UNASSIGNED: To compare healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and all-cause medical costs among individuals aged ≥50 years who received influenza and COVID-19 vaccines on the same day and those who received influenza vaccine only.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective cohort study leveraging Optum\'s de-identified Clinformatics DataMart from 8/31/2021 to 7/31/2023. Individuals aged ≥50 years continuously enrolled in health plans for 1 year prior and until 7/31/2023 were included. Two cohorts were formed based on vaccination status between 8/31/2022 and 1/31/2023: co-administered influenza and COVID-19 vaccines (co-admin cohort) and influenza vaccine only (influenza cohort). Associations between vaccination status and all-cause, influenza-related, COVID-related, pneumonia-related, and cardiorespiratory-related hospitalization, outpatient or emergency room visits and all-cause medical costs were estimated by weighted generalized linear models, adjusting for confounding by stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting.
UNASSIGNED: 613,156 (mean age: 71) and 1,340,011 (mean age: 72) individuals were included in the co-admin and influenza cohorts, respectively. After weighting, the baseline characteristics were balanced between cohorts. The co-admin cohort was at statistically significant lower risk of all-cause (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.96), COVID-19-related (RR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.56-0.63), cardiorespiratory-related (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.93-0.96) and pneumonia-related (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.83-0.90) hospitalization but not influenza-related hospitalizations (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.81, 1.04) compared with the influenza cohort. Co-administration was associated with 3% lower all-cause medical cost (cost ratio: 0.974, 95% CI: 0.968, 0.979) during the follow-up period compared to receiving influenza vaccine only.
UNASSIGNED: Limitations include the potential residual confounding bias in observational data, measurement errors from claims data, and that the cohort was followed for a single season.
UNASSIGNED: Receiving co-administered COVID-19 and influenza vaccines versus only receiving influenza vaccination reduced the risk of HCRU, especially COVID-19-related hospitalization and all-cause medical costs. Increasing vaccine coverage, particularly for COVID-19, might have public health and economic benefits.

UNASSIGNED: Cardiac ablation is a well-established method for treating atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal therapeutic alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoballoon ablation (CRYO). PFA uses high-voltage electric pulses to target cells. The present analysis aims to quantify the costs, outcomes, and resources associated with these three ablation strategies for paroxysmal AF.
UNASSIGNED: Real-world clinical data were prospectively collected during index hospitalization by three European medical centers (Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands) specialized in cardiac ablation. These data included procedure times (pre-procedural, skin-to-skin and post-procedural), resource use, and staff burden. Data regarding complications associated with each of the three treatment options and redo procedures were extracted from the literature. Costs were collected from hospital economic formularies and published cost databases. A cost-consequence model from the hospital perspective was built to estimate the impact of the three treatment options in terms of effectiveness and costs.
UNASSIGNED: Across the three centers, N = 91 patients were included over a period of 12 months. A significant difference was seen in pre-procedural time (mean ± SD, PFA: 13.6 ± 3.7 min, CRYO: 18.8 ± 6.6 min, RFA: 20.4 ± 6.4 min; p < .001). Procedural time (skin-to-skin) was also different across alternatives (PFA: 50.9 ± 22.4 min, CRYO: 74.5 ± 24.5 min, RFA: 140.2 ± 82.4 min; p < .0001). The model reported an overall cost of €216,535 per 100 patients treated with PFA, €301,510 per 100 patients treated with CRYO and €346,594 per 100 patients treated with RFA. Overall, the cumulative savings associated with PFA (excluding kit costs) were €850 and €1,301 per patient compared to CRYO and RFA, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: PFA demonstrated shorter procedure time compared to CRYO and RFA. Model estimates indicate that these time savings result in cost savings for hospitals and reduce outlay on redo procedures. Clinical practice in individual hospitals varies and may impact the ability to transfer the results of this analysis to other settings.

UNASSIGNED: Patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are predisposed to severe recurrent/chronic infections, and often require hospitalization, resulting in substantial burden to patients/healthcare systems. While immunoglobulin replacement therapies (IgRTs) are the standard first-line treatment for most forms of IEI, limited real-world data exist regarding clinical characteristics and treatment costs for patients with IEI initiating such treatment. This retrospective analysis examined infection and treatment characteristics in US patients with IEI initiating IgRT with immune globulin infusion (human), 10% (IG10%). Healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs before and after treatment initiation were compared. Additionally, the impact of COVID-19 on infection diagnoses was evaluated.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with IEI initiating IG10% between July 2012 and August 2019 were selected from Merative MarketScan Databases using diagnosis/prescription codes. Patients were followed 6 months before and after first IG10% claim date. Demographic and clinical characteristics were described. Treatment characteristics and HCRU before and after IG10% initiation were compared. Infection diagnoses during 2020 and 2019 (March-December) were compared.
UNASSIGNED: The study included 1,497 patients with IEI diagnoses (mean age = 43.4 years) initiating IG10%, with frequently reported comorbidities like asthma (32.1%). Following IG10% initiation, fewer severe infection diagnoses (11.6% vs 19.9%), fewer infection-related inpatient (10.8% vs 19.5%) and outpatient services (71.6% vs 79.9%), and lower infection-related total healthcare costs ($7,849 vs $13,995; p < 0.001)-driven by lower inpatient costs ($2,746 vs $9,900)-were observed than before. Fewer patients had infection diagnoses during COVID-19 (22.8%) than the prior year (31.2%).
UNASSIGNED: Patients with IEI are susceptible to severe infections leading to high disease burden and treatment costs. Following IG10% initiation, we observed fewer infections, lower infection-related treatment costs, and shift in care (inpatient to outpatient) leading to significant cost savings. Among patients with IEI, 27% fewer infection diagnoses were observed during the early COVID-19 lockdown period than the prior year.
Some people are born with inborn errors of immunity, or IEI. This study included 1,497 people with IEI who recently started taking a drug called immunoglobulin therapy. Before taking this drug, the participants got infections easily, were hospitalized often, and had to take other costly medicines. After starting this drug, they had fewer infections and could be treated at the doctor’s office. They had fewer infections during the COVID-19 pandemic than before the pandemic.

UNASSIGNED: The sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor empagliflozin was approved for treatment of adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on the basis of its demonstrated ability to slow CKD progression and reduce the risk of cardiovascular death. This analysis was performed to assess the cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin plus standard of care (SoC) vs SoC alone in the treatment of CKD in the UK.
UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive, patient-level CKD progression model that simulates the evolution of risk factors for disease progression based on CKD-specific equations and clinical data was used to project a broad range of CKD-related complications. Patient baseline characteristics, distribution across Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) health states, and changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urine albumin-creatinine ratio (uACR), and other parameters while on treatment were derived from the EMPA-KIDNEY trial. UK cost and utilities/disutilities were sourced from the literature. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Annual discounting of 3.5% was applied on costs and outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Over a 50-year horizon, SoC resulted in per-patient costs, life years, and QALYs of £95,930, 8.55, and 6.28, respectively. Empagliflozin plus SoC resulted in an incremental gain in life years (+1.04) and QALYs (+0.84), while decreasing per-patient costs by £6,019. Empagliflozin was more effective and less costly (dominant) with a net monetary benefit of £22,849 at the willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000. Although treatment cost was higher for empagliflozin, this was more than offset by savings in kidney replacement therapy. Empagliflozin remained highly cost-effective in patients with and without diabetes, and across scenario and sensitivity analyses.
UNASSIGNED: This analysis is limited by reliance on short-term clinical trial data and by uncertainties in modelling CKD progression.
UNASSIGNED: Empagliflozin as an add-on to SoC for treatment of adults with CKD represents cost-effective use of UK National Health Service (NHS) resources.

UNASSIGNED: This retrospective claims data study characterized real-world treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in Germany.
UNASSIGNED: Continuously insured adults with incident mUC diagnosis (=index; ICD-10: C65-C68/C77-C79) in 2015-2019 were identified from two German claims databases. Patients who received first-line (1 L) treatment within 12 months of index were divided into three mutually exclusive sub-cohorts: platinum-based chemotherapy (PB-CT), non-PB-CT, and immunotherapy (IO). Patient characteristics were assessed during a 24-month baseline period; treatments, HCRU, and costs (of the health insurance fund) per patient-year (ppy) were described during 12-month follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: We identified 3,226 patients with mUC (mean age, 73.8 years; male, 70.8%; mean Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, 17.6); 1,286 (39.9%) received 1 L treatment within 12 months of index. Of these, 825 (64.2%) received PB-CT, 322 (25.0%) non-PB-CT, and 139 (10.8%) IO. On average, treated patients had 5.1 hospitalizations ppy. Most UC-related hospitalizations ppy were observed in the PB-CT cohort (5.8), followed by the non-PB-CT (4.2) and IO (2.3) cohorts. Mean UC-related hospitalization costs ppy were €22,218 in the treated cohort, €24,294 in PB-CT, €19,079 in IO, and €18,530 in non-PB-CT cohorts. Cancer-related prescription costs ppy averaged €6,323 in treated patients, and €25,955 in IO, €4,318 in non-PB-CT, and €4,270 in PB-CT cohorts.
UNASSIGNED: We recognized limitations in our study\'s sample selection due to unavailable mUC disease status data. We addressed this through an upstream feasibility study conducted in consultation with clinical experts to determine a suitable proxy. Proxies were also used to delineate treatment lines, switches, and discontinuations due to data absence. Furthermore, due to data restrictions, collective dataset analysis was not possible, prompting a meta-analysis for pooled results.
UNASSIGNED: The study shows that mUC is associated with significant HCRU and costs across different types of 1 L systemic therapy.

UNASSIGNED: Patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis have an increasing number of advanced therapy options including several biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors. Though data on efficacy and safety of these advanced therapies are available, less is known about the potential economic implications of their utilization in Japan. We evaluated the relative value of these advanced therapies in Japan using a locally developed cost per responder model.
UNASSIGNED: A model was developed using relevant clinical endpoints and treatment costs to calculate cost per responder of all advanced therapies used for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis treatment in Japan. Cost per responder was assessed in biologic-naïve and biologic-exposed populations, respectively. The model incorporated induction and maintenance therapy pathways as patients progressed through based on efficacy rates (clinical response, clinical remission and endoscopic improvement). Total costs for induction and maintenance included: drug acquisition, drug administration and serious adverse event management (as necessary) for responders, with additional rescue treatment cost only for non-responders.
UNASSIGNED: Upadacitinib showed lower cost per clinical response and cost per clinical remission across both biologic-naïve and biologic-exposed populations with only one exemption in cost per clinical remission in biologic-naïve population. In addition, upadacitinib demonstrated lower cost per endoscopic improvement in both populations. Janus kinase inhibitors outperformed with lower cost per responder than other mediations across all outcomes and patient populations with the exception of tofacitinib for clinical remission in biologic-exposed UC population.
UNASSIGNED: Comparative data used in this analysis have been derived from network meta-analysis, not from direct comparison.
UNASSIGNED: The results of this cost per responder analysis suggest upadacitinib is a cost-effective option for the first- and second-line treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in Japan.

UNASSIGNED: Ebola virus disease (EVD) continues to be a major public health threat globally, particularly in the low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) of Africa. The social and economic burdens of EVD are substantial and have triggered extensive research into prevention and control. We aim to highlight the impact and economic implications, identify research gaps, and offer recommendations for future economic studies pertaining to EVD.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a comprehensive librarian-led search in PubMed/Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, EconLit and Scopus for economic evaluations of EVD. After study selection and data extraction, findings on the impact and economics of EVD were synthesized using a narrative approach, while identifying gaps, and recommending critical areas for future EVD economic studies.
UNASSIGNED: The economic evaluations focused on the burden of illness, vaccine cost-effectiveness, willingness-to-pay for a vaccine, EVD funding, and preparedness costs. The estimated economic impact of the 2014 EVD outbreak in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone across studies ranged from $30 billion to $50 billion. Facility construction and modification emerged as significant cost drivers for preparedness. The EVD vaccine demonstrated cost-effectiveness in a dynamic transmission model; resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of about $96 per additional disability adjusted life year averted. Individuals exhibited greater willingness to be vaccinated if it incurred no personal cost, with a minority willing to pay about $1 for the vaccine.
UNASSIGNED: The severe impact of EVD puts pressure on governments and the international community for better resource utilization and re-allocation. Several technical and methodological issues related to economic evaluation of EVD remain to be addressed, especially for LMICs. We recommend conducting cost-of-sequelae and cost-of-distribution analyses in addition to adapting existing economic analytical methods to EVD. Characteristics of the affected regions should be considered to provide evidence-based economic plans and economic-evaluation of mitigations that enhance resource allocation for prevention and treatment.
Ebola virus disease (EVD) is a serious health problem, not only in Africa where there have been outbreaks but in other parts of the world as well. In addition to its severe health implications and resultant death, EVD also poses significant impact across several sectors, including food and agriculture, transportation, education, among others, ultimately impacting the economies of affected countries. While some studies have estimated the economic burden of EVD, there remains questions that need addressing. We conducted a review of published studies to estimate what is known about the economic burden of EVD, identified research gaps. Studies looked at how much money EVD costs in terms of prevention and treatment, while others reported on people’s willingness to pay for a vaccine. The estimated economic impact of the 2014 EVD outbreak in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone ranged from approximately $30 billion to $50 billion across studies. Healthcare facility construction and modification were significant cost factors for response preparedness for EVD outbreaks. While the EVD vaccine showed cost-effectiveness, surveys of people across various regions revealed that more individuals were willing to get vaccinated if it was free, with a minority willing to pay a median of about $1 for the vaccine. The severe impact of EVD puts pressure on governments and the international community to use resources more efficiently. We recommend conducting analyses on the costs of long-term effects of EVD and costs of vaccine and treatment distribution, as well as adapting existing economic methods to the specific characteristics of affected regions. This would help create evidence-based economic plans and evaluations of strategies to enhance resource allocation for EVD prevention and treatment.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of the study is to assess the accuracy of overall survival (OS) extrapolations in cost-effectiveness analysis made by the Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency (TLV) to decide on the reimbursement and use of oncology drugs in Sweden.
UNASSIGNED: TLV appraisals for oncology drugs were identified during a 5-year period (2013-2017). To be included each appraisal and health economic model must include a TLV base case extrapolation of OS. Further, Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates on OS from the original and follow-up clinical trials must be available. Potential follow-up trials on OS were identified in ClinicalTrials.gov and the Lund University Libraries databases, and in the Swedish Medical Products Agency (MPA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) databases. In cases where the KM estimates were not available, data points from figures published in TLV\'s appraisals were extracted using the semi-automated tools Digitizelt and WebPlotDigitizer. The accuracy of survival extrapolations was assessed by comparing extrapolated and observed life-years (LYs), using three different measures: 1) difference in LYs between the treatment and control group; 2) LYs in the treatment group, 3) LYs in the control group.
UNASSIGNED: We study TLV\'s preferred OS extrapolations and show that on average they overestimate the observed mean gain in LYs by 24%, and underestimate observed LYs by 3% and 11% in the treatment and control group, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: We conclude that it is feasible to validate OS extrapolations by comparing extrapolated and observed life-years. Even if survival extrapolations are reasonably accurate for the treatment group, this may still imply that extrapolations of LYs gained deviates to a larger extent. Follow-up studies on OS should be carried out to an increased extent to be able to validate, update and improve OS extrapolations in cost-effectiveness analysis of oncology drugs.

UNASSIGNED: To evaluate cost-effectiveness of upadacitinib (targeted synthetic-disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug [ts-DMARD]) as first-line (1 L) treatment versus current treatment among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), who had an inadequate response to prior conventional-synthetic (csDMARDs) and/or biologic-DMARDs (bDMARDs).
UNASSIGNED: This Excel-based model included patients with moderate (Disease Activity Score [DAS28]: >3.2 to ≤5.1) or severe RA (DAS28 > 5.1). Cost-effectiveness of current treatment (1 L: adalimumab-originator/biosimilar; second-line (2 L): other bDMARDs/tofacitinib) was compared against a new treatment involving two scenarios (1 L: upadacitinib, 2 L: adalimumab-biosimilar [scenario-1]/adalimumab-originator [scenario-2]) for a 10-year time-horizon from societal perspective. Model outcomes included direct and indirect costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), hospitalization days, number of orthopedic surgeries, and incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) per QALY.
UNASSIGNED: With the current pathway, estimated total societal costs for 100 RA patients over 10-year period were Saudi Riyal (SAR) 50,450,354 (United States dollars [USD] 13,453,428) (moderate RA) and SAR50,013,945 (USD13,337,052) (severe RA). New pathway (scenario-1) showed that in patients with moderate-to-severe RA, upadacitinib led to higher QALY gain (+8.99 and +15.63) at lower societal cost (cost difference: -SAR2,023,522 [-USD539,606] and -SAR3,373,029 [-USD899,474], respectively). Thus, as 1 L, upadacitinib projects \"dominant\" ICUR per QALY over current pathway. Moreover, in alternate pathway (scenario-2), upadacitinib also projects \"dominant\" ICUR per QALY for patient with severe RA (QALY gain: +15.63; cost difference: -SAR 164,536 [-USD43,876]). However, moderate RA was associated with additional cost of SAR1,255,696 (USD334,852) for improved QALY (+8.99) over current pathway (ICUR per QALY: SAR139,742 [USD37,264]). Both scenarios resulted in reduced hospitalization days (scenario-1: -14.83 days; scenario-2: -11.41 days) and number of orthopedic surgeries (scenario-1: -8.36; scenario-2: -6.54) for moderate-to-severe RA over the current treatment pathway.
UNASSIGNED: Upadacitinib as 1 L treatment in moderate-to-severe RA can considerably reduce healthcare resource burden in KSA, majorly due to reduced drug administration/monitoring/hospitalization/surgical and indirect costs.

UNASSIGNED: Establishment of dedicated Stroke Centers has shown to be effective on the outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke, as well as mechanical thrombectomy (MTE) in acute large vessel occlusion. The cost-effectiveness of this treatment has also been proven in several countries, but so far not in Switzerland.
UNASSIGNED: We compare the pathways and economic impact of patients with acute large vessel occlusions causing acute ischemic stroke before the establishment of the stroke center and MTE in 2016 with the time afterwards in the years 2016-2020. Local data from the Swiss Stroke Registry and hospital accounting as well as economic data from a healthcare insurance company was used for evaluation in an economic model. Both payer and societal perspectives were considered, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was undertaken to explore uncertainty.
UNASSIGNED: Establishment of a new Stroke Center in Central Switzerland increased the absolute number of thrombectomies from 0 in 2015 to 55 in 2016 to 83 in 2020, as well as the percentage of MTE in large vessel occlusions (LVO) from 50.9% in 2016 to 58.2% in 2020. Over a 15-year horizon, predicted average additional costs of CHF 7,978 were associated with the establishment of a new stroke center, as well as 0.60 quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) per patient and an additional survival of 0.59 years per patient. The calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was therefore CHF 13,297 per QALY gained. When societal costs were included, the new stroke care model was predicted to dominate the old care model. Robustness of model results was confirmed via probabilistic sensitivity analysis.
UNASSIGNED: The results rely on data from a single stroke center and, therefore, cannot be generalized.
UNASSIGNED: Establishment of a new Stroke Center can be cost-effective and provide better outcomes in terms of functional independence as well as quality-adjusted life-years.