目的:为了评估含量,关于玻璃体内注射(IVI)程序的YouTube视频的接收和质量,作为患者的教育资源。
方法:我们的研究是回顾性的,横截面,基于注册的研究。术语“玻璃体内注射,\"\"玻璃体内注射治疗,\"\"眼部注射,“\”眼部注射治疗,\"\"地塞米松眼内注射,“\”抗VEGF注射液,\"\"Ozurdex®,\"\"Lucentis®,在YouTube上搜索了“”和“Eylea®”。视频持续时间,总视图,喜欢的数量,不喜欢的数量,并记录了评论的数量。使用DISCERN问卷评估视频内容的质量和可靠性,美国医学会杂志(JAMA)评分,和全球质量评分(GQS)。视频功率指数(VPI)用于确定视频的流行度。
结果:研究中包含了111个视频。平均持续时间为4.30分钟,平均观看次数为27,415.90次。意思是否定的,JAMA,GQS评分分别为45.39±9.7、1.76±0.49和3.60±0.84。平均VPI为12.16±35.56(0-277.80)。视频发行商如下:31个(27.9%)私人医院YouTube频道,17名(15.3%)眼科医生,45个(40.5%)健康相关的YouTube频道,18(16.2%)“其他渠道。“视频的主要叙述者中有72位(64.9%)是眼科医生。TheDISDERN,GQS和JAMA评分呈正相关(P=0.001)。VPI分数和DISCERN之间没有相关性,JAMA和GQS评分(P=0.05)。
结论:这项研究表明,关于IVIs的YouTube视频包含对患者中等有用的信息。YouTube视频可能有助于患者寻求有关IVIs的信息,但是医生必须小心纠正任何误解。
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the content, reception and quality of YouTube videos on intravitreal injection (IVI) procedures as an educational resource for patients.
METHODS: Our study was a retrospective, cross-sectional, register-based study. The terms \"intravitreal injection,\" \"intravitreal injection treatment,\" \"eye injection,\" \"eye injection treatment,\" \"dexamethasone intraocular injection,\" \"anti-VEGF injection,\" \"Ozurdex®,\" \"Lucentis®,\" and \"Eylea®\" were searched on YouTube. Video duration, total views, number of likes, number of dislikes, and number of comments were recorded. Quality and reliability of video content was assessed using the DISCERN questionnaire, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score, and the Global Quality Score (GQS). The video power index (VPI) was used to determine the popularity of the videos.
RESULTS: One hundred eleven videos were included in the study. The mean duration was 4.30minutes, and the mean number of views was 27,415.90. The mean DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS scores were 45.39±9.7, 1.76±0.49, and 3.60±0.84 respectively. The mean VPI was 12.16±35.56 (0-277.80). Video publishers were as follows: 31 (27.9%) private hospital YouTube channels, 17 (15.3%) ophthalmologists, 45 (40.5%) health-related YouTube channels, 18 (16.2%) \"other channels.\" Seventy-two (64.9%) of the main narrators of the videos were ophthalmologists. The DISCERN, GQS and JAMA scores were correlated (P = 0.001). There was no correlation between the VPI scores and the DISCERN, JAMA and GQS scores (P = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that YouTube videos on IVIs contain moderately useful information for patients. YouTube videos may be helpful for patients seeking information about IVIs, but physicians must be careful to correct any misunderstandings.