Intravoxel incoherent motion

体素内不连贯运动
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在高检查者间可靠性的前提下,确定多重扩散加权成像(DWI)技术对肝纤维化(HF)分期的诊断效率。
    方法:招募活检证实为HF的参与者,并将其分为早期HF(EHF)和晚期HF(AHF)组;健康志愿者(HVs)作为对照。两名检查者使用IVIM-DWI和扩散峰度成像(DKI)模型分析了体素内不相干运动(IVIM)。体素内不连贯运动-DWI,DKI,和扩散张量成像参数的组内相关系数(ICC)≥0.6被用来创建回归模型:HV与EHF和EHFvs.AHF。
    结果:我们注册了48辆SUV,59例EHF患者,38名AHF患者。意思是,径向,和轴向峰度;分数各向异性;平均值,径向,和轴向扩散系数;α表现出优异的可靠性(ICC:0.80-0.98)。峰度的分数各向异性,f,和表观扩散系数表现出良好的可靠性(ICC:0.69-0.92)。真实(0.58-0.67),伪-(0.27-0.76),分布扩散系数(0.58-0.67)显示出较低的可靠性。在HVs与(与)EHF模型,α(p=0.008)和ADC(p=0.011)呈现统计学差异(曲线下面积[AUC]:0.710)。在EHF与AHF模型,α(p=0.04)和分布扩散系数(p=0.02)存在显着差异(AUC:0.758)。
    结论:在高考试者信度的前提下,DWI和IVIM导出的拉伸指数模型参数可以帮助阶段HF。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic efficiencies of multiple diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) techniques for hepatic fibrosis (HF) staging under the premise of high inter-examiner reliability.
    METHODS: Participants with biopsy-confirmed HF were recruited and divided into the early HF (EHF) and advanced HF (AHF) groups; healthy volunteers (HVs) served as controls. Two examiners analyzed intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) using the IVIM-DWI and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) models. Intravoxel incoherent motion-DWI, DKI, and diffusion tensor imaging parameters with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of ≥0.6 were used to create regression models: HVs vs. EHF and EHF vs. AHF.
    RESULTS: We enrolled 48 HVs, 59 EHF patients, and 38 AHF patients. Mean, radial, and axial kurtosis; fractional anisotropy; mean, radial, and axial diffusivity; and α exhibited excellent reliability (ICCs: 0.80-0.98). Fractional anisotropy of kurtosis, f, and apparent diffusion coefficient showed good reliability (ICCs: 0.69-0.92). The real (0.58-0.67), pseudo- (0.27-0.76), and distributed diffusion coefficients (0.58-0.67) showed low reliability. In the HVs versus (vs.) EHF model, α (p=0.008) and ADC (p=0.011) presented statistical differences (area under curve [AUC]: 0.710). In the EHF vs. AHF model, α (p=0.04) and distributed diffusion coefficient (p=0.02) presented significant differences (AUC: 0.758).
    CONCLUSIONS: Under the premise of high inter-examiner reliability, DWI and IVIM-derived stretched-exponential model parameters may help stage HF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究的目的是前瞻性地研究使用整合的切片特异性动态匀场(iShim)技术对原发性食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)分期和预测ESCC淋巴结转移的诊断表现。
    方法:2016年4月至2019年4月前瞻性纳入63例ESCC患者。术前在3.0TMRI系统上使用iSim技术(b=0、25、50、75、100、200、400、600、800s/mm2)进行MR和IVIM。原发性肿瘤表观扩散系数(ADC)和IVIM参数,包括真实扩散系数(D),伪扩散系数(D*),假扩散分数(f)由两个独立的放射科医生测量。D的差异,D*,评估不同T和N阶段的f和ADC值。计算了组内相关系数(ICC),以评估两个读者之间的观察者之间的一致性。D的诊断性能,D*,使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定ESCC原发肿瘤分期和淋巴结转移预测中的f和ADC值。
    结果:对于IVIM参数和ADC,观察者间的共识非常好(D:ICC=0.922;D*:ICC=0.892;f:ICC=0.948;ADC:ICC=0.958)。ADC,D,T1+T2组的D*和f值明显高于T3+T4a组[ADC:(2.55±0.43)×10-3mm2/svs.(2.27±0.40)×10-3mm2/s,t=2.670,P=0.010;D:(1.82±0.39)×10-3mm2/svs.(1.53±0.33)×10-3mm2/s,t=3.189,P=0.002;D*:46.45(30.30,55.53)×10-3mm2/svs.32.30(18.60,40.95)×10-3mm2/s,z=-2.408,P=0.016;f:0.45±0.12vs.0.37±0.12,t=2.538,P=0.014]。ADC,淋巴结阳性(N+)组的D值和f值明显低于淋巴结阴性(N0)组[ADC:(2.10±0.33)×10-3mm2/svs.(2.55±0.40)×10-3mm2/s,t=-4.564,P<0.001;D:(1.44±0.30)×10-3mm2/svs.(1.78±0.37)×10-3mm2/s,t=-3.726,P<0.001;f:0.32±0.10vs.0.45±0.11,t=-4.524,P<0.001]。D的组合,在区分组T1+T2和组T3+T4a时,D*和f产生最高的曲线下面积(AUC)(0.814)。D结合f在鉴定ESCC的N+组和N0组时提供了最高的诊断性能(AUC=0.849)。
    结论:IVIM可以作为一种有效的功能成像技术来评估原发肿瘤的术前分期和预测ESCC淋巴结转移的存在。
    BACKGROUND: The aim of this research is to prospectively investigate the diagnostic performance of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) using the integrated slice-specific dynamic shimming (iShim) technique in staging primary esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and predicting presence of lymph node metastases from ESCC.
    METHODS: Sixty-three patients with ESCC were prospectively enrolled from April 2016 to April 2019. MR and IVIM using iShim technique (b = 0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800 s/mm2) were performed on 3.0T MRI system before operation. Primary tumour apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and IVIM parameters, including true diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*), pseudodiffusion fraction (f) were measured by two independent radiologists. The differences in D, D*, f and ADC values of different T and N stages were assessed. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to evaluate the interobserver agreement between two readers. The diagnostic performances of D, D*, f and ADC values in primary tumour staging and prediction of lymph node metastasis of ESCC were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
    RESULTS: The inter-observer consensus was excellent for IVIM parameters and ADC (D: ICC = 0.922; D*: ICC = 0.892; f: ICC = 0.948; ADC: ICC = 0.958). The ADC, D, D* and f values of group T1 + T2 were significantly higher than those of group T3 + T4a [ADC: (2.55 ± 0.43) ×10- 3 mm2/s vs. (2.27 ± 0.40) ×10- 3 mm2/s, t = 2.670, P = 0.010; D: (1.82 ± 0.39) ×10- 3 mm2/s vs. (1.53 ± 0.33) ×10- 3 mm2/s, t = 3.189, P = 0.002; D*: 46.45 (30.30,55.53) ×10- 3 mm2/s vs. 32.30 (18.60,40.95) ×10- 3 mm2/s, z=-2.408, P = 0.016; f: 0.45 ± 0.12 vs. 0.37 ± 0.12, t = 2.538, P = 0.014]. The ADC, D and f values of the lymph nodes-positive (N+) group were significantly lower than those of lymph nodes-negative (N0) group [ADC: (2.10 ± 0.33) ×10- 3 mm2/s vs. (2.55 ± 0.40) ×10- 3 mm2/s, t=-4.564, P < 0.001; D: (1.44 ± 0.30) ×10- 3 mm2/s vs. (1.78 ± 0.37) ×10- 3 mm2/s, t=-3.726, P < 0.001; f: 0.32 ± 0.10 vs. 0.45 ± 0.11, t=-4.524, P < 0.001]. The combination of D, D* and f yielded the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.814) in distinguishing group T1 + T2 from group T3 + T4a. D combined with f provided the highest diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.849) in identifying group N + and group N0 of ESCC.
    CONCLUSIONS: IVIM may be used as an effective functional imaging technique to evaluate preoperative stage of primary tumour and predict presence of lymph node metastases from ESCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨体素内不相干运动(IVIM)和增强T2*加权血管造影(ESWAN)联合应用对肝细胞癌(HCC)微血管侵犯(MVI)术前预测的价值。
    76例经病理证实的HCC患者,分为MVI阳性组(n=26)和MVI阴性组(n=50)。常规MRI,IVIM,和ESWAN序列进行。将三个感兴趣区域(ROI)放置在D上病变的最大轴向切片上,D*,和从IVIM序列导出的f图,和从ESWAN序列导出的R2*映射,还自动测量了来自ESWAN序列的相位图的肿瘤内敏感性信号(ITSS)。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线以评估预测MVI的能力。单因素和多因素logistic回归用于筛选临床和影像学信息中的独立风险预测因子。Delong检验用于比较曲线下面积(AUC)之间的差异。
    MVI阴性组的D和D*值均明显高于MVI阳性组(P=0.038,P=0.023),MVI阴性组分别为0.892×10-3(0.760×10-3,1.303×10-3)mm2/s和0.055(0.025,0.100)mm2/s,MVI阳性组分别为0.591×10-3(0.372×10-3,0.824×10-3)mm2/s和0.028(0.006,0.050)mm2/s,分别。MVI阴性组的R2*和ITSS值明显低于MVI阳性组(P=0.034,P=0.005),在MVI阴性组中分别为29.290(23.117,35.228)Hz和0.146(0.086,0.236),MVI阳性组为43.696(34.914,58.083)Hz和0.199(0.155,0.245),分别。经过单变量和多变量分析,只有法新社(赔率比,0.183;95%CI,0.041~0.823;P=0.027)是预测MVI状态的独立危险因素。AFP的AUC,D,D*,R2*,预测MVI的ITSS分别为0.652、0.739、0.707、0.798和0.657。IVIM的AUC(D+D*),ESWAN(R2*+ITSS),预测MVI的组合(D+D*+R2*+ITSS)分别为0.772、0.800和,分别为0.855。当IVIM与ESWAN结合使用时,性能得到改善,灵敏度为73.1%,特异性为92.0%(临界值:0.502),AUC明显高于AFP(P=0.001),D(P=0.038),D*(P=0.023),R2*(P=0.034),和ITSS(P=0.005)。
    IVIM和ESWAN参数在预测HCC患者MVI方面显示出良好的疗效。IVIM和ESWAN的组合可能有助于临床术前对MVI的无创性预测。
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the value of the combined application of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and enhanced T2*-weighted angiography (ESWAN) for preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
    UNASSIGNED: 76 patients with pathologically confirmed HCC were retrospectively enrolled and divided into the MVI-positive group (n=26) and MVI-negative group (n=50). Conventional MRI, IVIM, and ESWAN sequences were performed. Three region of interests (ROIs) were placed on the maximum axial slice of the lesion on D, D*, and f maps derived from IVIM sequence, and R2* map derived from ESWAN sequence, and intratumoral susceptibility signal (ITSS) from the phase map derived from ESWAN sequence was also automatically measured. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to evaluate the ability for predicting MVI. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to screen independent risk predictors in clinical and imaging information. The Delong\'s test was used to compare the differences between the area under curves (AUCs).
    UNASSIGNED: The D and D* values of MVI-negative group were significantly higher than those of MVI-positive group (P=0.038, and P=0.023), which in MVI-negative group were 0.892×10-3 (0.760×10-3, 1.303×10-3) mm2/s and 0.055 (0.025, 0.100) mm2/s, and in MVI-positive group were 0.591×10-3 (0.372×10-3, 0.824×10-3) mm2/s and 0.028 (0.006, 0.050)mm2/s, respectively. The R2* and ITSS values of MVI-negative group were significantly lower than those of MVI-positive group (P=0.034, and P=0.005), which in MVI-negative group were 29.290 (23.117, 35.228) Hz and 0.146 (0.086, 0.236), and in MVI-positive group were 43.696 (34.914, 58.083) Hz and 0.199 (0.155, 0.245), respectively. After univariate and multivariate analyses, only AFP (odds ratio, 0.183; 95% CI, 0.041-0.823; P = 0.027) was the independent risk factor for predicting the status of MVI. The AUCs of AFP, D, D*, R2*, and ITSS for prediction of MVI were 0.652, 0.739, 0.707, 0.798, and 0.657, respectively. The AUCs of IVIM (D+D*), ESWAN (R2*+ITSS), and combination (D+D*+R2*+ITSS) for predicting MVI were 0.772, 0.800, and, 0.855, respectively. When IVIM combined with ESWAN, the performance was improved with a sensitivity of 73.1% and a specificity of 92.0% (cut-off value: 0.502) and the AUC was significantly higher than AFP (P=0.001), D (P=0.038), D* (P=0.023), R2* (P=0.034), and ITSS (P=0.005).
    UNASSIGNED: The IVIM and ESWAN parameters showed good efficacy in prediction of MVI in patients with HCC. The combination of IVIM and ESWAN may be useful for noninvasive prediction of MVI before clinical operation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:准确评估胃癌(GC)的肿瘤浸润深度对于选择合适的新辅助化疗(NAC)患者至关重要。当前的问题是,对于放射科医生来说,在GC中T1-2和T3-4阶段病例之间的术前区分始终是极具挑战性的。
    方法:将129例GC患者分为训练组(91例)和验证组(38例)。手术标本的病理学将患者分为T1-2和T3-4期。评估IVIM-DWI和MRI形态学特征,并开发了多模态列线图。MRI形态学模型,IVIM-DWI模型,并采用logistic回归建立组合模型。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估其有效性,校正曲线,决策曲线分析(DCA),和临床影响曲线(CIC)。
    结果:组合列线图,整合术前IVIM-DWI参数(D值)和MRI形态学特征(最大肿瘤厚度,浆膜外侵入),在训练和验证队列中,曲线下面积(AUC)值最高,分别为0.901和0.883,分别。在任一队列中,IVIM-DWI和MRI形态学模型的AUC之间均未观察到显着差异(训练:0.796vs.0.835,p=0.593;验证:0.794vs.0.766,p=0.79)。
    结论:多模态列线图,结合IVIM-DWI参数和MRI形态学特征,作为一种评估GC肿瘤浸润深度的有前途的工具,可能指导选择新辅助化疗(NAC)治疗的合适候选人。
    BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of the depth of tumor invasion in gastric cancer (GC) is vital for the selection of suitable patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Current problem is that preoperative differentiation between T1-2 and T3-4 stage cases in GC is always highly challenging for radiologists.
    METHODS: A total of 129 GC patients were divided into training (91 cases) and validation (38 cases) cohorts. Pathology from surgical specimens categorized patients into T1-2 and T3-4 stages. IVIM-DWI and MRI morphological characteristics were evaluated, and a multimodal nomogram was developed. The MRI morphological model, IVIM-DWI model, and combined model were constructed using logistic regression. Their effectiveness was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and clinical impact curves (CIC).
    RESULTS: The combined nomogram, integrating preoperative IVIM-DWI parameters (D value) and MRI morphological characteristics (maximum tumor thickness, extra-serosal invasion), achieved the highest area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.901 and 0.883 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the AUCs of the IVIM-DWI and MRI morphological models in either cohort (training: 0.796 vs. 0.835, p = 0.593; validation: 0.794 vs. 0.766, p = 0.79).
    CONCLUSIONS: The multimodal nomogram, combining IVIM-DWI parameters and MRI morphological characteristics, emerges as a promising tool for assessing tumor invasion depth in GC, potentially guiding the selection of suitable candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们研究了简化的体素内不相干运动(IVIM)成像对活动期骶髂关节(SIJ)滑膜炎的诊断准确性。
    方法:根据国际关节炎协会评估标准,在2020年11月至2022年1月进行的这项回顾性研究中,纳入了46例活动性骶髂关节炎患者的86例SIJs。基于T1加权后钆图像,SIJs分为两组:滑膜炎阳性(SIP)(n=28)和滑膜炎阴性(SIN)(n=58)。SIJ空间中的滑膜区域由具有不同放射学专业知识水平的两名放射科医师独立且盲目地检查炎症的存在。使用四个b值,表观扩散系数(ADC)=ADC(0,800),简化的3TIVIM方法参数真实扩散系数(D1)=ADC(50,800),D=ADC(400,800),f1=f(0,50,800),f2=f(0,400,800),伪扩散系数(D*)=D*(0,50,400,800),ADClow=ADC(0,50),和ADCdiff=ADClow-D为每个患者逐个体素生成。比较了SIN和SIP关节处的IVIM和ADC参数。
    结果:与SIN区(1.02±0.16×10-3mm2/s)相比,SIP区(1.23±0.34×10-3mm2/s)的D参数显着增加(P=0.004)。相反,与SIN区(16.19±4.58×10-3mm2/s)相比,SIP区(21.78±3.77×10-3mm2/s)的D*参数显着降低(P<0.001)。当选择1.11×10-3mm2/s的最佳截止值时,D值的敏感性为71%,特异性为72%[曲线下面积(AUC):0.716].当选择最佳截止值为21.06×10-3mm2/s时,对D*值的灵敏度为78.6%,特异性为79.3%(AUC:0.829)。f1、f2D*的类间相关系数非常好,D,和ADCdiff,好的ADClow和D1,但合理的ADC。
    结论:通过简化的IVIM方法,仅使用四个b值就可以高灵敏度和特异性地评估SIJ中滑膜炎症的存在,而无需造影剂。
    结论:IVIM成像是一种技术,使我们能够在不使用造影剂的情况下获得对组织灌注的见解,利用扩散加权图像。在这项研究中,第一次,我们证明了使用IVIM检测SIJ滑膜炎症的潜力,特别是通过伪扩散(D*)参数,不需要造影剂。
    OBJECTIVE: We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of simplified intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging for detecting synovial inflammation in the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) in a population with active sacroiliitis.
    METHODS: In accordance with the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society criteria, 86 SIJs of 46 patients with active sacroiliitis were included in this retrospective study conducted between November 2020 and January 2022. Based on T1-weighted post-gadolinium images, the SIJs were divided into two groups: synovial inflammation positive (SIP) (n = 28) and synovial inflammation negative (SIN) (n = 58). Synovial areas in the SIJ space were independently and blindly reviewed for the presence of inflammation by two radiologists with differing levels of expertise in radiology. Using four b values, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)= ADC (0, 800) and the simplified 3T IVIM method parameters true diffusion coefficient (D1)= ADC (50, 800), D= ADC (400, 800), f1= f (0, 50, 800), f2= f (0, 400, 800), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*)= D* (0, 50, 400, 800), ADClow = ADC (0, 50), and ADCdiff= ADClow - D were generated voxel by voxel for each patient. The IVIM and ADC parameters at the SIN and SIP joints were compared.
    RESULTS: The D parameter was significantly increased in SIP areas (1.23 ± 0.34 × 10-3 mm2/s) compared with SIN areas (1.02 ± 0.16 × 10-3 mm2/s) (P = 0.004). Conversely, the D* parameter was significantly decreased in SIP areas (21.78 ± 3.77 × 10-3 mm2/s) compared with SIN areas (16.19 ± 4.58 × 10-3 mm2/s) (P < 0.001). When the optimal cut-off value of 1.11 × 10-3 mm2/s was selected, the sensitivity for the D value was 71% and the specificity was 72% [area under the curve (AUC): 0.716)]. When the optimal cut-off value of 21.06 × 10-3 mm2/s was selected, the sensitivity for the D* value was 78.6%, and the specificity was 79.3% (AUC: 0.829). The interclass correlation coefficient was excellent for f1, f2 D*, D, and ADCdiff, good for ADClow and D1, but reasonable for ADC.
    CONCLUSIONS: The presence of synovial inflammation in the SIJ can be evaluated with high sensitivity and specificity using only four b values through the simplified IVIM method without the need for a contrast agent.
    CONCLUSIONS: IVIM imaging is a technique that allows us to gain insights into tissue perfusion without the administration of contrast agents, utilizing diffusion-weighted images. In this study, for the first time, we demonstrated the potential of detecting synovial inflammation in the SIJ using IVIM, specifically through the pseudodiffusion (D*) parameter, without the need for contrast agents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文探讨了在分析拟合显示限制的情况下,用于分析扩散核磁共振成像(dMRI)模型的不同机器学习(ML)算法。它回顾了用于dMRI分析的各种ML技术,并评估了它们在不同b值范围数据集上的性能,将它们与分析方法进行比较。
    标准配合后,四组扩散加权核磁共振图像用于训练/测试各种ML算法,以预测扩散系数(D),伪扩散系数(D*),灌注分数(f),和峰度(K)。ML分类算法,包括树外分类器(ETC),逻辑回归,C-支持向量,额外的梯度提升,和多层感知器(MLP),用于确定扩散参数的存在(D,D*,f,和K)在单个体素内。回归算法,包括线性回归,多项式回归,脊,套索,随机森林(RF),弹性网,和支持向量机,用于估计扩散参数的值。使用准确性(ACC)评估性能,曲线下面积(AUC)测试,和交叉验证均方根误差(RMSECV)。还评估了计算时机。
    ETC和MLP是最好的分类器,分别为94.1%和91.7%,分别,ACC测试和98.7%和96.3%的AUC测试。对于参数估计,RF算法产生最准确的结果RMSECV百分比为:D的8.39%,D*为3.57%,f为4.52%,和K的3.53%。在训练阶段之后,ML方法显示了计算时间的大幅减少,比传统方法快约232倍。
    研究结果表明,ML算法可以提高dMRI模型分析的效率,并为生物组织的微观结构和功能组织提供新的视角。本文还讨论了基于ML的dMRI分析的局限性和未来发展方向。
    UNASSIGNED: This paper explores different machine learning (ML) algorithms for analyzing diffusion nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) models when analytical fitting shows restrictions. It reviews various ML techniques for dMRI analysis and evaluates their performance on different b-values range datasets, comparing them with analytical methods.
    UNASSIGNED: After standard fitting for reference, four sets of diffusion-weighted nuclear magnetic resonance images were used to train/test various ML algorithms for prediction of diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), and kurtosis (K). ML classification algorithms, including extra-tree classifier (ETC), logistic regression, C-support vector, extra-gradient boost, and multilayer perceptron (MLP), were used to determine the existence of diffusion parameters (D, D*, f, and K) within single voxels. Regression algorithms, including linear regression, polynomial regression, ridge, lasso, random forest (RF), elastic-net, and support-vector machines, were used to estimate the value of the diffusion parameters. Performance was evaluated using accuracy (ACC), area under the curve (AUC) tests, and cross-validation root mean square error (RMSECV). Computational timing was also assessed.
    UNASSIGNED: ETC and MLP were the best classifiers, with 94.1% and 91.7%, respectively, for the ACC test and 98.7% and 96.3% for the AUC test. For parameter estimation, RF algorithm yielded the most accurate results The RMSECV percentages were: 8.39% for D, 3.57% for D*, 4.52% for f, and 3.53% for K. After the training phase, the ML methods demonstrated a substantial decrease in computational time, being approximately 232 times faster than the conventional methods.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings suggest that ML algorithms can enhance the efficiency of dMRI model analysis and offer new perspectives on the microstructural and functional organization of biological tissues. This paper also discusses the limitations and future directions of ML-based dMRI analysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估肝脏中跨场强和具有不同梯度硬件的MR扫描仪的体素内不相干运动(IVIM)定量的可重复性和叶间一致性。
    方法:进行了Cramer-Rao下界优化,以确定优化的单极和运动鲁棒2D(b值和一阶运动矩[M1])IVIM-DWI采集。11名健康志愿者接受了肝脏扩散MRI检查,其中每个优化的采集在三个MRI扫描仪中获得五次。对于每个数据集,IVIM估计(扩散系数(D),伪扩散系数(d1*$${d}_1^{\\ast}$$和d2*$${d}_2^{\ast}$$),血流速度SDs(Vb1和Vb2),和灌注分数[f1和f2])使用两种信号模型(伪扩散和M1依赖性物理模型)在有和没有T2校正(fc1和fc2)和三种拟合技术(基于三指数感兴趣区域的完整和分段拟合以及血流速度SD分布拟合)。使用受试者内部和成对变异系数(CVw和CVp)比较了方法的可重复性和叶间一致性,配对样本t检验,和Bland-Altman分析.
    结果:使用运动鲁棒2D(b-M1)数据采集的组合,具有T2校正的M1相关物理信号建模,和血流速度SD分布拟合,多扫描仪再现性,CVw中位数=5.09%,11.3%,9.20%,14.2%,D为12.6%,分别为Vb1、Vb2、fc1和fc2,叶间一致性与CVp=8.14%,11.9%,8.50%,49.9%,和42.0%,分别,已实现。
    结论:最近提出了先进的IVIM收购,信号建模,和拟合技术可以促进肝脏中可重复的IVIM定量,根据建立用于检测的基于IVIM的定量生物标志物的需要,分期,和疾病的治疗监测。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate reproducibility and interlobar agreement of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) quantification in the liver across field strengths and MR scanners with different gradient hardware.
    METHODS: Cramer-Rao lower bound optimization was performed to determine optimized monopolar and motion-robust 2D (b-value and first-order motion moment [M1]) IVIM-DWI acquisitions. Eleven healthy volunteers underwent diffusion MRI of the liver, where each optimized acquisition was obtained five times across three MRI scanners. For each data set, IVIM estimates (diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficients ( d 1 * $$ {d}_1^{\\ast } $$ and d 2 * $$ {d}_2^{\\ast } $$ ), blood velocity SDs (Vb1 and Vb2), and perfusion fractions [f1 and f2]) were obtained in the right and left liver lobes using two signal models (pseudo-diffusion and M1-dependent physical) with and without T2 correction (fc1 and fc2) and three fitting techniques (tri-exponential region of interest-based full and segmented fitting and blood velocity SD distribution fitting). Reproducibility and interlobar agreement were compared across methods using within-subject and pairwise coefficients of variation (CVw and CVp), paired sample t-tests, and Bland-Altman analysis.
    RESULTS: Using a combination of motion-robust 2D (b-M1) data acquisition, M1-dependent physical signal modeling with T2 correction, and blood velocity SD distribution fitting, multiscanner reproducibility with median CVw = 5.09%, 11.3%, 9.20%, 14.2%, and 12.6% for D, Vb1, Vb2, fc1, and fc2, respectively, and interlobar agreement with CVp = 8.14%, 11.9%, 8.50%, 49.9%, and 42.0%, respectively, was achieved.
    CONCLUSIONS: Recently proposed advanced IVIM acquisition, signal modeling, and fitting techniques may facilitate reproducible IVIM quantification in the liver, as needed for establishment of IVIM-based quantitative biomarkers for detection, staging, and treatment monitoring of diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:不同磁共振成像(MRI)设备中胰腺表观扩散系数(ADC)值和体素内不相干运动(IVIM)参数值的一致性显著影响患者的诊断和治疗。
    目的:为了探索图像质量的一致性,ADC值,胰腺检查中不同MRI设备之间的IVIM参数值。
    方法:这项回顾性研究得到了当地伦理委员会的批准,并获得所有参与者的知情同意书.总的来说,22名健康志愿者(10名男性和12名女性),年龄24-61岁(平均值,28.9±2.3年)使用来自三个供应商的3.0TMRI设备进行了胰腺扩散加权成像。两名独立观察者对图像质量进行主观评分,并测量胰腺的总体ADC值和信噪比(SNR)。随后,针对IVIM参数(真实扩散系数,伪扩散系数,和灌注分数)使用后处理软件。这些ROI在头上,身体,和胰腺的尾巴.使用kappa一致性检验评估主观图像评级。使用组内相关系数(ICC)和混合线性模型来评估每个设备的定量参数值。最后,使用Bland-Altman图对每个装置的IVIM参数值进行成对分析。
    结果:不同观察者主观评分的Kappa值为0.776(P<0.05)。观察者间和观察者内定量参数协议的ICC值分别为0.803[95%置信区间(CI):0.684-0.880]和0.883(95CI:0.760-0.945),分别为(P<0.05)。不同设备之间信噪比的ICC具有可比性(P>0.05),不同器件ADC值的ICC分别为0.870、0.707和0.808(P<0.05)。值得注意的是,对于不同的IVIM参数,仅观察到少数具有统计学意义的器械间协议,其中,ICC值普遍较低.混合线性模型结果显示胰头f值存在差异(P<0.05),胰体的D值,以及使用不同MRI机器获得的胰尾D值。Bland-Altman图在某些数据点显示出显着的变异性。
    结论:ADC值在不同器件之间是一致的,但IVIM参数重复性适中。因此,例如,IVIM参数值的可变性可以与使用不同的MRI机器相关联。因此,使用IVIM参数值评估胰腺时应谨慎。
    BACKGROUND: The consistency of pancreatic apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameter values across different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) devices significantly impacts the patient\'s diagnosis and treatment.
    OBJECTIVE: To explore consistency in image quality, ADC values, and IVIM parameter values among different MRI devices in pancreatic examinations.
    METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the local ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. In total, 22 healthy volunteers (10 males and 12 females) aged 24-61 years (mean, 28.9 ± 2.3 years) underwent pancreatic diffusion-weighted imaging using 3.0T MRI equipment from three vendors. Two independent observers subjectively scored image quality and measured the pancreas\'s overall ADC values and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Subsequently, regions of interest (ROIs) were delineated for the IVIM parameters (true diffusion coefficient, pseudo-diffusion coefficient, and perfusion fraction) using post-processing software. These ROIs were on the head, body, and tail of the pancrease. The subjective image ratings were assessed using the kappa consistency test. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and mixed linear models were used to evaluate each device\'s quantitative parameter values. Finally, a pairwise analysis of IVIM parameter values across each device was performed using Bland-Altman plots.
    RESULTS: The Kappa value for the subjective ratings of the different observers was 0.776 (P < 0.05). The ICC values for inter-observer and intra-observer agreements for the quantitative parameters were 0.803 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.684-0.880] and 0.883 (95%CI: 0.760-0.945), respectively (P < 0.05). The ICCs for the SNR between different devices was comparable (P > 0.05), and the ICCs for the ADC values from different devices were 0.870, 0.707, and 0.808, respectively (P < 0.05). Notably, only a few statistically significant inter-device agreements were observed for different IVIM parameters, and among those, the ICC values were generally low. The mixed linear model results indicated differences (P < 0.05) in the f-value for the pancreas head, D-value for the pancreas body, and D-value for the pancreas tail obtained using different MRI machines. The Bland-Altman plots showed significant variability at some data points.
    CONCLUSIONS: ADC values are consistent among different devices, but the IVIM parameters\' repeatability is moderate. Therefore, the variability in the IVIM parameter values may be associated with using different MRI machines. Thus, caution should be exercised when using IVIM parameter values to assess the pancreas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估扩散峰度成像(DKI)和体素内不相干运动(IVIM)在前列腺癌(PCa)检测和表征中的诊断能力。
    方法:对PubMed进行了全面搜索,Scopus,WebofScience,和Cochrane图书馆在2023年9月10日之前发表的文章,评估了MD的诊断功效,MK,Dt,f,和Dp参数。使用双变量混合效应回归模型汇总数据,并用R软件进行分析。
    结果:总计,共纳入27项研究。分析揭示了DKI和IVIM的不同诊断功效。在整体模型中,敏感性和特异性分别为0.807和0.797,前瞻性研究显示更高的特异性(0.858,p=0.024)。检测模型提高了灵敏度(0.845)和特异性(0.812),DKI在两个指标中均优于IVIM(灵敏度:0.87,p=0.043;特异性:0.837,p=0.26);MD具有高灵敏度(0.88)和特异性(0.82),而MK的特异性显著较高(0.854,p=0.04);Dp的敏感性显著较低(0.64,p=0.016)。在表征中,敏感性和特异性分别为0.708和0.735,DKI和IVIM或Gleason评分之间没有显着差异;MK具有更高的灵敏度(0.78,p=0.039),f\的敏感性显著降低(0.51,p=0.019)。
    结论:总之,该研究强调了DKI在检测PCa方面比IVIM具有更高的诊断准确性,MK因其精确度而脱颖而出。相反,诊断性能中的Dp和f滞后。尽管这些有希望的结果,该研究强调了标准化方案和研究设计的必要性,以实现可靠和一致的结果。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the diagnostic capabilities of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging (DKI) and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) in prostate cancer (PCa) detection and characterization.
    METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for articles published up to September 10, 2023, that evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of MD, MK, Dt, f, and Dp parameters. Data were pooled using a bivariate mixed-effects regression model and analyzed with R software.
    RESULTS: In total, 27 studies were included. The analysis revealed distinct diagnostic efficacies for DKI and IVIM. In the overall model, sensitivity and specificity were 0.807 and 0.797, respectively, with prospective studies showing higher specificity (0.858, p = 0.024). The detection model yielded increased sensitivity (0.845) and specificity (0.812), with DKI outperforming IVIM in both metrics (sensitivity: 0.87, p = 0.043; specificity: 0.837, p = 0.26); MD had high sensitivity (0.88) and specificity (0.82), while MK\'s specificity was significantly higher (0.854, p = 0.04); Dp\'s sensitivity was significantly lower (0.64, p = 0.016). In characterization, sensitivity and specificity were 0.708 and 0.735, respectively, with no significant differences between DKI and IVIM or Gleason Scores; MK had higher sensitivity (0.78, p = 0.039), and f\'s sensitivity was significantly lower (0.51, p = 0.019).
    CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the study underscores DKI\'s enhanced diagnostic accuracy over IVIM in detecting PCa, with MK standing out for its precision. Conversely, Dp and f lag in diagnostic performance. Despite these promising results, the study highlights the imperative for standardized protocols and study designs to achieve reliable and consistent outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    特发性颅内高压(IIH)的病理学,一种以乳头状水肿和颅内压升高(IICP)为特征的疾病,尚不清楚;由于包括视力丧失在内的症状,这种疾病显着影响生活质量,头痛,和搏动性耳鸣.相比之下,浅表铁质沉着症(SS),一种血铁素沉积在大脑皮层和小脑表面的疾病,可能导致小脑共济失调或听力损失。到目前为止,没有报道IIH伴有幕下和幕上皮质SS的病例。在这里,我们报道了一例31岁肥胖女性患者出现这种情况。病人突然出现头痛和头晕,走路有困难,随后意识到复视。眼底检查发现双侧视神经充血乳头和右眼外展障碍。头部磁共振成像(MRI)显示小脑表面和大脑皮层明显的SS。腰椎穿刺显示IICP为32cmH2O,符合IIH的诊断标准,并开始口服乙酰唑胺治疗;随后,颅内压下降至20cmH2O。她的绑架障碍消失了,视神经乳头的肿胀得到改善.她现在能够回到老师的生活,没有任何后遗症。SS是由蛛网膜下腔持续轻微出血引起的。在这种情况下,观察到幕下和幕上皮质浅表SS。虽然由SS并发的IIH病例很少见,应该记住,从我们的案例中推断IIH和SS之间存在因果关系.我们的发现还表明,使用MRI进行脑脊液动态分析可有效诊断IIH并确定治疗效果。
    The pathology of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), a disease characterized by papillary edema and increased intracranial pressure (IICP), is not yet understood; this disease significantly affects quality of life due to symptoms including vision loss, headache, and pulsatile tinnitus. By contrast, superficial siderosis (SS), a disorder in which hemosiderin is deposited on the surface of the cerebral cortex and cerebellum, potentially causes cerebellar ataxia or hearing loss. So far, no cases of IIH with infratentorial and supratentorial cortical SS have been reported. Herein, we report a case of a 31-year-old woman with obesity who developed this condition. The patient suddenly developed headache and dizziness, had difficulty walking, and subsequently became aware of diplopia. Fundus examination revealed bilateral optic nerve congestive papillae and right eye abducens disturbance. Head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed prominent SS on the cerebellar surface and cerebral cortex. Lumbar puncture revealed IICP of 32 cmH2O, consistent with the diagnostic criteria for IIH, and treatment with oral acetazolamide was started; subsequently, the intracranial pressure decreased to 20 cmH2O. Her abduction disorder disappeared, and the swelling of the optic papilla improved. She was now able return to her life as a teacher without any sequelae. SS is caused by persistent slight hemorrhage into the subarachnoid space. In this case, both infratentorial and supratentorial cortical superficial SS was observed. Although cases of IIH complicated by SS are rare, it should be kept in mind that a causal relationship between IIH and SS was inferred from our case. Our findings also suggest that cerebrospinal fluid dynamic analysis using MRI is effective in diagnosing IIH and in determining the efficacy of treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号