Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)

免疫检查点抑制剂 (ICI)
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)用于不可切除的肝细胞癌(HCC),目前尚不清楚序贯ICI治疗-阿替珠单抗联合贝伐单抗(AB)进展后的durvalumab联合曲美木单抗(DT)是否对HCC有效.在这项全国性的多中心研究中,我们旨在根据治疗时机研究DT治疗的效果.共纳入85例接受DT治疗的患者。主要终点是接受一线DT治疗的患者在第8周的治疗反应,那些接受二线或后期治疗而未接受AB治疗的患者,和那些接受二线或后期治疗与先前的AB治疗。一线治疗患者的客观反应率(ORR),二线治疗无AB,二线治疗与先前的AB是44%,54%,5%,分别(p<0.001)。同样,疾病控制率(DCRs)为69%,91%,26%,分别(p<0.001)。在先前接受AB治疗的患者中,ORR和DCR显着降低。先前AB治疗后接受二线治疗的患者的无进展生存期(PFS)显着缩短,并且这些患者的PFS调整后的风险比(95%置信区间),以一线治疗为参考,为2.35(1.1-5.1,p=0.03)。总之,AB治疗后DT测序的影响有限.然而,即使经过二线治疗,无AB治疗史的患者,其治疗效果可与一线治疗相当。因此,开始DT治疗时应考虑既往治疗史.
    Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are used for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), it is unclear whether sequential ICI treatment-durvalumab plus tremelimumab (DT) after progression on atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB)-is effective for HCC. In this nationwide multicenter study, we aimed to investigate the effect of DT treatment based on the timing of treatment. A total of 85 patients receiving DT treatment were enrolled. The primary endpoint is treatment response at week 8 among patients receiving first-line DT treatment, those receiving second-line or later treatment without prior AB therapy, and those receiving second-line or later treatment with prior AB therapy. Objective response rates (ORRs) in patients with first-line treatment, second-line treatment without AB, and second-line treatment with prior AB were 44%, 54%, and 5%, respectively (p < 0.001). Similarly, disease control rates (DCRs) were 69%, 91%, and 26%, respectively (p < 0.001). ORR and DCR were significantly lower in patients with prior AB treatment. Progression free survival (PFS) was significantly shortened in patients receiving second-line therapy following prior AB treatment and an adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) in those patients for PFS, using first-line therapy as a reference, was 2.35 (1.1-5.1, p = 0.03). In conclusion, the impact of DT sequencing following AB treatment was limited. However, even after second-line treatment, the treatment effect can be equivalent to that of first-line treatment in cases with no history of AB treatment. Thus, prior treatment history should be taken into account when initiating DT treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    我们报告一例胆管炎,免疫相关不良事件(IRAE),在口腔癌肺转移患者中使用nivolumab引起的。一名72岁的男子在口腔癌手术后出现肺转移。第二次治疗后观察到肝酶异常,根据血液检查结果和内窥镜检查结果诊断为irAE胆管炎。我们建议使用类固醇治疗,但病人拒绝了.因此,他接受了熊去氧胆酸治疗。胆管炎逐渐恶化,患者一般情况恶化,他在胆管炎发作169天后死亡。
    We report a case of cholangitis, an immune-related adverse event (irAE), caused by the administration of nivolumab in a patient with lung metastasis of oral cancer. A 72-year-old man developed pulmonary metastasis after surgery for oral cancer. Hepatic enzyme abnormalities were observed after the second session of treatment, and irAE cholangitis was diagnosed based on the results of the blood test results and endoscopy findings. We suggested steroid treatment, but the patient refused it. Therefore, he was treated with ursodeoxycholic acid. The cholangitis gradually deteriorated, the patients\' general condition worsened, and he died 169 days after the onset of cholangitis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Kirsten大鼠肉瘤同源物(KRAS)突变是非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的关键驱动因素之一,FDA批准的KRAS-G12C突变的特异性抑制剂可用于临床。然而,某些KRAS突变亚型的抑制剂仍然不可用,特别是罕见的KRAS突变,包括G13C,G13D,和Q61H。在这项研究中,我们回顾性调查了具有罕见KRAS突变的NSCLC患者的结局,以确定他们是否可以从免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)中获益.
    我们的回顾性研究涉及240例KRAS突变的晚期NSCLC患者,他于2018年7月至2021年7月就诊于上海胸科医院。记录完整的临床和病理数据,并采用无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)作为主要终点。
    中位随访时间为36.5个月(范围,30.8-42.1个月),中位OS为9.7个月(范围,7.6-11.8个月)。在接受评估的240名患者中,130例(54.2%)接受化疗,110例(45.8%)接受基于ICI的治疗。在接受化疗的患者中,罕见KRAS突变患者的生存结局较差(中位PFS,3.4vs.4.1个月,P=0.047;OS中位数,5.2vs.7.1个月,P=0.02)比常规KRAS突变患者高。免疫治疗后,罕见KRAS突变患者的PFS和OS延长(中位PFS7.3vs.3.4个月,P<0.001;中位OS,13.3vs.5.2个月,P<0.001),与常规KRAS突变患者相比无显着差异,其中一部分在免疫治疗前可获得程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达数据(n=72),肿瘤细胞PD-L1阳性率较高(≥50%)的患者PFS和OS升高.
    尽管与其他非小细胞肺癌患者相比存在潜在的生存劣势,罕见的KRAS突变患者(G12A除外,C,D,V)可以从基于ICI的治疗中特别受益,生存结果与PD-L1表达相关。
    UNASSIGNED: Kirsten rat sarcoma homolog (KRAS) mutations are one of the key drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and FDA-approved specific inhibitors of KRAS-G12C mutation are available clinically. However, inhibitors of certain KRAS mutation subtypes remain unavailable, especially rare KRAS mutations including G13C, G13D, and Q61H. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the outcomes of NSCLC patients with rare KRAS-mutation to determine if they may benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
    UNASSIGNED: Our retrospective study involved 240 advanced NSCLC patients with KRAS mutations, who visited Shanghai Chest Hospital from July 2018 to July 2021. Complete clinical and pathological data were recorded and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were adopted as primary endpoints.
    UNASSIGNED: The median follow-up time was 36.5 months (range, 30.8-42.1 months) and the median OS was 9.7 months (range, 7.6-11.8 months). Of the 240 patients evaluated, 130 (54.2%) received chemotherapy and 110 (45.8%) received ICI-based treatment. Among the patients who received chemotherapy, patients with rare KRAS-mutations presented worse survival outcomes (median PFS, 3.4 vs. 4.1 months, P=0.047; median OS, 5.2 vs. 7.1 months, P=0.02) than conventional KRAS-mutant patients. PFS and OS of rare KRAS-mutation patients were prolonged after immunotherapy (median PFS 7.3 vs. 3.4 months, P<0.001; median OS, 13.3 vs. 5.2 months, P<0.001) and had no significant difference compared with conventional KRAS-mutant patients, in part of them whose programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression data before immunotherapy were available (n=72), patients with a higher rate of PD-L1 positive tumor cells (≥50%) presented elevated PFS and OS.
    UNASSIGNED: Despite having potential survival disadvantage compared with other NSCLC patients, rare KRAS-mutant patients (other than G12A, C, D, V) could benefit specifically from ICI-based therapy and survival outcomes are correlated with PD-L1 expression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    免疫检查点抑制剂加铂-依托泊苷(PE)可改善广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者的总生存期(OS)。虽然CASPIAN试验证明了durvalumab加PE的疗效,临床试验结果可能不能代表一般情况,因为临床试验通常有严格的纳入和排除标准。我们在此报告Durvalumab联合PE在真实世界的ES-SCLC患者中的疗效和安全性,临床实践。
    现在,单心,回顾性研究评估了ES-SCLC或复发患者,在2020年9月至2023年2月期间接受Durvalumab加PE的有限阶段SCLC。还评估了疗效和不良事件(AE)的发生率。
    该研究包括40名患者,其中17人为老年人(年龄>70岁),15人的表现状态(PS)为2或3。中位随访时间为13.0个月[95%置信区间(CI):8.0-22.2个月]。客观有效率为80.0%(95%CI:63.1-91.6%),疾病控制率为88.6%(95%CI:73.3-96.8%)。中位无进展生存期(PFS)为5.9个月(95%CI:4.9-6.9),中位OS为25.4个月(95%CI:4.6-46.2)。高龄等因素,可怜的PS,脑转移的存在与较低的PFS和OS无关。26名患者(65.0%)出现3级或更高的不良事件,主要是血液学毒性。导致治疗中断的不良事件发生在3例患者中(8%)。
    Durvalumab联合PE在ES-SCLC患者中显示出良好的疗效和安全性,表明这种治疗在临床实践中耐受性良好,即使是老年患者和PS较差的患者。
    UNASSIGNED: Immune checkpoint inhibitor plus platinum-etoposide (PE) improved overall survival (OS) in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). While the CASPIAN trial demonstrated the efficacy of durvalumab plus PE, the clinical trial results may not be representative of the general, real-world population because clinical trials often have strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. We herein report the efficacy and safety of durvalumab plus PE in patients with ES-SCLC in real-world, clinical practice.
    UNASSIGNED: The present, monocentric, retrospective study evaluated patients with ES-SCLC or recurrent, limited-stage SCLC who received durvalumab plus PE between September 2020 and February 2023. The efficacy and incidence of adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: The study included 40 patients, of whom 17 were elderly (age >70 years), and 15 had performance status (PS) 2 or 3. The median follow-up time was 13.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 8.0-22.2 months]. The objective response rate was 80.0% (95% CI: 63.1-91.6%), and the disease control rate was 88.6% (95% CI: 73.3-96.8%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.9 months (95% CI: 4.9-6.9), and the median OS was 25.4 months (95% CI: 4.6-46.2). Factors such as advanced age, poor PS, and presence of brain metastases were not associated with lower PFS and OS. Twenty-six patients (65.0%) experienced grade 3 or higher AEs, mainly hematological toxicity. AEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in three patients (8%).
    UNASSIGNED: Durvalumab plus PE in patients with ES-SCLC showed good efficacy and safety according to our real-world data, suggesting that this treatment is well tolerated in clinical practice, even in elderly patients and those with poor PS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者的最佳一线治疗方法。材料与方法:我们进行了网络荟萃分析(CRD42023486863),以系统地评估8种一线治疗方案对ES-SCLC的疗效和安全性。包括15项临床试验。结果:我们的分析表明,PD-1/PD-L1+依托泊苷联合铂(EP)和PD-L1+血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)+EP方案显着提高总生存期和无进展生存期。亚组分析显示,serplulimab是改善总体生存率的最有希望的选择。将抗血管生成药物整合到免疫化疗中具有潜在的益处,随着不良事件发生率的增加,需要进一步调查。结论:我们的发现为未来的研究和开发更有效的ES-SCLC治疗策略提供了有价值的见解。强调了在这一治疗领域不断创新的迫切需要。
    [方框:见正文]。
    Aim: To identify the optimal first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Materials & methods: We conducted a network meta-analysis (CRD42023486863) to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of eight first-line treatment regimens for ES-SCLC, including 15 clinical trials. Results: Our analysis showed that the PD-1/PD-L1 + etoposide combined with platinum (EP) and PD-L1 + vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) + EP regimens significantly enhanced overall survival and progression-free survival, with subgroup analysis revealing that serplulimab ranked as the most promising option for improving overall survival. Integrating anti-angiogenesis drugs into immunochemotherapy presents potential benefits, with an increased incidence of adverse events necessitating further investigation. Conclusion: Our findings offer valuable insights for future research and for developing more effective treatment strategies for ES-SCLC, underscoring the critical need for continued innovation in this therapeutic area.
    [Box: see text].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:男性原发性性腺外绒毛膜癌(PEGCC)很少见。它是高度恶性的,通常在诊断时出现远处转移,对治疗反应不佳。由于PD-L1的高水平,PD-1/PD-L1途径可能是治疗靶标。在这里,我们报告了我们在三级医院治疗6名男孩的儿科PEGCC的经验。
    方法:我们分析了2009年至2021年间经病理证实为PEGCC的六个男孩的数据。他们的临床人口统计学和组织病理学特征以及治疗和临床结果从他们的医学图表中检索。
    结果:患者的中位年龄为15岁(范围:12-17岁)。最常见的原发肿瘤部位是纵隔(67%,4/6),腹膜后(16.7%)和脑(16.7%)各1例。除了脑部PEGCC患者,均在诊断时出现转移。观察到以下转移部位:肺(100%,5/5),大脑(3/5,60%),肝脏(3/5,60%),肾脏(2/5,40%),和脾脏(1/5,20%)。大多数病人有干咳,呼吸困难,初次报告时咯血,可能是由于肺转移。所有患者的血清人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)水平均高度升高。所有患者均接受基于铂的细胞毒性化疗。患有脑绒毛膜癌的患者接受了手术肿瘤切除术;所有其他人仅接受了手术活检。两名患者的PD-L1免疫组织化学染色呈强阳性。一名患者接受了PD-L1抑制剂派姆单抗,并获得了良好的反应。我们队列的1年生存率为33.3%,中位生存期为4.34个月。在随访期间,两名幸存者的血清HCG水平保持正常。
    结论:目前以铂类为基础的化疗反应不佳仍然是儿科PEGCC治疗的主要挑战。在常规化疗方案中加入派姆单抗可能会改善PEGCC男孩的预后。
    BACKGROUND: Primary extragonadal choriocarcinoma (PEGCC) in male is rare. It is highly malignant, typically presents with distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis, and responds poorly to treatment. Because of its associated high levels of PD-L1, the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is a likely therapeutic target. Herein, we report our experience of treating pediatric PEGCC in six boys at a tertiary hospital.
    METHODS: We analyzed the data of six boys with pathologically confirmed PEGCC between 2009 and 2021. Their clinicodemographic and histopathological characteristics as well as treatments and clinical outcomes were retrieved from their medical charts.
    RESULTS: The patients\' median age was 15 (range: 12-17) years. The most common primary tumor site was the mediastinum (67%, 4/6), with one case each in the retroperitoneum (16.7%) and brain (16.7%). Except for the patient with brain PEGCC, all presented with metastasis at the time of diagnosis. The following metastatic sites were observed: the lungs (100%, 5/5), brain (3/5, 60%), liver (3/5, 60%), kidneys (2/5, 40%), and spleen (1/5, 20%). Most patients had dry cough, dyspnea, and hemoptysis at initial presentation, likely due to lung metastasis. Serum human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) levels were highly elevated in all patients. All patients received platinum-based cytotoxic chemotherapy. The patient with brain choriocarcinoma underwent surgical tumor resection; all others underwent only surgical biopsy. Strong positive PD-L1 immunohistochemical staining was noted for two patients. One patient received the PD-L1 inhibitor pembrolizumab and achieved a good response. Our cohort\'s 1-year survival rate was 33.3%, with a median survival of 4.34 months. Serum HCG levels remained normal in the two survivors during follow-up visits.
    CONCLUSIONS: The poor response to current platinum-based chemotherapy remains a major challenge in the management of pediatric PEGCC. Adding pembrolizumab to a conventional chemotherapy regimen may improve the outcomes in boys with PEGCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管在免疫治疗领域取得了快速进展,包括免疫检查点抑制在治疗多种癌症中的成功,高级别胶质瘤(HGG)的临床反应令人失望。这部分归因于大多数HGs的低肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)。超突变是一种最近表征的神经胶质瘤特征,发生在一小部分病例中,这可能为免疫疗法开辟了一条途径。这些肿瘤的显著升高的TMB最常见的原因是在广泛暴露于替莫唑胺或,不那么频繁,来自遗传性癌症易感性综合症。在这次审查中,我们讨论了HGs超突变的遗传学和病因学,强调产生的基因组特征,以及这些患者人群中免疫肿瘤学研究的状态和未来方向。
    Despite rapid advances in the field of immunotherapy, including the success of immune checkpoint inhibition in treating multiple cancer types, clinical response in high-grade gliomas (HGGs) has been disappointing. This has been in part attributed to the low tumor mutational burden (TMB) of the majority of HGGs. Hypermutation is a recently characterized glioma signature that occurs in a small subset of cases, which may open an avenue to immunotherapy. The substantially elevated TMB of these tumors most commonly results from alterations in the DNA mismatch repair pathway in the setting of extensive exposure to temozolomide or, less frequently, from inherited cancer predisposition syndromes. In this review, we discuss the genetics and etiology of hypermutation in HGGs, with an emphasis on the resulting genomic signatures, and the state and future directions of immuno-oncology research in these patient populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    RESORCE-III试验表明,与安慰剂相比,接受索拉非尼治疗并接受瑞戈非尼二线治疗的晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的总生存率提高。稍后,免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)联合抗血管生成抗体的免疫治疗已发展成为适合患者的首选一线治疗.我们旨在探讨瑞戈非尼作为一线药物单独或与ICIs联合治疗晚期HCC患者的疗效和安全性。
    我们确定了50例晚期肝癌患者接受瑞戈非尼作为一线药物治疗。两名患者失访并排除。基线因素,给药,同时使用ICIs,毒性和治疗结果由电子病历记录.
    26例患者接受瑞戈非尼单药治疗,22例患者接受瑞戈非尼+ICI联合治疗。在总队列中,中位无进展生存期(mPFS)为7.7个月,中位总生存期(mOS)为16.7个月(P=0.02).实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST)1.1版评估的客观反应率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)分别为21%和73%。在regorafenib单药治疗组中,mPFS为5.9个月,mOS为13.9个月;在组合组中,mPFS为7.8个月,mOS为23.6个月。单药治疗组的ORR和DCR分别为15%和65%,联合治疗组分别为27%和82%,分别。
    与ICIs联合使用的Regorafenib具有轻微的安全性,与单药治疗相比,改善了反应和几乎加倍的mOS,在一项随机研究中需要进一步的前瞻性评估。
    UNASSIGNED: The RESORCE-III trial demonstrated that advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who progressed on sorafenib and had second-line therapy with regorafenib improved overall survival compared with placebo. Later, immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with antiangiogenetic antibodies has evolved as the preferred first-line treatment for fit patients. We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of regorafenib as a first-line agent alone or in combination with ICIs in patients with advanced HCC.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified 50 patients with advanced HCC treated with regorafenib as a first-line agent. Two patients were lost to follow-up and excluded. Baseline factors, dosing, concomitant use of ICIs, toxicity and outcome of treatment were recorded from electronic medical records.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-six patients received regorafenib as monotherapy and twenty-two received regorafenib + ICI in combination. In the total cohort, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 7.7 months and the median overall survival (mOS) was 16.7 months (P=0.02). Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 were 21% and 73%. In the regorafenib monotherapy group, mPFS was 5.9 months, and mOS was 13.9 months; in the combination group, mPFS was 7.8 months, and mOS was 23.6 months. ORR and DCR were 15% and 65% in the monotherapy group, and 27% and 82% in the combined treatment group, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Regorafenib used in combination with ICIs had a mild safety profile and resulted in improved response and an almost doubling of mOS compared to monotherapy, warranting further prospective evaluation in a randomized study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    破坏性甲状腺炎和继发性肾上腺功能不全是免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的主要内分泌免疫相关不良事件。然而,每个事件在给药后最频繁发生的时间各不相同,同时发生多个事件的情况很少见。我们遇到了一名同时患有甲状腺毒症和肾上腺功能不全的患者。一名有2型糖尿病(DM)病史的80岁女性被诊断为IVA期肺鳞状细胞癌。开始使用纳武单抗和伊匹单抗的组合进行治疗。尽管她的甲状腺球蛋白抗体检测呈阳性,并且在两个疗程后观察到短暂的亚临床甲状腺功能亢进,继续使用ICIs治疗。四个月后,由于药物诱发的肺部疾病,我们停止了治疗.上届政府一个月后,病人失去知觉,住进了另一家医院,诊断为糖尿病酮症酸中毒,尿路感染,还有败血症.急性期治疗后,由于持续发烧和心动过速,她被转移到我们医院。观察甲状腺毒症和肾上腺功能不全,高水平的游离甲状腺素,低甲状腺刺激激素(TSH),和皮质醇水平。用细胞外液治疗,碘化钾,β受体阻滞剂,开始使用氢化可的松,病人的病情好转了。没有观察到其他垂体激素缺乏。根据甲状腺球蛋白抗体阳性,她被诊断为无痛性甲状腺炎和继发性肾上腺功能不全,TSH受体抗体阴性,甲状腺超声检查中多普勒血流减少,低肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH),促肾上腺皮质激素和皮质醇对促肾上腺皮质激素释放激素负荷试验反应低。MRI未见异常。我们报告了一例甲状腺毒症和继发性肾上腺功能不全的病例,在首次使用nivolumab和ipilimumab后五个月。在使用ICIs联合治疗的患者中,仔细的随访和内分泌紊乱的早期发现至关重要。
    Destructive thyroiditis and secondary adrenal insufficiency are major endocrinological immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, the timing at which each event occurs most frequently after drug administration varies, and cases where multiple events occur simultaneously are rare. We encountered a patient who concurrently suffered from thyrotoxicosis and adrenal insufficiency. An 80-year-old woman with a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) was diagnosed with stage IVA squamous cell carcinoma of the lungs. Treatment with a combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab was initiated. Although she tested positive for thyroglobulin antibody and transient subclinical hyperthyroidism was observed after two courses, treatment with ICIs was continued. Four months later, treatment was discontinued due to drug-induced lung disease. One month after the last administration, the patient became unconscious and was admitted to another hospital, diagnosed with diabetic ketoacidosis, urinary tract infection, and sepsis. After acute-phase treatment, she was transferred to our hospital due to persistent fever and tachycardia. Thyrotoxicosis and adrenal insufficiency were observed, with high levels of free thyroxine, low thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and cortisol levels. Treatment with extracellular fluids, potassium iodide, beta-blockers, and hydrocortisone was initiated, and the patient\'s condition improved. No other pituitary hormone deficiencies were observed. She was diagnosed with painless thyroiditis and secondary adrenal insufficiency based on the positive thyroglobulin antibody, negative TSH receptor antibody, decreased Doppler flow in thyroid ultrasonography, low adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), and low response of ACTH and cortisol to corticotropin-releasing hormone loading test. MRI revealed no abnormalities. We report a case of thyrotoxicosis and secondary adrenal insufficiency five months after the first administration of nivolumab and ipilimumab. Careful follow-up and early detection of endocrine disorders are critical in patients treated with a combination of ICIs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号