can easily be adapted to other production systems elsewhere.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号