We present the case of a 35-y-old woman with short bowel syndrome secondary to extensive intestinal resection with associated chronic kidney disease who was undergoing hemodialysis. This patient required permanent supplementation with intradialytic parenteral nutrition because of a high-output end-jejunostomy. The patient was a candidate for treatment with teduglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 2 analog, intending to increase intestinal absorption. A complete nutritional assessment was performed using bioelectrical impedance vector analysis. Teduglutide treatment was successful, and after a 1-y follow-up, the patient had considerably reduced end-jejunostomy output (reduction of 6 L/d) and an improved nutritional status (9.1 kg weight gain, 1.4 kg fat-free mass gain, and a 2.2-degree increase in bioimpedance phase angle). However, we have been unable to reduce intradialytic parenteral nutrition, which the patient requires thrice weekly. No significant secondary effects have occurred because of teduglutide administration. This may be the first reported use of teduglutide in a patient with short bowel syndrome undergoing hemodialysis who was monitored using bioelectrical impedance data during follow-up.

It was reported that amino acid infusion during hemodialysis is useful for improving nutritional status. The optimal administration method of amino acid infusion under the high-volume pre-dilution on-line HDF (HVPO-HDF) was analyzed in this study. Subjects were 10 patients on maintenance dialysis at our clinic. We performed high-volume pre-dilution on-line HDF. We investigated two methods for administration of Neoamiyu® 200-ml total amino acid (TAA) infusion for patients with renal failure: (1) continuous infusion into the dialysis circuit for 4 h from the start of dialysis to its completion (infusion rate 50 ml/h) and (2) continuous infusion started 1 h before completion of dialysis (infusion rate 200 ml/h), and compared pre- and post-dialysis blood concentrations and leakage of TAA, essential amino acids (EAA), and nonessential amino acids (NEAA) between these methods. Pre-dialysis blood concentrations of amino acids showed no difference between both the groups. Post-dialysis blood concentrations of amino acids were higher in all concentrations were significantly higher with continuous infusion starting 1 h before completion of dialysis. Leakage of amino acids showed no difference between both the groups. The continuous intradialytic amino acid infusion from the start of dialysis is better to avoid catabolism under high-volume pre-dilution on-line HDF.

Children with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis are at increased risk for malnutrition. Aggressive nutrition intervention such as intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) should be considered to prevent further co-morbidities and mortality associated with malnutrition when other interventions fail. IDPN is a non-invasive method of providing nutrition to malnourished hemodialysis (HD) patients via the HD access throughout the HD treatment. Although the evidence on the long-term benefits of IDPN is scant in pediatrics, there is evidence that it improves metabolic parameters and nutritional status. In this paper, therapy with IDPN including indications, goals of therapy, and elements to monitor will be described. In addition, a practice guideline for prescribing IDPN is provided.

Intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) is a form of supplemental nutrition used to treat patients with malnutrition who receive hemodialysis. Once the diagnosis of malnutrition is made in such patients, encouragement of oral intake is the first-line treatment. If this fails, then enteral or parenteral nutrition may be needed. This review examines the literature on the use of IDPN and summarizes the current recommendations. There is considerable controversy over indications and benefits of IDPN, and well-controlled, long-term studies are needed to help tease out these issues. In the interim, clinical judgment should be used when considering IDPN for individual patients.

BACKGROUND: This prospective randomised study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) therapy in malnourished patients with refractory anaemia.
METHODS: Forty patients who were malnourished with a BMI not greater than 23 (17-23) kg/m2 , undergoing regular HD were included. Of those, 20 patients received 500-1000 ml of IDPN at a rate of 250-300 ml/h at each HD session three days per week for six consecutive months. The other 20 patients did not receive IDPN infusion. The malnutrition inflammation score (MIS) and haematological parameters were recorded at baseline and after three and six months.
RESULTS: Mean haemoglobin levels, BMI and serum albumin were significantly increased while MIS was significantly decreased after the 3rd and 6th months of IDPN.
CONCLUSIONS: IDPN has a good role in improving refractory anaemia by significantly increasing haemoglobin levels, body weight, and serum albumin levels. The intervention also significantly decreases the MIS of patients.

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a rare complication of peritoneal dialysis that carries a high morbidity and mortality. Although its pathogenesis is still not clear, the \"two hit theory\" suggests that long term deterioration of the peritoneum combined with intraperitoneal inflammation is needed in the pathogenesis of EPS. To date, there is no proven effective therapy with an absence of randomized controlled trials. Individual case reports and small case series have reported on the use of tamoxifen and corticosteroids for medical management of EPS. Here, we present the first case of EPS treated successfully with a combination of sirolimus, low dose corticosteroid and intradialytic parenteral nutrition. A critical review of the relevant literature on this subject is also presented to determine the best approach.

Protein-energy wasting (PEW) is increasingly becoming a clinical problem in maintenance hemodialysis patients and guidelines call for nutritional interventions. Serum prealbumin (transthyretin) represents a critical nutritional marker positively correlated with patient survival and negatively correlated with morbidity. Nutritional counseling, oral supplementation as well as intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) are recommended to fight PEW, however clinical trials on their use are scarce.
We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled, parallel-group Phase IV clinical trial in 107 maintenance hemodialysis patients suffering from PEW to assess the impact of IDPN on prealbumin and other biochemical and clinical parameters reflecting nutritional status. Patients randomized to the intervention group received standardized nutritional counseling plus IDPN three times weekly over 16 weeks followed by a treatment-free period of 12 weeks. The control group received standardized nutritional counseling only. Main trial inclusion criteria included moderate to severe malnutrition (SGA score B or C), maintenance hemodialysis therapy (3 times per week) for more than six months, and presence of two out of the following three criteria: albumin <35 g/L, prealbumin <250 mg/L, phase angle alpha <4.5° assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Changes in serum prealbumin, albumin, transferrin, phase angle alpha, subjective global assessment (SGA) score and health-related quality of life using the 12-item short form health survey (SF-12) were investigated.
IDPN significantly increased prealbumin (p < 0.05), showing rapid rise within 16 weeks of treatment and sustained response thereafter. In the full analysis set (n = 83), 41.0% of 39 patients receiving IDPN achieved a relevant (i.e., at least ≥15%) increase in prealbumin over baseline at week 4 compared to 20.5% of 44 patients in the control group. Considerably more patients with IDPN therapy achieved an increment of prealbumin >30 mg/L at week 16 (48.7% vs. 31.8%). Prealbumin response to IDPN therapy was more prominent in patients suffering from moderate malnutrition (SGA score B) compared to patients with severe malnutrition (SGA score C).
The results of this trial demonstrate for the first time that IDPN therapy, given three times weekly in a 16-week short-term intervention, results in a statistically significant and clinically relevant increase in mean serum prealbumin, a surrogate marker for outcome and survival in hemodialysis patients suffering from PEW, and is superior to nutritional counseling. Clinical trial registry:www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00501956).