Initiation of treatment

开始治疗
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在评估15年治疗开始时慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者临床特征的变化。
    该研究包括659名初治CHB患者,他们在2006年1月至2020年12月之间开始接受核苷(t)ide类似物。纳入研究的患者分为三组,每组五年,根据治疗的开始日期。
    平均年龄为46.2±14.5岁,男性为445(67.5%)。二百零五(31.1%)患者患有肝硬化。41例(6.2%)发生肝细胞癌(HCC)。与第1组患者相比,第2组较年轻,失代偿期肝硬化较低,肝癌和腹水,儿童A肝硬化较高(均p<0.05)。与第2组患者相比,第3组患者的肝硬化和食管静脉曲张较高(均p<0.05)。恩替卡韦或替诺福韦的使用从第1组的66.5%增加到第3组的99.2%(p<0.05)。
    开始治疗CHB患者的平均年龄增加。患者肝硬化较少。在过去的5年里,几乎所有患者均接受恩替卡韦或替诺福韦治疗。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to evaluate the changes in the clinical characteristics of chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) patients at the initiation of treatment over a 15-years period.
    UNASSIGNED: The study included 659 treatment-naive CHB patients who started receiving nucleos(t)ide analogs between January 2006 and December 2020. The patients included in the study were divided into three groups of five years each, according to the start date of treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean age was 46.2±14.5 years and 445 (67.5%) were male. Two hundred and five (31.1%) patients had cirrhosis. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) developed in forty-one patients (6.2%). Compared to patients in Group 1, Group 2 were younger and had lower decompensated cirrhosis, HCC and ascites, had higher Child A cirrhosis (all p<0.05). Cirrhosis and esophageal varices were higher in patients in Group 3 compared to patients in Group 2 (all p<0.05). Entecavir or tenofovir use increased from 66.5% in Group 1 to 99.2% in Group 3 (p<0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: The mean age at initiation of treatment for CHB patients increased. The patients had less cirrhosis. In the last 5 years, almost all patients were treated with entecavir or tenofovir.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Background: The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pandemic increased the demand for health care resources in South Africa. To decrease the burden on specialised facilities, the Department of Health decentralised antiretroviral (ARV) management. In the uMgungundlovu district, adult HIV primary care services reported lower rates of HIV viral load (VL) suppression after initiation of ARVs compared to other levels of care. The aim of the study was to evaluate paediatric HIV services in the same district. Methods: Four ARV clinics, at different levels of care, initiating and monitoring paediatric HIV infection treatment in uMgungundlovu district, KwaZulu Natal, were selected: primary healthcare services, general practitioner services, general paediatric services and subspecialist infectious diseases services were included. Paediatric patients newly diagnosed between January 2014 and June 2015 were included in the study. The rate of HIV VL suppression at one year after treatment initiation was the primary outcome measure. A total of 377 patients were included, 35 at the nurse-led primary care clinic, 25 at the general practitioner-led primary care clinic, 156 at the paediatrician-led secondary care clinic, and 161 at the HIV paediatric subspecialist-led tertiary care clinic. Of the 377 patients, 154 (59.9%) achieved VL suppression at one year, with 75% (18/24), 61.9% (13/21), 51.7% (60/116) and 66.7% (63/96) achieving HIV VL suppression at the four clinic types, respectively. Conclusion: HIV VL suppression rates were variable, but did not differ statistically across levels of health care. Outcomes were not improved by initiation in specialist or subspecialist-led clinics, which supports the strategy of increasing access by decentralising HIV care for paediatric patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Following publication in 2014 of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) official report changing the definition of epilepsy, a number of questions remain unresolved in regard to deciding when to start treatment and to the choice of a particular antiseizure medication (ASM). This study uses a Delphi method to update consensus among a panel of experts on the initiation of epilepsy treatment in order to provide insight regarding those questions. The study was undertaken in four phases. Firstly, a multi-center steering committee met to review relevant bibliography and to draft a questionnaire. Secondly, a panel of neurologists specialized in epilepsy was selected and convened. Thirdly, an online survey was carried out in two rounds. Fourthly, the final results were discussed at a face-to-face meeting of the steering committee to draw conclusions. The final questionnaire focused on three independent sections: the decision to commence ASM in different clinical situations, the choice of initial monotherapy depending on the type of epilepsy and the patient\'s age/sex (including childbearing potential), and the choice of initial monotherapy depending on comorbidity. In these two latter sections, fourteen ASMs approved for monotherapy use by the EMA and available in Spain were considered. Regarding the decision as to when to commence treatment, the results show agreement exists to initiate treatment following a first generalized tonic-clonic seizure or a focal seizure if the electroencephalography (EEG) reveals epileptiform activity, if the MRI reveals a lesion, or when it occurs in elderly patients. With respect to the choice of initial monotherapy depending on the type of epilepsy and the patient\'s age/sex profile, it is agreed to avoid valproic acid (VPA) in women with childbearing potential, with levetiracetam (LEV) and lamotrigine (LTG) being the preferable options in generalized epilepsy. In focal epilepsy, the options are broader, particularly in men, and include the most recent ASMs approved for monotherapy. In the elderly, LEV, lacosamide (LCM), eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) and LTG are considered the most suitable drugs for initiating treatment. With regard to comorbidities, the recommendation is to avoid enzyme inducing ASMs, with LEV, the most recent ASMs approved for monotherapy and LTG being the preferred options. In conclusion, as the ILAE definition states, there are different situations that lead to treatment initiation after a first seizure. When choosing the first ASM, the type of epilepsy, childbearing potential and drug-drug interaction are key factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Congenital hypothyroidism (CH) is a common cause of mental retardation; it has a worldwide incidence ranging from 1:3000 to 1:4500 live births. Predictably, an increase in the reported incidence of primary CH occurs when the cut-off levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone are lowered. We aimed to evaluate the results of a congenital hypothyroidism screening program and current status in this study.
    METHODS: Analysis results of 1300 infants who were referred to the endocrinology polyclinic because of suspected CH within the scope of the Ministry of Health National Neonatal Screening Program were retrospectively evaluated.
    RESULTS: The diagnosis of CH and initiation of treatment were both done in 223 (18.5%) and 10 (0.8%) infants as a result of the initial evaluation and follow-up, respectively. The mean capillary and venous thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels of 223 patients were 40.78 (5.5-100) μIU/mL and 67.26 (10.7-100) μIU/mL, respectively. These patients\' mean heel prick time was 8.65 (0-30, median: 7) days. The mean age of the 223 infants whose treatment was initiated as a result of the initial evaluation was 19.87 (4-51, median: 20) days, and the mean age of the infants whose treatment was started at follow-up was 43.71 (29-65) days. The duration between heel prick time and venous TSH time was 11.10 (2-28, median: 11) days and was longer than planned (3-5 days).
    CONCLUSIONS: Although the duration for the diagnosis and initiation of CH treatment were markedly reduced with the implementation of the screening program in Turkey compared to those before the implementation of the screening program, we have not yet achieved the ideal time (≤14 days).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Hyperlactatemia is a strong predictor of mortality in diverse populations of critically ill patients. In this article, we will give an overview of how lactate is used in the intensive care unit. We describe the use of lactate as a predictor of outcome, as a marker to initiate therapy and to monitor adequacy of initiated treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号