Intraoperative blood transfusion

术中输血
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:正常胆汁是无菌的。研究表明,肝移植(LT)后胆管炎的预后相对较差。尚不清楚细菌病或真菌是否会影响LT患者的预后。尤其是循环性死亡(DCD)同种异体移植后的捐赠,这与同种异体移植失败的高风险相关。
    方法:这项回顾性研究包括2019年至2021年的139名接受DCD移植的LT患者。根据是否存在细菌病或真菌,将所有患者分为两组。术后细菌病或真菌的患病率和微生物谱及其与结局的可能关联,特别是住院时间进行了分析。
    结果:在第1周和第2周分别分离出135和171种生物。在本分析中包括的所有患者中,83例(59.7%)在移植后2周内出现了细菌病或真菌。细菌病或真菌的发生(β=7.43,95%CI:0.02至14.82,P=0.049),特别是在移植后2周内检测到假单胞菌(β=18.84,95%CI:6.51~31.07,P=0.003)与住院时间延长相关.然而,它没有影响移植物和患者的生存。
    结论:细菌病或真菌的发生,特别是移植后2周内的假单胞菌,可能会影响肝功能的恢复,并且与住院时间延长有关,但与移植物和患者生存率无关。
    BACKGROUND: Normal bile is sterile. Studies have shown that cholangitis after liver transplantation (LT) was associated with a relatively poor prognosis. It remains unclear whether the bacteriobilia or fungibilia impact the patient outcomes in LT recipients, especially with donation after circulatory death (DCD) allografts, which was correlated with a higher risk of allograft failure.
    METHODS: This retrospective study included 139 LT recipients of DCD grafts from 2019 to 2021. All patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of bacteriobilia or fungibilia. The prevalence and microbial spectrum of postoperative bacteriobilia or fungibilia and its possible association with outcomes, especially hospital stay were analyzed.
    RESULTS: Totally 135 and 171 organisms were isolated at weeks 1 and 2, respectively. Among all patients included in this analysis, 83 (59.7%) developed bacteriobilia or fungibilia within 2 weeks post-transplantation. The occurrence of bacteriobilia or fungibilia (β = 7.43, 95% CI: 0.02 to 14.82, P = 0.049), particularly the detection of Pseudomonas (β = 18.84, 95% CI: 6.51 to 31.07, P = 0.003) within 2 weeks post-transplantation was associated with a longer hospital stay. However, it did not affect the graft and patient survival.
    CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of bacteriobilia or fungibilia, particularly Pseudomonas within 2 weeks post-transplantation, could influence the recovery of liver function and was associated with prolonged hospital stay but not the graft and patient survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:肝切除术中经常使用肝椎弓根夹闭(HPC)以减少术中出血并减少术中输血(IBT)的需要。肝细胞癌(HCC)肝切除术后HPC的长期预后影响仍在争论中。本研究旨在阐明肝癌切除术后HPC和肿瘤学结果之间的关联,根据是否给予IBT进行分层。
    方法:从多中心数据库中前瞻性收集接受根治性切除术的HCC患者的数据。根据是否给予IBT,将患者分为两组。通过单变量和多变量Cox回归分析评估HPC对两个队列之间的长期总生存率(OS)和无复发生存率(RFS)的影响。
    结果:在3362例患者中,535收到IBT。在IBT队列中,使用或不使用HPC在OS和RFS结局方面没有显着差异(5年OS和RFS率27.9%与24.6%和13.8%与12.0%,P=0.810和0.530)。然而,在2827例患者的非IBT队列中,HPC亚组显示出显著降低的OS(5年45.9%vs.56.5%,P<0.001)和RFS(5年24.7%vs.33.3%,与无HPC的亚组相比,P<0.001)。多变量Cox回归分析确定,在未接受IBT的患者中,HPC是OS和RFS的独立危险因素[风险比(HR)分别为1.16和1.12,P=0.024和0.044]。
    结论:HPC对肝癌患者肝切除术后肿瘤结局的影响是否给予IBT显著不同,和HPC对肝切除术期间未接受IBT的患者的长期生存率产生不利影响。
    BACKGROUND: Hepatic pedicle clamping (HPC) is frequently utilized during hepatectomy to reduce intraoperative bleeding and diminish the need for intraoperative blood transfusion (IBT). The long-term prognostic implications of HPC following hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain under debate. This study aims to elucidate the association between HPC and oncologic outcomes after HCC resection, stratified by whether IBT was administered.
    METHODS: Prospectively collected data on patients with HCC who underwent curative resection from a multicenter database was studied. Patients were stratified into two cohorts on the basis of whether IBT was administered. The impact of HPC on long-term overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the two cohorts was assessed by univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses.
    RESULTS: Of 3362 patients, 535 received IBT. In the IBT cohort, using or not using HPC showed no significant difference in OS and RFS outcomes (5-year OS and RFS rates 27.9% vs. 24.6% and 13.8% vs. 12.0%, P = 0.810 and 0.530). However, in the non-IBT cohort of 2827 patients, the HPC subgroup demonstrated significantly decreased OS (5-year 45.9% vs. 56.5%, P < 0.001) and RFS (5-year 24.7% vs. 33.3%, P < 0.001) when compared with the subgroup without HPC. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified HPC as an independent risk factor of OS and RFS [hazard ratios (HR) 1.16 and 1.12, P = 0.024 and 0.044, respectively] among patients who did not receive IBT.
    CONCLUSIONS: The impact of HPC on the oncological outcomes following hepatectomy for patients with HCC differed significantly whether IBT was administered, and HPC adversely impacted on long-term survival for patients without receiving IBT during hepatectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:输血是先天性心脏手术(CHS)中常见的挽救生命的手术,患者在手术前确定危险因素至关重要。我们的目的是分析CHS期间影响血液使用的术前因素,并为术前血液准备提供指导。
    方法:对我院2019年5月至2020年6月共1550例病例进行回顾性分析。我们确定是否使用红细胞(RBC),血小板,和血浆作为因变量;我们将特征和实验室测试的数据视为二进制数据,除了先天性心脏手术风险调整(RACHS)方法作为多项数据,最后进行二元Logistic回归分析。
    结果:输注红细胞的总量,血小板,血浆为850.5U(N=713,46%),159U(N=21,1.4%),和1374.2U(N=953,61.5%),分别。多因素分析发现年龄(OR0.142,95%CI0.099-0.203,P<0.001),重量(0.170,0.111-0.262,P<0.001)RACHS方法(RACHS2与RACHS1,3.444,2.521-4.704,P<0.001;RACHS3vs.RACHS1,9.333,4.731-18.412,P<0.001;RACHS4vs.RACHS1,31.327,2.916-336.546,P=0.004),和血红蛋白(0.524,0.315-0.871,P=0.013)是红细胞输注量的独立风险预测因子;年龄(9.911,1.008-97.417,P=0.049),重量(0.029,0.003-0.300,P=0.029),RACHS方法(RACHS3与RACHS1,13.001,2.482-68.112,P=0.002;RACHS4与RACHS1,59.748,6.351-562.115,P<0.001)是血小板;年龄(0.488,0.352-0.676,P<0.001),体重(0.252,0.164-0.386,P<0.001),RACHS方法(RACHS2与RACHS1,2.931,2.283-3.764,P<0.001;RACHS3vs.RACHS1,10.754,4.751-24.342,P<0.001),APTT(1.628,1.058-2.503,P=0.027),PT(2.174,1.065-4.435,P=0.033)为血浆。
    结论:尽管患者年龄,体重,血常规检查,凝血功能,和蛋白质水平都应该考虑在CHS之前准备血液,RACHS方法是影响术中输血量的最重要因素,应在临床血液准备中首先考虑。
    OBJECTIVE: Blood transfusion is a common and life-saving procedure in congenital heart surgery (CHS), and it is critical for patients to identify risk factors prior to surgery. Our objective is to conduct an analysis of the preoperative factors that influence blood use during CHS and to offer guidance on preoperative blood preparation.
    METHODS: A total of 1550 cases were retrospectively analyzed in our institution between May 2019 and June 2020. We determined whether to employ red blood cells (RBCs), platelets, and plasma as dependent variables; we treated the data from characteristics and laboratory tests as binary data, except for the Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS) methods as multinomial data, and finally taken into binary logistic regression analysis.
    RESULTS: The total amounts of transfused RBCs, platelets, and plasma were 850.5 U (N = 713, 46%), 159 U (N = 21, 1.4%), and 1374.2 U (N = 953, 61.5%), respectively. Multivariate analysis found age (OR 0.142, 95% CI 0.099-0.203, P < 0.001), weight (0.170, 0.111-0.262, P < 0.001) RACHS method (RACHS2 vs. RACHS1, 3.444, 2.521-4.704, P < 0.001; RACHS3 vs. RACHS1, 9.333, 4.731-18.412, P < 0.001; RACHS4 vs. RACHS1, 31.327, 2.916-336.546, P = 0.004), and hemoglobin (0.524, 0.315-0.871, P = 0.013) to be independent risk predictors of RBC transfused volume; age (9.911, 1.008-97.417, P = 0.049), weight (0.029, 0.003-0.300, P = 0.029), RACHS method (RACHS3 vs. RACHS1, 13.001, 2.482-68.112, P = 0.002; RACHS4 vs. RACHS1, 59.748, 6.351-562.115, P < 0.001) to be platelets; and age (0.488, 0.352-0.676, P < 0.001), weight (0.252, 0.164-0.386, P < 0.001), RACHS method (RACHS2 vs. RACHS1, 2.931, 2.283-3.764, P < 0.001; RACHS3 vs. RACHS1, 10.754, 4.751-24.342, P < 0.001), APTT (1.628, 1.058-2.503, P = 0.027), and PT (2.174, 1.065-4.435, P = 0.033) to be plasma.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although patients\' age, weight, routine blood test, coagulation function, and protein levels should all be considered for preparing blood before CHS, the RACHS method is the most important factor influencing intraoperative blood transfused volume and should be considered first in clinical blood preparation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:食管胃结合部腺癌(AEG)具有复杂的手术解剖结构,因此,它有时会导致术中失血过多,需要术中输血(BTF)。然而,很少有报道关注BTF对AEG患者生存结局的影响.我们旨在评估BTF对AEG预后的影响。材料和方法:我们纳入了2010年1月至2020年9月在我院接受AEG手术切除的63例患者。比较了有(n=12)和没有(n=51)BTF的患者的临床病理特征和生存结果。进行多因素分析以确定总生存期的独立预后因素。结果:接受微创手术的患者均未接受BTF。接受BTF的患者的5年生存率明显低于未接受BTF的患者(67.8%vs.28.3%,p=0.001)。BTF是总生存期的独立危险因素(风险比:3.90,95%置信区间1.30-11.7),即使在接受微创手术的患者被排除后.结论:BTF对接受根治性手术的AEG患者的生存结果产生不利影响。为了避免BTF,外科医生应努力减少术中出血。
    Background and objectives: Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) has a complicated surgical anatomy, due to which it sometimes induces excessive intraoperative blood loss that necessitates intraoperative blood transfusion (BTF). However, few reports have focused on the impact of BTF on the survival outcomes of patients with AEG. We aimed to evaluate the impact of BTF on AEG prognosis. Materials andMethods: We included 63 patients who underwent surgical resection for AEG at our hospital between January 2010 and September 2020. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes were compared between patients with (n = 12) and without (n = 51) BTF. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify the independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Results: None of the patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery received BTF. Patients who received BTF had a significantly worse 5-year survival rate than those who did not (67.8% vs. 28.3%, p = 0.001). BTF was an independent risk factor for overall survival (hazard ratio: 3.90, 95% confidence interval 1.30-11.7), even after patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery were excluded. Conclusions: BTF adversely affected the survival outcomes of patients with AEG who underwent curative surgery. To avoid BTF, surgeons should strive to minimize intraoperative bleeding.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:本研究的目的是分析术中失血(IBL)和术中输血(IBT)对原发性结直肠癌(CRC)手术患者的短期预后和预后的影响。
    UNASSIGNED:我们从2011年1月至2020年1月从教学医院的数据库中回顾性收集了患者的信息。收集和分析IBL和IBT,并进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析。
    未经批准:本研究共纳入4,250例CRC患者。较大的IBL组中有1,911例患者,较小的IBL组中有2,339例患者。至于IBT,IBT组82例,非IBT组4,168例.1:1比例PSM后,IBT组82例,非IBT组82例.IBL较大组手术时间较长(p=0.000<0.01),术后住院时间延长(p=0.000<0.01),较小的淋巴结(p=0.000<0.01),总体并发症(p=0.000<0.01)高于较小的IBL组。IBT组手术时间较长(p=0.000<0.01),住院时间更长(p=0.016<0.05),在短期结局方面,与非IBT组相比,总体并发症较高(p=0.013<0.05)。较大的IBL(p=0.000,HR=1.352,95%CI=1.142-1.601)和IBT(p=0.044,HR=1.487,95%CI=1.011-2.188)是总生存(OS)的独立预测因素。较大的IBL(p=0.000,HR=1.338,95%CI=1.150-1.558)是无病生存期(DFS)的独立预测因子;然而,IBT(p=0.179,HR=1.300,95%CI=0.886-1.908)不是DFS的独立预测因子。
    未经评估:根据IBL和IBT的短期结果和预后,外科医生在手术过程中应谨慎,外科医生需要更仔细和熟练的手术技能。
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of the current study was to analyze the effect of intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and intraoperative blood transfusion (IBT) on the short-term outcomes and prognosis for patients who underwent primary colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively collected the patients\' information from the database of a teaching hospital from January 2011 to January 2020. IBL and IBT were collected and analyzed, and the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 4,250 patients with CRC were included in this study. There were 1,911 patients in the larger IBL group and 2,339 patients in the smaller IBL group. As for IBT, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 4,168 patients in the non-IBT group. After 1:1 ratio PSM, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 82 patients in the non-IBT group. The larger IBL group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 < 0.01), longer post-operative hospital stay (p = 0.000 < 0.01), smaller retrieved lymph nodes (p = 0.000 < 0.01), and higher overall complication (p = 0.000 < 0.01) than the smaller IBL group. The IBT group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 < 0.01), longer hospital stay (p = 0.016 < 0.05), and higher overall complications (p = 0.013 < 0.05) compared with the non-IBT group in terms of short-term outcomes. Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.352, 95% CI = 1.142-1.601) and IBT (p = 0.044, HR = 1.487, 95% CI = 1.011-2.188) were independent predictive factors of overall survival (OS). Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.338, 95% CI = 1.150-1.558) was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (DFS); however, IBT (p = 0.179, HR = 1.300, 95% CI = 0.886-1.908) was not an independent predictor of DFS.
    UNASSIGNED: Based on the short-term outcomes and prognosis of IBL and IBT, surgeons should be cautious during the operation and more careful and proficient surgical skills are required for surgeons.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:间歇性Pringle's动作(IPM)主要在肝切除术过程中进行,以控制术中失血(IBL),但自从手术技术和术中管理改进以来,它一直受到质疑。因此,我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以验证IPM的临床价值.
    方法:在PubMed上搜索旨在评估肝切除术中IPM的合格研究,Medline,和其他数据库从数据库建立到2019年10月。主要终点为IBL和术中输血(IBT)。使用具有95%置信区间(CI)的风险比(RR)来确定效应大小。
    结果:共有6项随机对照试验(RCTs)的16项研究纳入本荟萃分析,其中IPM组1770例,非IPM组1611例。总的来说,IPM组和非IPM组之间的IBL量和IBT发生率没有显着差异(RR=0.96,95%CI0.67-1.37,P=0.82),在RCT亚组中也得到了证实(P>0.05)。然而,亚组分析显示,对于结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)患者,IPM组的IBL含量普遍高于非IPM组,IPM组IBT发生率明显高于IPM组(RR=7.17,95%CI1.91~26.94,P=0.004)。此外,两组术后并发症比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。
    结论:根据当前数据,我们得出的结论是,IPM在CRLM患者中已经失去了价值,尽管它在肝细胞癌患者中仍然存在争议。
    BACKGROUND: The intermittent Pringle\'s maneuver (IPM) is conducted mainly during the procedure of hepatectomy to control intraoperative blood loss (IBL), but it has been questioned since improvement of surgical technology and intraoperative management. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to validate the clinical value of IPM.
    METHODS: Eligible studies that were designed to evaluate the IPM in the procedure of hepatectomy were searched for on PubMed, Medline, and other databases from establishment of the database to October 2019. The primary endpoints were IBL and intraoperative blood transfusion (IBT). The risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to determine the effect size.
    RESULTS: A total of 16 studies with six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were enrolled in this meta-analysis, including 1,770 cases in the IPM group and 1,611 cases in the non-IPM group. Overall, there were no significant differences between the IPM and non-IPM groups in the amount of IBL and the incidence of IBT (RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.67-1.37, P = 0.82), which was also confirmed in the subgroups of RCTs (P > 0.05). However, subgroup analyses showed that for patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), the amount of IBL was generally higher in the IPM group than in the non-IPM group, and the incidence of IBT was significantly higher in the IPM group (RR = 7.17, 95% CI 1.91-26.94, P = 0.004). In addition, no significant differences were observed in terms of postoperative complications between the two groups (all P > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: With the current data, we concluded that IPM had lost its value in patients with CRLM, although it remained controversial in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of timing of blood transfusion in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).
    METHODS: Outcomes of consecutive patients with UTUC treated with RNU were analyzed. Clinicopathologic factors were compared using Fisher\'s exact test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test between patients who received any transfusion and no transfusion, and between patients receiving intraoperative transfusion only and patients receiving no transfusion. Cancer-specific and overall survival were estimated and multivariable analyses were performed to assess the impact of timing of transfusion on clinical outcomes.
    RESULTS: Among 402 patients included in this study, 71 (17.6%) patients received a transfusion at any point and 27 (6.7%) patients received an intraoperative blood transfusion. Transfusion at any time, patient comorbidity, high grade, advanced stage, positive surgical margins, low preoperative hemoglobin, longer operative duration, and increased blood loss were significantly associated with cancer-specific survival (DSS) on univariable analysis (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.20-2.85, p < 0.005). In the multivariable analysis, transfusion at any point was not a prognostic factor (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.60-1.68, p = 0.99). When examining intraoperatively transfusion only, transfusion was significantly associated with DSS (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.01-3.59, p = 0.045) but no longer significant in multivariable analysis (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.32-1.65, p = 0.440).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that the administration of blood transfusion either intraoperatively or postoperatively is not associated with clinical or oncological outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma when adjusted for other factors in multivariable analysis. Further study is required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:虽然围手术期输血(BT)与多种恶性肿瘤的不良结局有关,BT时机的重要性尚未确定。
    目的:本研究的目的是评估膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术(RC)患者术中BT是否与不良癌症预后相关。
    方法:分析了两个独立的连续接受RC治疗的膀胱癌患者的结果。
    方法:无复发生存,癌症特异性生存率(CSS),我们估计了总生存期,并进行了多变量分析,以评估BT时机与癌症结局的相关性.
    结论:在360名患者的主要队列中,241(67%)接受围手术期BT,其中术中162例,术后79例。接受术中BT的患者的五年CSS为44%,而接受术后BT的患者为64%(p=0.0005)。经过多变量分析,术中BT与癌症死亡风险增加相关(风险比[HR]:1.93;p=0.02),而术后未接受BT(p=0.60)。在1770名患者的验证队列中,1100(62%)接受了围手术期BT,中位术后随访时间为11年(四分位距:8.0-15.7)。在接受术中BT的患者中,5年RFS(p<0.001)和CSS(p<0.001)明显更差。术中BT与复发独立相关(HR:1.45;p=0.001),癌症特异性死亡率(HR:1.55;p=0.0001),和全因死亡率(HR:1.40;p<0.0001)。术后BT与疾病复发或癌症死亡的风险无关。
    结论:术中BT与膀胱癌复发和死亡风险增加相关。
    结果:在这项研究中,评估输血对膀胱癌手术结局的影响.术中输血,但不是术后输血,与较高的复发率和癌症特异性死亡率相关。
    BACKGROUND: While perioperative blood transfusion (BT) has been associated with adverse outcomes in multiple malignancies, the importance of BT timing has not been established.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether intraoperative BT is associated with worse cancer outcomes in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC).
    METHODS: Outcomes from two independent cohorts of consecutive patients with bladder cancer treated with RC were analyzed.
    METHODS: Recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival were estimated and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the association of BT timing with cancer outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the primary cohort of 360 patients, 241 (67%) received perioperative BT, including 162 intraoperatively and 79 postoperatively. Five-year CSS was 44% among patients who received an intraoperative BT versus 64% for patients who received postoperative BT (p=0.0005). After multivariate analysis, intraoperative BT was associated with an increased risk of cancer mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.93; p=0.02), while receipt of postoperative BT was not (p=0.60). In the validation cohort of 1770 patients, 1100 (62%) received perioperative BT with a median postoperative follow-up of 11 yr (interquartile range: 8.0-15.7). Five-year RFS (p<0.001) and CSS (p<0.001) were significantly worse among patients who received an intraoperative BT. Intraoperative BT was independently associated with recurrence (HR: 1.45; p=0.001), cancer-specific mortality (HR: 1.55; p=0.0001), and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.40; p<0.0001). Postoperative BT was not associated with risk of disease recurrence or cancer death.
    CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative BT is associated with increased risk of bladder cancer recurrence and mortality.
    RESULTS: In this study, the effects of blood transfusion on bladder cancer surgery outcomes were evaluated. Intraoperative blood transfusion, but not postoperative transfusion, was associated with higher rates of recurrence and cancer-specific mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号