暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

Salivary gland neoplasms account for 3% of all head and neck tumours. Pleomorphic adenoma (PA) is the most common salivary gland tumour that mainly occurs in the parotid gland, followed by minor salivary glands of the oral cavity, however, the occurrence of PA inside the jaw bones is exceedingly rare and very few cases have been reported in the literature. Inside jaw bones these lesions tend to imitate large osteolytic lesions encompass a diagnostic challenge. An exhaustive review of the literature revealed only 10 cases of central pleomorphic adenoma. We present a rare case of primary PA that occurred inside the mandible and was provisionally diagnosed as ameloblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Odontogenic tumors arise in the jawbone and originate from cells associated with tooth development. Therefore, understanding odontogenic tumors requires knowledge of all aspects of dental research, including tooth development and eruption. Ameloblastoma is the most common odontogenic tumor.
CONCLUSIONS: Although a benign tumor, ameloblastoma progresses with marked jawbone resorption. Because of its locally aggressive features, it can be treated surgically by resecting the surrounding bone. From a molecular pathology perspective, several genetic mutations and dysregulated signaling pathways involved in ameloblastoma tumorigenesis have been identified. Histopathologically, ameloblastomas consist of peripheral ameloblast-like cells and an inner stellate reticulum. The stromal region consists of fibrovascular connective tissue, showing a characteristic sparse myxoid histology. In general, the tumor microenvironment, including the surrounding non-tumor cells, contributes to tumorigenesis and progression. In this review, we focus on the tumor microenvironment of ameloblastomas. In addition, we present some of our recent studies on osteoclastogenesis, tubulin acetylation-induced cell migration, and hypoxia-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in ameloblastomas.
CONCLUSIONS: Further research on ameloblastomas can lead to the development of new treatments and improve patients\' quality of life.

UNASSIGNED: Restoration of dental occlusion and oral rehabilitation is the ultimate goal of functional jaw reconstruction.
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the prefabricated fibula flap (PFF) technique in occlusion-driven jaw reconstruction for benign or previously treated malignant disease.
UNASSIGNED: This cohort study was conducted from January 2000 to December 2019 at the University of Alberta Hospital and Institute of Reconstructive Sciences in Medicine in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, among patients who underwent PFF or bone-driven and delayed osseointegrated implant installation (BDD). Patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year after occlusal rehabilitation. Data were analyzed from July 2021 to June 2022.
UNASSIGNED: Patients underwent BDD or PFF, which consists of osseointegrated dental implant installation and skin grafting of the fibular bone 3 to 6 months before jaw tumor resection or defect reconstruction. The implant osseointegration is completed at the time of jaw reconstruction, allowing for full reconstruction, loading, and restoration of the dental occlusion in the immediate postoperative period.
UNASSIGNED: Safety, effectiveness, accuracy, timeliness of occlusal reconstruction, and aesthetic appeal were compared between PFF and BDD. Groups were compared for the following variables: postoperative complications, number of bony segments used, number of procedures needed, total operative time, time to occlusal rehabilitation, and number of implants installed, exposed, lost, and used (ie, exposed implants - lost implants). Aesthetic appeal was assessed using standardized full-face and profile digital photographs taken before and 6 to 12 months after the operation and analyzed by 3 naive raters.
UNASSIGNED: Among 9 patients receiving PFF (mean [SD] age, 43.3 [13.0] years; 7 men [77.8%]) and 12 patients receiving BDD (mean [SD] age, 41.9 [18.0] years; 8 men [66.7%]), the overall complication rate was similar (4 patients [44.4%] vs 3 patients [25.0%], respectively; relative risk, 1.78 [95% CI, 0.52 to 6.04]). The number of patients with implant loss was similar between PFF and BDD groups (0 patients vs 3 patients [25.0%], respectively; difference, -25.0 percentage points [95% CI, -48.4 to 9.7 percentage points]). PFF had a clinically meaningful faster mean (SD) occlusal rehabilitation compared with BDD (12.1 [1.9] months vs 60.4 [23.1] months; difference, -48.3 months [95% CI, -64.5 to -32.0 months]). The mean (SD) difference in preoperative to postoperative aesthetic score was similar between PFF and BDD groups (-0.8 [1.5] vs -0.2 [0.8]; difference, -0.6 [95% CI, -1.6 to 0.4]).
UNASSIGNED: This study found that PFF compared with BDD was a safe, effective, and aesthetic reconstructive option for patients with benign or previously treated jaw malignant tumors. This technique may provide rapid occlusal reconstruction and oral rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Currently, the differentiation of jaw tumors is mainly based on the lesion\'s morphology rather than the enhancement characteristics, which are important in the differentiation of neoplasms across the body. There is a paucity of literature on the enhancement characteristics of jaw tumors. This is mainly because, even though computed tomography (CT) is used to evaluate these lesions, they are often imaged without intravenous contrast. This study hypothesised that the enhancement characteristics of the solid component of jaw tumors can aid in the differentiation of these lesions in addition to their morphology by dual-energy CT, therefore improving the ability to differentiate between various pathologies.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of contrast enhancement and dual-energy quantitative parameters in CT in the differentiation of jaw tumors.
METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with jaw tumors underwent contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT. Morphological analysis of the tumor, including the enhancing solid component, was done, followed by quantitative analysis of iodine concentration (IC), water concentration (WC), HU, and normalized IC. The study population was divided into four subgroups based on histopathological analysis-central giant cell granuloma (CGCG), ameloblastoma, odontogenic keratocyst (OKC), and other jaw tumors. A one-way ANOVA test for parametric variables and the Kruskal-Wallis test for non-parametric variables were used. If significant differences were found, a series of independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests were used.
RESULTS: Ameloblastoma was the most common pathology (n = 20), followed by CGCG (n = 11) and OKC. CGCG showed a higher mean concentration of all quantitative parameters than ameloblastomas (P < 0.05). An IC threshold of 31.35 × 100 μg/cm3 had the maximum sensitivity (81.8%) and specificity (65%). Between ameloblastomas and OKC, the former showed a higher mean concentration of all quantitative parameters (P < 0.001), however when comparing unilocular ameloblastomas with OKCs, the latter showed significantly higher WC. Also, ameloblastoma had a higher IC and lower WC compared to \"other jaw tumors\" group.
CONCLUSIONS: Enhancement characteristics of solid components combined with dual-energy parameters offer a more precise way to differentiate between jaw tumors.

BACKGROUND: Adenomatoid Odontogenic Tumor (AOT) accounts for 3% of all odontogenic tumors. It has been classified by WHO as an odontogenic tumor of purely epithelial origin. The current study attempts to establish the origin of the tumor along with detailed histopathological and clinicoradiographic analysis of 43 cases of AOT.
METHODS: Forty-three cases were reviewed from the departmental archives for demographic data, radiographic features and histological features. Further, histopathological slides were stained with Picrosirius Red (PSR) and observed under polarised light.
RESULTS: A majority of the cases were seen in the anterior jaws (76.7%), and were less than 3 cms (76.7%) in greatest dimension. Equal number of cases were of follicular and extra-follicular location while one was peripheral. Predominantly solid histological pattern was noted in 53.5%. Varied sub-patterns were observed with most cases exhibiting solid nodules and strands of tumor cells. Few cases showed melanin pigmentation. Over a third of cases (37.2%) showed dentigerous cyst like areas and one case each showed features of ossifying fibroma and focal cemento-osseous dysplasia. Tumor droplets, hyaline rings within duct-like structures, dentinoid material and osteodentin showed reddish yellow birefringence when observed under polarised microscopy post PSR staining.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the diverse histopathological variation of AOT with evidence to reclassify it as a mixed odontogenic tumor based on the polarising microscopic findings with PSR staining.

Ameloblastoma (AM) is a benign, although aggressive, epithelial odontogenic tumour originating from tooth-forming tissues or remnants. Its aetiopathogenesis remains unclear; however, molecular analysis techniques have allowed researchers to progress in understanding its genetic basis. The high frequency of BRAF p.V600E as a main driver mutation in AM is well established; nevertheless, it is insufficient to explain its tumourigenesis. In this review, we aimed to integrate the current knowledge about the biology of AM and to describe the main genetic alterations reported, focusing on the findings of large-scale sequencing and gene expression profiling techniques. Current evidence shows that besides BRAF mutation and activation of the MAPK pathway, alterations in Hedgehog and Wnt/β-catenin pathway-related genes are also involved in AM pathogenesis. Recently, a tumour suppressor gene, KMT2D, has been reported as mutated by different research groups. The biological impact of these mutations in the pathogenesis of AM has yet to be elucidated. Further studies are needed to clarify the impact of these findings in the identification of novel biomarkers that could be useful for diagnosing, classifying, and molecular targeting this neoplasm.

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative diagnosis of oral ameloblastoma (AME) and odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) has been a challenge in dentistry. This study uses radiomics approaches and machine learning (ML) algorithms to characterize cone-beam CT (CBCT) image features for the preoperative differential diagnosis of AME and OKC and compares ML algorithms to expert radiologists to validate performance.
METHODS: We retrospectively collected the data of 326 patients with AME and OKC, where all diagnoses were confirmed by histopathologic tests. A total of 348 features were selected to train six ML models for differential diagnosis by a 5-fold cross-validation. We then compared the performance of ML-based diagnoses to those of radiologists.
RESULTS: Among the six ML models, XGBoost was effective in distinguishing AME and OKC in CBCT images, with its classification performance outperforming the other models. The mean precision, recall, accuracy, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.900, 0.807, 0.843, 0.841, and 0.872, respectively. Compared to the diagnostics by radiologists, ML-based radiomic diagnostics performed better.
CONCLUSIONS: Radiomic-based ML algorithms allow CBCT images of AME and OKC to be distinguished accurately, facilitating the preoperative differential diagnosis of AME and OKC.
CONCLUSIONS: ML and radiomic approaches with high-resolution CBCT images provide new insights into the differential diagnosis of AME and OKC.

Calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC), once called calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor, is classified under the category of odontogenic cysts. However, the proliferative capacity of the lesional epithelium and consistent nuclear β-catenin expression raise questions about its current classification. This study aimed to determine whether COC would be better classified as a neoplasm in the histologic and molecular context. Eleven odontogenic lesions diagnosed as COC or calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor were included in this study. The growth patterns of the lesional epithelium were analyzed histologically in all cases. β-catenin immunohistochemistry and molecular profiling using Sanger sequencing and whole-exome sequencing were performed in 10 cases. Of the 11 cases studied, histologic features reminiscent of so-called adenoid ameloblastoma were observed in 72.7% (8/11), and small islands of clear cells extended into the wall in 36.4% (4/11). Intraluminal and/or mural epithelial proliferation was found in 72.7% of the cases (8/11). Nuclear β-catenin expression was observed focally in all 10 cases studied, mainly highlighting epithelial cells forming morules and adjacent to dentinoid. CTNNB1 hotspot mutations were detected in 60.0% of the cases (6/10). All the remaining cases had frameshift mutations in tumor-suppressor genes involved in the WNT pathway, including APC and NEDD4L. Recurrent WNT pathway mutations leading to nuclear translocation of β-catenin and distinct epithelial growth patterns found in COC are the neoplastic features shared by its solid counterpart, dentinogenic ghost cell tumor, supporting its classification as a tumor rather than a cyst.