背景:一些勃起功能障碍(ED)患者不接受或受益于5型磷酸二酯酶抑制剂的常规治疗;因此,需要替代和补充疗法。中医在中国一直在治疗ED,但其临床价值尚无定论。
目的:系统评价中医药治疗ED的疗效和安全性。
方法:随机对照试验是从WebofScience在过去十年中发表的文献中进行的全面搜索中获得的。PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,SinoMed,中国全民知识互联网,万方,和VIP。我们对国际勃起功能指数5问卷(IIEF-5)得分进行了荟萃分析,临床恢复率,使用ReviewManager5.4软件和睾酮水平。进行试验序贯分析以检查结果。
结果:共纳入45项试验,共5016例患者。Meta分析结果显示,中医治疗能有效提高IIEF-5评分(加权平均差=3.78,95%CI:3.12,4.44;P<0.001),临床恢复率(风险比=1.57,95%CI:1.38,1.79;P<0.001),与对照组相比,睾酮水平(加权平均差异=2.42,95%CI:1.59,3.25;P<0.001)。中药的单一和附加应用可以提高IIEF-5评分(P<0.001)。试验序贯分析证实了IIEF-5评分分析的稳健性。治疗组和对照组之间的不良反应发生率没有显着差异(风险比=0.82,95%CI:0.65,1.05;P=0.58)。
结论:中医可以在提高IIEF-5评分方面获得更好的反应,临床恢复率,和睾丸激素水平作为替代和补充治疗,没有副作用的增加。然而,更加标准化,长期的,需要中医和综合治疗的临床试验来支持中医的临床应用。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
Several patients with erectile dysfunction do not accept or benefit from conventional therapy with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors; thus, alternative and complementary therapies are in need. Traditional Chinese medicine has been treating erectile dysfunction in China, but its clinical value is inconclusive.
To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine in treating erectile dysfunction.
Randomized controlled trials were retrieved from a comprehensive search in the literature published in the past decade from the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Internet, WanFang, and VIP. We performed a meta-analysis of the International Index of Erectile Function 5 questionnaire scores, clinical recovery rates, and testosterone levels using Review Manager 5.4 software. The trial sequential analysis was conducted to check the results.
A total of 45 trials with 5016 patients were included. Meta-analysis results showed that traditional Chinese medicine effectively improved the International Index of Erectile Function 5 questionnaire scores (weighted mean difference = 3.78, 95% confidence interval: 3.12, 4.44; p < 0.001), clinical recovery rates (risk ratio = 1.57, 95% confidence interval: 1.38, 1.79; p < 0.001), testosterone levels (weighted mean difference = 2.42, 95% confidence interval: 1.59, 3.25; p < 0.001) compared with the controls. The single and add-on applications of traditional Chinese medicine could improve the International Index of Erectile Function 5 questionnaire score (p < 0.001). The trial sequential analysis confirmed the robustness of the analysis of the International Index of Erectile Function 5 questionnaire scores. A significant difference in the incidence of adverse effects between the treatment and control groups was not observed (risk ratio = 0.82, 95% confidence interval: 0.65, 1.05; p = 0.12).
Traditional Chinese medicine can gain better responses in improving the International Index of Erectile Function 5 questionnaire scores, clinical recovery rates, and testosterone levels as an alternative and complementary treatment, with no increase in side effects. However, more standardized, long-term, traditional Chinese medicine and integrative therapy clinical trials are needed to support the clinical application of traditional Chinese medicine.