OBJECTIVE: How are ART and IUI regulated, funded, and registered in European countries, and how has the situation changed since 2018?
CONCLUSIONS: Of the 43 countries performing ART and IUI in Europe, and participating in the survey, specific legislation exists in only 39 countries, public funding varies across and sometimes within countries (and is lacking or minimal in four countries), and national registries are in place in 33 countries; only a small number of changes were identified, most of them in the direction of improving accessibility, through increased public financial support and/or opening access to additional subgroups.
BACKGROUND: The annual reports of the European IVF-Monitoring Consortium (EIM) clearly show the existence of different approaches across Europe regarding accessibility to and efficacy of ART and IUI treatments. In a previous survey, some coherent information was gathered about how those techniques were regulated, funded, and registered in European countries, showing that diversity is the paradigm in this medical field.
METHODS: A survey was designed using the SurveyMonkey tool consisting of 90 questions covering several domains (legal, funding, and registry) and considering specific details on the situation of third-party donations. New questions widened the scope of the previous survey. Answers refer to the situation of countries on 31 December 2022.
METHODS: All members of the EIM were invited to participate. The received answers were checked and initial responders were asked to address unclear answers and to provide any additional information considered relevant. Tables resulting from the consolidated data were then sent to members of the Committee of National Representatives of ESHRE, requesting a second check. Conflicting information was clarified by direct contact.
RESULTS: Information was received from 43 out of the 45 European countries where ART and IUI are performed. There were 39 countries with specific legislation on ART, and artificial insemination was considered an ART technique in 33 of them. Accessibility is limited to infertile couples only in 8 of the 43 countries. In 5 countries, ART and IUI are permitted also for treatments of single women and all same sex couples, while a total of 33 offer treatment to single women and 19 offer treatment to female couples. Use of donated sperm is allowed in all except 2 countries, oocyte donation is allowed in 38, simultaneous donation of sperm and oocyte is allowed in 32, and embryo donation is allowed in 29 countries. Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT)-M/SR (for monogenetic disorders, structural rearrangements) is not allowed in 3 countries and PGT-A (for aneuploidy) is not allowed in 10; surrogacy is accepted in 15 countries. Except for marital/sexual situation, female age is the most frequently reported limiting criterion for legal access to ART: minimal age is usually set at 18 years and the maximum ranges from 42 to 54 with some countries not using numeric definition. Male maximum age is set in very few countries. Where third-party donors are permitted, age is frequently a limiting criterion (male maximum age ranging from 35 to 50; female maximum age from 30 to 37). Other legal restrictions in third-party donation are the number of children born from the same donor (or, in some countries, the number of families with children from the same donor) and, in 12 countries, there is a maximum number of oocyte donations. How countries deal with the anonymity is diverse: strict anonymity, anonymity just for the recipients (not for children when reaching legal adulthood age), a mixed system (anonymous and non-anonymous donations), and strict non-anonymity. Inquiring about donors\' genetic screening showed that most countries have enforced either mandatory or scientific recommendations that exclude the most prevalent genetic diseases, although, again, diversity is evident. Reimbursement/compensation systems exist in more than 30 European countries, with around 10 describing clearly defined maximum amounts considered acceptable. Public funding systems are extremely variable. One country provides no financial assistance to ART/IUI patients and three offer only minimal support. Limits to the provision of funding are defined in the others i.e. age (female maximum age is the most used), existence of previous children, BMI, maximum number of treatments publicly supported, and techniques not entitled for funding. In a few countries reimbursement is linked to a clinical policy. The definitions of the type of expenses covered within an IVF/ICSI cycle, up to which limit, and the proportion of out-of-pocket costs for patients are also extremely dissimilar. National registries of ART are in place in 33 out of the 43 countries contributing to the survey and a registry of donors exists in 19 of them. When comparing with the results of the previous survey, the main changes are: (i) an extension of the beneficiaries of ART techniques (and IUI), evident in nine countries; (ii) public financial support exists now in Albania and Armenia; (iii) in Luxembourg, the only ART centre expanded its on-site activities; (iv) donor-conceived children are entitled to know the donor identity in six countries more than in 2018; and (v) four more countries have set a maximum number of oocyte donations.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the responses were provided by well-informed and committed individuals and submitted to double checking, no formal validation by official bodies was in place. Therefore, possible inaccuracies cannot be excluded. The results presented are a cross-section in time, and ART and IUI frameworks within European countries undergo continuous modification. Finally, some domains of ART activity were deliberately left out of the scope of this survey.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results offer a detailed updated view of the ART and IUI situation in European countries. It provides extensive answers to many relevant questions related to ART usage at the national level and could be used by institutions and policymakers at both national and European levels.
BACKGROUND: The study has no external funding, and all costs were covered by ESHRE. There were no competing interests.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive value of serum AMH for clinical pregnancy in non-infertile population undergoing intrauterine insemination with donor sperm (ds-IUI).
METHODS: This multicenter prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06263192) recruited all non-infertile women undergoing ds-IUI from June 2020 to December 2022 in three different fertility clinics in Spain and Chile. Indications for ds-IUI included severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia, female partner, or single status. Clinical pregnancy rates were compared between women with AMH ≥ 1.1 and < 1.1 ng/mL. The main outcome measure was the cumulative clinical pregnancy rate after up to 4 ds-IUI cycles.
RESULTS: A total of 458 ds-IUI cycles were performed among 245 patients, of whom 108 (44.08%) achieved clinical pregnancy within 4 cycles, 60.2% of these occurring in the first attempt and 84.2% after two attempts. We found no significant differences in AMH levels or other parameters (such as age, BMI, FSH, AFC) between women who became pregnant and those who did not. Cumulative pregnancy rates and logistic regression analysis revealed that AMH ≥ 1.1 ng/mL was not predictive of ds-IUI success. While a high positive correlation was observed between AFC and AMH (r = 0.67, p < 0.001), ROC curve analyses indicated that neither of these ovarian reserve markers accurately forecasts cumulative ds-IUI outcomes in non-infertile women.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this multicenter study suggest that AMH is not a reliable predictor of pregnancy in non-infertile women undergoing ds-IUI. Even women with low AMH levels can achieve successful pregnancy outcomes, supporting the notion that diminished ovarian reserve should not restrict access to ds-IUI treatments in eligible non-infertile women.

BACKGROUND: Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is one of the most widespread fertility treatments. However, IUI protocols vary significantly amongst fertility clinics. Various add-on interventions have been proposed to boost success rates. These are mostly chosen arbitrarily or empirically. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the effectiveness and safety of add-on interventions to the standard IUI protocol and to provide evidence-based recommendations on techniques used to optimize the clinical outcomes of IUI treatment.
METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analyses were performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A computerized literature search was performed from database inception to May 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included reporting on couples/single women undergoing IUI with any protocol for any indication using partner\'s or donor sperm. A meta-analysis based on random effects was performed for each outcome and add-on. Three authors independently assessed the trials for quality and risk of bias and overall certainty of evidence. Uncertainties were resolved through consensus. Primary outcomes were ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) or live birth rate (LBR) per cycle/per woman randomized. Registration number PROSPERO: CRD42022300857.
RESULTS: Sixty-six RCTs were included in the analysis (16 305 participants across 20 countries). Vaginal progesterone as luteal phase support in stimulated cycles was found to significantly increase LBR/OPR (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.09-1.72, I2 = 4.9%) (moderate/low certainty of the evidence). Endometrial scratch prior/during stimulated IUI cycles may increase LBR/OPR (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.03-2.01, I2 = 1.8%), but evidence is very uncertain. Results from two studies suggest that follicular phase ovarian stimulation increases LBR/OPR (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.00-1.94, I2 = 0%) (low certainty of evidence). No significant difference was seen for the primary outcome for the other studied interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that vaginal luteal phase progesterone support probably improves LBR/OPR in stimulated IUI treatments. In view of moderate/low certainty of the evidence more research is needed for solid conclusions. Further research is also recommended for the use of endometrial scratch and ovarian stimulation. Future studies should report on results according to subfertility background as it is possible that different add-ons could benefit specific patient groups.

OBJECTIVE: What is the relationship between late follicular phase progesterone levels and clinic pregnancy and live birth rates in couples with unexplained infertility undergoing ovarian stimulation with IUI (OS-IUI)?
CONCLUSIONS: Late follicular progesterone levels between 1.0 and <1.5 ng/ml were associated with higher live birth and clinical pregnancy rates while the outcomes in groups with higher progesterone levels did not differ appreciably from the <1.0 ng/ml reference group.
BACKGROUND: Elevated late follicular progesterone levels have been associated with lower live birth rates after fresh embryo transfer following controlled ovarian stimulation and egg retrieval, but less is known about whether an association exists with outcomes in OS-IUI cycles. Existing studies are few and have been limited to ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins, but the use of oral agents, such as clomiphene citrate and letrozole, is common with these treatments and has not been well studied.
METHODS: The study was a prospective cohort analysis of the Assessment of Multiple Intrauterine Gestations from Ovarian Stimulation (AMIGOS) randomized controlled trial. Frozen serum was available for evaluation from 2121 cycles in 828 AMIGOS participants. The primary pregnancy outcome was live birth per cycle, and the secondary pregnancy outcome was clinical pregnancy rate per cycle.
METHODS: Couples with unexplained infertility in the AMIGOS trial, for whom female serum from day of trigger with hCG was available in at least one cycle of treatment, were included. Stored frozen serum samples from day of hCG trigger during treatment with OS-IUI were evaluated for serum progesterone level. Progesterone level <1.0 ng/ml was the reference group for comparison with progesterone categorized in increments of 0.5 ng/ml up to ≥3.0 ng/ml. Unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (RR) and 95% CI were estimated using cluster-weighted generalized estimating equations to estimate modified Poisson regression models with robust standard errors.
RESULTS: Compared to the reference group with 110/1363 live births (8.07%), live birth rates were significantly increased in cycles with progesterone 1.0 to <1.5 ng/ml (49/401 live births, 12.22%) in both the unadjusted (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.14, 2.13) and treatment-adjusted models (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.10, 2.06). Clinical pregnancy rates were also higher in this group (55/401 clinical pregnancies, 13.72%) compared to reference group with 130/1363 (9.54%) (unadjusted RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.10, 1.94 and adjusted RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.07, 1.89). In cycles with progesterone 1.5 ng/ml and above, there was no evidence of a difference in clinical pregnancy or live birth rates relative to the reference group. This pattern remained when stratified by ovarian stimulation treatment group but was only statistically significant in letrozole cycles.
CONCLUSIONS: The AMIGOS trial was not designed to answer this clinical question, and with small numbers in some progesterone categories our analyses were underpowered to detect differences between some groups. Inclusion of cycles with progesterone values above 3.0 ng/ml may have included those wherein ovulation had already occurred at the time the IUI was performed. These cycles would be expected to experience a lower success rate but pregnancy may have occurred with intercourse in the same cycle.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to previous literature focusing primarily on OS-IUI cycles using gonadotrophins, these data include patients using oral agents and therefore may be generalizable to the wider population of infertility patients undergoing IUI treatments. Because live births were significantly higher when progesterone ranged from 1.0 to <1.5 ng/ml, further study is needed to clarify whether this progesterone range may truly represent a prognostic indicator in OS-IUI cycles.
BACKGROUND: Oklahoma Shared Clinical and Translational Resources (U54GM104938) National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS). AMIGOS was funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development: U10 HD077680, U10 HD39005, U10 HD38992, U10 HD27049, U10 HD38998, U10 HD055942, HD055944, U10 HD055936, and U10HD055925. Research made possible by the funding by American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Dr Burks has disclosed that she is a member of the Board of Directors of the Pacific Coast Reproductive Society. Dr Hansen has disclosed that he is the recipient of NIH grants unrelated to the present work, and contracts with Ferring International Pharmascience Center US and with May Health unrelated to the present work, as well as consulting fees with May Health also unrelated to the present work. Dr Diamond has disclosed that he is a stockholder and a member of the Board of Directors of Advanced Reproductive Care, Inc., and that he has a patent pending for the administration of progesterone to trigger ovulation. Dr Anderson, Dr Gavrizi, and Dr Peck do not have conflicts of interest to disclose.
BACKGROUND: N/A.

OBJECTIVE: Is there an association between the length of in vitro culture, mode of ART and the initial endogenous hCG rise, in cycles with a foetal heartbeat after single embryo transfer (ET) and implantation?
CONCLUSIONS: Both the length of in vitro culture and the mode of ART have an impact on the initial endogenous rise in hCG in singleton pregnancies.
BACKGROUND: Different factors have been identified to alter the kinetics of hCG in pregnancies. Current studies show conflicting results regarding the kinetics of hCG after different types of ART (fresh vs frozen ET (FET)), the inclusion or not of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), and the length of time in in vitro culture.
METHODS: This was a multicentre cohort study, using prospectively collected data derived from 4938 women (5524 treatment cycles) undergoing IUI (cycles, n = 608) or ART (cycles, n = 4916) treatments, resulting a in singleton ongoing pregnancy verified by first-trimester ultrasound scan. Data were collected from the Danish Medical Data Centre, used by the three participating Danish public fertility clinics at Copenhagen University hospitals: Herlev Hospital, Hvidovre Hospital, and Rigshospitalet, from January 2014 to December 2021.
METHODS: The fresh ET cycles included cleavage-stage (2 or 3 days in vitro) and blastocyst (5 days in vitro) transfers. FET cycles included cleavage-stage (3 days in vitro before cryopreservation) or blastocyst (5 or 6 days in vitro before cryopreservation) transfers. The IUI cycles represented no time in vitro. To attain a comparable interval for serum-hCG (s-hCG), the ovulation induction time was identical: 35-37 h before oocyte retrieval or IUI. The conception day was considered as: the insemination day for pregnancies conceived after IUI, the oocyte retrieval day for fresh ET, or the transfer day minus 3 or 5 as appropriate for FET of Day 3 or 5 embryos. Multiple linear regression analysis was used, including days post-conception for the hCG measurement as a covariate, and was adjusted for the women\'s age, the cause of infertility, and the centre. For FET, a sensitivity analysis was used to adjust for endometrial preparation.
RESULTS: The study totally includes 5524 cycles: 2395 FET cycles, 2521 fresh ET cycles, and 608 IUI cycles. Regarding the length of in vitro culture, with IUI as reference (for no time in in vitro culture), we found a significantly lower s-hCG in pregnancies achieved after fresh ET (cleavage-stage ET or blastocyst transfer). S-hCG was 18% (95% CI: 13-23%, P < 0.001) lower after fresh cleavage-stage ET, and 23% (95% CI: 18-28%, P < 0.001) lower after fresh blastocyst transfer compared to IUI. In FET cycles, s-hCG was significantly higher after blastocyst transfers compared to cleavage-stage FET, respectively, 26% (95% CI: 13-40%, P < 0.001) higher when cryopreserved on in vitro Day 5, and 14% (95% CI: 2-26%, P = 0.02) higher when cryopreserved on in vitro Day 6 as compared to Day 3. Regarding the ART treatment type, s-hCG after FET blastocyst transfer (Day 5 blastocysts) cycles was significantly higher, 33% (95% CI: 27-45%, P < 0.001), compared to fresh ET (Day 5 blastocyst), while there was no difference between cleavage-stage FET (Days 2 + 3) and fresh ET (Days 2 + 3). S-hCG was 12% (95% CI: 4-19%, 0.005) lower in PGT FET (Day 5 blastocysts) cycles as compared to FET cycles without PGT (Day 5 blastocysts).
CONCLUSIONS: The retrospective design is a limitation which introduces the risk of possible bias and confounders such as embryo score, parity, and ovarian stimulation.
CONCLUSIONS: This study elucidates how practices in medically assisted reproduction treatment are associated with the hCG kinetics, underlining a potential impact of in vitro culture length and mode of ART on the very early embryo development and implantation. The study provides clinicians knowledge that the type of ART used may be relevant to take into account when evaluating s-hCG for the prognosis of the pregnancy.
BACKGROUND: No funding was received for this study. AP has received consulting fees, research grants, or honoraria from the following companies: Preglem, Novo Nordisk, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gedeon Richter, Cryos, Merck A/S, and Organon. AZ has received grants and honoraria from Gedeon Richter. NLF has received grants from Gedeon Richter, Merck A/S, and Cryos. MLG has received honoraria fees or research grants from Gedeon Richter, Merck A/S, and Cooper Surgical. CB has received honoraria from Merck A/S. MB has received research grants and honoraria from IBSA. MPR, KM, and PVS all report no conflicts of interest.
BACKGROUND: The study was registered and approved by the Danish Protection Agency, Capital Region, Denmark (Journal-nr.: 21019857). No approval was required from the regional ethics committee according to Danish law.

UNASSIGNED: To examine the association between semen characteristics and outcomes of intrauterine insemination (IUI).
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective analysis examined 1380 IUI procedures involving 421 couples. The association of clinical pregnancy with pre- and post-wash sperm characteristics was assessed.
UNASSIGNED: Pre- and post-wash sperm characteristics did not differ between IUI cycles that resulted in pregnancy and those that did not. When the motility of pre-wash sperm was below the normal range (<42%) established by the World Health Organization (WHO), the pregnancy rate was significantly lower. In the IUI cycles when post-wash sperm motility was below the WHO standard, pregnancy was not achieved. The frequency of improvement in post-wash sperm motility in repeated IUI cycles appeared to correlate with the success of future IUI cycles. At the fourth IUI cycle, pregnancy was not achieved unless the post-wash sperm motility was normal in at least two of three attempts. When post-wash sperm concentration was below the normal range, the woman\'s age did not affect the IUI outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Sperm motility above the lower limit of the WHO criteria in post-wash semen samples is an important factor in IUI outcomes.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: The objective of this document is to provide guidance to the infertility specialist, gynecologist, embryologist, and counselors on the management of sub-fertility and brief them with the recent advances in the field. These recommendations will aid the aforementioned healthcare professionals in everyday clinical decisions about appropriate and effective care of their patients with the best available evidence.
UNASSIGNED: Extensive deliberations, discussion, and brainstorming was done between different reproductive medicine (RM) specialists, to develop the recommendations.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic review of the literature published up to June 2019 was carried out using PubMed and Cochrane Collaboration Library. International guidelines, cohort studies, case series, observational studies, and randomized controlled trials currently available in the literature were reviewed. Indian data whatever available was also reviewed.
UNASSIGNED: Primary meetings were held with leading reproductive medicine specialists. Each topic was brainstormed on by a group of reproductive medicine experts, who then prepared the first draft of the recommendation. These recommendations then were reviewed by Dr. Jaideep Malhotra, Dr. Gouri Devi, and Dr. Madhuri Patil along with the chief co-ordinator of each consensus to finalize the final draft.
UNASSIGNED: From the literature and discussion of the available evidence, several topics were identified for which evidence is inconsistent, insufficient, or non-existing. For the benefit of couples undergoing several treatments, the working committee recommends that future research, where possible in well-designed RCTs, will help in establishing evidence for a particular practice. In the Indian context, one also needs to take into consideration facilities and options available, cost, lack of insurance coverage, experimental nature of some advanced techniques used.

This study aimed to investigate the influence of hormonal treatment on the vaginal microbiome during fertility treatments. Bacterial vaginosis (BV) could affect fecundity, particularly in the in vitro fertilization (IVF) population, where negative effects on pregnancy outcomes have been reported. It is hypothesized that the hormone treatment during fertility treatments could influence the abundance of Lactobacilli, with negative effects on the pregnancy results. A total of 53 couples attending a fertility clinic in the Netherlands between July 2019 and August 2022 were included in this prospective cohort study. Vaginal samples were collected at start of treatment, oocyte retrieval or insemination from subjects undergoing intra uterine insemination (IUI) with mild ovarian stimulation, and IVF or intra cytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. AmpliSens® Florocenosis/Bacterial vaginosis-FRT qPCR and 16S rRNA gene-based amplicon sequencing were performed on all samples. In total, 140 swabs were analyzed, with a median of two swabs per person. 33 (24%) tested qPCR BV positive. Lactobacilli percentage decreased during fertility treatments, leading to changes in the vaginal microbiome. Shannon diversity index was not significantly different. Of the total of 53 persons, nine switched from qPCR BV negative to positive during treatment. The persons switching to qPCR BV positive had already a (not significant) higher Shannon diversity index at start of treatment. If the vaginal microbiome of persons deteriorates during fertility treatments, timing of following treatments, lifestyle modifications, or a freeze all strategy could be of possible benefit.

OBJECTIVE: What is the success rate of intrauterine insemination (IUI) after failing IVF?
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the pregnancy outcomes of 551 patients who underwent a total of 992 IUI cycles at an academic fertility centre between October 2008 and April 2018.
RESULTS: The study participants (n = 551) had previously failed one to three fresh IVF cycles and any resultant embryo transfers, and subsequently underwent a total of 992 IUI cycles. When comparing demographics, women with ongoing pregnancies, clinical pregnancies and positive pregnancies were significantly younger (P = 0.037, P = 0.025 and P = 0.049, respectively) compared with women who did not conceive. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate for all IUI cycles was 7.44% per patient (41 pregnancies in 551 patients), and the ongoing pregnancy rate after the first IUI cycle was 4.72%. In single women who had previously failed six IUI cycles before undergoing IVF cycles with donor sperm, the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate was 15.8% in donor sperm IUI cycles compared with 5.1% in women who used their partner\'s sperm for both IVF and IUI cycles, with an adjusted odds ratio of 6.1. Patient age, number of previous pregnancies, daily gonadotrophin dose for IVF, number of mature follicles at trigger, and number of failed IVF cycles failed to predict pregnancy outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing pregnancy following IUI after failed IVF occurs at a rate of approximately 5% per cycle, and this rate is higher if donor sperm is used for both IVF and IUI cycles. This can be considered with proper counselling in women aged <40 years, and may be discouraged in women aged ≥43 years.