Information Seeking Behavior

信息寻求行为
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    主动感知是一种探索环境的行为策略。在这项研究中,我们表明,接触发声行为可以是一种主动感知机制,使用采样来获得有关社会环境的信息,特别是,别人的声音行为。专注于the猴的实时声音互动,我们将主动采样与声音调节框架进行对比,在该框架中,声音被简单地调整以最大化响应。我们对人声调节和主动采样策略进行模拟,并将其与实际的人声交互数据进行比较。我们的发现支持主动采样作为实时mar猴声音交换的最佳模型。在某些情况下,主动采样模型甚至能够部分预测个体的声音持续时间的分布,以逼近最佳通话持续时间。这些结果表明,灵长类动物的声音相互作用具有非传统的功能,在这种功能中,动物使用它们来寻找有关其社会环境的信息。
    Active sensing is a behavioral strategy for exploring the environment. In this study, we show that contact vocal behaviors can be an active sensing mechanism that uses sampling to gain information about the social environment, in particular, the vocal behavior of others. With a focus on the real-time vocal interactions of marmoset monkeys, we contrast active sampling to a vocal accommodation framework in which vocalizations are adjusted simply to maximize responses. We conduct simulations of a vocal accommodation and an active sampling policy and compare them with actual vocal interaction data. Our findings support active sampling as the best model for real-time marmoset monkey vocal exchanges. In some cases, the active sampling model was even able to partially predict the distribution of vocal durations for individuals to approximate the optimal call duration. These results suggest a non-traditional function for primate vocal interactions in which they are used by animals to seek information about their social environments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:相对于特定国家的流行病学趋势,科威特人口中2型糖尿病的负担要大得多。信息行为是2型糖尿病患者自我护理管理的重要组成部分。然而,这仍然是疾病管理的一个研究不足的方面。本研究旨在调查科威特2型糖尿病患者的信息行为,并描述了控制其疾病的方法。
    方法:这项定性研究采用了扎根的理论方法。在小学数据收集的三个阶段,对27名参与者进行了半结构化访谈,科威特的二级和三级医疗机构。通过深入访谈来补充这些参与者的信息行为。采访在适当的地方进行了翻译,成绩单,并通过定性编码进行分析,综合信息行为模式。
    结果:研究结果表明,患有2型糖尿病的患者涉及一系列发展和变革阶段,包括改变病人的情绪状态,重建他们的生活方式和身份,以及他们发现和使用信息的方式的变化。生活在慢性病中被视为一个动态和过渡的过程,患者的信息行为在整个过程中不断变化,跨越各个可识别的阶段。这种动态模式在参与者的行为需求中得到了最突出的反映,来源和信息寻求模式。
    结论:2型糖尿病患者不断调整他们的信息行为,以在相对可预测的模式下优化病情的自我管理。在更广泛的人群中更好地了解这些行为将改善糖尿病患者的临床护理。
    BACKGROUND: Relative to country-specific epidemiological trends, Kuwait experiences a far greater burden of type 2 diabetes among its population. Information behaviours form a significant component of self-care management for patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, however this remains an understudied aspect of disease management. This study aims to investigate the information behaviours of patients with type 2 diabetes in Kuwait, and characterise the methods employed to manage their disease.
    METHODS: This qualitative study employed a grounded theory method. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twenty-seven participants over three phases of data collection in primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare settings across Kuwait. These were complemented by in-depth interviews to detail the information behaviours of these participants. The interviews were translated where appropriate, transcripts, and analysed through qualitative coding to synthesise the information behaviour patterns.
    RESULTS: The findings demonstrated that living with type 2 diabetes involved a range of developmental and transformative stages, including changes to the patients\' emotional state, reconstruction of their lifestyle and identity, and changes in the ways they find and use information. Living with the chronic condition was viewed as a dynamic and transitional process, where patients\' information behaviours continually changed throughout the process across various identifiable stages. This dynamic pattern was reflected most prominently across the participants\' behavioural needs, sources and information-seeking patterns.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with type 2 diabetes continuously adapted their information behaviours to optimise the self-management of their condition across a relatively predictable pattern. Greater understanding of these behaviours across a wider population would improve the provision of clinical care for patients with diabetes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在日常生活中做决定时,我们通常依靠内部产生的信心来帮助我们修改和指导未来的行为。例如,信心直接告知在承诺做出最终决定之前是否应寻求进一步的信息。许多研究表明,衰老以及精神病理学的临床和亚临床症状与信心的系统性改变有关。然而,尚不清楚这些信心扭曲是否会影响信息寻求行为。我们在一个大的一般人群样本中调查了这个问题(N=908)。参与者完成了一系列精神病症状调查表,并执行了具有信心等级的感知决策任务,在该任务中,他们可以选择寻求有用的信息(付费),然后再做出最终决定。复制以前的调查结果,“焦虑抑郁”(AD)症状维度与系统性低置信度相关,尽管对客观任务的准确性没有损害。相反,“强迫性行为和侵入性思维”(CIT)维度与任务准确性受损相关,但存在矛盾的过度自信。然而,两种症状维度均不与寻求信息的趋势增加或减少显著相关.因此,ADorCIT得分较高的参与者没有使用超过平均水平的信息搜索选项来增加他们的信心(AD)或提高他们的决策准确性(CIT).相比之下,最初,年龄较大与准确性受损和信心下降有关,但是信息寻求行为的增加介导了最终决策的准确性和信心的增加。因此,老年人使用信息寻求选项来克服客观表现的初始缺陷,并相应地增加他们的信心。结果表明,可以适当地使用信息来克服知觉缺陷和对健康衰老的低信心,而这在诊断性精神病理学中是不存在的。
    When making decisions in everyday life, we often rely on an internally generated sense of confidence to help us revise and direct future behaviours. For instance, confidence directly informs whether further information should be sought prior to commitment to a final decision. Many studies have shown that aging and both clinical and sub-clinical symptoms of psychopathology are associated with systematic alterations in confidence. However, it remains unknown whether these confidence distortions influence information-seeking behaviour. We investigated this question in a large general population sample (N = 908). Participants completed a battery of psychiatric symptom questionnaires and performed a perceptual decision-making task with confidence ratings in which they were offered the option to seek helpful information (at a cost) before committing to a final decision. Replicating previous findings, an \'anxious-depression\' (AD) symptom dimension was associated with systematically low confidence, despite no detriment in objective task accuracy. Conversely, a \'compulsive behaviour and intrusive thoughts\' (CIT) dimension was associated with impaired task accuracy but paradoxical over-confidence. However, neither symptom dimension was significantly associated with an increased or decreased tendency to seek information. Hence, participants scoring highly for AD or CIT did not use the option to information seek any more than average to either increase their confidence (AD) or improve the accuracy of their decisions (CIT). In contrast, older age was associated with impaired accuracy and decreased confidence initially, but increased information seeking behaviour mediated increases in both accuracy and confidence for final decisions. Hence, older adults used the information seeking option to overcome initial deficits in objective performance and to increase their confidence accordingly. The results show an appropriate use of information seeking to overcome perceptual deficits and low confidence in healthy aging which was not present in transdiagnostic psychopathology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:宫颈癌(CC)和乳腺癌(BC)威胁着女性的福祉,受与健康相关的耻辱和缺乏可靠信息的影响,这可能会导致晚期诊断和早期死亡。ChatGPT很可能成为健康信息的关键来源,尽管质量问题也会影响寻求健康的行为。
    方法:这项横断面在线调查比较了ChatGPT对五名专门从事乳房X线照相术的医生和五名专门从事妇科的医生的反应。关于CC和BC的二十个常见问题被问到4月26日和29日,2023年。由七名专家组成的小组评估准确性,一致性,以及使用7点李克特量表的ChatGPT反应的相关性。分析了反应的可读性,可靠性,和效率。ChatGPT的反应被合成,结果以雷达图的形式呈现。
    结果:ChatGPT对CC和BC问题的准确性得分为7.0(范围:6.6-7.0),超过得分最高的医师(P<0.05)。ChatGPT平均花费13.6s(范围:7.6-24.0)来回答所提出的20个问题中的每一个。可读性与所涉及的专家和医生相当,但与医生相比,ChatGPT产生了更多的扩展反应。重复回答的一致性为5.2(范围:3.4-6.7)。结合不同的上下文,总体ChatGPT相关性评分为6.5分(范围:4.8-7.0分).雷达图分析表明精度相当好,效率,在某种程度上,相关性。然而,有明显的不一致之处,可靠性和可读性被认为是不够的。
    结论:ChatGPT有望成为CC和BC的初始信息来源。ChatGPT也具有很高的功能,似乎优于医生,并符合专家共识,尽管可读性还有改进的空间,可靠性,和一致性。未来的工作应该集中在开发先进的ChatGPT模型上,这些模型明确旨在改善医疗实践和对症状有担忧的人。
    BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer (CC) and breast cancer (BC) threaten women\'s well-being, influenced by health-related stigma and a lack of reliable information, which can cause late diagnosis and early death. ChatGPT is likely to become a key source of health information, although quality concerns could also influence health-seeking behaviours.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional online survey compared ChatGPT\'s responses to five physicians specializing in mammography and five specializing in gynaecology. Twenty frequently asked questions about CC and BC were asked on 26th and 29th of April, 2023. A panel of seven experts assessed the accuracy, consistency, and relevance of ChatGPT\'s responses using a 7-point Likert scale. Responses were analyzed for readability, reliability, and efficiency. ChatGPT\'s responses were synthesized, and findings are presented as a radar chart.
    RESULTS: ChatGPT had an accuracy score of 7.0 (range: 6.6-7.0) for CC and BC questions, surpassing the highest-scoring physicians (P < 0.05). ChatGPT took an average of 13.6 s (range: 7.6-24.0) to answer each of the 20 questions presented. Readability was comparable to that of experts and physicians involved, but ChatGPT generated more extended responses compared to physicians. The consistency of repeated answers was 5.2 (range: 3.4-6.7). With different contexts combined, the overall ChatGPT relevance score was 6.5 (range: 4.8-7.0). Radar plot analysis indicated comparably good accuracy, efficiency, and to a certain extent, relevance. However, there were apparent inconsistencies, and the reliability and readability be considered inadequate.
    CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT shows promise as an initial source of information for CC and BC. ChatGPT is also highly functional and appears to be superior to physicians, and aligns with expert consensus, although there is room for improvement in readability, reliability, and consistency. Future efforts should focus on developing advanced ChatGPT models explicitly designed to improve medical practice and for those with concerns about symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们旨在综合中风患者(PwS)在预防复发性中风方面的信息需求。
    在此范围审查中,我们搜索了Medline(通过PubMed),CINAHL,和PsycINFO从开始到2023年6月5日,以确定描述在过去5年内遭受中风或短暂性脑缺血发作的18岁及以上人群的信息需求的所有研究。我们纳入了以德语或英语出版的发达国家的定性和定量研究。根据Arksey和O'Malley的范围审查方法框架进行数据分析。
    我们筛选了5822条合格记录,其中包括1993年至2023年之间发表的36篇文章。所有纳入的研究都没有使用全面的框架或明确的信息需求。根据普华永道及其护理人员的声明,普华永道需要治疗信息,病因学,中风的影响,预后,康复,放电,生活的变化,照顾角色,支持选项,信息来源,医院的程序。最常见的需求是治疗信息(77.8%)和中风病因(63.9%)。主要信息来源是医疗保健专业人员(85.7%),其次是书面信息(71.4%),家人和朋友(42.6%),和互联网(35.7%),由医疗保健专业人员直接提供的信息是首选。信息传输的时机通常被描述为过早。
    PwS主要对中风的临床信息感兴趣,例如,治疗和病因,很少出现在日常生活信息中,例如,康复,护理的作用,或生活方式的改变。PwS更喜欢直接从医疗保健专业人员那里获得信息。发展对PwS的信息需求的共同理解对于在临床实践中实施适当的策略和计划来处理这些需求至关重要。
    UNASSIGNED: We aimed to synthesize the information needs of people with stroke (PwS) in recurrent stroke prevention.
    UNASSIGNED: In this scoping review we searched Medline (via PubMed), CINAHL, and PsycINFO from inception to June 5, 2023, to identify all studies describing the information needs of people 18 years and older who have suffered a stroke or transient ischemic attack within the past 5 years. We included qualitative and quantitative studies from developed countries published in German or English. Data analysis was performed following Arksey and O\'Malley\'s methodological framework for scoping reviews.
    UNASSIGNED: We screened 5822 records for eligibility and included 36 articles published between 1993 and 2023. None of the included studies used a comprehensive framework or defined information needs. Based on statements from PwS and their caregivers, PwS needed information on treatment, etiology, effects of stroke, prognosis, rehabilitation, discharge, life changes, care role, support options, information sources, and hospital procedures. The most frequently expressed needs were information on the treatment (77.8%) and stroke etiology (63.9%). The primary information source was healthcare professionals (85.7%), followed by written information (71.4%), family and friends (42.6%), and the internet (35.7%), with information provided directly by healthcare professionals being preferred. The timing of information transfer is often described as too early.
    UNASSIGNED: PwS are primarily interested in clinical information about stroke, for example, treatment and etiology, and less often in information about daily life, for example, rehabilitation, the role of care, or lifestyle changes. PwS prefer to receive information directly from healthcare professionals. Developing a shared understanding of PwS\'s information needs is crucial to implement suitable strategies and programs for dealing with these needs in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:挪威对电子健康的使用率很高。
    方法:本文总结并讨论了Tromsø7研究的公开数据,2015年至2016年进行,重点是挪威40岁及以上人口的电子卫生利用。
    结果:超过一半的参与者报告说使用互联网进行健康目的。获取信息的主要渠道是搜索引擎,应用程序,社交媒体平台,和在线视频。受访者经常根据网上获得的信息采取行动,和在线健康信息影响了有关医疗保健利用和治疗管理的决策。大多数受访者表示对网上发现的信息有积极的反应。
    结论:Tromsø7研究强调了电子健康在挪威的广泛利用。该研究还强调了电子健康对个人健康相关决策过程的重大影响。研究结果表明,整体使用电子卫生并不能取代传统卫生服务的使用,而是作为补充。大多数受访者报告对在线健康信息的积极反应,强调电子健康在现代医疗保健实践中的重要性和相关性。
    BACKGROUND: Norway has a high use of e-health.
    METHODS: This paper summarizes and discusses the published data from the Tromsø 7 Study, conducted between 2015 and 2016, focusing on e-health utilization in the Norwegian population aged 40 and above.
    RESULTS: More than half of the participants reported using the Internet for health purposes. The main channels for obtaining information were search engines, apps, social media platforms, and online videos. The respondents frequently acted upon the information obtained online, and online health information influenced decisions regarding healthcare utilization and treatment management. Most respondents indicated a positive reaction to the information found online.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Tromsø 7 Study highlights the widespread utilization of e-health in Norway. The study also emphasizes the significant impact of e-health on individuals\' decision-making processes related to their health. The findings suggest that the use of e-health overall does not replace the use of traditional health services, but rather functions as a supplement. Most respondents report positive reactions to online health information, highlighting the importance and relevance of e-health in modern healthcare practices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着互联网用途的多样化,在线内容类型变得更加丰富。除了有机结果,搜索引擎结果页面现在提供了改进信息搜索和学习的工具。人们还要求(PAA)框旨在通过提供易于访问的信息来降低用户的认知成本。然而,关于用户实际如何处理它的研究很少,与更传统的内容类型相比(即,有机结果和在线文件)。当前的眼动追踪研究通过考虑搜索上下文(复杂的查找任务与探索性任务)和用户的先验领域知识(高与低)。主要结果表明,用户固定PAA盒和在线文档更多的是为了实现探索性目标,并更多地固定有机结果以实现查找目标。具有低知识的用户在搜索的早期阶段处理PAA内容,与具有高知识的用户相反。鉴于这些结果,信息系统开发人员应根据搜索上下文和用户先前的领域知识使PAA内容多样化。
    With the diversification of Internet uses, online content type has become richer. Alongside organic results, search engine results pages now provide tools to improve information searching and learning. The People also ask (PAA) box is intended to reduce users\' cognitive costs by offering easily accessible information. Nevertheless, there has been scant research on how users actually process it, compared with more traditional content type (i.e., organic results and online documents). The present eye-tracking study explored this question by considering the search context (complex lookup task vs. exploratory task) and users\' prior domain knowledge (high vs. low). Main results show that users fixated the PAA box and online documents more to achieve exploratory goals, and fixated organic results more to achieve lookup goals. Users with low knowledge process PAA content at an early stage in their search contrary to their counterparts with high knowledge. Given these results, information system developers should diversify PAA content according to search context and users\' prior domain knowledge.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    当涉及到健康相关的信息寻求行为时,在线社区对一些群体起着关键作用,如父母。以松散组织的疫苗接种系统中的在线社区为例,奥地利的,我们研究父母如何利用一个著名的在线论坛(父母。at)在其疫苗接种轨迹中,并将此分析置于其社会政治背景中。基于相关线索的归纳定性分析(n=27),我们发现父母通过三种方式使用论坛:第一,该论坛是一个平台,父母可以通过该平台在组织松散和分散的疫苗接种系统中寻求指导。第二,论坛提供了分享的空间,收集,评估不同形式的专业知识。在这样做的时候,父母们开辟了一个空间,让他们可以舒适地将专业知识和有资质的专业知识放在一起,特别是在他们给同龄人的建议中。第三,在此基础上,父母使用该论坛审议未来或过去与疫苗接种相关的决定。在这样做的时候,他们经常借鉴个人风险和收益的特殊概念。这三种做法使父母能够积累和分享我们标记的导航资本。我们得出的结论是,父母出于主观需要而诉诸网络空间,对一些人来说,由于国家儿童疫苗接种计划的功能障碍,该计划为父母提供了很少的指导。
    When it comes to health-related information-seeking behavior, online communities play a key role for some groups, such as parents. With a case study of online communities in a loosely organized vaccination system, that of Austria, we study how parents make use of a prominent online forum (parents.at) in their vaccination trajectories and situate this analysis in its socio-political context. Based on inductive qualitative analysis of relevant threads (n = 27), we find that parents use forums in three ways: First, the forum serves as a platform through which parents seek orientation in a loosely organized and fragmented vaccination system. Second, the forum offers space for sharing, collecting, and evaluating different forms of expertise. In doing so, parents carve out a space in which they can comfortably put lay expertise and credentialed expertise on a par, particularly in their advice to peers. Third, and on that basis, parents use the forum for deliberating on future or past vaccination-related decisions. In doing so, they frequently draw on idiosyncratic notions of individual risks and benefits. These three practices enable parents to accumulate and share what we label navigational capital. We conclude that parents resort to online spaces both out of a subjective need and, for some, as a result of a dysfunction of the national childhood vaccination program which offers little orientation for parents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:OpenAI的ChatGPT是高级在线健康信息(OHI)的来源,可以集成到个人寻求健康信息的例程中。然而,人们对其事实准确性和对健康结果的影响表示担忧。预测对医疗实践和公共卫生的影响,需要更多关于谁使用该工具的信息,多久,为了什么。
    目的:本研究旨在描述ChatGPTOHI使用的原因和类型,并描述最有可能使用该平台的用户。
    方法:在这项横断面调查中,患者通过ResearchMatch平台收到了参与邀请,美国国立卫生研究院的非营利组织。一项基于网络的调查测量了人口特征,使用ChatGPT和其他来源的OHI,经验表征,以及由此产生的健康行为。使用描述性统计来总结数据。使用双尾t检验和Pearson卡方检验将ChatGPTOHI的用户与非用户进行比较。
    结果:在2406名受访者中,21.5%(n=517)的受访者报告使用ChatGPT进行OHI。ChatGPT用户比非用户年轻(32.8岁vs39.1岁,P<.001)具有较低的高级程度(BA或更高;49.9%vs67%,P<.001)和更多使用临时医疗保健(ED和紧急护理;P<.001)。ChatGPT用户是一般非ChatGPTOHI的更狂热的消费者(过去6个月内每周或更多OHI寻求频率的百分比,28.2%vs22.8%,P<.001)。约39.3%(n=206)的受访者认可每周使用OHI2-3次或更多的平台,大多数人寻求工具来确定是否需要咨询(47.4%,n=245)或探索替代治疗(46.2%,n=239)。使用表征是有利的,因为许多人认为ChatGPT与其他OHI一样或更有用(87.7%,n=429)和他们的医生(81%,n=407)。约三分之一的受访者要求转介(35.6%,n=184)或更换药物(31%,n=160)基于从ChatGPT接收的信息。由于许多用户对ChatGPT的输出表示怀疑(67.9%,n=336),大多数人求助于他们的医生(67.5%,n=349)。
    结论:这项研究强调了AI产生的OHI在塑造寻求健康行为和患者-提供者相互作用的潜在演变中的重要作用。鉴于这些用户倾向于根据人工智能生成的内容制定健康行为改变,医生有机会指导ChatGPTOHI用户对该技术的知情和检查使用。
    BACKGROUND: OpenAI\'s ChatGPT is a source of advanced online health information (OHI) that may be integrated into individuals\' health information-seeking routines. However, concerns have been raised about its factual accuracy and impact on health outcomes. To forecast implications for medical practice and public health, more information is needed on who uses the tool, how often, and for what.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize the reasons for and types of ChatGPT OHI use and describe the users most likely to engage with the platform.
    METHODS: In this cross-sectional survey, patients received invitations to participate via the ResearchMatch platform, a nonprofit affiliate of the National Institutes of Health. A web-based survey measured demographic characteristics, use of ChatGPT and other sources of OHI, experience characterization, and resultant health behaviors. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Both 2-tailed t tests and Pearson chi-square tests were used to compare users of ChatGPT OHI to nonusers.
    RESULTS: Of 2406 respondents, 21.5% (n=517) respondents reported using ChatGPT for OHI. ChatGPT users were younger than nonusers (32.8 vs 39.1 years, P<.001) with lower advanced degree attainment (BA or higher; 49.9% vs 67%, P<.001) and greater use of transient health care (ED and urgent care; P<.001). ChatGPT users were more avid consumers of general non-ChatGPT OHI (percentage of weekly or greater OHI seeking frequency in past 6 months, 28.2% vs 22.8%, P<.001). Around 39.3% (n=206) respondents endorsed using the platform for OHI 2-3 times weekly or more, and most sought the tool to determine if a consultation was required (47.4%, n=245) or to explore alternative treatment (46.2%, n=239). Use characterization was favorable as many believed ChatGPT to be just as or more useful than other OHIs (87.7%, n=429) and their doctor (81%, n=407). About one-third of respondents requested a referral (35.6%, n=184) or changed medications (31%, n=160) based on the information received from ChatGPT. As many users reported skepticism regarding the ChatGPT output (67.9%, n=336), most turned to their physicians (67.5%, n=349).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the significant role of AI-generated OHI in shaping health-seeking behaviors and the potential evolution of patient-provider interactions. Given the proclivity of these users to enact health behavior changes based on AI-generated content, there is an opportunity for physicians to guide ChatGPT OHI users on an informed and examined use of the technology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管使用eHealth有潜在的好处,电子健康使用中存在社会人口统计学差异,这可能会进一步扩大卫生公平差距。文献一直表明年龄和教育与电子健康的使用有关,而种族和族裔差异的调查结果喜忧参半。然而,以前的差距可能已经缩小,因为由于COVID-19大流行,每个人的医疗保健互动都转向基于网络的模式。
    目的:本研究旨在提供对社会人口统计学差异的最新研究,这些差异导致与使用eHealth进行3个时间点的信息查找相关的健康公平性差距。
    方法:本研究的数据来自全国代表性的2018年(n=3504),2020年(n=3865),和2022年(n=6252)健康信息国家趋势调查的时间点。使用Logistic回归来回归电子健康在种族和族裔信息搜索中的使用,性别,年龄,教育,收入,健康状况,和调查年份。考虑到年龄与因变量的一致关联,分析按年龄队列分层(千禧一代,X代,婴儿潮一代,和沉默的一代)来比较相似年龄的个体。
    结果:对于千禧一代,作为女性,获得一些大学或大学学位,报告年收入50,000-74,999美元或>75,000美元与使用电子健康寻求信息有关。对于X代,作为女性,获得了某种大学或大学学位,报告年收入为50,000-74,999美元或>75,000美元,自我报告的健康状况更好,在2022年完成调查(vs2018;比值比[OR]1.80,95%CI1.11-2.91)与使用eHealth寻求信息相关。对于婴儿潮一代来说,作为女性,年纪大了,获得高中学位,获得一些大学或大学学位,报告年收入为50,000-74,999美元或>75,000美元,并在2020年(OR1.56,95%CI1.15-2.12)和2022年(OR4.04,95%CI2.77-5.87)完成调查与使用eHealth寻求信息相关。在沉默的一代中,年纪大了,获得一些大学或大学学位,报告年收入为50,000-74,999美元或>75,000美元,并在2022年完成调查(OR5.76,95%CI3.05-10.89)与使用eHealth寻求信息相关。
    结论:随着时间的推移,婴儿潮一代可能在使用eHealth寻求信息方面取得了最大的收获。种族和种族的发现,或缺乏,可能表明种族和族裔差异的减少。基于性别的差异,教育,所有年龄组的收入保持一致。这与关注社会经济地位较低的个体的健康差异文献相一致,最近,与女性相比,男性寻求医疗保健的可能性较小。
    BACKGROUND: Despite the potential benefits of using eHealth, sociodemographic disparities exist in eHealth use, which threatens to further widen health equity gaps. The literature has consistently shown age and education to be associated with eHealth use, while the findings for racial and ethnic disparities are mixed. However, previous disparities may have narrowed as health care interactions shifted to web-based modalities for everyone because of the COVID-19 pandemic.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to provide an updated examination of sociodemographic disparities that contribute to the health equity gap related to using eHealth for information seeking using 3 time points.
    METHODS: Data for this study came from the nationally representative 2018 (n=3504), 2020 (n=3865), and 2022 (n=6252) time points of the Health Information National Trends Survey. Logistic regression was used to regress the use of eHealth for information seeking on race and ethnicity, sex, age, education, income, health status, and year of survey. Given the consistent association of age with the dependent variable, analyses were stratified by age cohort (millennials, Generation X, baby boomers, and silent generation) to compare individuals of similar age.
    RESULTS: For millennials, being female, attaining some college or a college degree, and reporting an annual income of US $50,000-$74,999 or >US $75,000 were associated with the use of eHealth for information seeking. For Generation X, being female, having attained some college or a college degree, reporting an annual income of US $50,000-$74,999 or >US $75,000, better self-reported health, and completing the survey in 2022 (vs 2018; odds ratio [OR] 1.80, 95% CI 1.11-2.91) were associated with the use of eHealth for information seeking. For baby boomers, being female, being older, attaining a high school degree, attaining some college or a college degree, reporting an annual income of US $50,000-$74,999 or >US $75,000, and completing the survey in 2020 (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.15-2.12) and 2022 (OR 4.04, 95% CI 2.77-5.87) were associated with the use of eHealth for information seeking. Among the silent generation, being older, attaining some college or a college degree, reporting an annual income of US $50,000-$74,999 or >US $75,000, and completing the survey in 2022 (OR 5.76, 95% CI 3.05-10.89) were associated with the use of eHealth for information seeking.
    CONCLUSIONS: Baby boomers may have made the most gains in using eHealth for information seeking over time. The race and ethnicity findings, or lack thereof, may indicate a reduction in racial and ethnic disparities. Disparities based on sex, education, and income remained consistent across all age groups. This aligns with health disparities literature focused on individuals with lower socioeconomic status, and more recently on men who are less likely to seek health care compared to women.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号