J-SIPHE

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:评估抗菌药物对细菌的选择压力对于促进抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)很重要。这项研究的目的是通过评估抗生素的使用(碳青霉烯[CBP]和保留CBP的治疗)随着时间的推移以及使用多中心数据对CBP抗性生物的检测状态来评估抗生素的选择压力。
    方法:在2017年至2020年在日本感染预防和医疗保健流行病学监测中注册的机构中,那些拥有使用CBP和CBP保留疗法(氟喹诺酮类药物[FQs],头孢美唑[CMZ],哌拉西林他唑巴坦[PIP/TAZ],氨苄西林-舒巴坦[ABPC/SBT],头孢曲松/头孢噻肟[CTRX/CTX],CAZ(头孢他啶),头孢吡肟[CFPM],和氨基糖苷类[AG])以及对CBP耐药的肠杆菌(CRE)和CBP耐药的铜绿假单胞菌(CRPA)的检测。还分析了基于酒精的手摩擦(ABHR)的使用情况。回归分析,包括多元回归分析,进行了评估趋势。评估了抗菌药物使用密度(AUD)与CRE和CRPA检出率的相关性。
    结果:在全国28个设施中,CBP,FQ,CAZ,AG,PIP/TAZ的使用量在3年内有所下降,而使用CMZ,ABPC/SBT,CTRX/CTX,CFPM,和ABHR以及CRE和CRPA检测率增加。平均AUD与CRE和CRPA检出率没有显着相关。多变量回归分析未显示每个AUD或ABHR与CRE或CRPA检测之间的任何显著相关性。
    结论:CBP和ABHR的使用呈下降和上升趋势,分别,而CRPA和CRE检出率呈逐渐上升趋势。相当低的CRE和CRPA检测率表明,随着趋势的过度变化,可能已经观察到了数量上的微小差异。需要进一步研究以评估选择压力,同时考虑ASP的特征和抵抗的潜在机制。
    BACKGROUND: Evaluating the selective pressure of antimicrobials on bacteria is important for promoting antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). The aim of this study was to assess the selective pressure of antimicrobials by evaluating their use (carbapenem [CBP] and CBP-sparing therapy) over time and the detection status of CBP-resistant organisms using multicenter data.
    METHODS: Among the facilities whose data were registered in the Japan Surveillance for Infection Prevention and Healthcare Epidemiology from 2017 to 2020, those that had data on the use of CBP and CBP-sparing therapy (fluoroquinolones [FQs], cefmetazole [CMZ], piperacillin-tazobactam [PIP/TAZ], ampicillin-sulbactam [ABPC/SBT], ceftriaxone/cefotaxime [CTRX/CTX], CAZ (ceftazidime), cefepime [CFPM], and aminoglycosides [AGs]) as well as on CBP-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and CBP-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) detection were included. Alcohol-based hand rubbing (ABHR) usage was also analyzed. Regression analyses, including multivariable regression analysis, were performed to evaluate trends. The association of antimicrobial use density (AUD) with CRE and CRPA detection rates was evaluated.
    RESULTS: In 28 facilities nationwide, CBP, FQ, CAZ, AG, and PIP/TAZ use decreased over the 3-year period, whereas the use of CMZ, ABPC/SBT, CTRX/CTX, CFPM, and ABHR as well as the rates of CRE and CRPA detection increased. The average AUD did not significantly correlate with CRE and CRPA detection rates. The multivariable regression analysis did not reveal any significant correlation between each AUD or ABHR and CRE or CRPA detection.
    CONCLUSIONS: CBP and ABHR use showed a decreasing and an increasing trend, respectively, while CRPA and CRE detection rates exhibited a gradual increase. The considerably low CRE and CRPA detection rates suggest that slight differences in numbers may have been observed as excessive trend changes. Further investigation is warranted to evaluate selective pressure while considering the characteristics of ASP and the mechanisms underlying resistance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:日本感染预防和医疗保健流行病学监测(J-SIPHE)系统汇总了与抗菌素耐药性(AMR)措施相关的信息。我们旨在使用J-SIPHE系统在时间序列分析中调查2013年至2021年大学医院抗生素使用与AMR之间的相关性。我们还研究了每个病房的这种相关性(行间分析)。
    方法:从J-SIPHE系统收集抗生素使用和耐药率的数据,除了每个病房的耐药率,这是根据为此系统准备的源数据计算得出的。
    结果:行间分析中,哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的使用与大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的哌拉西林/他唑巴坦耐药性呈正相关,和铜绿假单胞菌在两种分析中。在时间序列分析中,在阴沟肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌中,碳青霉烯的使用与美罗培南耐药性呈正相关。铜绿假单胞菌对亚胺培南/西司他丁的耐药性分析。在两种分析中,喹诺酮类药物的使用与大肠杆菌的左氧氟沙星耐药性呈正相关。以及肺炎克雷伯菌的行间分析。
    结论:这是第一项使用J-SIPHE系统和为此系统准备的数据,以时间序列和病房间分析的方式调查单家医院抗生素使用与AMR之间的相关性的研究。这表明该系统可能有助于促进AMR措施。
    OBJECTIVE: The Japan Surveillance for Infection Prevention and Healthcare Epidemiology (J-SIPHE) system aggregates information related to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) measures. We aimed to investigate the correlation between antibiotic use and AMR at a university hospital from 2013 to 2021 in a time series analysis using the J-SIPHE system. We also studied this correlation in each ward (inter-ward analysis).
    METHODS: Data on antibiotic use and resistance rates were collected from the J-SIPHE system, except for the resistance rate in each ward, which was calculated from the source data prepared for this system.
    RESULTS: Piperacillin/tazobactam use was positively correlated with piperacillin/tazobactam resistance in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in the inter-ward analysis, and in Pseudomonas aeruginosa in both analyses. Carbapenem use was positively correlated with meropenem resistance in Enterobacter cloacae in the time series analysis and in P. aeruginosa in both analyses, and imipenem/cilastatin resistance in P. aeruginosa in inter-ward analysis. Quinolone use was positively correlated with levofloxacin resistance in E. coli in both analyses, and in K. pneumoniae in inter-ward analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to investigate the correlation between antibiotic use and AMR at a single hospital in time series and inter-ward analyses using the J-SIPHE system and data prepared for this system, suggesting that this system may be useful for promoting AMR measures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,观察到感染趋势的变化。然而,很少有报道全面评估COVID-19早期阶段对细菌分离趋势的影响。
    方法:我们使用日本国家数据库提取了大约200个机构的住院患者的阳性培养物数量。结果是每月分离的10个物种与总分离株的比率。中断的时间序列分析在13个(2019年1月至2020年1月)和8个(2020年5月至2020年12月)月度数据点之间进行。
    结果:共涉及369,210个分离株。肺炎链球菌水平变化的差异,流感嗜血杆菌,化脓性链球菌显著下降0.272(95%置信区间[CI]:0.192-0.352),0.244(95CI:0.174-0.314),和0.324(95CI:0.06-0.589),分别。通过接触性感染传播的细菌,如金黄色葡萄球菌,没有减少。在所有物种中,斜率变化的差异并不显著。
    结论:在COVID-19的早期阶段后,通过液滴感染传播的分离细菌的比率立即下降并保持在相同水平。对增加COVID-19预防的意识和行为改变可能对预防细菌感染产生重大影响,尤其是液滴感染。
    During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a change in the trend of infections was observed. However, there are few reports comprehensively assessing the impact of the early phase of COVID-19 on the trend of bacteria isolated.
    We extracted the number of positive cultures of hospitalized patients for approximately 200 institutions using the Japanese national database. The outcome was the ratio of 10 species isolated in comparison to the total isolates for each month. Interrupted time-series analyses were conducted between 13 (from Jan-2019 to Jan-2020) and 8 (from May-2020 to Dec-2020) monthly data points.
    A total of 369,210 isolates were involved. Differences in the level change for Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pyogenes decreased significantly by 0.272 (95% confidence interval [CI]:0.192-0.352), 0.244 (95%CI:0.174-0.314), and 0.324 (95%CI:0.06-0.589), respectively. Bacteria transmitted by contact infection, such as Staphylococcus aureus, did not decrease. Differences in slope change were not significant in all species.
    The ratios of isolated bacteria transmitted by droplet infection decreased immediately after the early phase of COVID-19 and maintained the same level. The awareness and behavioral changes toward increased COVID-19 prevention might have a substantial impact on the prevention of bacterial infections, especially droplet infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于窄谱抗菌药物短缺对细菌敏感性影响的临床证据有限。我们的目的是确定日本大多数头孢唑林(CEZ)供应中断对病原体敏感性的影响,并分析CEZ短缺后这些变化持续了多长时间。
    我们使用日本全国传染病数据库进行了中断时间序列分析。我们分析了2018年至2020年52家大学医院CEZ短缺前后的每种病原体。2019年5月至11月被指定为CEZ短缺的实施期限。主要结果是对CEZ和其他抗菌药物的敏感性。在从设施中分离出的所有病原体中,我们确定了对CEZ敏感性测试的病原体。
    在确定的26种病原体中,对总共36,346株五种病原体(大肠杆菌,肺炎克雷伯菌,氧化克雷伯菌,变形杆菌,和金黄色葡萄球菌)。在四种低敏感性的革兰氏阴性病原体中,CEZ短缺后没有立即发生重大变化;然而,坡度变化每月显着增加1.29至2.69%,并在短缺后一年继续改善。关于金黄色葡萄球菌,在基线高度易感,即时变化和斜率均不显著。
    使用全国大型数据库进行的这种准实验分析显示,由于窄谱抗菌药物短缺而限制使用可能会导致随后一年的敏感性改善。结果表明,在全国范围内临时更换抗菌剂可能是有效的。
    The clinical evidence for the effect of narrow-spectrum antimicrobial shortages on bacterial susceptibility is limited. Our purposes were to determine the affects of the disruption of most of the cefazolin (CEZ) supply in Japan on the susceptibility of pathogens and to analyze how long these changes persisted after the shortage of CEZ.
    We performed an interrupted time series analysis using the Japanese Infectious Disease Nationwide database. We analyzed each pathogen before and after CEZ shortage in 52 university hospitals from 2018 to 2020. May to November 2019 was designated as the implementation term for CEZ shortage. The primary outcome was the susceptibility to CEZ and other antimicrobial agents. Amongst all pathogens isolated from facilities, we identified pathogens that were tested for susceptibility to CEZ.
    Of the 26 pathogens identified, analysis was performed on a total of 36,346 isolates of five pathogens (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Proteus mirabilis, and Staphylococcus aureus). Amongst four Gram-negative pathogens with low susceptibility, there were no significant immediate changes after the CEZ shortage; however, the slope change significantly increased by 1.29 to 2.69% per month and continued to improve one year after the shortage. Regarding S. aureus, which was highly susceptible at the baseline, neither immediate change nor slope was significant.
    This quasi-experimental analysis using a nationwide-large database revealed that restriction of use because of narrow-spectrum antimicrobial shortages may lead to improved susceptibility over the subsequent year. The results suggest that temporary switching of antimicrobial agents on a national scale could be effective.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号