Irradiation time

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是评估激光辅助办公室牙齿漂白治疗的有效性,采用二极管激光器(445nm)使用不同的功率和时间设置。收集了两百个人门牙,用于评估激光辅助牙齿漂白处理后牙齿的颜色变化(ΔE00)和牙齿白度指数(ΔWID)。根据激光输出功率(0.5-2W)和照射持续时间(10-60s)将样品分为25组(n=8)。使用分光光度计在三个时间点(24小时,治疗后1周和1个月)。三因素方差分析揭示了这种力量,激光照射的持续时间,和漂白处理后的测量时间显著影响ΔE00和ΔWID(p<0.05)。此外,与对照组相比,激光照射在所有应用功率下都增加了ΔE00和ΔWID(p<0.05),但是这种增加取决于照射的持续时间。当在0.5-1W下操作时间为50-60s时,激光照射显着增加ΔE00,当持续时间为30-60s时,1.5-2W显着增加。与所有功率的对照组相比,激光组的ΔWID显着更高,除了0.5W,当持续时间为50-60s时,其显着较高。研究结果可以帮助选择合适的功率设置和激光暴露持续时间,以达到最佳的美白效果,同时确保牙髓的安全性。
    The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a laser-assisted in-office tooth bleaching treatment, employing a diode laser (445 nm) using different power and time settings. Two hundred human incisors were collected for evaluating tooth color change (ΔΕ00) and whiteness index in dentistry (ΔWID) following laser-assisted tooth bleaching treatment. The specimens were distributed into 25 groups (n = 8) according to laser output power (0.5-2 W) and duration of irradiation (10-60 s) that was applied. ΔΕ00 and ΔWID were evaluated using a spectrophotometer at three points of time (24 h, 1 week and 1 month after treatments). Three-way ANOVA revealed that power, duration of laser irradiation, and time of measurement after bleaching treatments significantly affected both ΔΕ00 and ΔWID(p < 0.05). Furthermore, laser irradiation increased ΔΕ00 and ΔWID at all applied powers compared to the control group (p < 0.05), but this increase was dependent on the duration of irradiation. Laser irradiation significantly increased ΔΕ00 when the duration of operation was 50-60 s at 0.5-1 W, while at 1.5-2 W was significantly increased when the duration was 30-60 s. ΔWID was significant higher in the laser groups compared to the control group at all powers, except for 0.5 W where it was significant higher when the duration was 50-60 s. The outcomes of the study can help in selecting the suitable power settings and duration of laser exposure to achieve the optimal whitening results while ensuring the safety of the tooth pulp.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在确定对于两种不同T/N比的硼载体,在较短的照射时间内向深层病变提供足够剂量的最佳条件。以每个超热中子(FNR)的快中子剂量为参数,检查了具有Li或Be靶和MgF2或CaF2减速剂的束成形组件(BSA)的中子束的治疗深度和辐照时间。当T/N=3.61时,在FNR约为10×10-13Gycm2时,治疗深度几乎饱和。当FNR值约为10×10-13Gycm2时,具有Be靶和MgF2慢化剂的BSA的中子束治疗深度几乎与具有Be靶和CaF2慢化剂的BSA的中子束治疗深度相同。略大于具有Li靶和MgF2或CaF2慢化剂的BSA的中子束;此外,具有Be靶和MgF2慢化剂的BSA的中子束的辐照时间比具有Be靶和CaF2慢化剂的BSA的中子束的辐照时间短。当T/N=100时,BSA的中子束的治疗深度根据FNR变化很大,并且大于T/N=3.61的相应值。因此,我们得出的结论是,具有Be靶和MgF2慢化剂的BSA可产生FNR约为10×10-13Gycm2的中子束,对于在T/N=3.61时在较短的照射时间内向深层病变提供足够的剂量是最佳的,并且当T/N=100时,需要对FNR进行更严格的控制。
    This study aimed to identify the optimal conditions for delivering sufficient doses to deep-seated lesions within short irradiation times for two boron carriers of different T/N ratios. The therapeutic depth and irradiation time of a neutron beam for beam shaping assemblies (BSAs) with a Li or Be target and a MgF2 or CaF2 moderator were examined with the fast-neutron dose per epithermal neutron (FNR) as a parameter. When T/N = 3.61, the therapeutic depth was almost saturated at an FNR of about 10 × 10-13 Gy cm2; when the FNR value was about 10 × 10-13 Gy cm2, the therapeutic depth of the neutron beam for the BSA with a Be target and a MgF2 moderator was almost identical to that for the neutron beam for the BSA with a Be target and a CaF2 moderator, and slightly greater than those for the neutron beams for the BSAs with a Li target and a MgF2 or CaF2 moderator; moreover, the irradiation time of the neutron beam for the BSA with a Be target and a MgF2 moderator was shorter than that for the neutron beam for the BSA with a Be target and a CaF2 moderator. When T/N = 100, the therapeutic depths of the neutron beams for the BSAs varied greatly depending on the FNR, and were greater than the corresponding values for T/N = 3.61. We therefore concluded that the BSA with a Be target and a MgF2 moderator that produced a neutron beam with an FNR of about 10 × 10-13 Gy cm2 is optimal for delivering sufficient doses to deep-seated lesions in short irradiation times when T/N = 3.61, and stricter control over FNR is required when T/N = 100.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这项工作中,一系列的海胆状Ce(HCOO)3纳米团簇是通过一个容易和可扩展的微波辅助方法通过改变辐照时间合成,并研究了结构-性质关系。反应时间的优化是基于结构表征和电化学性能,Ce(HCOO)3-210s样品在1Ag-1的电流密度下显示出高达132Fg-1的比电容。这是由于最佳的介孔分层结构和结晶度有利于其导电性,提供丰富的Ce3+/Ce4+活性位点,促进电解质离子的运输。此外,制备了基于Ce(HCOO)3//AC的非对称超级电容器,提供14.78Whkg-1的最大能量密度和15168Wkg-1的相当高的功率密度。在3Ag-1下进行10,000次连续充放电循环后,ASC设备保留了其初始比电容的81.3%。这种海胆状Ce(HCOO)3的优异的综合电化学性能为实际的超级电容器应用提供了重要的前景。
    In this work, a series of urchin-like Ce(HCOO)3 nanoclusters were synthesized via a facile and scalable microwave-assisted method by varying the irradiation time, and the structure-property relationship was investigated. The optimization of the reaction time was performed based on structural characterizations and electrochemical performances, and the Ce(HCOO)3-210 s sample shows a specific capacitance as high as 132 F g-1 at a current density of 1 A g-1. This is due to the optimal mesoporous hierarchical structure and crystallinity that are beneficial to its conductivity, offering abundant Ce3+/Ce4+ active sites and facilitating the transportation of electrolyte ions. Moreover, an asymmetric supercapacitor based on Ce(HCOO)3//AC was fabricated, which delivers a maximum energy density of 14.78 Wh kg-1 and a considerably high power density of 15,168 W kg-1. After 10,000 continuous charge-discharge cycles at 3 A g-1, the ASC device retains 81.3% of its initial specific capacitance. The excellent comprehensive electrochemical performance of this urchin-like Ce(HCOO)3 offers significant promise for practical supercapacitor applications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:高能电子(VHEE)可以弥补低能电子的处理深度不足,同时在光子和质子之间提供中等剂量优势。结合FLASH和VHEE,对不同能量进行了定量比较,关于计划质量,剂量率分布(在PTV和OAR中),和治疗的总持续时间(开束时间)。
    方法:在2例患者(头部和肺部)中,我们通过蒙特卡罗模拟和基于PTV的优化算法,利用扫描笔形波束创建了治疗计划。Geant4用于模拟VHEE笔形光束,尺寸为0.3-5mm,由半峰全宽(FWHM)定义。在x和y方向(ISOURC=19)上具有高斯分布的单能束用作电子源。使用大规模非线性求解器(IPOPT)来计算最佳点权重。优化后,对治疗计划质量进行了不同能量之间的定量比较,剂量率分布(在PTV和OAR中),和总光束持续时间。
    结果:对于头部(80MeV,100MeV,和120MeV)和肺部病例(100MeV,120MeV,和140MeV),最小束强度需要为2.5×1011电子/s和9.375×1011电子/s,以允许>90%体积的PTV达到高于40Gy/s的平均剂量率(DADR)。在此光束强度下(部分剂量:10Gy),头部外壳的总辐照时间为5258.75ms(80MeV),5149.75ms(100MeV),4976.75ms(120MeV),包括扫描时间872.75ms。对于肺部病例,这个数字是1034.25ms(100MeV),981.55ms(120MeV),和928.15ms(140MeV),包括扫描时间298.75ms。更高能量的计划总是以更高的剂量率(在PTV和OAR两者中)执行,并且由此花费更少的递送时间(射束开启时间)。
    结论:该研究系统地研究了目前已知的VHEE放疗的FLASH参数,并成功地为其FLASH剂量率性能建立了基准参考。
    OBJECTIVE: Very high-energy electron (VHEE) can make up the insufficient treatment depth of the low-energy electron while offering an intermediate dosimetric advantage between photon and proton. Combining FLASH with VHEE, a quantitative comparison between different energies was made, with regard to plan quality, dose rate distribution (both in PTV and OAR), and total duration of treatment (beam-on time).
    METHODS: In two patient cases (head and lung), we created the treatment plans utilizing the scanning pencil beam via the Monte Carlo simulation and a PTV-based optimization algorithm. Geant4 was used to simulate VHEE pencil beams and sizes of 0.3-5 mm defined by the full width at half maximum (FWHM). Monoenergetic beams with Gaussian distribution in x and y directions (ISOURC = 19) were used as the source of electrons. A large-scale non-linear solver (IPOPT) was used to calculate the optimal spot weights. After optimization, a quantitative comparison between different energies was made regarding treatment plan quality, dose rate distribution (both in PTV and OAR), and total beam duration.
    RESULTS: For head (80 MeV, 100 MeV, and 120 MeV) and lung cases (100 MeV, 120 MeV, and 140 MeV), the minimum beam intensity needs to be ∼2.5 × 1011 electrons/s and ∼9.375 × 1011 electrons/s to allow > 90 % volume of PTV reaching the average dose rate (DADR) higher than 40 Gy/s. At this beam intensity (fraction dose: 10 Gy), the overall irradiation time for the head case is 5258.75 ms (80 MeV), 5149.75 ms (100 MeV), and 4976.75 ms (120 MeV), including scanning time 872.75 ms. For lung cases, this number is 1034.25 ms (100 MeV), 981.55 ms (120 MeV), and 928.15 ms (140 MeV), including scanning time 298.75 ms. The plan of higher energy always performs with a higher dose rate (both in PTV and OAR) and thereby costs less delivery time (beam-on time).
    CONCLUSIONS: The study systematically investigated the currently known FLASH parameters for VHEE radiotherapy and successfully established a benchmark reference for its FLASH dose rate performance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这项研究中,我们比较了三代断层疗法(Hi-ART,Tomo-HD,和Radixact)。这是为了研究断层治疗系统在剂量分布到计划目标体积和危险器官方面的差异,和照射时间。材料与方法采用CT及轮廓资料对7例直肠癌术前放疗病例进行治疗计划。使用的轮廓信息是计划目标体积,有危险的器官被设定为膀胱和身体。使用临床环境中实际使用的参数在每个计划站进行优化。规定的辐射剂量为25Gy,分为五个部分,并在等剂量线进行归一化,覆盖95%的规划目标量。结果3种模型在规划目标体积上无显著差异。同时,Hi-ART在体内D50%时的剂量明显高于Tomo-HD和Radixact。与Hi-ART/Tomo-HD相比,Radixact的照射时间缩短了约15%。结论断层治疗仪的计划目标体积剂量分布无差异。与Hi-ART和Tomo-HD相比,Radixact需要的时间明显更短。
    Aim In this study, we compared three generations of tomotherapy (Hi-ART, Tomo-HD, and Radixact). This is to study the difference among tomotherapy systems in terms of dose distribution to planning target volume and organs at risk, and irradiation time.  Materials and methods The treatment planning CT and contour information used were seven cases of rectum cancer pre-operative irradiation. The contour information used was the planning target volume, and the organs at risk were set as the bladder and body. Optimization was conducted at each planning station using the parameters that were actually used in a clinical setting. The prescribed radiation dose was 25 Gy in five fractions and normalized at the isodose line, covering 95% of the planning target volume. Results There were no significant differences in planning target volume among the three models. Meanwhile, Hi-ART had a significantly higher dose than Tomo-HD and Radixact at body D50%. Radixact shortened the irradiation time by approximately 15% compared to Hi-ART/Tomo-HD. Conclusion Planning target volume dose distribution of tomotherapy devices was not different. Radixact required a significantly shorter time than Hi-ART and Tomo-HD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文的目的是研究光聚合过程中控制三种类型的牙科复合材料-通用(UC)的显微硬度的因素的影响,散装(BC),可流动(FC)。制备具有不同厚度的圆柱形试样并进行光固化。光强度的意义,辐照时间,通过实验设计评估维氏显微硬度的层厚,方差分析,和回归分析。发现影响三种复合材料顶表面显微硬度的主要因素是光照强度。第二个因素是UC和FC的层厚度,而对于BC来说,这是固化时间。第三个因素是前两种复合材料的固化时间和整体填充的层厚度。影响底面显微硬度的因素的重要性对于UC和FC是相同的,但与BC不同。前两种复合材料的主要因素是层厚度,其次是固化时间和光强度。对于批量填充,固化时间是主要因素,光强度是第二,层厚度是最后的。在本研究中首次揭示了影响所研究复合材料顶面和底面显微硬度的因素的不同意义。
    The aim of the present paper is to investigate the influence of factors in photopolymerization process that govern microhardness of three types of dental composites-universal (UC), bulk-fill (BC), and flowable (FC). Cylindrical specimens with different thicknesses are made and light cured. The significance of light intensity, irradiation time, and layer thickness on Vickers microhardness is evaluated by experimental design, analysis of variance, and regression analysis. It is found that the main factor influencing the microhardness on the top surface of the three composites is light intensity. The second factor is layer thickness for the UC and FC, while for BC, it is curing time. The third factor is curing time for the first two composites and layer thickness for bulk-fill. The significance of factors\' influence on the microhardness of the bottom surface is the same for the UC and FC, but different for BC. The main factor for the first two composites is layer thickness, followed by curing time and light intensity. For bulk-fill, curing time is main factor, light intensity is second, and layer thickness is last. Different significance of factors influencing the microhardness on top and bottom surfaces of investigated composites is revealed for the first time in the present study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用Halcyon保留海马的全脑放疗,一种专用于体积调制电弧治疗的仪器,到目前为止还没有研究过;因此,我们的目的是检查它是否符合RTOG0933标准。基于此,我们比较了Halcyon和Tomotherapy,它还使用了O型环型直线加速器。方法:这种探索性,实验性的,回顾性研究在头部区域使用5组计算机断层扫描图像来调查计划目标体积,海马剂量,和照射时间。从1到4弧进行计算,以确定Halcyon计划中的最佳弧数,与Tomotherapy相比。结果:1弧的Halcyon无法满足肿瘤放射治疗组0933的标准。有两个弧,1例海马区不满足条件Dmax<16Gy。由于3和4个弧之间没有显着差异,包括照射时间,3条弧线被认为是最好的。我们将3弧的Halcyon与断层疗法进行了比较,发现断层疗法在D98%时不如Halcyon;但是,在其他剂量参数方面优于Halcyon。相比之下,Halcyon的照射时间非常优越,Halcyon的照射时间是Tomotherapy的1/9。结论:Halcyon可有效处理保留海马的全脑放疗。我们认为3弧辐射最适合此程序。尽管Halcyon在不包括D98%的剂量分布方面不如Tomtherapy,在辐照时间方面,它绝对优越。
    Objective: Hippocampus-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy using Halcyon, an instrument dedicated to volumetric modulated arc therapy, has not been studied till date; hence, we aimed to examine whether it can meet the RTOG0933 criteria. Based on this, we compared Halcyon to Tomotherapy, which also uses an O-ring-type linear accelerator. Methods: This exploratory, experimental, and retrospective study used 5 sets of computed tomography images in the head area to investigate the planning target volume, hippocampal doses, and irradiation time. Calculations were performed from 1 to 4 arcs to determine the optimal number of arcs in the Halcyon plan, which were compared to those of Tomotherapy. Results: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0933 criteria could not be satisfied in Halcyon with 1 arc. With 2 arcs, the condition Dmax<16 Gy was not satisfied for 1 case in the hippocampus. Since there were no significant differences between 3 and 4 arcs, including the irradiation time, 3 arcs were considered the best. We compared Halcyon at 3 arcs with tomotherapy and found that tomotherapy was inferior to Halcyon at D98%; however, it was superior to Halcyon in other dose parameters. In contrast, the irradiation time in Halcyon was overwhelmingly superior, with the irradiation time for Halcyon being 1/ninth the time for Tomotherapy. Conclusion: Halcyon was effective in handling hippocampus-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy. We believe that 3-arc radiation is best suited for this procedure. Although Halcyon was inferior to Tomotherapy in terms of dose distribution excluding D98%, it was overwhelmingly superior in terms of irradiation time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:光动力疗法(PDT)是涉及染料的治疗模式,所述染料通过在氧的存在下暴露于特定波长的光以形成引起对微生物的局部损伤的氧物种而被激活。
    目的:确定基于赤藓红的PDT对体内形成的牙菌斑生物膜的最有效的杀菌孵育和照射时间。
    方法:一项随机对照研究;18名健康的成年参与者佩戴带有人类牙釉质板的口内矫治器,在两个单独的时间段内收集牙菌斑样本,每个时间段为两周,用于第1臂和第2臂。在不同的实验条件下用PDT处理这些积累的牙菌斑样品。在arm-1和arm-2中分别使用光敏剂(赤霉酸)的孵育时间为15分钟和2分钟,然后光辐射15分钟(连续)或作为分割剂量(5×30秒)。治疗后,比较了不同组之间细菌总数减少的百分比.此外,使用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)和LIVE/DEAD®BacLight™细菌活力试剂盒观察PDT对体内形成的生物膜的影响。
    结果:当使用2分钟或15分钟的孵育时间并施加15分钟的连续光照时,发现体内形成的生物膜的总细菌计数百分比(〜93-95%)显着降低。虽然当应用分馏光时,与2分钟的孵育时间(〜64%)相比,使用15分钟的孵育时间(〜91%)的细胞死亡更多。CLSM结果支持这些发现。
    结论:通过减少PDT的整体治疗时间来改善PDT的临床应用,在杀死体内形成的牙菌斑生物膜方面似乎是有希望和有效的。
    BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a treatment modality involving a dye that is activated by exposure to light of a specific wavelength in the presence of oxygen to form oxygen species causing localised damage to microorganisms.
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the most effective bactericidal incubation and irradiation times of erythrosine-based PDT on in vivo-formed dental plaque biofilms.
    METHODS: A randomised controlled study; 18-healthy adult participants wearing intraoral appliances with human enamel slabs to collect dental plaque samples in two separate periods of two weeks each for use in arm-1 and arm-2. These accumulated dental plaque samples were treated with PDT under different experimental conditions. Incubation times with photosensitiser (erythrosine) of 15 min and 2 min were used in arm-1 and arm-2, respectively, followed by light irradiation for either 15 min (continuous) or as a fractionated dose (5 × 30 sec). Following treatment, percentage reductions of total bacterial counts were compared between the different groups. In addition, confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and LIVE/DEAD® BacLight™ Bacterial Viability Kit were used to visualise the effect of PDT on in vivo-formed biofilms.
    RESULTS: Significant reductions in the percentage of total bacterial counts (~93-95%) of in vivo-formed biofilms were found when using either 2 min or 15min incubation times and applying 15 min continuous light. Although when applying fractionated light, there was more cell death when 15 min incubation time was used (~ 91%) compared with the 2 min incubation time (~ 64%). CLSM results supported these findings.
    CONCLUSIONS: Improving the clinical usefulness of PDT by reducing its overall treatment time seems to be promising and effective in killing in vivo-formed dental plaque biofilms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Background: To identify the most effective time procedure for irradiation to prevent possible harmful pulp temperature rises during diode laser (DL) as an adjunct to scaling and root planning (SRP) treatment. Methods: One hundred fifty freshly extracted human teeth (30 molars, 30 premolars, 30 canines, 30 upper incisors, and 30 lower incisors) were irradiated using a 940-nm DL with a power output at 0.8 W and exposure time of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 sec per specimen. The thermocouple was used to measure intrapulpal temperature. As an addition, the impact of dark deposits on the root surface was investigated for the intrapulpal temperature rise. The threshold value of 5.6°C is predetermined to damage the pulp. Temperature variations were measured at every 10 sec for five different types of teeth, and statistical analysis was performed. Results: Despite large differences between tooth types, the observed temperature increases for all tooth types were below the threshold of 5.6°C in 20 sec. Dark deposits on the tooth surface reduced the reliable working time of DLs (p < 0.01). Conclusions: DLs as an adjunct to SRP treatment at 0.8 W in molars, premolars, canine, upper incisors, and lower incisors for 42, 37, 38, 27, and 21 sec, respectively, generate acceptable temperature rises for pulp but should be changed as 39, 21, 26, 23, and 13 sec, respectively, in the presence of dark deposits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Kyphoplasty is an established method of treating osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures. In recent years, several techniques to enhance the efficiency and outcomes of this surgery have been developed and implemented in clinical practice. In the present study, we assess the impact of two new access instruments on overall operation time and the administered dose area product in comparison with the standard access instrument used in our clinical practice. The two newer comparator devices have been designed with the intention of streamlining intraoperative workflow by omitting several procedural steps.
    METHODS: This was a single-center prospective randomized trial investigating three distinct access instruments compatible with the Joline Allevo balloon catheter system. Specifically, two newer access devices marketed as being able to enhance surgical workflow (Joline RapidIntro Vertebra Access Device with a trocar tip and Joline SpeedTrack Vertebra Introducer Device with a short, tapered tip) were compared with the older, established Joline Vertebra Access Device from the same firm. Consecutive eligible and consenting patients scheduled to undergo kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture refractory to conservative, medical treatment during the period May 2012-August 2015 were randomized to receive surgery using one of the three devices. Besides the use of the trial instruments, all other preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative care was delivered according to standard practice.
    RESULTS: 91 kyphoplasties were performed on 65 unique patients during the study period. The median operation time across the three groups was 29 min (IQR 22.5-35.5) with a median irradiation time of 2.3 min (IQR 1.2-3.4). The median patient age was 74 years (IQR 66-80). The groups did not significantly differ in terms of age (p = 0.878), sex (p = 0.37), T score (p = 0.718), BMI (p = 0.285) or the applied volume of cement (p = 0.792). There was no significant difference between the treatment groups with respect to surgical duration (p = 0.157) or dose area product (p = 0.913).
    CONCLUSIONS: Although use of the two newer-generation access instruments were designed to involve fewer unique steps per operation, their use was not associated with reduction in surgical duration, irradiation time or dose area product administered compared with the older, established vertebral access device. Care should be taken to evaluate the impact of new instruments on key surgery-related parameters such as surgical duration and radiation exposure and claims made about new instruments should be assessed a structured fashion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号