BACKGROUND: Optimal initial exposure through an extended endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for suprasellar craniopharyngiomas ensures safe and unrestricted surgical access while avoiding overexposure, which may prolong the procedure and increase neurovascular adverse events.
METHODS: Here, the authors outline the surgical nuances of a customized bony and dural opening through the transplanum/transtuberculum and transclival variants of the extended EEA to suprasellar craniopharyngiomas based on the tumor-pituitary stalk relationship. A stepwise cadaveric dissection and intraoperative photographs relevant to the approaches are also provided.
CONCLUSIONS: Safe maximal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas through extended EEAs can be feasibly and safely achieved by implementing of tailored ventral exposure.

BACKGROUND: Intractable postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) can be difficult to manage even with aggressive multimodal therapies. Patients who experience uncontrolled refractory cranial PHN despite conservative treatment may benefit from an intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS). For craniofacial neuropathic pain, the traditional approach has been to place the intrathecal catheter tip below the level of the cranial nerve root entry zones, which may lead to insufficient analgesia.
METHODS: We describe a 69-year-old man with a 1-year history of PHN after developing a vesicular rash in the ophthalmic division of cranial nerve V (trigeminal nerve) distribution. The pain was rated 7-8 at rest and 9-10 at breakthrough pain (BTP) on a numeric rating scale. Despite receiving aggressive multimodal therapies including large doses of oral analgesics (gabapentin 150 mg q12 h, oxycodone 5 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg q6 h, and lidocaine 5% patch 700 mg q12 h) and sphenopalatine ganglion block, there was no relief of pain. Subsequently, the patient elected to have an implantable IDDS with the catheter tip placed at the interpeduncular cistern. The frequency of BTP episodes decreased. The patient\'s continuous daily dose was adjusted to 0.032 mg/d after 3 mo of follow-up and stopped 5 mo later. He did not report pain or other discomfort at outpatient follow-up 6 mo and 1 year after stopping intracisternal hydromorphone.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of interpeduncular cistern intrathecal infusion with low-dose hydromorphone by IDDS may be effective for severe craniofacial PHN.

We describe the anatomical landmarks and surgical feasibility of a novel \'safe\' brainstem entry zone to approach ventrally placed intra-axial midbrain tumors. The anatomy of the brainstem was specifically studied to evaluate safe surgical entry zone in the midbrain on two formalin fixed silicon injected cadaver head specimens. A novel entry point through the lateral one - fifth of the cerebral peduncle was identified to be \'safe\' to approach lesions of the ventral midbrain. Three patients, having oculomotor schwannoma, peduncular glioma and a peduncular cavernoma were operated using this safe entry zone. To approach the midbrain, retrosigmoid lateral supracerebellar route was used in two patients and a basal subtemporal avenue was deployed in one patient. On the basis of fine microanatomical dissection on cadavers, a novel entry point through the lateral one-fifth of the cerebral peduncle, 5 mm anterior to the lateral mesencephalic sulcus and approximately 5 mm superior to the fourth nerve was identified. The proposed brainstem entry point traverses the parieto-temporo-occipital pontine fibers and the trajectory is between the corticospinal tracts ventrally and the substantia nigra dorsally. Three patients were operated successfully using the approach. There were no post-operative motor, sensory or extra-pyramidal deficits. The corridor through the lateral one-fifth of the cerebral peduncle presents a safe and relative \'easy\' surgical route to approach ventrally placed intra-axial midbrain tumors.

Excelsior knowledge of endoscopic anatomy and techniques to remove the natural barriers preventing full endonasal access to the interpeduncular and prepontine cisterns determines the ease of transposing the pituitary gland (hypophysiopexy) preserving the glandular function without manipulating the optic apparatus and the oculomotor nerves.
Throughout stepwise cadaveric dissections, we describe the expanded endonasal approach (EEA) to the interpeduncular and prepontine cisterns with special references to the intricate anatomy of the region and techniques for hypophysiopexy and posterior clinoidectomies.
This article illustrates sellar-diaphragmatic dural incisions and various \"pituitary gland transpositions\" techniques performed via extradural (lifting the gland still covered by both dural layers), interdural (transcavernous), and intradural (between the medial wall of the cavernous sinus and the pituitary tunica) to access the prepontine and interpeduncular cisterns.

An understanding of the microsurgical anatomy of posterior clinoid process (PCP) is extremely important to where the removal of PCP is required to access the interpeduncular and prepontine cisterns and upper basilar artery region to manage the aneurysms located in this region. In the present article, we describe our experience with a technique that is safe and provides ample space to look into these regions. The key to safe drilling is that the drilling of the posterior clinoid needs to be performed in a \"touch and back\" manner (rather than clockwise or counterclockwise motion) to break the cortex.

The expanded endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has shown promising results in treatment of midline skull base lesions. Several case reports exist on the utilization of the EEA for treatment of aneurysms. However, a comparison of this approach with the classic transcranial orbitozygomatic approach to the basilar apex (BAX) region is missing.The present study summarizes the results of a series of cadaveric surgical simulations for assessment of the EEA to the BAX region for aneurysm clipping and its comparison with the transcranial orbitozygomatic approach as one of the most common approaches used to treat BAX aneurysms.
Fifteen cadaveric specimens underwent bilateral orbitozygomatic craniotomies as well as an EEA (first without a pituitary transposition [PT] and then with a PT) to expose the BAX. The following variables were measured, recorded, and compared between the orbitozygomatic approach and the EEA: 1) number of perforating arteries counted on bilateral posterior cerebral arteries (PCAs); 2) exposure and clipping lengths of the PCAs, superior cerebellar arteries (SCAs), and proximal basilar artery; and 3) surgical area of exposure in the BAX region.
Except for the proximal basilar artery exposure and clipping, the orbitozygomatic approach provided statistically significantly greater values for vascular exposure and control in the BAX region (i.e., exposure and clipping of ipsilateral and contralateral SCAs and PCAs). The EEA with PT was significantly better in exposing and clipping bilateral PCAs compared to EEA without a PT, but not in terms of other measured variables. The surgical area of exposure and PCA perforator counts were not significantly different between the 3 approaches. The EEA provided better exposure and control if the BAX was located ≥ 4 mm inferior to the dorsum sellae.
For BAX aneurysms located in the retrosellar area, PT is usually required to obtain improved exposure and control for the bilateral PCAs. However, the transcranial approach is generally superior to both endoscopic approaches for accessing the BAX region. Considering the superior exposure of the proximal basilar artery obtained with the EEA, it could be a viable option when surgical treatment is considered for a low-lying BAX or mid-basilar trunk aneurysms (≥ 4 mm inferior to dorsum sellae).

OBJECTIVE: The interpeduncular cistern, including the retrochiasmatic area, is one of the most challenging regions to approach surgically. Various conventional approaches to this region have been described; however, only the endoscopic endonasal approach via the dorsum sellae and the transpetrosal approach provide ideal exposure with a caudal-cranial view. The authors compared these 2 approaches to clarify their limitations and intrinsic advantages for access to the interpeduncular cistern.
METHODS: Four fresh cadaver heads were studied. An endoscopic endonasal approach via the dorsum sellae with pituitary transposition was performed to expose the interpeduncular cistern. A transpetrosal approach was performed bilaterally, combining a retrolabyrinthine presigmoid and a subtemporal transtentorium approach. Water balloons were used to simulate space-occupying lesions. \"Water balloon tumors\" (WBTs), inflated to 2 different volumes (0.5 and 1.0 ml), were placed in the interpeduncular cistern to compare visualization using the 2 approaches. The distances between cranial nerve (CN) III and the posterior communicating artery (PCoA) and between CN III and the edge of the tentorium were measured through a transpetrosal approach to determine the width of surgical corridors using 0- to 6-ml WBTs in the interpeduncular cistern (n = 8).
RESULTS: Both approaches provided adequate exposure of the interpeduncular cistern. The endoscopic endonasal approach yielded a good visualization of both CN III and the PCoA when a WBT was in the interpeduncular cistern. Visualization of the contralateral anatomical structures was impaired in the transpetrosal approach. The surgical corridor to the interpeduncular cistern via the transpetrosal approach was narrow when the WBT volume was small, but its width increased as the WBT volume increased. There was a statistically significant increase in the maximum distance between CN III and the PCoA (p = 0.047) and between CN III and the tentorium (p = 0.029) when the WBT volume was 6 ml.
CONCLUSIONS: Both approaches are valid surgical options for retrochiasmatic lesions such as craniopharyngiomas. The endoscopic endonasal approach via the dorsum sellae provides a direct and wide exposure of the interpeduncular cistern with negligible neurovascular manipulation. The transpetrosal approach also allows direct access to the interpeduncular cistern without pituitary manipulation; however, the surgical corridor is narrow due to the surrounding neurovascular structures and affords poor contralateral visibility. Conversely, in the presence of large or giant tumors in the interpeduncular cistern, which widen the spaces between neurovascular structures, the transpetrosal approach becomes a superior route, whereas the endoscopic endonasal approach may provide limited freedom of movement in the lateral extension.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。