Immunosuppressant

免疫抑制剂
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:乳糜腹水是由淋巴系统破坏引起的,其特征在于在腹腔内积聚含有高水平甘油三酯的混浊流体。两个最常见的原因是肝硬化和肺结核,和结肠标志环细胞癌(SRCC)由于使用免疫抑制剂是极其罕见的肝硬化患者肝移植后,容易误诊和漏诊。
    方法:一名52岁的男子接受了肝移植并接受了8个月的免疫抑制剂治疗,他有3个月的进行性腹胀病史。最初,基于淋巴闪烁显像和淋巴管造影,考虑到淋巴阻塞,并进行膀胱乳糜减压,带溶解和淋巴管外膜剥离。然而,他的腹胀持续没有消退。腹腔穿刺术显示腹水中有同种异体细胞,免疫组织化学分析显示腺癌细胞具有提示胃肠道起源的表型特征。进行了胃肠内窥镜检查,活检显示回盲瓣中存在非典型印戒细胞。由于肿瘤进展,患者最终在三个月的随访后死亡。
    结论:结肠SRCC,由免疫抑制剂引起的,是乳糜腹水的不寻常但不容忽视的原因。
    BACKGROUND: Chylous ascites is caused by disruption of the lymphatic system, which is characterized by the accumulation of a turbid fluid containing high levels of triglycerides within the abdominal cavity. The two most common causes are cirrhosis and tuberculosis, and colon signer ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) due to the use of immunosuppressants is extremely rare in cirrhotic patients after liver transplantation, making it prone to misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis.
    METHODS: A 52-year-old man who underwent liver transplantation and was administered with immunosuppressants for 8 months was admitted with a 3-month history of progressive abdominal distention. Initially, based on lymphoscintigraphy and lymphangiography, lymphatic obstruction was considered, and cystellar chyli decompression with band lysis and external membrane stripping of the lymphatic duct was performed. However, his abdominal distention was persistent without resolution. Abdominal paracentesis revealed allogenic cells in the ascites, and immunohistochemistry analysis revealed adenocarcinoma cells with phenotypic features suggestive of a gastrointestinal origin. Gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed, and biopsy showed atypical signet ring cells in the ileocecal valve. The patient eventually died after a three-month follow-up due to progression of the tumor.
    CONCLUSIONS: Colon SRCC, caused by immunosuppressants, is an unusual but un-neglected cause of chylous ascites.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:提高对获得性血友病A(AHA)的认识和早期诊断对于降低相关死亡率至关重要。我们旨在描述中国患者的获得性血友病,并评估免疫治疗的有效性。
    方法:临床特征,实验室测试数据,治疗方法,对2012年1月至2020年12月期间在西安市中心医院接受治疗的20例AHA患者的结局进行回顾性研究.
    结果:9例患者(45%)通过单一糖皮质激素给药治疗;3例(15%)与环磷酰胺(CP)联合糖皮质激素治疗;4例患者(20%)接受利妥昔单抗与CP和糖皮质激素或利妥昔单抗与CP的联合治疗。长春新碱,和糖皮质激素;三种(15%)通过注射人免疫球蛋白与糖皮质激素的组合;一种(5%)单独使用CP。6例患者(30%)达到完全缓解,11例(55%)部分缓解(PR),但三个(15%)没有进入缓解期,表明客观反应率为85%。
    结论:利妥昔单抗或静脉注射人免疫球蛋白的联合治疗在某些AHA患者中取得了更好的效果。免疫抑制和凝血因子的给药可以迅速控制疾病,并且是有效的,但>50%的患者仅达到PR.这些发现表明,完全消除抑制剂需要长期的免疫抑制治疗。
    OBJECTIVE: Raising awareness of acquired hemophilia A (AHA) and early diagnosis is critical to reduce the associated mortality rate. We aimed to characterize acquired hemophilia in Chinese patients and evaluate the effectiveness of immunotherapy.
    METHODS: The clinical characteristics, laboratory test data, therapeutic approaches, and outcomes of 20 patients with AHA who were admitted to Xi\'an Central Hospital between January 2012 and December 2020 were retrospectively studied.
    RESULTS: Nine of the patients (45%) were treated by single glucocorticoid administration; three (15%) with cyclophosphamide (CP) in combination with a glucocorticoid; four individuals (20%) received a combination therapy of rituximab with CP and glucocorticoid or rituximab with CP, vincristine, and a glucocorticoid; three (15%) by injection of human immunoglobulin in combination with a glucocorticoid; and one (5%) with CP alone. Six patients (30%) achieved total remission and 11 (55%) partial remission (PR), but three (15%) did not enter remission, indicating an objective response rate of 85%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with rituximab or intravenous human immunoglobulin achieves superior results in some patients with AHA. Immunosuppression and the administration of coagulation factors can rapidly control the disease and are efficacious, but >50% of patients only achieved PR. These findings suggest that the complete elimination of inhibitors requires prolonged immunosuppression therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    高风险(HR)角膜移植提出了巨大的挑战,超过50%的移植物经历排斥反应,尽管术后强化护理包括频繁的局部滴眼液给药,每2小时,在6-12个月内逐渐减少,和持续的维持剂量。虽然临床证据强调了抑制术后血管生成的潜在益处,在这种情况下,有效的抗血管生成疗法仍然难以捉摸。这里,我们设计了包含免疫抑制剂(纳米颗粒)和抗血管生成药物(纳米片)的控释纳米药物制剂,并证明这些制剂可以在临床相关大鼠模型中预防HR角膜移植排斥反应至少6个月.与未经治疗的角膜移植物不同,在术后2周内普遍面临排斥反应,一次性结膜下注射长效免疫抑制剂纳米颗粒可有效避免移植排斥6个月,移植物存活率达到70%。值得注意的是,免疫抑制剂纳米颗粒和抗VEGF纳米载体的组合产生显著更好的功效,移植物存活率>85%。显着增强的疗效表明,结合免疫抑制剂和抗血管生成药物的联合纳米药物策略可以极大地增强眼部药物递送,并有利于HR角膜移植的结果,提高存活率。确保患者依从性并减轻给药频率和毒性问题。
    High-risk (HR) corneal transplantation presents a formidable challenge, with over 50% of grafts experiencing rejection despite intensive postoperative care involving frequent topical eyedrop administration up to every 2 h, gradually tapering over 6-12 months, and ongoing maintenance dosing. While clinical evidence underscores the potential benefits of inhibiting postoperative angiogenesis, effective antiangiogenesis therapy remains elusive in this context. Here, we engineered controlled-release nanomedicine formulations comprising immunosuppressants (nanoparticles) and antiangiogenesis drugs (nanowafer) and demonstrated that these formulations can prevent HR corneal transplantation rejection for at least 6 months in a clinically relevant rat model. Unlike untreated corneal grafts, which universally faced rejection within 2 weeks postsurgery, a single subconjunctival injection of the long-acting immunosuppressant nanoparticle alone effectively averted graft rejection for 6 months, achieving a graft survival rate of ∼70%. Notably, the combination of an immunosuppressant nanoparticle and an anti-VEGF nanowafer yielded significantly better efficacy with a graft survival rate of >85%. The significantly enhanced efficacy demonstrated that a combination nanomedicine strategy incorporating immunosuppressants and antiangiogenesis drugs can greatly enhance the ocular drug delivery and benefit the outcome of HR corneal transplantation with increased survival rate, ensuring patient compliance and mitigating dosing frequency and toxicity concerns.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于腺相关病毒(AAV)的基因治疗的出现为患有严重单基因疾病的患者带来了希望。然而,对AAV载体和转基因产物的免疫应答提出了需要有效的免疫抑制策略的挑战。本系统综述集中于38项临床试验和35项真实世界研究中采用的免疫抑制方案。考虑到一系列单基因疾病,AAV血清型,和管理路线。该综述强调需要更深入地了解免疫抑制方案,以提高基于AAV的基因治疗的安全性和有效性。表征与各种基因治疗治疗相关的免疫应答对于优化治疗方案和确保即将进行的基因治疗干预的安全性和有效性至关重要。进一步研究和了解免疫抑制对疾病的影响,治疗,和给药途径将有助于未来开发更有效和更安全的基因治疗方法。
    The emergence of adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based gene therapy has brought hope to patients with severe monogenic disorders. However, immune responses to AAV vectors and transgene products present challenges that require effective immunosuppressive strategies. This systematic review focuses on the immunosuppressive protocols used in 38 clinical trials and 35 real-world studies, considering a range of monogenic diseases, AAV serotypes, and administration routes. The review underscores the need for a deeper understanding of immunosuppressive regimens to enhance the safety and effectiveness of AAV-based gene therapy. Characterizing the immunological responses associated with various gene therapy treatments is crucial for optimizing treatment protocols and ensuring the safety and efficacy of forthcoming gene therapy interventions. Further research and understanding of the impact of immunosuppression on disease, therapy, and route of administration will contribute to the development of more effective and safer gene therapy approaches in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:抗体介导的排斥反应(ABMR)构成了移植物长期存活的障碍,是肾移植后最具挑战性的事件之一。通过治疗性血浆置换(PLEX)去除供体特异性抗体(DSA)是抗体消耗的基石,但效果不一致。imlifidase是目前用于在血管内和血管外空间中DSA几乎完全失活的脱敏的治疗方法。
    方法:这是一个6个月,随机化,开放标签,多中心,在14个移植中心进行的跨国试验。30名患者随机接受imlifidase或PLEX治疗。主要终点是治疗开始后5天内DSA水平的降低。
    结果:尽管试验人群中存在相当大的异质性,由主要终点定义的DSA减少对于imliidase为97%,而对于PLEX为42%。此外,imlifidase将DSA降低到非补体固定水平,而PLEX没有这样做。抗体在imlifidase臂反弹后(大约6-12天),两组的DSA减少量相似.在ABMR治疗开始后的6个月内发生了5次同种异体移植物丢失,其中4次在抗菌肽组中(18例接受治疗),1次在PLEX组中(10例接受治疗)。在临床疗效方面,Kaplan-Meier估计移植物存活率为78%,PLEX为89%,在试验结束时,PLEX臂的eGFR略高。试验中观察到的不良事件符合预期,武器之间没有明显的差异。
    结论:Imlifidase在ABMR人群中是安全且耐受性良好的。尽管与PLEX相比达到了最大DSA降低的主要终点,该试验未能证明imlifidase在该异质性ABMR人群中的临床获益.
    背景:EudraCT编号:2018-000022-66,2020-004777-49;ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03897205,NCT04711850。
    BACKGROUND: Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) poses a barrier to long-term graft survival and is one of the most challenging events after kidney transplantation. Removing donor specific antibodies (DSA) through therapeutic plasma exchange (PLEX) is a cornerstone of antibody depletion but has inconsistent effects. Imlifidase is a treatment currently utilized for desensitization with near-complete inactivation of DSA both in the intra- and extravascular space.
    METHODS: This was a 6-month, randomized, open-label, multicenter, multinational trial conducted at 14 transplant centers. Thirty patients were randomized to either imlifidase or PLEX treatment. The primary endpoint was reduction in DSA level during the 5 days following the start of treatment.
    RESULTS: Despite considerable heterogeneity in the trial population, DSA reduction as defined by the primary endpoint was 97% for imlifidase compared to 42% for PLEX. Additionally, imlifidase reduced DSA to noncomplement fixing levels, whereas PLEX failed to do so. After antibody rebound in the imlifidase arm (circa days 6-12), both arms had similar reductions in DSA. Five allograft losses occurred during the 6 months following the start of ABMR treatment-four within the imlifidase arm (18 patients treated) and one in the PLEX arm (10 patients treated). In terms of clinical efficacy, the Kaplan-Meier estimated graft survival was 78% for imlifidase and 89% for PLEX, with a slightly higher eGFR in the PLEX arm at the end of the trial. The observed adverse events in the trial were as expected, and there were no apparent differences between the arms.
    CONCLUSIONS: Imlifidase was safe and well-tolerated in the ABMR population. Despite meeting the primary endpoint of maximum DSA reduction compared to PLEX, the trial was unsuccessful in demonstrating a clinical benefit of imlifidase in this heterogenous ABMR population.
    BACKGROUND: EudraCT number: 2018-000022-66, 2020-004777-49; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03897205, NCT04711850.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在强调外用他克莫司在治疗眼科眼前节疾病中的作用。本研究分析了来自国际数据库的研究论文和出版物,包括Pubmed,MedLine,谷歌学者,科克伦图书馆,Embase,中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),和Scopus强调了他克莫司局部应用的意义和优势及其治疗过敏性眼部疾病的疗效,免疫介导的疾病,和其他眼表疾病。他克莫司和环孢素是眼科最常用的两种局部免疫抑制剂。他克莫司是一种选择性钙调磷酸酶抑制剂,用于预防和治疗实体器官移植受体的同种异体移植排斥反应,具有与环孢菌素相似的作用机制。免疫介导的炎性眼前段的管理需要强烈的免疫抑制,研究表明他克莫司的有效性是环孢素的十到一百倍。缩写:IL-2=白介素-2,FDA=食品和药物管理局,GvHD=移植物抗宿主病,(Ig)E=免疫球蛋白E,SAC=季节性结膜炎,PAC=常年性过敏性结膜炎,VKC=春季角膜结膜炎,AKC=过敏性角膜结膜炎,GPC=巨大乳头状结膜炎,PKC=体表性角膜结膜炎,DED=干眼病,TBUT=撕裂破裂时间。
    The purpose of this study is to emphasize topical tacrolimus\'s role in treating anterior segment diseases in ophthalmology. The present study analyzed research papers and publications from international databases, including Pubmed, MedLine, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Scopus to highlight the significance and advantages of topical application of tacrolimus and its efficacy in treating allergic eye disorders, immune-mediated diseases, and other ocular surface disorders. Tacrolimus and cyclosporine are the two most commonly used topical immunosuppressants in ophthalmology. Tacrolimus is a selective calcineurin inhibitor administered for the prevention and treatment of allograft rejection in solid organ transplant recipients and has a similar mechanism of action to cyclosporine. Management of immune-mediated inflammatory anterior segment requires intense immunosuppression and studies have shown that tacrolimus is ten to hundred times more effective than cyclosporine. Abbreviations: IL-2 = interleukin-2, FDA = Food and Drug Administration Agency, GvHD = graft versus host disease, (Ig)E = immunoglobulin E, SAC = seasonal conjunctivitis, PAC = perennial allergic conjunctivitis, VKC = vernal keratoconjunctivitis, AKC = allergic keratoconjunctivitis, GPC = giant papillary conjunctivitis, PKC = phyctenular keratoconjunctivitis, DED = dry eye disease, TBUT = tear break up time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    这篇社论评论了《世界胃肠病学杂志》上一篇题为“使用酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的肿瘤患者乙型肝炎病毒再激活的风险:病例报告和文献分析”的文章。在这篇社论中,我们专注于提供更全面的探索与酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)使用相关的乙型肝炎病毒再激活(HBVr)。它包括对潜在的HBV再激活机制的见解,TKIs与HBV再激活的时间关系,和预防措施。目的是了解需要核苷(t)ide类似物(NAT)和系列血液测试的早期识别的再激活和急性肝损伤,以及管理策略。TKI被认为是HBVr的中间体(1%-10%)。目前的指南规定,患者接受治疗与高或中度风险的再激活或最近的癌症诊断必须有至少测试乙肝表面抗原,抗乙型肝炎核心抗原(HBc),和抗乙型肝炎表面抗体。在高流行地区进行抗HBc筛查意味着测试阴性的人应该接种HBV疫苗。核苷或核苷酸类似物(NAs)如恩替卡韦(ETV),富马酸替诺福韦酯(TDF),替诺福韦艾拉酚胺(TAF)是免疫抑制期间HBV再激活预防和治疗的基础。相反,拉米夫定,替比夫定,和阿德福韦通常是不鼓励,因为它们的抗病毒功效降低和培养耐药病毒株的风险较高。然而,在ETV,TDF,和TAF不是可行的治疗选择。
    This editorial commented on an article in the World Journal of Gastroenterology titled \"Risks of Reactivation of Hepatitis B Virus in Oncological Patients Using Tyrosine Kinase-Inhibitors: Case Report and Literature Analysis\" by Colapietro et al. In this editorial, we focused on providing a more comprehensive exploration of hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) associated with the usage of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). It includes insights into the mechanisms underlying HBV reactivation, the temporal relationship between TKIs and HBV reactivation, and preventive measures. The aim is to understand the need for nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAT) and serial blood tests for early recognition of reactivation and acute liver injury, along with management strategies. TKIs are considered to be an intermediate (1%-10%) of HBVr. Current guidelines stipulate that patients receiving therapy with high or moderate risks of reactivation or recent cancer diagnosis must have at least tested hepatitis B surface antigen, anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc), and anti-hepatitis B surface antibody. Anti-HBc screening in highly endemic areas means people with negative tests should be vaccinated against HBV. Nucleoside or nucleotide analogs (NAs) like entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) form the basis of HBV reactivation prophylaxis and treatment during immunosuppression. Conversely, lamivudine, telbivudine, and adefovir are generally discouraged due to their reduced antiviral efficacy and higher risk of fostering drug-resistant viral strains. However, these less effective NAs may still be utilized in cases where ETV, TDF, and TAF are not feasible treatment options.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:风湿性疾病的影响,长期用药,疫苗接种对COVID-19的严重程度仍未得到充分理解,阻碍有效的病人管理。本研究旨在调查影响中国风湿性疾病患者COVID-19严重程度的因素,并为患者护理提供现实证据。
    方法:我们进行了一项由两个队列组成的回顾性观察研究,然后是嵌套的案例控制分析。门诊队列包括非重症COVID-19患者,而住院队列包括连续的重症COVID-19住院患者。此外,来自两个队列的风湿性疾病患者被纳入巢式病例对照研究.从电子病历和调查中获得临床信息。
    结果:共纳入749名门诊患者和167名住院患者。在门诊队列中,风湿性疾病被确定为呼吸困难严重程度的危险因素(无风湿性疾病:OR=0.577,95%CI=0.396-0.841,p=.004),但不是为了死亡率,住院时间,或住院队列中的住院费用。长期使用糖皮质激素被确定为风湿性疾病患者呼吸困难严重程度的独立危险因素(OR=1.814,95%CI=1.235-2.663,p=0.002),而疫苗接种和免疫抑制剂治疗没有相关性。接种疫苗被确定为风湿性疾病患者因COVID-19导致住院的保护因素(OR=0.031,95%CI=0.007-0.136,p<.001),而长期糖皮质激素和免疫抑制剂治疗没有相关性。
    结论:风湿性疾病和长期使用糖皮质激素是中国人群COVID-19严重程度的重要危险因素,而强调疫苗对COVID-19严重程度的保护作用是至关重要的。此外,这项研究为长期免疫抑制剂治疗不一定需要额外调整处方这一概念提供了初步支持.
    OBJECTIVE: The impact of rheumatic diseases, long-term medication, and vaccination on COVID-19 severity remain insufficiently understood, hindering effective patient management. This study aims to investigate factors influencing COVID-19 severity in Chinese rheumatic patients and to provide real-world evidence for patient care.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study consisting of two cohorts, followed by a nested case-control analysis. The outpatient cohort included non-severe COVID-19 patients, while the inpatient cohort included consecutive severe COVID-19 inpatients. Additionally, rheumatic patients from both cohorts were included for the nested case-control study. Clinical information was obtained from electronic medical records and surveys.
    RESULTS: A total of 749 outpatients and 167 inpatients were enrolled. In the outpatient cohort, rheumatic diseases were identified as a risk factor for the severity of dyspnea (No rheumatic disease: OR = 0.577, 95% CI = 0.396-0.841, p = .004), but not for mortality, length of hospitalization, or hospitalization costs in the inpatient cohort. Long-term glucocorticoids use was identified as an independent risk factor for severity of dyspnea in rheumatic patients (OR = 1.814, 95% CI = 1.235-2.663, p = .002), while vaccination and immunosuppressant treatment showed no association. Vaccination was identified as a protective factor against hospitalization due to COVID-19 in patients with rheumatic diseases (OR = 0.031, 95% CI = 0.007-0.136, p < .001), whereas long-term glucocorticoids and immunosuppressant treatment showed no association.
    CONCLUSIONS: Rheumatic diseases and long-term glucocorticoids use are significant risk factors for COVID-19 severity in the Chinese population, whereas emphasizing the protective effects of vaccines against COVID-19 severity is crucial. Additionally, the investigation provides preliminary support for the concept that long-term immunosuppressant therapy does not necessarily require additional prescription adjustments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    作为常用免疫抑制剂的活性代谢物,通常监测霉酚酸(MPA)水平以防止移植后的器官排斥。三唑通常用于治疗免疫受损患者的侵袭性真菌感染。由于个体药代动力学和药物-药物相互作用的可变性,治疗药物监测建议三唑类抗真菌药。已经开发了可以定量血清中的MPA和三唑药物的多重LC-MS/MS测定。
    建立样品制备程序以加入内标化合物并沉淀蛋白质。反相色谱分离在C18柱上进行,每个样品的分析时间为5分钟。质谱仪以多反应监测模式操作。该方法在与TripleQuad6500或API4000仪器连接的两个HPLC系统上进行了验证。
    多重测定在宽动态范围内呈线性,MPA的分析物测量范围为0.4-48μg/mL,泊沙康唑0.1-12μg/mL,伏立康唑为0.2-24μg/mL,伊曲康唑,羟基伊曲康唑,和伊沙武康唑.日内和日内的不精确度不到10%。检测限低于0.04ug/mL,定量限低于0.2μg/mL。方法与当前内部方法的比较研究符合验收标准。仪器比较研究表明,从两个系统收集的数据之间存在很强的相关性。
    开发并验证了一种强大的多重LC-MS/MS测定法,用于在临床实验室中监测MPA和三唑药物水平。在两种不同仪器上的测定性能是可接受的和可比较的。
    UNASSIGNED: As an active metabolite of a commonly prescribed immunosuppressant, mycophenolic acid (MPA) levels are often monitored to prevent organ rejection following a transplant. Triazoles are often prescribed for treatment of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients. Due to the variability in individual pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended for triazole antifungals. A multiplex LC-MS/MS assay has been developed that can quantify both MPA and triazole drugs in serum.
    UNASSIGNED: A sample preparation procedure was established to spike in internal standard compounds and precipitate proteins. Reversed-phase chromatographic separation was performed on a C18 column with an analysis time of five minutes per sample. The mass spectrometer was operated in multiple reaction monitoring mode. The method was validated on two HPLC systems interfaced with either a Triple Quad 6500 or an API 4000 instrument.
    UNASSIGNED: The multiplex assay was linear over a wide dynamic range with analyte measurable ranges of 0.4-48 μg/mL for MPA, 0.1-12 μg/mL for posaconazole, and 0.2-24 μg/mL for voriconazole, itraconazole, hydroxyitraconazole, and isavuconazole. The between-day and intraday imprecisions were less than 10 %. Limits of detection were below 0.04 ug/mL with limits of quantitation below 0.2 μg/mL. Method comparison studies against the current in-house method met acceptance criteria. The instrument comparison study demonstrated a strong correlation between data collected from the two systems.
    UNASSIGNED: A robust multiplex LC-MS/MS assay was developed and validated for monitoring MPA and triazoles drug levels in a clinical laboratory. The assay performance on two distinct instruments was acceptable and comparable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    淋巴细胞性心肌炎(LM)主要由多种因素引发,包括病毒感染和随后的免疫反应。虽然罕见,一些LM患者经历了危及生命的暴发性形式的复发。虽然结合了类固醇和免疫抑制剂,如硫唑嘌呤和霉酚酸酯,在LM患者中表现出良好的预后,其疗效仅限于慢性期。的确,各种免疫抑制剂已用于具有暴发性表现的LM;然而,他们的证据仍然缺乏。在我们的案例系列中,两名LM患者在类固醇逐渐减少期间经历了暴发性复发,和另一个提出了持续的心肌酶升高,尽管类固醇治疗。因此,我们与类固醇一起启动了钙调磷酸酶抑制剂,导致良好控制的临床过程,没有进一步的LM复发和显着的不良反应。我们的病例表明,钙调磷酸酶抑制剂可作为治疗类固醇耐药的LM伴暴发性复发的治疗选择。
    Lymphocytic myocarditis (LM) is primarily triggered by various factors including viral infections and subsequent immune responses. While rare, some patients with LM experience recurrence with a life-threatening fulminant form. Although combining steroids and immunosuppressants, such as azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil, has demonstrated favourable outcomes in patients with LM, their efficacy is limited to the chronic phase. Indeed, various immunosuppressants have been used for LM with fulminant manifestation; however, their evidence remains lacking. In our case series, two patients with LM experienced fulminant relapses during steroid tapering, and another presented persistent cardiac enzymes elevation despite steroid therapies. Consequently, we initiated calcineurin inhibitors alongside steroids, resulting in well-controlled clinical courses without further recurrence of LM and significant adverse effects. Our cases suggest calcineurin inhibitors as therapeutic options for managing steroid-resistant LM with fulminant relapse.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号