Interstitial lung abnormalities

间质性肺异常
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:间质性肺炎和肺气肿可能会使肺癌患者复杂化。然而,轻微和轻度肺部异常的临床意义尚不清楚.在这项研究中,我们的目的是调查是否轻微和轻度间质性肺炎和肺气肿,除了它们的先进形式,间质性肺炎(AEIP)会影响肺癌患者的预后并导致其急性加重。
    方法:本回顾性队列研究在三级医院进行,纳入肺癌患者。使用间质性肺异常(ILA)评分评估间质性肺炎的计算机断层扫描图像,其中不包括ILA,模棱两可的ILA,ILA,间质性肺病(ILD),还有Goddard的肺气肿评分.Cox分析使用ILA和Goddard分数作为主要解释变量,调整多个协变量。
    结果:在1,507例肺癌患者中,1,033没有ILA,160有模棱两可的ILA,174有ILA,140人患有ILD。总的来说,474例患者(31.5%)出现间质性肺炎,638例(42.3%)出现肺气肿。对数秩趋势检验显示,无ILA患者的生存概率明显更好,紧随其后的是那些模棱两可的ILA,ILA,和ILD(P<0.001)。调整后,ILA和戈达德得分仍然是死亡率风险比(HR)增加的显著变量:无ILA(HR,1.00:参考),模棱两可的ILA(HR,1.31;95%置信区间[CI],1.18-1.46;P<0.001),ILA(HR,1.71;95%CI,1.39-2.12;P<0.001),ILD(HR,2.24;95%CI,1.63-3.09;P<0.001),和戈达德得分(HR,1.03;95%CI,1.01-1.06;P<0.010)。此外,两个评分均与AEIP的病因特异性HR增加相关.
    结论:我们的结果显示,大约三分之一的肺癌患者在合并轻微和轻度病例时患有间质性肺炎。因为间质性肺炎和肺气肿,从琐碎到严重,显着影响肺癌患者的死亡率和AEIP,除了晚期肺癌,我们应该在肺癌患者中识别这些肺部异常的轻微病例。
    BACKGROUND: Interstitial pneumonia and emphysema may complicate patients with lung cancer. However, clinical significance of trivial and mild pulmonary abnormalities remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether trivial and mild interstitial pneumonia and emphysema, in addition to their advanced forms, impact the prognosis and lead to acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia (AEIP) in patients with lung cancer.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary hospital and included patients with lung cancer. Computed tomography images were evaluated using the interstitial lung abnormality (ILA) score for interstitial pneumonia, which included no ILA, equivocal ILA, ILA, interstitial lung disease (ILD), and the Goddard score for emphysema. Cox analyses were performed using the ILA and Goddard scores as the main explanatory variables, adjusting for multiple covariates.
    RESULTS: Among 1,507 patients with lung cancer, 1,033 had no ILA, 160 had equivocal ILA, 174 had ILA, and 140 had ILD. In total, 474 patients (31.5%) exhibited interstitial pneumonia and 638 (42.3%) showed emphysema. The log-rank trend test showed that survival probability was significantly better in patients with no ILA, followed by those with equivocal ILA, ILA, and ILD (P < 0.001). After adjustment, the ILA and Goddard scores remained significant variables for increased hazard ratios (HR) for mortality: no ILA (HR, 1.00: reference), equivocal ILA (HR, 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.46; P < 0.001), ILA (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.39-2.12; P < 0.001), ILD (HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.63-3.09; P < 0.001), and Goddard score (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06; P < 0.010). Moreover, both scores were associated with increased cause-specific HRs for AEIP.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that approximately one-third of patients with lung cancer had interstitial pneumonia when incorporating trivial and mild cases. Because interstitial pneumonia and emphysema, ranging from trivial to severe, significantly impact mortality and AEIP in patients with lung cancer, we should identify even trivial and mild cases of these pulmonary abnormalities among patients with lung cancer in addition to the advanced ones.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    间质性肺异常(ILA)是计算机断层扫描扫描的偶然发现,以影响超过5%的任何肺区的非依赖性异常为特征。它们与年龄等因素有关,吸烟,遗传变异,恶化的临床结果,和死亡率增加。基于ILA的临床和放射学特征的风险分层在临床实践中至关重要,特别是用于识别进展为肺纤维化的高风险病例。牵引支气管扩张/支气管扩张指数已成为ILA预后风险分层的有希望的成像生物标志物。这些发现表明了一系列纤维化间质性肺病,包括从ILAs到肺纤维化。
    Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are incidental findings on computed tomography scans, characterized by nondependent abnormalities affecting more than 5% of any lung zone. They are associated with factors such as age, smoking, genetic variants, worsened clinical outcomes, and increased mortality. Risk stratification based on clinical and radiological features of ILAs is crucial in clinical practice, particularly for identifying cases at high risk of progression to pulmonary fibrosis. Traction bronchiectasis/bronchiolectasis index has emerged as a promising imaging biomarker for prognostic risk stratification in ILAs. These findings suggest a spectrum of fibrosing interstitial lung diseases, encompassing from ILAs to pulmonary fibrosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:特发性树状肺骨化(DPO)大多无症状,并在肺部CT中偶然发现。尚无有关精确的CT-病理相关性和特发性DPO患病率的报道。本研究旨在阐明特发性DPO的组织学背景和患病率。
    方法:16例经组织学证实的特发性DPO患者(男性12例,女性4例;平均年龄,38.8年;范围22-56年)在全国流行病学调查中确定。活检前检查的局部HRCT表现,比如分支,圆形,有或没有高衰减的线性结构与组织学发现并排比较.分支的衰减,圆形,线性结构在骨骼窗口图像上分为三点水平(宽度,2500HU;水平,500HU).此外,我们收集了8111例患者的连续肺部CT图像,以检查单个机构的胸腔外恶性肿瘤转移,并评估间质性肺异常(ILAs)和DPO的患病率。
    结果:在所有16例中,分支(n=15,93%),圆形(n=5,31%),或线性(n=5,31%)结构被鉴定,组织学上对应于树状骨化和瘢痕性组织肺炎(OP)/纤维化。组织学上,16例患者均证实骨化。然而,在两种情况下,在相同区域的活检前CT上无法检测到高度衰减的结构.关于特发性DPO的患病率,8111例患者中有283例(3.5%)患有ILA,其中共26例(占所有病例的0.3%,9.2%的ILAs病例)有DPO。
    结论:特发性DPO在CT上显示有或没有高衰减的线性或分支结构,对应于骨化,瘢痕性OP/纤维化。在9.2%的ILAs病例中发现DPO。特发性DPO是ILAs的病理表型之一。
    OBJECTIVE: Idiopathic dendriform pulmonary ossification (DPO) is mostly asymptomatic, and detected incidentally in lung CT. There have been no reports on the precise CT-pathologic correlation and the prevalence of idiopathic DPO. This study aimed to clarify the histological background and prevalence of idiopathic DPO.
    METHODS: Sixteen patients with histologically confirmed idiopathic DPO (12 men and 4 women; mean age, 38.8 years; range 22-56 years) were identified in a nationwide epidemiological survey. Local HRCT findings of pre-biopsy examinations, such as branching, round, linear structures with or without high attenuation were compared side by side with histological findings. The attenuation of branching, round, and linear structures was classified into three-point levels on bone window images (width, 2500 HU; level, 500 HU). Furthermore, we collected continuous pulmonary CT images of 8111 cases for checking up metastasis from extrathoracic malignancy at a single institution, and evaluated the prevalence of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and DPO.
    RESULTS: In all 16 cases, branching (n = 15, 93%), round (n = 5, 31%), or linear (n = 5, 31%) structures were identified, histologically corresponding to dendriform ossification and cicatricial organizing pneumonia (OP)/fibrosis. Histologically, ossification was confirmed in all the 16 patients. However, in two cases, a highly attenuated structure could not be detected on the pre-biopsy CT of the same area. Regarding the prevalence of idiopathic DPO, 283 (3.5%) of 8111 patients had ILAs, of which a total of 26 (0.3% of all cases, 9.2% of ILAs cases) had DPO.
    CONCLUSIONS: Idiopathic DPO showed linear or branching structures with or without high attenuation on CT, corresponded to ossification, cicatricial OP/fibrosis. DPO was seen in 9.2% of ILAs cases. Idiopathic DPO is one of pathologic phenotypes of ILAs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    间质性肺异常(ILA)是放射学术语,它最近经历了定义的澄清,创建了3个亚型。ILA定义为未怀疑患有间质性肺病(ILD)的患者的计算机断层摄影异常的偶然鉴定。ILA的子集可能发展为临床上显著的ILD,并且与与进展无关的发病率相关,例如败血症相关的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的发病率增加。ILA与肺癌患者治疗相关并发症的发生率增加有关。有关相应组织学的信息有限;存在有关最佳患者管理的知识空白。
    Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) is a radiographic term, which has recently undergone clarification of definition with creation of 3 subtypes. ILA is defined as incidental identification of computed tomography abnormalities in a patient who is not suspected of having an interstitial lung disease (ILD). A subset of ILA may progress to clinically significant ILD and is associated with morbidities not related to progression such as an increased incidence of sepsis-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ILA has been associated with an increased incidence of treatment-related complications in patients with lung cancer. Information on corresponding histology is limited; knowledge gaps exist concerning optimal patient management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨间质性肺异常(ILAs)与食管癌患者死亡率的关系及死亡原因。
    方法:这项回顾性研究调查了2011年1月至2015年12月的食管癌患者。使用3点量表在基线CT上对ILA进行视觉评分(0=非ILA,1=ILA不确定,和2=ILA)。ILAs分为非胸膜下亚类,胸膜下非纤维化,胸膜下纤维化.使用多变量Cox比例风险模型比较有和没有ILA的患者的五年总生存期(OS)。根据癌症分期和ILA亚类进行亚组分析。使用Fisher精确检验分析食管癌和肺炎/呼吸衰竭导致的治疗并发症和死亡的发生率。
    结果:共有478例食管癌患者(年龄,66.8岁±8.6[标准差];64名女性)在这项研究中进行了评估。其中,267例患者未显示ILA,125名患者的ILA不确定,86例患者显示ILAs。在调整年龄的多变量Cox比例风险模型中,ILAs是较短OS的重要因素(风险比[HR]=1.68,95%置信区间[CI]1.10-2.55,P=0.016),性别,吸烟史,临床分期,和组织学。在使用临床阶段IVB患者的亚组分析中,ILAs的存在是一个显著因素(HR=3.78,95%CI1.67-8.54,P=0.001)。胸膜下纤维化ILAs与较短的OS显著相关(HR=2.22,95%CI1.25-3.93,P=0.006)。治疗并发症差异无统计学意义。与没有ILA的患者相比,患有ILA的患者因肺炎/呼吸衰竭而死亡的患病率更高(非ILA,2/95[2%];ILA,5/39[13%];P=0.022)。有和没有ILA(非ILA,82/95[86%];ILA32/39[82%];P=0.596)。
    结论:ILA与食管癌患者的生存期缩短显著相关。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and mortality in patients with esophageal cancer and the cause of mortality.
    METHODS: This retrospective study investigated patients with esophageal cancer from January 2011 to December 2015. ILAs were visually scored on baseline CT using a 3-point scale (0 = non-ILA, 1 = indeterminate for ILA, and 2 = ILA). ILAs were classified into subcategories of non-subpleural, subpleural non-fibrotic, and subpleural fibrotic. Five-year overall survival (OS) was compared between patients with and without ILAs using the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Subgroup analyses were performed based on cancer stage and ILA subcategories. The prevalences of treatment complications and death due to esophageal cancer and pneumonia/respiratory failure were analyzed using Fisher\'s exact test.
    RESULTS: A total of 478 patients with esophageal cancer (age, 66.8 years ± 8.6 [standard deviation]; 64 women) were evaluated in this study. Among them, 267 patients showed no ILAs, 125 patients were indeterminate for ILAs, and 86 patients showed ILAs. ILAs were a significant factor for shorter OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-2.55, P = 0.016) in the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for age, sex, smoking history, clinical stage, and histology. On subgroup analysis using patients with clinical stage IVB, the presence of ILAs was a significant factor (HR = 3.78, 95% CI 1.67-8.54, P = 0.001). Subpleural fibrotic ILAs were significantly associated with shorter OS (HR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.25-3.93, P = 0.006). There was no significant difference in treatment complications. Patients with ILAs showed a higher prevalence of death due to pneumonia/respiratory failure than those without ILAs (non-ILA, 2/95 [2%]; ILA, 5/39 [13%]; P = 0.022). The prevalence of death due to esophageal cancer was similar in patients with and without ILA (non-ILA, 82/95 [86%]; ILA 32/39 [82%]; P = 0.596).
    CONCLUSIONS: ILAs were significantly associated with shorter survival in patients with esophageal cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:间质性肺异常(ILA)与疾病的进一步进展有关,死亡风险增加,老年人的肺功能下降,这值得足够的关注。
    目的:本研究的目的是使用低剂量CT(LDCT)量化中国非吸烟无症状城市队列中间质性肺异常(ILA)的程度,并分析与年龄相关的病理变化。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了733名受试者的临床数据和胸部LDCT图像,这些受试者根据年龄分为3组:18-39岁、40-59岁和≥60岁。此外,我们选择了40例肺大泡切除术后存档的蜡包埋肺组织块,并对相同年龄组进行了分类。ILA的四个代表性CT征象,包括小叶间隔增厚(ILST),小叶内间质增厚(ILIT),毛玻璃不透明度(GGO),和网状阴影(RS),根据受影响面积的百分比进行半量化。比较不同性别和年龄组ILA4种CT征象的评分和分布。分析与年龄相关的病理改变。
    结果:ILA发现主要在下叶和胸膜下区域。所有40岁以下受试者的四种CT征象的半定量评分均为0.然而,在40岁以上的受试者中,分数随着年龄的增长而逐渐增加,尽管他们中的大多数仍然很低。肺泡的大小增加,肺泡数量减少,肺泡隔膜变薄,ATII细胞的数量随着年龄的增长而增加。不同年龄组间差异有统计学意义(χ2=50.624,P=0.033;χ2=80.000,P=0.043;χ2=33.833,P=0.000;χ2=13.525,P=0.031)。肺泡隔巨噬细胞数量和胶原纤维百分比增加,而弹性纤维的百分比随着年龄的增长而下降。不同年龄组间差异无统计学意义(χ2=19.817,P=0.506;χ2=52.419,P=0。682;χ2=54.868,P=0.518)。
    结论:当上述四个CT征象位于中央上部区域时,分数有中等或高分,确定潜在的病理原因至关重要。ILA可能是慢性肺损伤的结果。
    BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) are associated with further disease progression, increased mortality risk, and decline in lung function in the elderly, which deserves enough attention.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to quantify the extent of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) in a non-smoking asymptomatic urban cohort in China using low-dose CT (LDCT) and to analyze the age-related pathological changes.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data and chest LDCT images from a cohort of 733 subjects who were categorized into 3 groups: 18-39, 40-59, and ≥60 years old according to age. Furthermore, we selected 40 cases of wax-embedded lung tissue blocks archived after pulmonary bullectomy and the same age groups were categorized. Four representative CT signs of ILA, including interlobular septal thickening (ILST), intralobular interstitial thickening (ILIT), ground-glass opacity (GGO), and reticular shadow (RS), were semi-quantified based on the percentage of the affected area. The scores and distribution of four CT signs of ILA were compared between different sex and age groups. The age-related pathological changes were analyzed.
    RESULTS: The ILA findings were found predominantly in the lower lobes and the subpleural region. The semi-quantitative scores of four CT signs in all subjects under 40 were 0. However, in subjects over 40 years old, the scores gradually increased with age, although most of them remained low. The size of the alveoli increased, the number of alveoli decreased, the alveolar septum became thinner, and the number of ATII cells increased with age. A statistically significant difference was observed among the different age groups (χ2=50.624, P=0.033; χ2=80.000, P=0.043; χ2=33.833, P=0.000; χ2=13.525, P=0.031). The macrophage population and the percentage of collagen fibers in the alveolar septum increased, while the percentage of elastic fibers decreased with age. There was no significant difference among the different age groups (χ2=19.817, P=0.506; χ2=52.419, P=0. 682; χ2=54.868, P=0.518).
    CONCLUSIONS: When the four CT signs mentioned above are in the upper central area, and the score has a medium or high score, it is crucial to determine the underlying pathological causes. ILA may be the result of chronic lung injury.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    气道是否参与间质性肺异常(ILA)的发病机制尚不清楚。ILA对COPD患者肺功能的影响也存在争议。我们旨在根据COPD患者的ILA状态评估气道壁厚度(AWT)和肺功能的定量CT测量。
    从2019年8月1日至2022年8月31日出院的157例COPD患者接受了胸部CT和肺功能检查。使用线性回归分析和多个模型来分析气道壁变化的定量评估与ILA的存在之间的关联。
    在157例COPD患者中,23例患者(14.6%)有模棱两可的ILA,42例患者(26.8%)有明确的ILA。明确的ILA组的Pi10测量值最高(理论气道壁面积的平方根,管腔周长为10mm),分段AWT和分段WA%(墙面积百分比),而无ILA组的Pi10、节段AWT和节段WA%测量值最低。在调整后的分析中(按年龄调整,性别,身体质量指数,吸烟强度,COPD黄金期,肺功能,切片厚度和扫描仪类型),与无ILA的COPD患者相比,在确定的ILA组中,Pi10,节段AWT和节段WA%的测量值更高,差异为0.225mm(p=0.012),0.152mm(p<0.001),4.8%(p<0.001)。明确ILA的COPD患者有较高的FEV1%预测值,FVC%预测和较低的MMEF75/25%预测,但三组间无统计学差异。
    我们的研究表明,与没有ILA的患者相比,有ILA的COPD患者的AWT测量值较高。这些发现表明,气道可能参与了ILA的发病机理。
    UNASSIGNED: Whether the airway is involved in the pathogenesis of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) is not well understood. Also the impact of ILA on lung function in COPD patients remains controversial. We aimed to assess the quantitative CT measurements of airway wall thickness (AWT) and lung function according to ILA status in COPD patients.
    UNASSIGNED: 157 COPD patients discharged from our hospital from August 1, 2019 through August 31, 2022 who underwent chest CT imagings and pulmonary function tests were retrospectively enrolled. Linear regression analysis and multiple models were used to analyze associations between quantitative assessment of airway wall changes and the presence of ILA.
    UNASSIGNED: In 157 COPD patients, 23 patients (14.6%) had equivocal ILA, 42 patients (26.8%) had definite ILA. The definite ILA group had the highest measurements of Pi10 (square root of theoretical airway wall area with a lumen perimeter of 10 mm), segmental AWT and segmental WA% (percentage of wall area), whereas the no ILA group had the lowest measurements of Pi10, segmental AWT and segmental WA%. In the adjusted analyses (adjusted by age, sex, body mass index, smoking intensity, COPD GOLD stage, lung function, slice thickness and scanner type), compared to COPD patients without ILA, the measurements of Pi10, segmental AWT and segmental WA% were higher in definite ILA group with differences of 0.225 mm (p = 0.012), 0.152 mm (p < 0.001), 4.8% (p < 0.001) respectively. COPD patients with definite ILA tended to have higher FEV1% predicted, FVC% predicted and lower MMEF75/25% predicted, but there were no statistically differences among the three groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study demonstrates the higher AWT measures in COPD patients with ILA compared to the patients without ILA. These findings suggest that the airway may be involved in the pathogenesis of ILA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    间质性肺异常(ILA)是在胸部CT上偶然发现的放射学异常,可以显示多种疾病,从亚临床肺纤维化到早期肺纤维化,包括确定性的常规间质性肺炎。为了消除对ILA的困惑,弗莱施纳协会发表了一份关于这个定义的立场文件,临床症状,死亡率增加,放射学进展,以及基于几个西方队列和文章的ILA管理。最近,关于长期结果的研究,危险因素,和量化的ILA,以解决混乱已经在亚洲出版。西方人的ILA发病率为7-10%,而亚洲人的ILA患病率约为4%。ILA与肺癌的各种呼吸道症状或治疗相关并发症的发生率增加密切相关。关于ILA的临床重要性,西方人和亚洲人之间几乎没有区别。尽管定量CT作为ILA的筛查工具的作用需要进一步的验证和标准化的成像方案,在至少一个区域使用5%的阈值显示67.6%的灵敏度,93.3%的特异性,和90.5%的准确度,在韩国,1.8%的面积阈值显示100%的敏感性和99%的特异性.根据Fleischner协会发布的立场文件,我想报告亚洲人口中有多少ILA,预后是什么,并回顾未来应采取哪些管理策略。
    Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are radiologic abnormalities found incidentally on chest computed tomography (CT) that can be show a wide range of diseases, from subclinical lung fibrosis to early pulmonary fibrosis including definitive usual interstitial pneumonia. To clear up confusion about ILA, the Fleischner society published a position paper on the definition, clinical symptoms, increased mortality, radiologic progression, and management of ILAs based on several Western cohorts and articles. Recently, studies on long-term outcome, risk factors, and quantification of ILA to address the confusion have been published in Asia. The incidence of ILA was 7% to 10% for Westerners, while the prevalence of ILA was about 4% for Asians. ILA is closely related to various respiratory symptoms or increased rate of treatment-related complication in lung cancer. There is little difference between Westerners and Asians regarding the clinical importance of ILA. Although the role of quantitative CT as a screening tool for ILA requires further validation and standardized imaging protocols, using a threshold of 5% in at least one zone demonstrated 67.6% sensitivity, 93.3% specificity, and 90.5% accuracy, and a 1.8% area threshold showed 100% sensitivity and 99% specificity in South Korea. Based on the position paper released by the Fleischner society, I would like to report how much ILA occurs in the Asian population, what the prognosis is, and review what management strategies should be pursued in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号