Interferon-gamma Release Tests

γ - 干扰素释放试验
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大量的结核病(TB)感染是结核病持续发病率的主要原因之一。准确的诊断测试对于正确识别和治疗结核病感染者至关重要,这对全球消除结核病至关重要。rdESAT-6和rCFP-10(Cy-Tb)注入(\'Cy-Tb\'),TB特异性抗原皮肤试验和标准FTB-FeronFIA(“标准FTB”)通过荧光免疫测定法测量干扰素-γ是诊断TB感染的两种新颖工具,与当前在低资源环境中的测试相比,具有优势,并降低了卫生系统和受TB影响人群的成本。拟议的研究旨在评估这两种新的结核病感染诊断测试的诊断准确性。
    方法:本横断面研究旨在评估Cy-Tb皮肤试验和标准FTB试验(研究性试验)与QuantiFERON-TBGoldPlus(QFT-Plus)试验作为免疫学参考标准对TB感染的诊断准确性。将在越南国立肺部医院招募三个不同的研究参与者:患有细菌学证实的肺结核的成年人(n=100),结核病患者(n=200)和未感染结核病的人(n=50)的家庭接触者。所有同意的参与者将同时接受Cy-Tb测试,标准FTB和QFT-Plus。主要终点是Cy-Tb皮肤试验和标准FTB测定的诊断准确性,表示为对参考标准的敏感性和特异性。
    背景:经越南国家肺部医院机构审查委员会(65/23/CN-HDDD-BVPTU)和瑞典伦理审查机构(Dnr2023-04271-01)批准。研究结果将通过科学出版物传播给科学界和决策者。
    背景:NCT06221735。
    BACKGROUND: The large reservoir of tuberculosis (TB) infections is one of the main reasons for the persistent incidence of TB. Accurate diagnostic tests are crucial to correctly identify and treat people with TB infection, which is vital to eliminate TB globally. The rdESAT-6 and rCFP-10 (Cy-Tb) injection (\'Cy-Tb\'), a TB-specific antigen skin test and STANDARD F TB-Feron FIA (\'Standard F TB\') measuring interferon-gamma by fluorescence immunoassay assay are two novel tools for the diagnosis of TB infection which offer advantages compared with current tests in low-resource settings and reduced costs to both health systems and TB-affected people. The proposed study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of these two new tests for TB infection diagnosis.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy for TB infection of the Cy-Tb skin test and Standard F TB assay (investigational tests) compared with the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) assay as the immunological reference standard. Three different cohorts of study participants will be recruited at the Vietnam National Lung Hospital: adults with bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary TB (n=100), household contacts of people with TB (n=200) and people without TB infection (n=50). All consenting participants will undergo simultaneous testing with Cy-Tb, Standard F TB and QFT-Plus. The primary endpoint is the diagnostic accuracy of the Cy-Tb skin test and Standard F TB assay, expressed as sensitivity and specificity against the reference standard.
    BACKGROUND: Ethical approval was granted by the Vietnam National Lung Hospital Institutional Review Board (65/23/CN-HDDD-BVPTU) and the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Dnr 2023-04271-01). Study results will be disseminated to the scientific community and policymakers through scientific publications.
    BACKGROUND: NCT06221735.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)释放测定(IGRA)是潜伏性结核分枝杆菌(TB)感染的重要实验室诊断。TB-IGRA测量IFN-γ从外周血细胞的释放,暴露于TB抗原(Ag)的人,丝裂原(MT),或体外阴性/无对照(NL)。同时,异常高的TBAg-NL水平将反映在相同条件下外周血淋巴细胞释放的IFN-γ的升高。因此,我们发现,TBAg-NL水平升高可能成为儿童系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者诊断和治疗的新生物标志物.
    方法:分析2018-2020年广州市妇女儿童医学中心变态反应风湿病科776例患儿的临床资料。探讨TBAg-NL与SLE的关系,我们分析了47例SLE患者的临床资料和TBAg-NL检测结果,然后评估TBAg-NL与SLE疾病活动性之间的关联。
    结果:活动性SLE患者的TBAg-NL水平明显高于非活动性SLE患者(p=0.0002)。TBAg-NL水平与SLE疾病活动指数(SLEDAI)和实验室诊断参数呈正相关。SLE患者的TBAg-NL平均值(0.04191±0.07955,IU/mL)明显高于青少年皮肌炎(JDM)患者(0.0158±0.0337,IU/mL,p=0.036),幼年特发性关节炎(JIA)(0.0162±0.0388,IU/mL,p=0.001),和健康对照(HC)(0.0001±0.0027,IU/mL,p=0.0003)。因此,升高的TBAg-NL水平可以作为SLE的潜在诊断生物标志物,特别是对于活跃的SLE。
    结论:通过TB-IGRA检测IFN-γ释放水平可能有助于评估患有活动性SLE的小儿SLE患者的疾病活动性。
    BACKGROUND: The interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assay (IGRA) is an important laboratory diagnosis for latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) infection. The TB-IGRA measures the release of IFN-γ from peripheral blood cells, who are exposed to TB antigen (Ag), mitogen (MT), or negative/nil control (NL) in vitro. While, an exceptional higher TB Ag-NL level will reflect an elevation of peripheral lymphocytes released IFN-γ in a same condition. Therefore, we found that the elevated levels of TB Ag-NL could become a new biomarker for the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients.
    METHODS: We have analyzed the clinical data of 776 children who are underwent TB-IGRA testing in the Department of Allergy and Rheumatology of Guangzhou Women and Children\'s Medical Center from 2018 to 2020. To investigate the association between TB Ag-NL and SLE, we have analyzed the clinical data of 47 SLE patients and TB Ag-NL testing results, and then evaluated the association between TB Ag-NL and SLE disease activity.
    RESULTS: The TB Ag-NL levels were significantly higher in patients with active SLE than those in inactive SLE (p = 0.0002). The TB Ag-NL levels were positively correlated with the SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) and laboratory diagnosis parameters. The mean value of TB Ag-NL in SLE patients (0.04191 ± 0.07955, IU/mL) were significantly higher than those in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) (0.0158 ± 0.0337, IU/mL, p = 0.036), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) (0.0162 ± 0.0388, IU/mL, p = 0.001), and healthy controls (HC) (0.0001 ± 0.0027, IU/mL, p = 0.0003). Therefore, the elevated TB Ag-NL levels could serve as a potential diagnostic biomarker of SLE, especially for the active SLE.
    CONCLUSIONS: The detection of IFN-γ release levels by the TB-IGRA may be useful to assess SLE disease activity in pediatric patients with active SLE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前,干扰素-γ释放试验(IGRA)成本较高,未将其作为潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)筛查试验策略纳入泰国全民覆盖计划(UCS)福利计划中.这项研究的目的是评估泰国结核病(TB)接触者中LTBI筛查策略的成本效用。建立了混合决策树和马尔可夫模型,以比较结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)和IGRA的终生成本和健康结果,与没有筛查相比,基于社会视角。健康结果是避免的结核病病例总数和质量调整生命年(QALY),结果以增量成本效益比(ICER)表示。进行了单向和概率敏感性分析,以探索所有参数的不确定性。与未筛查相比,TST的ICER为每QALY获得27,645泰铢,而IGRA与TST相比,每QALY的收益为851,030泰铢。在一组1000TB的联系人中,TST和IGRA策略都可以避免282和283例TB病例,分别。在泰国社会支付意愿门槛为每QALY获得160,000泰铢的情况下,TST被认为具有成本效益,而IGRA不会有成本效益,除非每次测试IGRA的成本降至1,434泰铢。
    Currently, interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) is costly and not included as latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening test strategy in Thailand\'s Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS) benefit package. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-utility of LTBI screening strategies among tuberculosis (TB) contacts in Thailand. A hybrid decision tree and Markov model was developed to compare the lifetime costs and health outcomes of tuberculin skin test (TST) and IGRA, in comparison to no screening, based on a societal perspective. Health outcomes were the total number of TB cases averted and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), with results presented as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore uncertainties in all parameters. The ICER of TST compared with no screening was 27,645 baht per QALY gained, while that of IGRA compared to TST was 851,030 baht per QALY gained. In a cohort of 1000 TB contacts, both TST and IGRA strategies could avert 282 and 283 TB cases, respectively. At the Thai societal willingness-to-pay threshold of 160,000 baht per QALY gained, TST was deemed cost-effective, whereas IGRA would not be cost-effective, unless the cost of IGRA was reduced to 1,434 baht per test.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们旨在确定三剂SARS-CoV-2疫苗后细胞和体液免疫受损的危险因素。方法:第三次接种疫苗六个月后,使用干扰素-γ释放测定(IGRAs)对60名健康和139名免疫受损(IC)个体进行T细胞免疫评估。包括血液系统恶性肿瘤(HM)患者,实体恶性肿瘤(SM),风湿性疾病(RD),和肾移植(KT)。使用噬斑减少中和测试(PRNT)和替代病毒中和测试(sVNT)测量中和抗体滴度。结果:T细胞免疫结果显示,使用野生型/α刺突蛋白(SP)和β/γSP的IGRA阳性结果的百分比分别为85%(51/60)和75%(45/60),分别,健康个体占45.6%(62/136)和40.4%(55/136),分别,在IC个人。具有SM或KT的IC显示高百分比的IGRA阴性结果。潜在的疾病造成对野生型SP的细胞免疫应答受损的风险。当所有剂量都作为mRNA疫苗施用时,风险很低。对β/γSP的细胞免疫应答受损的危险因素是潜在的疾病和单核细胞%。在使用野生型SP的sVNT中,191人中有12人(6.3%)检测为阴性。在46个随机样本的PRNT中,6人(13%)对野生型病毒检测呈阴性,和19(41.3%)的omicrons测试为阴性。KT具有体液免疫应答受损的风险。结论:在第三剂SARS-CoV-2疫苗后,潜在疾病会导致细胞免疫反应受损;KT会导致体液免疫反应受损。强调患者的预防措施要求。
    Background: We aimed to identify the risk factors for impaired cellular and humoral immunity after three doses of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Methods: Six months after the third vaccine dose, T-cell immunity was evaluated using interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) in 60 healthy and 139 immunocompromised (IC) individuals, including patients with hematologic malignancy (HM), solid malignancy (SM), rheumatic disease (RD), and kidney transplantation (KT). Neutralizing antibody titers were measured using the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) and surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT). Results: T-cell immunity results showed that the percentages of IGRA-positive results using wild-type/alpha spike protein (SP) and beta/gamma SP were 85% (51/60) and 75% (45/60), respectively, in healthy individuals and 45.6% (62/136) and 40.4% (55/136), respectively, in IC individuals. IC with SM or KT showed a high percentage of IGRA-negative results. The underlying disease poses a risk for impaired cellular immune response to wild-type SP. The risk was low when all doses were administered as mRNA vaccines. The risk factors for an impaired cellular immune response to beta/gamma SP were underlying disease and monocyte%. In the sVNT using wild-type SP, 12 of 191 (6.3%) individuals tested negative. In the PRNT of 46 random samples, 6 (13%) individuals tested negative for the wild-type virus, and 19 (41.3%) tested negative with omicrons. KT poses a risk for an impaired humoral immune response. Conclusions: Underlying disease poses a risk for impaired cellular immune response after the third dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine; KT poses a risk for impaired humoral immune response, emphasizing the requirement of precautions in patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着结核病(TB)发病率的迅速下降,韩国已经强调了潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)的重要性.尽管与其他国家相比,韩国的移民比例不高,越来越多的人认为,它应该积极接受移民,作为解决低出生率和人口老龄化问题的解决方案。这项研究旨在评估在韩国参加LTBI筛查试点计划的移民中的结核病发病率。
    方法:2018年至2019年期间参加韩国LTBI筛查试点计划的移民记录与韩国国家结核病监测系统相关联,以确定结核病的发展。参与者接受了干扰素-γ释放试验(IGRA)和胸部X光检查。按年龄分层的标准化发病率(SIR),来源国的结核病负担是根据一般韩国人口的参考组计算的。
    结果:共有9,517名参与者,确定了14例TB病例。IGRA阳性结果未开始LTBI治疗的参与者显示,结核病发病率为312.5/100,000人年,而那些阴性结果显示结核病发病率为每10万人年34.4,导致发病率比率为9.08(95%置信区间[CI],2.50-32.99)。总参与者(包括IGRA结果阴性的参与者)中TB的SIR为2.60(95%CI,1.54-4.38;P<0.001),而IGRA阳性的SIR为5.86(95%CI,3.15-10.89;P<0.001)。在计算IGRA结果为阳性的参与者之间的SIR时,来自高结核病负担国家或中等结核病负担国家的35岁以下人群表现出较高的SIR(18.08;95%CI,2.55-128.37;P=0.004),和11.30(95%CI,2.82-45.16;P<0.001),分别)。与以前的报告相反,这些报告表明,大多数IGRA阳性结果的老年人是由于远程感染,并且与年轻人相比,结核病风险较低。来自中等结核病负担国家的65岁或以上人群的SIR为6.15(95%CI,0.87-43.69;P=0.069),这与年龄在35至49岁之间的年轻参与者的情况相当(SIR,4.87;95%CI,1.22-19.49;P=0.025)或年龄在50至64岁之间的人(SIR,4.62;95%CI,1.73-12.31;P=0.002)。
    结论:与普通韩国人群相比,来自高或中等结核病负担国家的IGRA阳性的年轻移民显示出相对较高的结核病风险。此外,在IGRA结果为阳性的老年移民中观察到意外的高TB风险.在为韩国移民制定未来的LTBI政策时,筛查应主要针对较年轻的年龄组(35岁以下)。此外,在老年移民中观察到的高结核病风险还需要进一步研究.
    BACKGROUND: With a rapid decrease in tuberculosis (TB) incidence, the significance of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) has been underscored in South Korea. Although South Korea does not have a high proportion of immigrants compared to other countries, there is a growing argument that it should actively embrace immigrants as a solution to address issues of low birth rates and population aging. This study aimed to assess TB incidence among immigrants who participated a pilot LTBI screening program in South Korea.
    METHODS: Records of immigrants participated in a pilot LTBI screening program in South Korea between 2018 and 2019 were linked with Korean National TB Surveillance System to determine TB development. Participants underwent interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) and chest X-rays. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) stratified by age, country of origin\'s TB burden was calculated with a reference group of general South Korean population.
    RESULTS: Of a total of 9,517 participants, 14 TB cases were identified. Participants with positive IGRA results who did not initiate LTBI treatment showed TB incidence of 312.5 per 100,000 person-years, whereas those with negative results showed TB incidence of 34.4 per 100,000 person-years, resulting in an incidence rate ratio of 9.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.50-32.99). SIR of TB among total participants including those with negative IGRA results was 2.60 (95% CI, 1.54-4.38; P < 0.001), whereas SIR among those with positive IGRA results was 5.86 (95% CI, 3.15-10.89; P < 0.001). In the calculation of SIR among participants with positive IGRA results, those aged under 35 from high TB-burden countries or intermediate TB-burden countries showed a high SIR (18.08; 95% CI, 2.55-128.37; P = 0.004), and 11.30 (95% CI, 2.82-45.16; P < 0.001), respectively). Contrary to previous reports that suggest the majority of elderly population with a positive IGRA result were due to remote infection and had a lower TB risk compared to younger ages, SIR among those aged 65 or over from intermediate TB-burden countries was 6.15 (95% CI, 0.87-43.69; P = 0.069), which was comparable to that in younger participants aged between 35 and 49 (SIR, 4.87; 95% CI, 1.22-19.49; P = 0.025) or those aged between 50 and 64 (SIR, 4.62; 95% CI, 1.73-12.31; P = 0.002).
    CONCLUSIONS: Young immigrants with positive IGRA results from countries with high or intermediate TB burden showed a relatively high TB risk compared to a general South Korea population. In addition, unexpected high TB risk was observed among elderly immigrants with positive IGRA results. In establishing future policies for LTBI in immigrants in South Korea, screenings should primarily focus on younger age group (who aged under 35). Additionally, further research is needed on the high TB risk observed in elderly immigrants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    结核病(TB)是由结核分枝杆菌(Mtb)引起的。感染后,可以使用结核菌素皮肤试验或干扰素-γ释放测定来测量对Mtb抗原的免疫应答。Mtb免疫反应性的增加,结核菌素皮肤试验或干扰素-γ释放试验结果从阴性变为阳性,被称为转换,长期以来一直被用作Mtb暴露的度量。然而,免疫反应性的丧失(逆转;阳性后是阴性结果)经常被忽视.相反,在临床和流行病学圈,Mtb免疫反应性通常被认为持续终身并赋予一生的疾病风险。我们提出了一个关键的审查,描述了从队列研究中回归的证据,生态学研究和结核病进展风险研究。我们概述了回归被排除在共识之外的不一致原因,并提出了证据表明,正如转化主要表明先前暴露于Mtb抗原一样,所以它的相反,回复,表明减少或不存在暴露(内源性或外源性)。Mtb免疫反应性在个体和群体中都是动态的,这就是为什么它可用于对短期TB进展风险进行分层。对逆转的忽视塑造了各级结核病研究和政策,影响临床管理和扭曲Mtb感染风险估计和传播模型,导致低估了再暴露对结核病负担的贡献,对传染病的严重疏忽。在它首次展示后一个多世纪,是时候将回归纳入我们对结核病自然史的理解了.
    Tuberculosis (TB) is caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). Following infection, immune responses to Mtb antigens can be measured using the tuberculin skin test or an interferon-γ release assay. The gain of Mtb immunoreactivity, a change from a negative to a positive tuberculin skin test or interferon-γ release assay result, is called conversion and has long been used as a measure of Mtb exposure. However, the loss of immunoreactivity (reversion; a positive followed by a negative result) has often been overlooked. Instead, in clinical and epidemiological circles, Mtb immunoreactivity is commonly considered to persist lifelong and confer a lifetime of disease risk. We present a critical review, describing the evidence for reversion from cohort studies, ecological studies and studies of TB progression risk. We outline the inconsistent reasons why reversion has been dismissed from common understanding and present evidence demonstrating that, just as conversion predominantly indicates prior exposure to Mtb antigens, so its opposite, reversion, suggests the reduction or absence of exposure (endogenous or exogenous). Mtb immunoreactivity is dynamic in both individuals and populations and this is why it is useful for stratifying short-term TB progression risk. The neglect of reversion has shaped TB research and policy at all levels, influencing clinical management and skewing Mtb infection risk estimation and transmission modelling, leading to an underestimation of the contribution of re-exposure to the burden of TB, a serious oversight for an infectious disease. More than a century after it was first demonstrated, it is time to incorporate reversion into our understanding of the natural history of TB.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:结核病(TB)预防性治疗(TPT)可降低人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)患者的结核病风险,然而,许多国家的吸收并不理想。我们评估了常规HIV护理期间QuantiFERONGoldin-ube(QGIT)是否会增加TB感染(TBI)测试和TPT处方。
    方法:这种平行臂,1:1集群随机对照试验比较了南非的标准治疗结核菌素皮肤试验与QGIT。我们登记同意,符合TPT条件的成年人在30天前诊断为HIV≤30天,并使用了意向治疗分析结果:记录有TBI结果的患者比例,与记录的TPT的比例,以及从入学到结果的时间。
    结果:我们从2014年11月至2017年5月在14个诊所招募了2232名患者(58%在干预诊所)。在24个月的随访中,更多干预诊所的参与者有TBI结果(69%vs2%,P<.001)和TPT处方(45%对30%,P=.13)比对照诊所。控制基线协变量,干预诊所有60%(95%置信区间,51-68;P<.001)更多的参与者有TBI结果,12%(95%置信区间,-6到31;P=.18)更多的是TPT处方。在有结果的参与者中,干预诊所的患者获得了结果,TPT更快(干预:入组后6天和29天与对照组的中位数:21天和54天,分别)。
    结论:在此设置中,QGIT在常规HIV护理中导致更多患者出现TBI结果。临床医生还在QGIT干预诊所中对更多的HIV感染者进行TPT,并且做得更快,而不是控制臂。
    背景:NCT02119130。
    BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) preventive therapy (TPT) reduces the risk of TB disease in people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), yet uptake has been suboptimal in many countries. We assessed whether QuantiFERON Gold In-Tube (QGIT) during routine HIV care increased TB infection (TBI) testing and TPT prescriptions.
    METHODS: This parallel-arm, 1:1 cluster-randomized controlled trial compared the standard-of-care tuberculin skin test to QGIT in South Africa. We enrolled consenting, TPT-eligible adults diagnosed with HIV ≤30 days prior and used intention-to-treat analyses for the outcomes: proportion of patients with documented TBI results, proportion with documented TPT, and time from enrollment to outcomes.
    RESULTS: We enrolled 2232 patients across 14 clinics from November 2014 to May 2017 (58% in intervention clinics). At 24 months of follow-up, more participants in intervention clinics had TBI results (69% vs 2%, P < .001) and TPT prescriptions (45% vs 30%, P = .13) than control clinics. Controlling for baseline covariates, intervention clinics had 60% (95% confidence interval, 51-68; P < .001) more participants with TBI results and 12% (95% confidence interval, -6 to 31; P = .18) more with TPT prescriptions. Among participants with results, those in intervention clinics received results and TPT faster (intervention: median of 6 and 29 days after enrollment vs control: 21 and 54 days, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: In this setting, QGIT in routine HIV care resulted in more patients with TBI results. Clinicians also initiated more people with HIV on TPT in QGIT intervention clinics, and did so more quickly, than the control arm.
    BACKGROUND: NCT02119130.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)释放试验在结核感染(TBI)诊断中起关键作用,QuantiFERON-TBGoldPlus是一种酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),是使用最广泛的方法之一。最近发布了周转时间较短的较新的QuantiFERON-TB平台。我们旨在评估这些平台在诊断TBI方面的协议。在基线和随访12周后收集来自结核病家庭接触者前瞻性队列的血液样本,用LIAISON测试,自动化学发光免疫测定(CLIA)系统,QIAreach,侧流(QFT-LF)半自动免疫测定,和ELISAQuantiFERON-TBGoldPlus平台。分析了测试一致性。所有受检样品的ELISA与CLIA总体一致性为83.3%(120/144)[科恩κ系数(κ):0.66(95%CI:0.54-0.77)]。与ELISA相比,CLIA阳性的样品始终提供更高的IFN-γ水平(P<0.001)。获得二十四对(16.7%)不和谐对,所有CLIA阳性/ELISA阴性:15(62.5%)的CLIAIFN-γ水平在边界值(0.35-0.99IU/mL)内,9(37.5%)>0.99IU/mL。QFT-LF与ELISA[κ:0.53(95%CI:0.37-0.68)]的总体一致性仅为76.4%(68/89),获得了21(23.6%)的不一致结果,所有QFT-LF阳性/ELISA阴性。ELISA和CLIA平台之间的总体一致性是相当大的,ELISA和QFT-LF之间仅中等。CLIA平台产生比ELISA更高的IFN-γ水平,导致阳性率提高近17%。这些技术似乎不可互换,并验证其他黄金标准,如微生物学证实的结核病,需要确定这些病例是否代表真正的新感染,或者CLIA是否需要更高的临界值。
    目的:结核病是由结核分枝杆菌引起的空气传播传染病,每年影响超过1000万人,全球有超过20亿人携带无症状结核病感染(TBI)。目前,TBI诊断包括结核菌素皮肤试验和基于血液的干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)释放测定,QiagenQuantiferon-TBGoldPlus(QFT)是使用最广泛的产品之一。我们在结核病接触的前瞻性队列中评估了Qiagen的较新的QFT平台。在当前的QFT-酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和新的QFT-化学发光免疫测定(CLIA)平台之间获得了实质性的协议,虽然QFT-CLIA提供了更高浓度的IFN-γ,导致阳性率提高16.6%。我们强调,这两个平台可能无法直接互换,需要进一步验证。
    Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assays play a pivotal role in tuberculosis infection (TBI) diagnosis, with QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus-an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-among the most widely utilized. Newer QuantiFERON-TB platforms with shorter turnaround times were recently released. We aimed to evaluate these platforms\' agreement in the diagnosis of TBI. Blood samples from a prospective cohort of tuberculosis household contacts were collected at baseline and after 12 weeks of follow-up, and tested with LIAISON, an automated chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) system, QIAreach, a lateral flow (QFT-LF) semi-automated immunoassay, and the ELISA QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus platform. Test concordances were analyzed. ELISA vs CLIA overall agreement was 83.3% for all tested samples (120/144) [Cohen\'s kappa coefficient (κ): 0.66 (95% CI: 0.54-0.77)]. Samples positive with CLIA provided consistently higher IFN-γ levels than with ELISA (P < 0.001). Twenty-four (16.7%) discordant pairs were obtained, all CLIA-positive/ELISA-negative: 15 (62.5%) had CLIA IFN-γ levels within borderline values (0.35-0.99 IU/mL) and 9 (37.5%) >0.99 IU/mL. QFT-LF showed only 76.4% (68/89) overall agreement with ELISA [κ: 0.53 (95% CI: 0.37-0.68)] with 21 (23.6%) discordant results obtained, all QFT-LF-positive/ELISA-negative. Overall concordance between ELISA and CLIA platforms was substantial, and only moderate between ELISA and QFT-LF. The CLIA platform yielded higher IFN-γ levels than ELISA, leading to an almost 17% higher positivity rate. The techniques do not seem interchangeable, and validation against other gold standards, such as microbiologically-confirmed tuberculosis disease, is required to determine whether these cases represent true new infections or whether CLIA necessitates a higher cutoff.
    OBJECTIVE: Tuberculosis is an airborne infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis that affects over 10 million people annually, with over 2 billion people carrying an asymptomatic tuberculosis infection (TBI) worldwide. Currently, TBI diagnosis includes tuberculin skin test and the blood-based interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assays, with Qiagen QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT) being among those most widely utilized. We evaluated Qiagen\'s newer QFT platforms commercially available in a prospective cohort of tuberculosis contacts. A substantial agreement was obtained between the current QFT-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the new QFT-chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) platform, although QFT-CLIA provided higher concentrations of IFN-γ, leading to a 16.6% higher positivity rate. We highlight that both platforms may not be directly interchangeable and that further validation is required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    世界卫生组织终止结核病战略的目标是到2035年将结核病(TB)发病率降低90%。建议在活动性结核病患者的接触者中对潜伏性结核病感染(LTBI)进行系统测试和治疗,作为减少结核病发病率的方法之一。然而,缺乏准确诊断LTBI的工具。我们评估了与HIV阴性健康对照(HC)相比,在细菌学证实的指标病例的家庭接触者中,全血宿主转录组标记(TM)诊断LTBI的适当性。QuantiFERON-TB金加干扰素γ释放测定(IGRA)和逆转录酶定量PCR分别用于测定LTBI和定量TM表达。通过逻辑回归模型评估TM表达与LTBI之间的关联。共有100人参加,49TB暴露(TBEX)家庭触点和51HC,已注册。25(51%)TBEX个体通过IGRA测试呈阳性,被称为LTBI个体,37例(72.5%)HC为IGRA阴性。与HC相比,在LTBI中11个评估的TM的表达被显著抑制。在11个TM中,ZNF296和KLF2表达与LTBI密切相关,并成功将LTBI与HC区分开来。矛盾的是,测试IGRA阴性的21名(49%)TBEX参与者表现出与IGRA阳性相同的抑制TM表达模式(LTBI确认的个体)。结果表明,基因表达的抑制是LTBI的基础,并且可能是比标准护理IGRA更敏感的诊断生物标志物。
    The World Health Organization End TB strategy aims for a 90% reduction of tuberculosis (TB) incidence by 2035. Systematic testing and treatment of latent TB infection (LTBI) among contacts of active TB patients is recommended as one of the ways to curtail TB incidence. However, there is a shortage of tools to accurately diagnose LTBI. We assessed the appropriateness of whole blood host transcriptomic markers (TM) to diagnose LTBI among household contacts of bacteriologically confirmed index cases compared to HIV negative healthy controls (HC). QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus Interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) and reverse-transcriptase quantitative PCR were used to determine LTBI and quantify TM expression respectively. Association between TM expression and LTBI was evaluated by logistic regression modelling. A total of 100 participants, 49 TB exposed (TBEx) household contacts and 51 HC, were enrolled. Twenty-five (51%) TBEx individuals tested positive by IGRA, and were denoted as LTBI individuals, and 37 (72.5%) HC were IGRA-negative. Expression of 11 evaluated TM was significantly suppressed among LTBI compared to HC. Out of the 11 TM, ZNF296 and KLF2 expression were strongly associated with LTBI and successfully differentiated LTBI from HC. Paradoxically, 21 (49%) TBEx participants who tested IGRA negative exhibited the same pattern of suppressed TM expression as IGRA positive (LTBI-confirmed individuals). Results suggest that suppression of gene expression underlies LTBI and may be a more sensitive diagnostic biomarker than standard-of-care IGRA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:患有风湿性疾病的患者服用疾病缓解性抗风湿药(DMARD)后,患结核病(TB)的风险增加。目前的指南建议在开始DMARD之前筛查潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)。然而,缺乏关于LTBI年度筛查价值的数据。
    方法:对2017-2021年期间门诊风湿病诊所的DMARD患者(≥18岁)进行了回顾性分析。收集的数据包括患者人口统计学,风湿病诊断,药物,结核病相关危险因素,干扰素γ释放试验(IGRA)结果,LTBI诊断和治疗。进行描述性统计。
    结果:在339名患者中,81(23.9%)为男性,259(76.4%)为白色,和93(27.5%)是拉丁裔。炎症性关节炎(84.1%)是最常见的风湿性诊断。常见的DMARD是JAK抑制剂(19.2%),TNF-α抑制剂(18.9%),和IL-17A抑制剂(18.0%)。只有2例患者在基线时IGRA阳性,两者都有LTBI治疗史。IGRA测试阳性记录在1(0.7%)中,3(1.8%),3(1.3%),和3(1.1%)分别在2018年、2019年、2020年和2021年。在连续的年度IGRA测试中,四名患者从阴性转变为阳性。在回顾了IGRA测试和结核病危险因素后,只有一名患者被认为是新诊断为LTBI,需要4个月的利福平.
    结论:在非流行地区,对DMARD低危患者进行系列IGRA检测,新诊断LTBI的发生率非常低.应在IGRA测试之前进行基于TB相关风险因素的有针对性的LTBI筛查,而不是在非地方性环境中进行普遍的年度筛查。
    OBJECTIVE: Patients living with rheumatologic diseases on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) are at an increased risk of developing tuberculosis (TB). Current guidelines recommend screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) before initiating DMARD. However, data is lacking on the value of yearly screening for LTBI.
    METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on adult patients (≥ 18 years) with rheumatologic disease on DMARD followed longitudinally in the outpatient rheumatology clinics between 2017-2021. Collected data included patient demographics, rheumatologic diagnosis, medications, TB-related risk factors, interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) results, LTBI diagnosis and treatment. Descriptive statistics were performed.
    RESULTS: Among 339 patients, 81 (23.9%) were male, 259 (76.4%) were white, and 93 (27.5%) were Latinx. Inflammatory arthritis (84.1%) was the most common rheumatic diagnosis. Common DMARD were JAK inhibitors (19.2%), TNF-alpha inhibitors (18.9%), and IL-17 A inhibitors (18.0%). Only 2 patients at baseline had positive IGRA, and both had a history of treated LTBI. Positive IGRA tests were recorded in 1 (0.7%), 3 (1.8%), 3 (1.3%), and 3 (1.1%) in the years 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. Four patients converted from negative to positive during serial yearly IGRA testing. After reviewing the IGRA test and TB risk factors, only one patient was considered newly diagnosed with LTBI, requiring 4 months of rifampin.
    CONCLUSIONS: In a non-endemic area, serial IGRA testing of low-risk patients on DMARD yielded very low rate of newly diagnosed LTBI. A targeted LTBI screening based on TB-related risk factors should be performed prior to IGRA testing rather than universal yearly screening in a non-endemic setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号