IVF add-ons

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估IVF和各种治疗方案的疗效的试验通常集中在上游结局指标上,可能无法转化为临床结果改善的改善。一项横断面在线调查在全球IVF患者中进行。受访者被随机分为16条关于假想的IVF治疗方案的陈述之一,称为“FertiSure”,声明要改善四个上游成果之一。声明中是否包含说明FertiSure未被证明可以提高活产率和潜在风险的信息。许多患者推断,上游结局的改善将导致活产概率的改善。近80%的受访者愿意使用FertiSure。受访者表示,FertiSure并未被证明可以提高活产率,并且不太愿意使用FertiSure。更多的受访者同意,当他们被告知这种情况时,FertiSure可能会对患者构成风险。然而,这并没有影响他们使用FertiSure的意愿。有趣的是,34%的受访者认为FertiSure不会提高活产的可能性,但仍然愿意使用它。这些结果对IVF诊所网站和有关治疗方案的信息有影响,这些信息可能不经常包含有关有限证据基础和可能风险的陈述。
    Trials evaluating the efficacy of IVF and various treatment options often focus on upstream outcome measures, improvements which may not translate into clinical outcome improvements. A cross-sectional online survey was distributed globally among IVF patients. Respondents were randomised to view one of 16 statements about a hypothetical IVF treatment option called \'FertiSure\', stated to improve one of four upstream outcomes. Statements varied in whether they contained information stating that FertiSure was not proven to improve live-birth rates and about potential risks. Many patients inferred that improvements in upstream outcomes would result in improvements in the probability of live-birth. Nearly 80% of respondents were willing to use FertiSure. Respondents told that FertiSure was not proven to improve live-birth rates and were less willing to use FertiSure. More respondents agreed that FertiSure may pose a risk to patients when they were told this was the case. However, this did not affect their willingness to use FertiSure. Interestingly, 34% of respondents believed FertiSure would not improve the probability of live-birth but were still willing to use it. These results have implications for IVF clinic websites and information about treatment options which may not routinely contain statements about the limited evidence-base and possible risks.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在体外受精(IVF)治疗期间经常使用补充疗法。这项研究的目的是确定英国生育诊所网站如何宣传补充治疗附加产品。人类受精和胚胎学管理局(HFEA)的“选择生育诊所”网站用于识别生育诊所及其网站。针灸,反射疗法,研究了营养建议和其他补充疗法,以确定治疗的提供和费用。使用归纳编码方法分析了针灸和反射疗法的治疗要求,并根据它们是否涉及整体利益进行分类,对IVF治疗结果的生理益处或改善。66个网站中有17个(26%)刊登了至少一种补充疗法的广告。针灸是最常见的广告补充疗法(16/66诊所网站,24%),其次是营养师服务(11/66,17%),反射疗法(10/66,15%)和其他各种补充疗法(9/66,14%)。发现治疗费用从个人预约的不到50英镑到治疗套餐的数百英镑不等。生育诊所内部并不总是提供治疗,而是将患者转介给附属医生。分析与补充疗法有关的索赔强调,诊所声称补充疗法有利于IVF的程度存在差异,这些信息偶尔会承认科学研究证据,但并不总是以公正的方式提供资源。生育诊所网站应为患者提供准确的信息以进行补充治疗。HFEA应将针灸和反射疗法添加到其交通灯系统中,并带有琥珀色和红色等级,分别。
    Complementary therapies are often used during in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. The aim of this study was to determine how UK fertility clinic websites are advertising complementary therapy add-ons. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority\'s (HFEA) \'Choose a Fertility Clinic\' website was used to identify fertility clinics and their websites. Acupuncture, reflexology, nutritional advice and miscellaneous complementary therapies were examined to determine treatment provision and costs. Treatment claims for acupuncture and reflexology were analysed using an inductive coding approach, and categorized depending on whether they pertained to holistic benefits, physiological benefits or improvements to IVF treatment outcome. At least one complementary therapy was advertised by 17 of 66 (26%) websites. Acupuncture was the most commonly advertised complementary therapy (16/66 clinic websites, 24%), followed by nutritionist services (11/66, 17%), reflexology (10/66, 15%) and other miscellaneous complementary therapies (9/66, 14%). Treatment costs were found to range from less than £50 for individual appointments to hundreds of pounds for treatment packages. Treatments were not always offered in-house at the fertility clinic, but rather patients were referred to an affiliated practitioner. Analysing claims relating to the complementary therapies highlighted that there were differences in the extent to which clinics claimed that complementary therapies benefited IVF, and that information occasionally acknowledged scientific research evidence but did not always present resources in an unbiased manner. Fertility clinic websites should provide accurate information for patients for complementary therapy add-ons. HFEA should add acupuncture and reflexology to their traffic-light system with amber and red ratings, respectively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    体外受精(IVF)周期取消的最常见原因是缺乏可用于胞浆内精子注射(ICSI)的优质配子。在这里,我们介绍了受阻塞性无精子症影响的夫妇的成功生育治疗以及对控制性卵巢刺激的次优反应。由于传统方法似乎无法有效克服双方的具体问题,有针对性的干预措施,即,(1)精子活力的药理增强和(2)偏振光显微镜(PLM)引导下ICSI时间的优化,用于挽救周期,仅回收未成熟的卵母细胞和不运动的睾丸精子。茶碱治疗有助于从冷冻保存的睾丸组织中选择可行的精子。当传统的刺激方案无法产生成熟的卵子时,采用非侵入性纺锤体成像将精子注射时间调整到体外挤出极体卵母细胞的成熟阶段。12个晚熟卵母细胞受精产生5个受精卵,都发育成胚泡。受精后第5天,将一个胚胎转移到子宫中,另外3个质量好的胚泡被玻璃化以备后用。怀孕导致足月分娩健康的孩子。该病例表明,应考虑超出标准IVF方案的个体化,以最大程度地提高预后不良患者用自己的配子实现妊娠的机会。
    The most common reason for in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle cancelation is a lack of quality gametes available for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Here we present the successful fertility treatment of the couple affected by obstructive azoospermia combined with suboptimal response to controlled ovarian stimulation. Since the conventional approach appeared ineffective to overcome both partners\' specific problems, the targeted interventions, namely, (1) pharmacological enhancement of sperm motility and (2) polarized light microscopy (PLM)-guided optimization of ICSI time, were applied to rescue the cycle with only immature oocytes and immotile testicular sperm retrieved. The treatment with theophylline aided the selection of viable spermatozoa derived from cryopreserved testicular tissue. When the traditional stimulation protocol failed to produce mature eggs, non-invasive spindle imaging was employed to adjust the sperm injection time to the maturational stage of oocytes extruding a polar body in vitro. The fertilization of 12 late-maturing oocytes yielded 5 zygotes, which all developed into blastocysts. One embryo was transferred into the uterus on day 5 post-fertilization, and another 3 good quality blastocysts were vitrified for later use. The pregnancy resulted in a full-term delivery of a healthy child. This case demonstrates that the individualization beyond the standard IVF protocols should be considered to maximize the chance of poor-prognosis patients to achieve pregnancy with their own gametes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号