BACKGROUND: Pancreatic trauma (PT) is rare among traumatic injuries and has a low incidence, but it can still lead to severe infectious complications, resulting in a high mortality rate. Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common complication after PT, and when combined with organ dysfunction and sepsis, it will result in a poorer prognosis.
METHODS: We report a 25-year-old patient with multiple organ injuries, including the pancreas, due to abdominal trauma, who developed necrotising pancreatitis secondary to emergency caesarean section, combined with intra-abdominal infection (IAI). The patient underwent performed percutaneous drainage, pancreatic necrotic tissue debridement, and abdominal infection foci debridement on the patient.
CONCLUSIONS: We report a case of severe AP and IAI secondary to trauma. This patient was managed by a combination of conservative treatment such as antibiotic therapy and fluid support with surgery, and a better outcome was obtained.

UNASSIGNED: The objective of the study is to investigate the changes in the composition of intestinal microecology in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) patients with or without intra-abdominal infection and also to analyze the expression of antibiotic resistance genes to provide evidence for early warning of infectious diseases and the rational use of antibiotics.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty patients with SAP were enrolled in the study. According to whether the enrolled patients had a secondary intra-abdominal infection, they were divided into two groups, each consisting of 10 patients. Stool specimens were collected when the patients were admitted to the emergency intensive care unit (EICU), and nucleic acid extraction was performed. Next-generation gene sequencing was used to compare the differences in intestinal microflora diversity and drug resistance gene expression between the two groups.
UNASSIGNED: The gut microbiota of patients in the infection group exhibited distribution on multiple clustered branches with some intra-group heterogeneity, and their flora diversity was compromised. The infected group showed an enrichment of various opportunistic bacteria in the gut microbiota, along with a high number of metabolic functions, stress functions to external signals, and genes associated with pathogenesis. Drug resistance genes were expressed in the gut microbiota of both groups, but their abundance was significantly lower in the non-infected group.
UNASSIGNED: The intestinal microbiota of patients in the infection group exhibited distribution on multiple clustered branches with some intra-group heterogeneity, and their flora diversity was compromised. Additionally, drug resistance genes were expressed in the gut microbiota of both groups, although their abundance was significantly lower in the non-infected group.

UNASSIGNED: In this paper, we observed the use of contezolid in patients with complex intra-abdominal infections in the intensive care unit of the Hepatobiliary Surgery department at the Chinese PLA General Hospital.
UNASSIGNED: The study collected data on complex intra-abdominal infections patients who received the antibiotic contezolid between January 2022 and April 2023.
UNASSIGNED: Contezolid was administered to 12 patients, including 8 with severe acute pancreatitis, 3 with intra-abdominal infections following abdominal surgery, and 1 with complicated intra-abdominal infection after trauma. Gram-positive bacteria, such as Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus casseliflavus, Staphylococcus capitis, and Staphylococcus haemo-lytica, were detected in 11 patients. All patients who received contezolid had previously been treated with other anti-Gram-positive agents, including linezolid for 9 patients, teicoplanin for 6 patients, and vancomycin for 3 patients. The treatment with contezolid began 20.0 (15.0, 34.5) days after admission and lasted for 8.0 (6.0, 10.0) days. At the end of the treatment, the patients\' body temperature showed a significant decrease. After concomitant therapy, IL-6 levels decreased, and platelet count increased.
UNASSIGNED: Contezolid has shown potential in treating complex intra-abdominal infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria by reducing fever and inflammatory response.

We compared epidemiology of intra-abdominal infection (IAI) between immunocompromised and non-immunocompromised ICU patients and identified risk factors for mortality. We performed a secondary analysis on the \"AbSeS\" database, a prospective, observational study with IAI patients from 309 ICUs in 42 countries. Immunocompromised status was defined as either neutropenia or prolonged corticosteroids use, chemotherapy or radiotherapy in the past year, bone marrow or solid organ transplantation, congenital immunodeficiency, or immunosuppressive drugs use. Mortality was defined as ICU mortality at any time or 28-day mortality for those discharged earlier. Associations with mortality were assessed by logistic regression. The cohort included 2589 patients of which 239 immunocompromised (9.2 %), most with secondary peritonitis. Among immunocompromised patients, biliary tract infections were less frequent, typhlitis more frequent, and IAIs were more frequently healthcare-associated or early-onset hospital-acquired compared with immunocompetent patients. No difference existed in grade of anatomical disruption, disease severity, organ failure, pathogens, and resistance patterns. Septic shock was significantly more frequent in the immunocompromised population. Mortality was similar in both groups (31.1% vs. 28.9 %; p = 0.468). Immunocompromise was not a risk factor for mortality (OR 0.98, 95 % CI 0.66-1.43). Independent risk factors for mortality among immunocompromised patients included septic shock at presentation (OR 6.64, 95 % CI 1.27-55.72), and unsuccessful source control with persistent inflammation (OR 5.48, 95 % CI 2.29-12.57). In immunocompromised ICU patients with IAI, short-term mortality was similar to immunocompetent patients, despite the former presented more frequently with septic shock, and septic shock and persistent inflammation after source control were independent risk factors for death.

How to cite this article: Das PK, Nath SS, Parashar S. Contradictory Recommendation in the Guideline for Antibiotic Prescription. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(7):713-714.

Background: The Surgical Infection Society (SIS) published evidence-based guidelines for the management of intra-abdominal infection (IAI) in 1992, 2002, 2010, and 2017. Here, we present the most recent guideline update based on a systematic review of current literature. Methods: The writing group, including current and former members of the SIS Therapeutics and Guidelines Committee and other individuals with content or guideline expertise within the SIS, working with a professional librarian, performed a systematic review using PubMed/Medline, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science from 2016 until February 2024. Keyword descriptors combined \"surgical site infections\" or \"intra-abdominal infections\" in adults limited to randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Additional relevant publications not in the initial search but identified during literature review were included. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system was utilized to evaluate the evidence. The strength of each recommendation was rated strong (1) or weak (2). The quality of the evidence was rated high (A), moderate (B), or weak (C). The guideline contains new recommendations and updates to recommendations from previous IAI guideline versions. Final recommendations were developed by an iterative process. All writing group members voted to accept or reject each recommendation. Results: This updated evidence-based guideline contains recommendations from the SIS for the treatment of adult patients with IAI. Evidence-based recommendations were developed for antimicrobial agent selection, timing, route of administration, duration, and de-escalation; timing of source control; treatment of specific pathogens; treatment of specific intra-abdominal disease processes; and implementation of hospital-based antimicrobial agent stewardship programs. Summary: This document contains the most up-to-date recommendations from the SIS on the prevention and management of IAI in adult patients.

UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to evaluate the epidemiology of septic shock (SS) associated with intraabdominal infections (IAI) as well as associated mortality and efficacy of early source control in a tertiary-care educational hospital.
UNASSIGNED: Patients who had SS with IAI and consulted by Infectious Diseases consultants between December 2013 and October 2022 during night shifts in our centre were analyzed retrospectively.
UNASSIGNED: A total number of 390 patients were included. Overall, 30-day mortality was 42.5% on day 3, while day 14 and 30 mortality rates were 63.3% and 71.3%, respectively. Source control by surgical or percutaneous operation was performed in 123 of 390 cases (31.5%), and the mortality rate was significantly lower in cases that were performed source control at any time during SS (65/123-52.8% vs 213/267-79.8%, p<0.001). In 44 of 123 cases (35.7%), source control was performed during the first 12 hours, and mortality was significantly lower in this group versus others (24/44-54.5% vs 254/346-73.4%, p=0.009). On the other hand, female gender (p<0.001, odds ratio(OR)= 2.943, 95%CI=1.714-5.054), diabetes mellitus (p= 0.014, OR=2.284, 95%CI=1.179-4.424), carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative etiology (p=0.011, OR=4.386, 95%CI=1.398-13.759), SOFA≥10 (p<0.001, OR=3.036, 95%CI=1.802-5.114), lactate >3 mg/dl (p<0.001, OR=2.764, 95%CI=1.562-4.891) and lack of source control (p=0.001, OR=2.796, 95%CI=1.523-5.133) were significantly associated with 30-day mortality in logistic regression analysis.
UNASSIGNED: Source control has a vital importance in terms of mortality rates for IAI-related septic shock patients. Our study underscores the need for additional research, as the present analysis indicates that early source control does not manifest as a protective factor in logistic regression.

As the first part of an update to the clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the panel presents twenty-one updated recommendations. These recommendations span risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation. The panel\'s recommendations are based upon evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.

This paper is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides recommendations for diagnostic imaging of suspected acute cholecystitis or acute cholangitis. The panel\'s recommendations are based upon evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.

This paper is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides recommendations for diagnostic imaging of suspected acute appendicitis. The panel\'s recommendations are based upon evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.