OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe reported adverse events (AEs) associated with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) in a pediatric sample with cystic fibrosis (CF) aged 6-18 years, with at least one F508del variant, followed at multiple Italian CF centers.
METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study. All children receiving ETI therapy from October 2019 to December 2023 were included. We assessed the prevalence and type of any reported potential drug-related AEs, regardless of discontinuation necessity. Persistent AEs were defined as those continuing at the end of the observation period.
RESULTS: Among 608 patients on ETI, 109 (17.9%) reported at least 1 AE. The majority (n = 85, 77.9%) were temporary, with a median duration of 11 days (range 1-441 days). Only 7 (1.1%) patients permanently discontinued treatment, suggesting good overall safety of ETI. The most common AEs leading to discontinuation were transaminase elevations (temporary 14.1%, persistent 25.9%) and urticaria (temporary 41.2%, persistent 7.4%). Creatinine phosphokinase elevation was uncommon. No significant differences in AEs were observed based on sex, age groups (6-11 vs 12-18 years), or genotype. Pre-existing CF-related liver disease was associated with an increased risk of transaminase elevations. We identified significant variability in the percentage of reported AEs (ANOVA P value .026).
CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study highlights significant variability in reported AEs. Our findings suggest that ETI is a safe and well-tolerated therapy in children and adolescents with CF. However, further long-term safety and effectiveness investigations are warranted.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of knowledge on the longer-term effects of CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapies upon the gut microbiome and associated outcomes. In a pilot study, we investigated longitudinal Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor (ETI) therapy on the gut microbiota, metabolomic functioning, and clinical outcomes in people with CF (pwCF).
METHODS: Faecal samples from 20 pwCF were acquired before and then following 3, 6, and 17+ months of ETI therapy. Samples were subjected to microbiota sequencing and targeted metabolomics to profile and quantify short-chain fatty acid composition. Ten healthy matched controls were included for comparison. Clinical data, including markers of intestinal function were integrated to investigate relationships.
RESULTS: Extended ETI therapy increased core microbiota diversity and composition, which translated to gradual shifts in whole microbiota composition towards that observed in healthy controls. Despite becoming more similar over time, CF microbiota and functional metabolite compositions remained significantly different to healthy controls. Antibiotic treatment for pulmonary infection significantly explained a relatively large degree of variation within the whole microbiota and rarer satellite taxa. Clinical outcomes were not significantly different following ETI.
CONCLUSIONS: Whilst differences persisted, a positive trajectory towards the microbiota observed in healthy controls was found. We posit that progression was predominately impeded by pulmonary antibiotics administration. We recommend future studies use integrated omics approaches within a combination of long-term longitudinal patient studies and model experimental systems. This will deepen our understanding of the impacts of CFTR modulator therapy and respiratory antibiotic interventions upon the gut microbiome and gastrointestinal pathophysiology in CF.

Purpose To assess the feasibility of monitoring the effects of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) therapy on lung ventilation and perfusion in people with cystic fibrosis (CF), using phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI. Materials and Methods This secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective study was carried out between August 2020 and March 2021 and included participants 12 years or older with CF who underwent PREFUL MRI, spirometry, sweat chloride test, and lung clearance index assessment before and 8-16 weeks after ETI therapy. For PREFUL-derived ventilation and perfusion parameter extraction, two-dimensional coronal dynamic gradient-echo MR images were evaluated with an automated quantitative pipeline. T1- and T2-weighted MR images and PREFUL perfusion maps were visually assessed for semiquantitative Eichinger scores. Wilcoxon signed rank test compared clinical parameters and PREFUL values before and after ETI therapy. Correlation of parameters was calculated as Spearman ρ correlation coefficient. Results Twenty-three participants (median age, 18 years [IQR: 14-24.5 years]; 13 female) were included. Quantitative PREFUL parameters, Eichinger score, and clinical parameters (lung clearance index = 21) showed significant improvement after ETI therapy. Ventilation defect percentage of regional ventilation decreased from 18% (IQR: 14%-25%) to 9% (IQR: 6%-17%) (P = .003) and perfusion defect percentage from 26% (IQR: 18%-36%) to 19% (IQR: 13%-24%) (P = .002). Areas of matching normal (healthy) ventilation and perfusion increased from 52% (IQR: 47%-68%) to 73% (IQR: 61%-83%). Visually assessed perfusion scores did not correlate with PREFUL perfusion (P = .11) nor with ventilation-perfusion match values (P = .38). Conclusion The study demonstrates the feasibility of PREFUL MRI for semiautomated quantitative assessment of perfusion and ventilation changes in response to ETI therapy in people with CF. Keywords: Pediatrics, MR-Functional Imaging, Pulmonary, Lung, Comparative Studies, Cystic Fibrosis, Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor Therapy, Fourier Decomposition, PREFUL, Free-Breathing Proton MRI, Pulmonary MRI, Perfusion, Functional MRI, CFTR, Modulator Therapy, Kaftrio Clinical trial registration no. NCT04732910 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

BACKGROUND: Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has revolutionized cystic fibrosis (CF) treatment. However, previous research has demonstrated profound global disparities in diagnosis and treatment access. If unaddressed, these threaten to widen existing health inequities. Therefore, in this analysis we aimed to reappraise gaps and evaluate progress in diagnosis and treatment equity in high-income (HIC) versus low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
METHODS: Estimates of the global CF population were made in 158 countries using patient registries, systematic literature searches, and an international survey of 14 CF experts. Estimates of the global burden of undiagnosed CF were made using epidemiological studies identified in literature searches and registry coverage data. The proportion of people receiving ETI was estimated using publicly available revenue data and a survey of 23 national drug pricing databases.
RESULTS: 188,336 (163,421-209,204) people are estimated to have CF in 96 countries. Of these, 111,767 (59%) were diagnosed and 51,322 (27%) received ETI. The undiagnosed patient burden is estimated to be 76,569 people, with 82% in LMICs. ETI is reimbursed in 35 HICs, but only one LMIC. Four years after approval, there are 13,723 people diagnosed with CF who live in a country where ETI is inaccessible. This increases to 76,199 when including the estimated undiagnosed population.
CONCLUSIONS: Equitable access to CFTR modulators must become a top priority for the international CF community. ETI costs up to $322,000 per year but could be manufactured for $5000 to allow access under a voluntary license. Given the extent of disparities, other mechanisms to improve access that circumvent the manufacturer should also be considered.

UNASSIGNED: The CFTR-modulating therapy Elexaftor - Tezacaftor - Ivacaftor (ETI) has been widely prescribed since its approval in 2020 in the European Union. The aim of this study was to methodically evaluate the effects of an ETI treatment on clinical, biochemical data and Pseudomonas colonization in order to demonstrate its efficacy.
UNASSIGNED: This prospective monocentric study comprised 69 patients diagnosed with cystic fibrosis aged at least 12 years and treated with ETI between September 2020 and November 2021. Clinical and laboratory data of each patient and study visit were collected before and after 24 weeks of ETI treatment. Follow-up status of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PsA) colonization was assessed after one year of therapy by regularly determined sputum or throat swab samples.
UNASSIGNED: Marked improvements biochemical markers of systemic inflammation as white blood cell count, levels of immunoglobulins A, G and M and albumin within 24 weeks of therapy were observed. ETI treatment proved to be effective as seen by amelioration of lung function and sweat chloride concentration. Assessment of PsA colonization status revealed a conversion from a positive to negative detection in 36% of the cases after one year of therapy.
UNASSIGNED: ETI treatment effectively improves systemic inflammation parameters and shows promising results in PsA status conversion.

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a potentially fatal monogenic disease that causes a progressive multisystemic pathology. Over the last decade, the introduction of CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator drugs into clinical practice has profoundly modified the lives of many people with CF (PwCF) by targeting the fundamental cause of the disease. These drugs consist of the potentiator ivacaftor (VX-770) and the correctors lumacaftor (VX-809), tezacaftor (VX-661), and elexacaftor (VX-445). In particular, the triple combination of CFTR modulators composed of elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor (ETI) represents a life-changing therapy for the majority of PwCF worldwide. A growing number of clinical studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of ETI therapy in both short- and long-term (up to two years of follow-up to date) and its ability to significantly reduce pulmonary and gastrointestinal manifestations, sweat chloride concentration, exocrine pancreatic dysfunction, and infertility/subfertility, among other disease signs and symptoms. Nevertheless, ETI therapy-related adverse effects have also been reported, and close monitoring by a multidisciplinary healthcare team remains vital. This review aims to address and discuss the major therapeutic benefits and adverse effects reported by the clinical use of ETI therapy for PwCF.

Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) is a new CFTR (Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator) modulator treatment, used over the last few years, which has shown an improvement in different clinical outcomes in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The objective of this study was a systematic research of the literature on the efficacy and safety of this CFTR modulator on patients with CF. A search of Pubmed was conducted for randomized clinical trials and observational studies published from 2012 to September 2022. The included full manuscripts comprised nine clinical trials and 16 observational studies, whose participants were aged ≥12 years or were children 6-11 years old with at least one Phe508del mutation and/or advanced lung disease (ALD). These studies reported that ELX/TEZ/IVA has a significant positive effect on the lung function of patients with CF, by ameliorating parameters such as FEV1, LCI, pulmonary exacerbations or sweat chloride concentration, increasing BMI and improving quality of their life. Its role in cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) is not yet clear. It was found that this new CFTR modulator has an overall favorable safety profile, with mild to moderate adverse events. Further studies are needed for a deeper understanding of the impact of CFTR modulators on other CF manifestations, or the possibility of treating with ELX/TEZ/IVA CF patients with rare CFTR mutations.

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) care is entering a period of personalised medicine with the emergence of CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapies. Anecdotally individuals are reporting life-changing effects of modulator therapies, proposing an important area of study.
Twenty adult participants (males: 8, age range: 22-51 years, average FEV1: 53.45%) were recruited via social media to participate in a semi-structured interview; 17 participants were currently taking Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor (Kaftrio).
An appreciation of a \"normal life\" post-modulator therapy is paramount, with improvements in symptoms and quality-of-life bringing a more urgent imperative for the provision of effective support to encourage positive health and lifestyle choices.
In this new era of CF care, there remains many challenges present for the CF community, with participants suggesting that proactive psychological support is required along with proactive awareness regarding health risk behaviours for the current and future CF generations.

BACKGROUND: While the clinical benefits of CFTR modulators are clear, their high prices render them inaccessible outside of the world\'s richest countries. Despite this, there is currently limited evidence regarding global access to these transformative therapies. Therefore, this study aims to estimate the minimum costs of production of CFTR modulators, assuming robust generic competition, and to compare them with current list prices to evaluate the feasibility of increased global access to treatment.
METHODS: Minimum costs of production for CFTR modulators were estimated via an algorithm validated in previous literature and identification of cost-limiting key starting materials from published routes of chemical synthesis. This algorithm utilised per kilogram active pharmaceutical ingredient costs obtained from global import/export data. Estimated production costs were compared with published list prices in a range of countries.
RESULTS: Costs of production for elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor are estimated at $5,676 [$4,628-6,723] per year, over 90% lower than the US list price. Analysis of chemical structure and published synthetic pathways for elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor revealed relatively straightforward routes of synthesis related to currently available products. Total cost of triple therapy for all eligible diagnosed CF patients worldwide would be $489 million per year. Comparatively, the annual cost at US list price would be $31.2 billion.
CONCLUSIONS: Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor could be produced via generic companies for a fraction of the list price. The current pricing model restricts access to the best available therapy, thereby exacerbating existing inequalities in CF care. Urgent action is needed to increase the availability of triple combination treatment worldwide. One strategy based on previous success is originator-issued voluntary licenses.