Nature prescription programs have become more common within healthcare settings. Despite the health benefits of being in nature, nature prescriptions within the context of Indigenous Peoples have received little attention. We therefore sought to answer the following question: What are circumpolar-based physicians\' and Indigenous Elders\' views on nature prescribing in the Northwest Territories, Canada? We carried out thirteen semi-structured interviews with physicians between May 2022 and March 2023, and one sharing circle with Indigenous Elders in February 2023. Separate reflexive thematic analysis was carried out to generate key themes through inductive coding of the data. The main themes identified from the physician interviews included the importance of cultural context; barriers with nature prescriptions in the region; and the potential for nature prescriptions in the North. Reflections shared by the Elders included the need for things to be done in the right way; the sentiment that the Land is not just an experience but a way of life; and the importance of traditional food as a connection with Nature. With expanding nature prescription programs, key considerations are needed when serving Indigenous communities. Further investigation is warranted to ensure that nature prescriptions are appropriate within a given context, are inclusive of supporting Land-based approaches to health and wellbeing, and are considered within the context of Indigenous self-determination.

BACKGROUND: Within Manitoba and Saskatchewan, pre-existing health inequities amongst Indigenous groups were intensified during the COVID-19 pandemic. Service disruptions in the health and social service sector-combined with the effects of intersectional stigma-disproportionately impacted Indigenous peoples living with HIV (IPLH). IPLH experience structural violence and necropolitical exclusion through systemic forms of stigma situated within Canada\'s expansive colonial history. Utilizing the theoretical foundations of structural violence and necropolitics, this qualitative study examines how the COVID-19 pandemic amplified preceding states of inequity for IPLH.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 60 participants. The sample comprised of those with lived experience (n = 45) as well as those who provided services for IPLH (n = 15). Indigenous Storywork guided the data collection and analysis process. Topics explored within each interview included access to health and social services, harm reduction, substance use, and experiences in providing services during COVID-19 pandemic. Thematic analysis was used to identify common themes throughout each story.
RESULTS: Our results indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic exposed and amplified pre-existing forms of structural violence and necropolitical logics for IPLH within Manitoba and Saskatchewan. Specifically, we describe how structural violence and necropolitics are manifested via three main avenues- (i) restrictions and removal of care, (ii) bureaucracy and institutional care politics, and (iii) discrimination and systemic racism within the Canadian healthcare system.
CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic within Manitoba and Saskatchewan sparked massive changes in service provision within settler-colonial and neoliberal institutions of care. For those services that remained open to IPLH, masking requirements, questionnaire requirements, scheduling requirements, and a lack of in-person services acted as only some of the barriers described by community members as detrimental to care access. Increased experiences of discrimination in health care on the basis of substance use or HIV status further limited access to needed services.

暂无摘要。

The Gigii-Bapiimin study explored the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health and wellbeing of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis people living with HIV in Manitoba and Saskatchewan, two provinces in Canada with alarmingly high rates of HIV infections. Participants (n = 28 in Manitoba and n = 23 in Saskatchewan) were recruited using various methods, including flyers, community organizations, peers, and social media. The qualitative interviews focused on the pandemic\'s impact on health, access to services, and ceremonies. The data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. The study identified three key themes: (a) resilience and coping; (b) negative impacts on health and substance use; (c) decreased access to health services, HIV care and harm reduction. The participants shared their experiences of social isolation and the loss of community support, which had deleterious effects on their mental health and substance use. The impacts on access to HIV care were exacerbated by poverty, homelessness, and distress over inadvertent disclosure of HIV status. Participants mitigated these impacts by relying on Indigenous knowledges, ceremonies, and resilience within their communities. Service providers must address the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on Indigenous people living with HIV and their access to HIV services and ceremonies.

UNASSIGNED: Considering the relevant 2015 Truth and Reconciliation Commission recommendations, this paper reviews the current state of Canadian medical schools\' Indigenous admissions processes and explores continued barriers faced by Indigenous applicants.
UNASSIGNED: A summary of literature illustrating disadvantages for Indigenous applicants of current admissions tools is presented. A grey literature search of current admissions requirements, interview processes, and other relevant data from each medical school was performed. Tables comparing differences in their approaches are included. A calculation of Indigenous access to medical school seats compared to the broader Canadian population was conducted. Gaps in execution are explored, culminating in a table of recommendations.
UNASSIGNED: Despite formal commitments to reduce barriers, Indigenous applicants to medical school in Canada still face barriers that non-Indigenous applicants do not. Most programs use tools for admission known to disadvantage Indigenous applicants. Indigenous applicants do not have equitable access to medical school seats. Facilitated Indigenous stream processes first ensure Indigenous applicants meet all minimum requirements of Canadian students, and then require further work.
UNASSIGNED: Seven years after the Truth and Reconciliation Commission called on Canadian universities and governments to train more Indigenous health care providers, there has been limited progress to reduce the structural disadvantages Indigenous students face when applying to medical school. Based on best practices observed in Canada and coupled with relevant Indigenous-focused literature, recommendations are made for multiple stakeholders.
UNASSIGNED: The study was limited by the data available on numbers of Indigenous applicants and matriculants. Where available, data are not encouraging as to equitable access to medical school for Indigenous populations in Canada. These findings were presented at the International Congress of Academic Medicine 2023 Conference, April 2023, Quebec City, Canada.
UNASSIGNED: Compte tenu des recommandations pertinentes de la Commission de vérité et réconciliation de 2015, cet article examine l\'état actuel des processus d\'admission des Autochtones dans les facultés de médecine canadiennes et explore les obstacles persistants auxquels sont confrontés les candidats autochtones.
UNASSIGNED: Un résumé de la littérature illustrant les désavantages des outils d\'admission actuels pour les candidats autochtones est présenté. Une recherche de la littérature grise a été effectuée sur les exigences d\'admission actuelles, les processus d\'entrevue et d\'autres données pertinentes de chaque faculté de médecine. Des tableaux comparant les différences entre leurs approches sont inclus. Un calcul de l\'accès des Autochtones aux places dans les facultés de médecine par rapport à l\'ensemble de la population canadienne a été effectué. Les lacunes dans l\'exécution sont explorées, aboutissant à un tableau de recommandations.
UNASSIGNED: Malgré les engagements officiels visant à réduire les obstacles, les candidats autochtones qui appliquent aux facultés de médecine canadiennes se heurtent encore à des obstacles auxquels les candidats non autochtones ne sont pas confrontés. La plupart des programmes utilisent des outils d\'admission connus pour désavantager les candidats autochtones. Les candidats autochtones n\'ont pas un accès équitable aux places dans les facultés de médecine. Des processus d’accès facilités pour les autochtones permettent d\'abord de s\'assurer que les candidats autochtones satisfont à toutes les exigences minimales des étudiants canadiens, puis nécessitent d\'autres travaux.
UNASSIGNED: Sept ans après que la Commission de vérité et réconciliation ait demandé aux universités et aux gouvernements canadiens de former davantage de prestataires de soins en santé autochtone, les progrès réalisés pour réduire les désavantages structurels auxquels les étudiants autochtones sont confrontés lorsqu\'ils posent leur candidature à une faculté de médecine sont limités. Sur la base des meilleures pratiques observées au Canada et de la littérature autochtone pertinente, des recommandations sont formulées à l\'intention de multiples parties prenantes.
UNASSIGNED: L\'étude est limitée par les données disponibles sur le nombre de candidats et d\'étudiants autochtones. Lorsqu\'elles sont disponibles, les données ne sont pas encourageantes en ce qui concerne l\'accès équitable aux études de médecine pour les populations autochtones au Canada. Ces conclusions ont été présentées lors de l’édition 2023 du Congrès international de médecine universitaire (CIMU) qui s’est déroulé en avril 2023 dans la ville de Québec, au Canada.

Indigenous Peoples in Canada face healthcare inequities impacting access to solid organ transplantation. The experiences of Indigenous patients during the liver transplant process, and how transplant professionals perceive challenges faced by Indigenous Peoples, has not been studied. Thirteen semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted via telehealth with Indigenous liver transplant patients (n = 7) and transplant care providers (n = 6) across British Columbia, Canada between April 2021-May 2022. Themes were identified to inform clinical approaches and transplant care planning and validated by Indigenous health experts. Among patient participants: transplants occurred between 1992-2020; all were women; and the mean age at the time of interview was 60 years. Among transplant care provider participants: roles included nursing, social work, and surgery; 83% were women; and the median number of years in transplant care was ten. Three broad themes were identified: Indigenous strengths and resources, systemic and structural barriers, and inconsistent care and cultural safety across health professions impact Indigenous patient care during liver transplantation. This study contributes insights into systemic barriers and Indigenous resilience in the liver transplant journey. Dismantling structural barriers to early linkage to care is needed, and training for transplant clinicians on Indigenous histories, cultural protocols, and cultural safety is strongly recommended.

BACKGROUND: Indigenous patients often present with complex health needs in clinical settings due to factors rooted in a legacy of colonization. Healthcare systems and providers are not equipped to identify the underlying causes nor enact solutions for this complexity. This study aimed to develop an Indigenous-centered patient complexity assessment framework for urban Indigenous patients in Canada.
METHODS: A multi-phased approach was used which was initiated with a review of literature surrounding complexity, followed by interviews with Indigenous patients to embed their lived experiences of complexity, and concluded with a modified e-Delphi consensus building process with a panel of 14 healthcare experts within the field of Indigenous health to identify the domains and concepts contributing to health complexity for inclusion in an Indigenous-centered patient complexity assessment framework. This study details the final phase of the research.
RESULTS: A total of 27 concepts spanning 9 domains, including those from biological, social, health literacy, psychological, functioning, healthcare access, adverse life experiences, resilience and culture, and healthcare violence domains were included in the final version of the Indigenous-centered patient complexity assessment framework.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed framework outlines critical components that indicate the presence of health complexity among Indigenous patients. The framework serves as a source of reference for healthcare providers to inform their delivery of care with Indigenous patients. This framework will advance scholarship in patient complexity assessment tools through the addition of domains not commonly seen, as well as extending the application of these tools to potentially mitigate racism experienced by underserved populations such as Indigenous peoples.

暂无摘要。

The psychosocial outcomes of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) diagnosed with cancer are poorer compared to their peers without cancer. However, AYAs with cancer from diverse racial and ethnic groups have been under-represented in research, which contributes to an incomplete understanding of the psychosocial outcomes of all AYAs with cancer. This paper evaluated the racial and ethnic representation in research on AYAs diagnosed with cancer using observational, cross-sectional data from the large Young Adults with Cancer in Their Prime (YACPRIME) study. The purpose was to better understand the psychosocial outcomes for those from diverse racial and ethnic groups. A total of 622 participants with a mean age of 34.15 years completed an online survey, including measures of post-traumatic growth, quality of life, psychological distress, and social support. Of this sample, 2% (n = 13) of the participants self-identified as Indigenous, 3% (n = 21) as Asian, 3% (n = 20) as \"other,\" 4% (n = 25) as multi-racial, and 87% (n = 543) as White. A one-way ANOVA indicated a statistically significant difference between racial and ethnic groups in relation to spiritual change, a subscale of post-traumatic growth, F(4,548) = 6.02, p < 0.001. Post hoc analyses showed that those under the \"other\" category endorsed greater levels of spiritual change than those who identified as multi-racial (p < 0.001, 95% CI = [2.49,7.09]) and those who identified as White (p < 0.001, 95% CI = [1.60,5.04]). Similarly, participants that identified as Indigenous endorsed greater levels of spiritual change than those that identified as White (p = 0.03, 95% CI = [1.16,4.08]) and those that identified as multi-racial (p = 0.005, 95% CI = [1.10,6.07]). We provided an extensive discussion on the challenges and limitations of interpreting these findings, given the unequal and small sample sizes across groups. We concluded by outlining key recommendations for researchers to move towards greater equity, inclusivity, and culturally responsiveness in future work.

BACKGROUND: Our previous research showed that, in Alberta, Canada, a higher proportion of visits to emergency departments and urgent care centres by First Nations patients ended in the patient leaving without being seen or against medical advice, compared with visits by non-First Nations patients. We sought to analyze whether these differences persisted after controlling for patient demographic and visit characteristics, and to explore reasons for leaving care.
METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study, including a population-based retrospective cohort study for the period of April 2012 to March 2017 using provincial administrative data. We used multivariable logistic regression models to control for demographics, visit characteristics, and facility types. We evaluated models for subgroups of visits with pre-selected illnesses. We also conducted qualitative, in-person sharing circles, a focus group, and 1-on-1 telephone interviews with health directors, emergency care providers, and First Nations patients from 2019 to 2022, during which we reviewed the quantitative results of the cohort study and asked participants to comment on them. We descriptively categorized qualitative data related to reasons that First Nations patients leave care.
RESULTS: Our quantitative analysis included 11 686 287 emergency department visits, of which 1 099 424 (9.4%) were by First Nations patients. Visits by First Nations patients were more likely to end with them leaving without being seen or against medical advice than those by non-First Nations patients (odds ratio 1.96, 95% confidence interval 1.94-1.98). Factors such as diagnosis, visit acuity, geography, or patient demographics other than First Nations status did not explain this finding. First Nations status was associated with greater odds of leaving without being seen or against medical advice in 9 of 10 disease categories or specific diagnoses. In our qualitative analysis, 64 participants discussed First Nations patients\' experiences of racism, stereotyping, communication issues, transportation barriers, long waits, and being made to wait longer than others as reasons for leaving.
CONCLUSIONS: Emergency department visits by First Nations patients were more likely to end with them leaving without being seen or against medical advice than those by non-First Nations patients. As leaving early may delay needed care or interfere with continuity of care, providers and departments should work with local First Nations to develop and adopt strategies to retain First Nations patients in care.