Inguinal hernia repair

腹股沟疝修补术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹股沟疝修补术(IHR)是通过开放或腹腔镜方法进行的常见儿科手术。这项调查研究的目的是评估全国儿科普通外科医生样本中IHR的当前方法。
    方法:在2023年,对21个美国机构的所有小儿普通外科医生进行了REDCap调查。描述性统计用于分析反应。
    结果:响应率为70.0%(145/207),平均奖学金毕业年份为2011年。受访者报告说,他们主要是在奖学金中教授开放(73.1%)或腹腔镜(6.9%)技术,而18.6%的人报告说两种技术都被平等地教授。总的来说,60.7%的受访者表示目前正在进行腹腔镜和开腹IHR,27.6%报告仅进行开腹IHR,11.7%报告仅进行腹腔镜IHR。在单方面开放的《国际卫生条例》期间,75.8%的受访者检查并修复对侧腹股沟疝,最常见的是通过疝囊放置腹腔镜(76.3%)。青少年的选择性网片使用在腹腔镜和开放修复方法之间相似。对于复发性疝,37.2%的受访者表示执行以前没有执行的方法,38.6%和22.8%表示他们常规进行腹腔镜或开腹手术,分别,无论最初的修复方法如何。
    结论:超过三分之二的外科医生报告将腹腔镜IHR纳入他们的实践中,尽管近四分之三的受访者表示他们主要在培训中被教导开放方法。随着时间的推移,腹腔镜IHR的培训一直在增加,受访者报告了各种各样的腹腔镜和开放修复技术。
    方法:IV.
    BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is a common pediatric operation performed via open or laparoscopic approaches. The objective of this survey study was to assess current approaches to IHR in a national sample of pediatric general surgeons.
    METHODS: A REDCap survey was distributed to all pediatric general surgeons at 21 US institutions in 2023. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze responses.
    RESULTS: The response rate was 70.0% (145/207) with median fellowship graduation year of 2011. Respondents reported they were primarily taught either an open (73.1%) or laparoscopic (6.9%) technique in fellowship, while 18.6% reported being taught both techniques equally. Overall, 60.7% of respondents reported currently performing both laparoscopic and open IHR, while 27.6% reported performing only open IHR and 11.7% reported performing only laparoscopic IHR. During unilateral open IHR, 75.8% of respondents check for and repair a contralateral inguinal hernia, most commonly by placing a laparoscope via the hernia sac (76.3%). Selective mesh use in adolescents was similar between laparoscopic and open repair approaches. For recurrent hernias, 37.2% of respondents indicated performing the approach that was not performed previously, while 38.6% and 22.8% indicated they routinely perform a laparoscopic or open approach, respectively, regardless of initial repair approach.
    CONCLUSIONS: Over two thirds of surgeons reported incorporating laparoscopic IHR into their practice despite nearly three-quarters of respondents indicating they were primarily taught an open approach in training. Training in laparoscopic IHR has been increasing over time, and respondents reported a wide variety of laparoscopic and open repair techniques.
    METHODS: IV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在探讨3D腹腔镜在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝(TAPP)手术老年患者中的安全性和有效性。根据手术期间使用的腹腔镜设备将患者分为两组。术前临床数据,术中,收集和术后资料进行统计分析。从2020年1月到2023年8月,这项研究共评估了127例原发性单侧腹股沟疝患者。3DTAPP组中61和2DTAPP组中66。基线数据差异无统计学意义,包括平均年龄,性别分布,BMI指数,疝类型,疝缺损的大小和位置,合并症,两组抗凝药物使用情况比较(P>0.05)。在操作指标方面,3D组平均手术时间较短(51.61±7.16minvs.78.59±13.51分钟,P<0.001),平均网格放置时间(6.07±1.40minvs.9.77±1.21分钟,P<0.001),和平均腹膜缝合时间(7.34±1.85minvs.9.73±1.32min,P<0.001)与2D组相比。然而,平均失血量没有统计学上的显著差异,术后疼痛评分,术后住院时间,两组住院总费用比较(P>0.05)。两组术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者手术期间均未出现头晕、恶心等不良反应。三维腹腔镜在TAPP手术中提供高清晰度,三维手术图像,降低操作难度,有效缩短操作时间。
    This study aims to explore the safety and efficacy of 3D laparoscopy in elderly patients undergoing transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) surgery for inguinal hernia. Patients were divided into two groups based on the laparoscopic equipment used during surgery. Clinical data preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively were collected and subjected to statistical analysis. From January 2020 to August 2023, a total of 127 patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia were evaluated in this study, 61 in the 3D TAPP group and 66 in the 2D TAPP group. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline data, including average age, gender distribution, BMI index, hernia type, hernia defect size and location, comorbidities, and usage of anticoagulant drugs between the two groups (P > 0.05). In terms of operative indicators, the 3D group showed shorter mean operation time (51.61 ± 7.16 min vs. 78.59 ± 13.51 min, P < 0.001), mean mesh placement time (6.07 ± 1.40 min vs. 9.77 ± 1.21 min, P < 0.001), and mean peritoneal suture time (7.34 ± 1.85 min vs. 9.73 ± 1.32 min, P < 0.001) compared to the 2D group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in mean blood loss, postoperative pain scores, postoperative hospital stay, and total hospital costs between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05). No adverse reactions such as dizziness or nausea were reported by surgeons during the procedures in either group. Three-dimensional laparoscopy in TAPP surgery provides high-definition, three-dimensional surgical images, reducing the difficulty of operations and effectively shortening the operation time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹股沟疝修补术是一种常见的外科手术。微创技术的进步,特别是腹腔镜(LR)和机器人辅助(RR)方法,重塑了手术选择的格局。这项荟萃分析旨在通过对文献的全面回顾,系统地评估和比较腹腔镜和机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术的有效性和安全性。对数据库进行了系统搜索,以确定截至2023年11月30日发表的相关研究。15项研究,共有64,568名参与者,符合纳入标准。对关键成果的汇总估计,包括操作持续时间,整体并发症,和手术部位感染(SSI),使用随机效应模型计算。这项荟萃分析揭示了手术持续时间的统计学差异,与机器人辅助技术相比,更喜欢腹腔镜修复(平均差:26.85分钟,95%CI(1.16,52.54))。两种方法的总体并发症没有显着差异(比值比:1.54,95%CI(0.83,2.85))。然而,机器人辅助手术的SSI风险显著增加(比值比:3.32,95%CI(2.63,4.19)).这项荟萃分析提供了对腹腔镜和机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术的比较有效性的见解。虽然腹腔镜检查的手术时间较短,总体并发症发生率相当,在机器人辅助手术期间,SSI的风险增加需要在临床决策中仔细考虑.外科医生和医疗保健提供者应根据患者特征权衡这些发现,强调个性化的手术决策方法。腹股沟疝修补术的不断发展的景观值得进行研究,以改进技术并优化结果,以使接受这些手术的患者受益。
    Inguinal hernia repair is a common surgical intervention. Advancements in minimally invasive techniques, specifically laparoscopic (LR) and robot-assisted (RR) approaches, have reshaped the landscape of surgical options. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically assess and compare the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic and robot-assisted inguinal hernia repair through a comprehensive review of the literature. A systematic search of databases was conducted to identify relevant studies published up to November 30, 2023. Fifteen studies, encompassing a total of 64,568 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Pooled estimates for key outcomes, including duration of operation, overall complications, and surgical site infection (SSI), were calculated using random-effects models. This meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in the duration of surgery, favoring laparoscopic repair over robot-assisted techniques (mean difference: 26.85 minutes, 95% CI (1.16, 52.54)). Overall complications did not significantly differ between the two approaches (odds ratio: 1.54, 95% CI (0.83, 2.85)). However, a significantly greater risk of SSI was identified for robot-assisted procedures (odds ratio: 3.32, 95% CI (2.63, 4.19)). This meta-analysis provides insights into the comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic and robot-assisted inguinal hernia repair. While laparoscopy has shorter operative times and comparable overall complication rates, the increased risk of SSI during robot-assisted procedures necessitates careful consideration in clinical decision-making. Surgeons and healthcare providers should weigh these findings according to patient characteristics, emphasizing a personalized approach to surgical decision-making. The evolving landscape of inguinal hernia repair warrants ongoing research to refine techniques and optimize outcomes for the benefit of patients undergoing these procedures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:经腹股沟腹膜前(TIPP)技术是一种开放的腹股沟疝修补术,后置网片可降低复发率。然而,经腹腹膜前(TAPP)和完全腹膜外(TEP)技术具有相似的网状定位,具有微创手术(MIS)的优势。因此,我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,比较了TIPP和MIS对腹股沟疝修补术的疗效.
    方法:Cochrane,Embase,Scopus,Scielo,和PubMed进行了系统搜索,以比较TIPP和MIS技术在腹股沟疝修补术中的研究。评估的结果是复发,慢性疼痛,手术部位感染(SSI),血清肿,还有血肿.我们分别对TAPP和TEP技术进行了亚组分析。用RStudio进行统计学分析。
    结果:对81项研究进行了筛选,对19项研究进行了全面回顾。包括六项研究,其中两人将TIPP与TEP技术进行了比较,两个人将TIPP与TAPP进行了比较,两个人将TIPP与TEP和TAPP技术进行了比较。我们发现与TIPP相比,TEP技术的复发率较低(0.38%对1.19%;RR2.68;95%CI1.01至7.11;P=0.04)。此外,在总体分析中,我们发现TIPP组的血清肿发生率较低(RR0.21;P=0.002).我们没有发现总复发的统计学差异(RR1.6;P=0.19),慢性疼痛(RR1.53;P=0.2),SSI(RR2.51;P=0.47),MIS和TIPP之间的血肿(RR1.29;P=0.76)。在TAPP技术的亚组分析中,所有结果均未发现统计学上的显着差异。
    结论:我们的系统评价和荟萃分析发现TIPP和MIS方法在复发的总体分析中没有差异,SSI,和慢性疼痛率。需要进一步的研究来分析各个技术,并就此主题得出更准确的结论。
    IDCRD42024530107,2024年4月8日。
    OBJECTIVE: The transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) technique is an open approach to groin hernia repair with posteriorly positioned mesh supposed to reduce recurrence rates. However, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) techniques have similar mesh positioning with the advantages of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing TIPP and MIS for groin hernia repair.
    METHODS: Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, Scielo, and PubMed were systematically searched for studies comparing TIPP and MIS techniques for groin hernia repair. Outcomes assessed were recurrence, chronic pain, surgical site infection (SSI), seroma, and hematoma. We performed a subgroup analysis of TAPP and TEP techniques separately. Statistical analysis was performed with R Studio.
    RESULTS: 81 studies were screened and 19 were thoroughly reviewed. Six studies were included, of which two compared TIPP with TEP technique, two compared TIPP with TAPP, and two compared TIPP with both TEP and TAPP techniques. We found lower recurrence rates for the TEP technique compared to TIPP (0.38% versus 1.19%; RR 2.68; 95% CI 1.01 to 7.11; P = 0.04). Also, we found lower seroma rates for TIPP group on the overall analysis (RR 0.21; P = 0.002). We did not find statistically significant differences regarding overall recurrence (RR 1.6; P = 0.19), chronic pain (RR 1.53; P = 0.2), SSI (RR 2.51; P = 0.47), and hematoma (RR 1.29; P = 0.76) between MIS and TIPP. No statistically significant differences were found in the subgroup analysis of TAPP technique for all the outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review and meta-analysis found no differences between TIPP and MIS approaches in the overall analysis of recurrence, SSI, and chronic pain rates. Further research is needed to analyze individual techniques and draw a more precise conclusion on this subject.
    UNASSIGNED: ID CRD42024530107, April 8, 2024.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    腹股沟疝修补术是儿科人群中最常见的外科手术之一。虽然罕见的并发症,膀胱损伤会给患者带来巨大的负担。这项研究概述了选择性腹股沟疝修补术后膀胱损伤的病例,并总结了预防这种并发症的方法。旨在强调不要低估标记为“常规手术”的干预措施的重要性,以避免对患者造成可避免的伤害。
    Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgical procedures in the pediatric population. While a rare complication, bladder injury can impose a significant burden on patients. This study outlined a case of bladder injury following selective inguinal hernia repair and summarized methods to prevent this complication, aiming to emphasize the importance of not underestimating interventions labeled as \"routine surgery\" in order to avoid avoidable harm to patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹股沟疝修补术缺乏标准的修复技术,腹腔镜和开放腹膜前方法显示相似的结果。尽管成本较高,机器人手术的普及正在上升,技术优势驱动。在将开放式修复技术与机器人方法进行比较方面存在争议,给出矛盾的结果。这项研究的目的是比较术后结果,包括并发症,慢性疼痛,和复发,开放式和机器人辅助腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术。
    方法:这项单中心回顾性研究包括在专业单位接受择期腹股沟疝修补术的患者,2018年9月至2023年5月,采用开放式腹膜前和机器人辅助腹腔镜方法。对这些技术的短期和长期结果进行了比较分析。此外,采用多因素logistic回归分析术后并发症的预测因素。
    结果:共有308例患者符合纳入标准。198例(64%)患者使用开放式腹膜前方法进行了手术,110例(36%)使用了机器人辅助腹腔镜检查。机器人辅助组患者年龄较小(P=0.006),合并症较少(P<0.001)。两组在术后并发症方面无差异(P=0.133)。慢性疼痛(P=0.463)或复发(P=0.192)。多变量分析确定ASA≥III(OR,1.763;95CI,1.068-3.994;P=0.027)和腹股沟腹疝(OR,2.371,95CI,1.407-3.944;P=0.001)为术后并发症的危险因素。
    结论:开放腹膜前和机器人辅助腹腔镜两种方法在并发症方面显示相似的结果,慢性疼痛,由经验丰富的外科医生进行时复发。开放式腹膜前入路,它的手术时间更快,对于高共病病例可能是有利的。治疗选择应考虑患者因素,外科医生的经验,和医疗资源。
    BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia repair lacks a standard repair technique, with laparo-endoscopic and open preperitoneal methods showing similar outcomes. Despite higher costs, the popularity of robotic surgery is on the rise, driven by technological advantages. Controversies persist in comparing open repair techniques with the robotic approach, given contradictory results. The objective of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes, including complications, chronic pain, and recurrence, between open and robotic-assisted preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.
    METHODS: This single-center retrospective study encompassed patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair in a specialized unit, employing both open preperitoneal and robotic-assisted laparoscopic approaches from September 2018 to May 2023. Comparative analysis of short- and long-term outcomes between these techniques was conducted. Additionally, multivariate logistic regression was employed to explore predictors of postoperative complications.
    RESULTS: A total of 308 patients met the inclusion criteria. 198 (64%) patients underwent surgery using an open preperitoneal approach and 110 (36%) using robot-assisted laparoscopy. Patients in the robot-assisted group were younger (P = 0.006) and had fewer comorbidities (P < 0.001). There were no differences between the groups in terms of postoperative complications (P = 0.133), chronic pain (P = 0.463) or recurrence (P = 0.192). Multivariate analysis identified ASA ≥ III (OR, 1.763; 95%CI, 1.068-3.994; P = 0.027) and inguinoscrotal hernias (OR, 2.371, 95%CI, 1.407-3.944; P = 0.001) as risk factors of postoperative complications.
    CONCLUSIONS: Both open preperitoneal and robotic-assisted laparoscopic approaches show similar outcomes for complications, chronic pain, and recurrence when performed by experienced surgeons. The open preperitoneal approach, with its quicker operative time, may be advantageous for high-comorbidity cases. Treatment choice should consider patient factors, surgeon experience, and healthcare resources.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:术后尿潴留(POUR)是已知的疝气手术并发症。微创腹股沟疝修补术(IHR)通常在神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)的全身麻醉下完成。通常用抗胆碱酯酶抑制剂与抗胆碱能药配对逆转。Sugammadex是一种独特的NMB逆转剂,不必与抗胆碱能药物配对。我们试图探索sugammadex在降低POUR率方面的作用。
    方法:数据是在2016年2月至2019年10月期间在单个机构进行回顾性收集的。我们确定并研究了接受微创IHR并接受Sugamadex或新斯的明/格隆溴铵逆转NMB的患者。主要终点是POUR需要膀胱导管插入术。次要终点包括术后和30天再入院。
    结果:本研究包括274例患者(143例接受了新斯的明和格隆溴铵,131sugammadex)。Sugammadex患者平均比新斯的明/格隆铵患者大5岁(63.2vs58.2,p=0.003),接受的中位静脉输液(IVF)较少(900mlvs1000ml;p=0.015)。Sugamadex和新斯的明/格隆溴铵患者的POUR发生率存在显着差异(0.0%vs8.4%,p≤0.001)。在控制年龄和IVF后,差异仍然显着。接受新斯的明/格隆溴铵的人的POUR几率比接受sugammadex的人高25倍。
    结论:本研究结果反映了Sugammadex在微创IHR病例中对POUR的保护作用。
    OBJECTIVE: Post-operative urinary retention (POUR) is a known complication of hernia surgery. Minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is typically done under general anesthesia with neuromuscular blockade (NMB), which is commonly reversed with an anticholinesterase inhibitor paired with an anticholinergic agent. Sugammadex is a unique NMB reversal agent that does not have to be paired with an anticholinergic. We sought to explore the role of sugammadex in reducing the rate of POUR following these procedures.
    METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively at a single institution between February 2016 and October 2019. We identified and studied patients who underwent minimally invasive IHR and received either sugammadex or neostigmine/glycopyrrolate for NMB reversal. The primary endpoint was POUR requiring bladder catheterization. Secondary endpoints included post-operative and 30-day readmissions.
    RESULTS: 274 patients were included in this study (143 received neostigmine and glycopyrrolate, 131 sugammadex). The sugammadex patients were on average 5 years older than the neostigmine/ glycopyrrolate patients (63.2 vs 58.2, p = 0.003), and received less median intravenous fluids (IVF) (900 ml vs 1000 ml; p = 0.015). There was a significant difference in the rate of POUR between the sugammadex and neostigmine/glycopyrrolate patients (0.0% vs 8.4%, p ≤ 0.001). The difference remained significant after controlling for age and IVF. The odds of POUR for those who received neostigmine/glycopyrrolate were 25 × higher than the odds of those who received sugammadex.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study reflect the protective role of sugammadex against POUR in minimally invasive IHR cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    患有严重心肺疾病的患者对围手术期和术中提供者提出了独特的挑战。在该患者人群中诱导全身麻醉会带来不良事件的风险,这些不良事件可能导致不良的手术结果。长时间的衰弱,或死亡。因此,重要的是,麻醉医师要适应术前评估以及提供手术麻醉的替代策略.该病例报告详细介绍了一名患有严重心肺疾病的患者的临床过程,该患者除了接受孤立的髂腹股沟和髂腹下神经阻滞外,还接受了多层椎旁阻滞,没有进行口服或静脉镇静的开放式腹股沟疝修补术。这个医学上具有挑战性的案例提供了有关术前评估的教育价值,相关的解剖学和神经支配,以及以患者为中心的护理和沟通的重要性。
    Patients with severe cardiopulmonary morbidity present a unique challenge to peri- and intraoperative providers. Inducing general anesthesia in this patient population poses the risk of adverse events that could lead to poor surgical outcomes, prolonged debilitation, or death. Therefore, it is important that anesthesiologists become comfortable with preoperative evaluation as well as alternative strategies to providing surgical anesthesia. This case report details the clinical course of a patient with severe cardiopulmonary morbidity who underwent open inguinal hernia repair without oral or intravenous sedation after receiving multi-level paravertebral blocks in addition to isolated ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve blocks. This medically challenging case provides educational value regarding preoperative evaluation, pertinent anatomy and innervation, and the importance of patient-centered care and communication.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    持续的术后疼痛(PPSP)是腹股沟疝修补术(IHR)手术后最麻烦和致残的长期并发症之一。了解导致PPSP的围手术期风险因素可以帮助识别高危患者并制定风险缓解方法。这项研究的目的是系统回顾和荟萃分析导致IHR后PPSP的危险因素。文献检索产生了这篇综述中的303篇论文,其中140份用于荟萃分析。我们的结果表明,年龄较小,女性性别,术前疼痛,复发性疝,术后并发症和术后疼痛与PPSP的高风险相关.与Lichtenstein修复等前路技术相比,腹腔镜技术可减少PPSP的发生,和组织缝合技术,如Shouldice修复。与大头钉相比,使用纤维蛋白胶进行网状固定始终与较低的PPSP率相关。订书钉,和缝线。在研究设计方面,PPSP评估和报告方法观察到相当大的差异。后续时间安排,疼痛定义的清晰度,以及疼痛强度或干扰阈值。在超过75%的研究中,至少一个领域存在高或中等偏倚风险。这些可能会限制我们结果的普遍性。未来的研究应评估和报告综合的术前和围手术期PPSP的危险因素,校正混杂因素。并开发风险预测模型,以推动分层PPSP缓解试验和个性化临床决策。PROSPERO注册:https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?RecordID=154663PERSECTIVE:本系统评价和荟萃分析总结了目前关于腹股沟疝修补术后持续性疼痛危险因素的证据。这些发现可以帮助识别有风险的患者,并测试个性化的风险缓解方法来预防疼痛。
    Persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP) is one of the most bothersome and disabling long-term complications after inguinal hernia repair surgery. Understanding perioperative risk factors that contribute to PPSP can help identify high-risk patients and develop risk-mitigation approaches. The objective of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze risk factors that contribute to PPSP after inguinal hernia repair. The literature search resulted in 303 papers included in this review, 140 of which were used for meta-analyses. Our results suggest that younger age, female sex, preoperative pain, recurrent hernia, postoperative complications, and postoperative pain are associated with a higher risk of PPSP. Laparoscopic techniques reduce the PPSP occurrence compared to anterior techniques such as Lichtenstein repair, and tissue-suture techniques such as Shouldice repair. The use of fibrin glue for mesh fixation was consistently associated with lower PPSP rates compared to tacks, staples, and sutures. Considerable variability was observed with PPSP assessment and reporting methodology in terms of study design, follow-up timing, clarity of pain definition, as well as pain intensity or interference threshold. High or moderate risk of bias in at least one domain was noted in >75% of studies. These may limit the generalizability of our results. Future studies should assess and report comprehensive preoperative and perioperative risk factors for PPSP adjusted for confounding factors, and develop risk-prediction models to drive stratified PPSP-mitigation trials and personalized clinical decision-making. PERSPECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes the current evidence on risk factors for persistent pain after inguinal hernia repair. The findings can help identify patients at risk and test personalized risk-mitigation approaches to prevent pain. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: htttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=154663.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    我们介绍了一例罕见的病例,该病例是由外科疝修补术后志贺氏菌感染引起的长期肠梗阻。感染性疾病是成人术后肠梗阻的罕见原因。我们的48岁男性患者在学术机构接受了双侧开放式腹股沟疝修补术和开放式脐疝修补术,没有并发症。当天出院。八天后,他向急诊科提出了严重腹痛的投诉,恶心,呕吐,和水样腹泻。体格检查,腹部和骨盆的计算机断层扫描,腹部X线最初考虑肠梗阻。患者被送往普外科服务。小肠随访显示造影剂最终到达直肠后,对肠梗阻和潜在的胃炎引起了关注。随后的胃肠道病原体小组对志贺氏菌呈阳性。经过适当的抗生素治疗后,患者的症状得到缓解。在术后肠梗阻的鉴别诊断中应考虑志贺氏菌病和其他感染性疾病。
    We present a rare case of prolonged ileus caused by underlying Shigella infection after surgical hernia repair. Infectious disease is an uncommon cause of postoperative prolonged ileus in adults. Our 48-year-old male patient underwent bilateral open inguinal hernia repair and open umbilical hernia repair without complication at an academic institution, with same-day discharge. Eight days later, he presented to the emergency department with complaints of severe cramping abdominal pain, nausea, emesis, and watery diarrhea. Physical examination, computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis, and abdominal X-ray were initially concerning for bowel obstruction. The patient was admitted to the general surgery service. Concern for ileus with underlying gastritis arose after a small bowel follow-through showed contrast eventually reaching the rectum. A subsequent gastrointestinal pathogens panel was positive for Shigella. The patient\'s symptoms resolved after appropriate antibiotic treatment. Shigellosis and other infectious diseases should be considered in the differential diagnosis of postoperative prolonged ileus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号