Identification accuracy

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    内分泌干扰化学物质由于可能对人类健康造成影响而令人担忧,因此,它们经常被包括在生物监测研究中。目前的分析方法集中在已知的化学物质上,无法识别或定量其他未知的化学物质及其代谢物。非目标分析(NTA)方法是有利的,因为它们允许广泛的化学筛选,这提供了更全面的人体化学暴露的特征,并且可以阐明未知化学物质的代谢途径。还有许多与NTA相关的挑战,这可能会影响获得的结果。化学空间,即,方法范围内的一组已知和可能的化合物,必须根据样品制备清楚地定义,因为这对于自信地识别化学品至关重要。数据采集模式和液相色谱与高分辨率质谱联用的流动相添加剂会影响基于光谱质量的化学物质电离和结构识别。在这项研究中,使用一种新型的CarbonS墨盒清理方法开发了一种样品制备方法,尿液中的内分泌干扰化学物质,包括新的双酚A类似物和二苯甲酮紫外线过滤剂,如双(4-羟基苯基乙酸甲酯)。研究表明,在低尖峰水平下,数据相关采集(DDA)的识别率较低(40%),即,1ng/mL,与数据独立采集(DIA)(57%)相比,当使用复合发现者时。在DDA,使用CompoundDiscoverer鉴定出更多化合物,当将乙酸铵与乙酸(82%)作为流动相添加剂进行比较时,识别率为95%。使用DDA数据,TraceFinder软件在1ng/mL加标水平下的识别率为53%,与使用DIA数据的40%相比。使用开发的方法,首次在尿液样品中鉴定出2,4双酚F。结果表明,NTA如何为风险评估和监管行动提供人体暴露信息,但需要标准化程序报告,以确保研究结果的可重复性和准确性。
    Endocrine disrupting chemicals are of concern because of possible human health effects, thus they are frequently included in biomonitoring studies. Current analytical methods are focused on known chemicals and are incapable of identifying or quantifying other unknown chemicals and their metabolites. Non-targeted analysis (NTA) methods are advantageous since they allow for broad chemical screening, which provides a more comprehensive characterization of human chemical exposure, and can allow elucidation of metabolic pathways for unknown chemicals. There are still many challenges associated with NTA, which can impact the results obtained. The chemical space, i.e., the group of known and possible compounds within the scope of the method, must clearly be defined based on the sample preparation, as this is critical in identifying chemicals with confidence. Data acquisition modes and mobile phase additives used with liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass-spectrometry can affect the chemicals ionized and structural identification based on the spectral quality. In this study, a sample preparation method was developed using a novel clean-up approach with CarbonS cartridges, for endocrine-disrupting chemicals in urine, including new bisphenol A analogues and benzophenone-based UV filters, like methyl bis (4-hydroxyphenyl acetate). The study showed that data dependent acquisition (DDA) had a lower identification rate (40%) at low spiking levels, i.e., 1 ng/mL, compared to data independent acquisition (DIA) (57%), when Compound Discoverer was used. In DDA, more compounds were identified using Compound Discoverer, with an identification rate of 95% when ammonium acetate was compared to acetic acid (82%) as a mobile phase additive. TraceFinder software had an identification rate of 53% at 1 ng/mL spiking level using the DDA data, compared to 40% using the DIA data. Using the developed method, 2,4 bisphenol F was identified for the first time in urine samples. The results show how NTA can provide human exposure information for risk assessment and regulatory action but standardized reporting of procedures is needed to ensure study results are reproducible and accurate. His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Health, 2024.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:使用重症监护医师(CCP)的波形分析改善患者-呼吸机异步(PVA)识别可能会改善患者预后。本研究旨在评估CCP使用波形分析以及与此能力相关的因素来识别不同类型的PVAs的能力。
    方法:我们调查了突尼斯12所大学附属医疗ICU(MICU)。在这些MICU中练习的CCP被要求在视觉上识别4例临床病例,每个对应于不同的PVA。我们收集了关于CCP的以下特征:科学等级,多年的经验,之前的机械通气培训,先前暴露于波形分析,以及他们实践的MICUs的特征。根据受访者正确识别PVAs的能力(定义为正确识别4例PVA中至少3例),将受访者分为2组。进行单变量分析以确定与正确识别PVA相关的因素。
    结果:在136个包含的CCP中,72人(52.9%)回答了本次调查。受访者包括59名(81.9%)居民,和13名(18.1%)高级医师。Further,50名(69.4%)受访者曾参加过机械通气培训。此外,21(29.2%)的受访者可以正确识别PVAs。双触发是最常见的PVA类型,43(59.7%),其次是自动触发,36(50%);过早骑自行车,28(38.9%);努力不力,25(34.7%)。单因素分析表明,高级医师比居民具有更好的正确识别PVAs的能力(7[53.8%]vs14[23.7%],P=.044)。
    结论:本研究揭示了在MICUs的CCP中准确视觉识别PVAs的显著缺陷。与居民相比,高级医师在正确识别PVAs方面表现出明显的优越才能。
    BACKGROUND: Improved patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) identification using waveform analysis by critical care physicians (CCPs) may improve patient outcomes. This study aimed to assess the ability of CCPs to identify different types of PVAs using waveform analysis as well as factors related to this ability.
    METHODS: We surveyed 12 university-affiliated medical ICUs (MICUs) in Tunisia. CCPs practicing in these MICUs were asked to visually identify 4 clinical cases, each corresponding to a different PVA. We collected the following characteristics regarding CCPs: scientific grade, years of experience, prior training in mechanical ventilation, prior exposure to waveform analysis, and the characteristics of the MICUs in which they practice. Respondents were categorized into 2 groups based on their ability to correctly identify PVAs (defined as the correct identification of at least 3 of the 4 PVA cases). Univariate analysis was performed to identify factors related to the correct identification of PVA.
    RESULTS: Among 136 included CCPs, 72 (52.9%) responded to the present survey. The respondents comprised 59 (81.9%) residents, and 13 (18.1%) senior physicians. Further, 50 (69.4%) respondents had attended prior training in mechanical ventilation. Moreover, 21 (29.2%) of the respondents could correctly identify PVAs. Double-triggering was the most frequently identified PVA type, 43 (59.7%), followed by auto-triggering, 36 (50%); premature cycling, 28 (38.9%); and ineffective efforts, 25 (34.7%). Univariate analysis indicated that senior physicians had a better ability to correctly identify PVAs than residents (7 [53.8%] vs 14 [23.7%], P = .044).
    CONCLUSIONS: The present study revealed a significant deficiency in the accurate visual identification of PVAs among CCPs in the MICUs. When compared to residents, senior physicians exhibited a notably superior aptitude for correctly recognizing PVAs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    戴口罩是避免COVID-19感染的最简单和最有效的方法;然而,它影响人际活动,尤其是面部识别。这项研究检查了三种面罩覆盖水平的影响(全覆盖,FC;覆盖到鼻梁的中间[MB]或底部[BB])对面部识别的准确性和时间。总共招募了115名大学生(60名男性和55名女性)进行了基于计算机的模拟测试,该测试包括30个问题(三个面具覆盖级别的10个问题[男女各5张人脸图像])。为每个问题设计了一张未遮盖的目标人脸和四张具有指定遮罩覆盖水平的人脸图像,要求参与者根据目标人脸从四个覆盖的人脸图像中选择相同的人脸。方差分析结果表明,识别准确性受性别(p<0.01)和面罩覆盖率(p<0.001)的影响显着。而识别时间只受到性别的影响(p<0.05)。多重比较结果表明,佩戴带有FC的口罩的面部的识别准确率(90.3%)明显低于佩戴口罩的覆盖率高达MB(93.7%)和BB(94.9%)位置的面部;但是,MB和BB水平之间的识别准确率没有差异.女性的识别准确率高于男性(94.1%vs.91.9%)在识别陌生面孔方面,即使他们可能花费更少的时间来识别图像。较小的掩码覆盖级别(即,BB级)不利于面部识别。这些发现可以为人们在日常活动中在戴口罩和人际交往之间进行权衡提供参考。
    Mask wearing is the easiest and most effective way to avoid COVID-19 infection; however, it affects interpersonal activities, especially face identification. This study examined the effects of three mask coverage levels (full coverage, FC; coverage up to the middle [MB] or bottom of the nose bridge [BB]) on face identification accuracy and time. A total of 115 university students (60 men and 55 women) were recruited to conduct a computer-based simulation test consisting of 30 questions (10 questions [five face images each of men and women] for the three mask coverage levels). One unmasked target face and four face images with a specified mask coverage level were designed for each question, and the participants were requested to select the same face from the four covered face images on the basis of the target face. The ANOVA results indicated that identification accuracy was significantly affected by sex (p < 0.01) and the mask coverage level (p < 0.001), whereas identification time was only influenced by sex (p < 0.05). The multiple comparison results indicated that the identification accuracy rate for faces wearing a mask with FC (90.3%) was significantly lower than for those wearing masks with coverage up to the MB (93.7%) and BB (94.9%) positions; however, no difference in identification accuracy rate was observed between the MB and BB levels. Women exhibited a higher identification accuracy rate than men (94.1% vs. 91.9%) in identifying unfamiliar faces, even though they may spend less time identifying the images. A smaller mask coverage level (i.e., the BB level) does not facilitate face identification. The findings can be served as a reference for people to trade-off between wearing a mask and interpersonal interaction in their daily activities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Machine-learning approaches (MLAs) for DNA barcoding outperform distance- and tree-based methods on identification accuracy and cost-effectiveness to arrive at species-level identification of wood. DNA barcoding is a promising tool to combat illegal logging and associated trade, and the development of reliable and efficient analytical methods is essential for its extensive application in the trade of wood and in the forensics of natural materials more broadly. In this study, 120 DNA sequences of four barcodes (ITS2, matK, ndhF-rpl32, and rbcL) generated in our previous study and 85 downloaded from National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) were collected to establish a reference data set for six commercial Pterocarpus woods. MLAs (BLOG, BP-neural network, SMO and J48) were compared with distance- (TaxonDNA) and tree-based (NJ tree) methods based on identification accuracy and cost-effectiveness across these six species, and also were applied to discriminate the CITES-listed species Pterocarpus santalinus from its anatomically similar species P. tinctorius for forensic identification. MLAs provided higher identification accuracy (30.8-100%) than distance- (15.1-97.4%) and tree-based methods (11.1-87.5%), with SMO performing the best among the machine learning classifiers. The two-locus combination ITS2 + matK when using SMO classifier exhibited the highest resolution (100%) with the fewest barcodes for discriminating the six Pterocarpus species. The CITES-listed species P. santalinus was discriminated successfully from P. tinctorius using MLAs with a single barcode, ndhF-rpl32. This study shows that MLAs provided higher identification accuracy and cost-effectiveness for forensic application over other analytical methods in DNA barcoding of Pterocarpus wood.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号