I-change model

I - 更改模型
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在堕胎法严格的国家,人工流产很普遍。这些区域内堕胎服务有限,增加了产妇并发症和死亡率的可能性。人工流产在伊朗是一个重大的公共卫生问题,其特点是许多复杂的因素仍未被探索。在伊朗背景下,与推动人工流产的影响有关的知识差距仍然存在。为充分解决人工流产的问题,必须辨别决定决策过程的决定因素。这项研究的主要目的是设计一项干预计划,重点是减轻夫妻中人工流产的发生。重点是确定导致这种现象的关键因素。
    方法:本研究包括三个阶段。在第一阶段,将采用基于I-变化模型的定性方法来确定影响人工流产的因素.第二阶段涉及系统审查,以确定人工流产的决定因素和预防人工流产的策略。在第三阶段,定性方法和系统审查的结果将使用德尔菲方法与专家和专家共享,以对策略进行分类和优先排序。随后,基于最终共识,将制定一项全面的计划来防止人工流产。
    结论:本研究介绍了一种基于I-change模型的人工流产预防方案。预防人工流产对降低孕产妇发病率和死亡率具有重要意义,削减医疗费用,促进人口增长率。研究结果将通过知名的同行评审期刊传播,并传达给学术界和医学界。这一传播旨在提供有价值的见解,有助于推进人工流产和预防流产计划。
    人工流产在伊朗受到限制,许多意外怀孕的已婚妇女诉诸秘密程序,导致不良的健康结果。人工流产占该国孕产妇死亡率的2.3%。了解影响流产的因素对于设计有效的预防干预措施至关重要。由于文化和政治敏感性,关于伊朗人工流产决定因素的可靠数据,特别是从男性伴侣的角度来看,保持稀缺。现有的研究主要集中在妇女的观点,忽略男性对堕胎相关决定的潜在影响。这项研究旨在通过调查夫妻人工流产的决定因素并在伊朗制定全面的基于夫妻的人工流产预防计划来弥合这一差距。采用混合方法方法,这项研究探讨了夫妇决定堕胎的相关因素.随后,系统审查将确定有关堕胎决定因素和预防策略的现有知识。在这种全面认识的基础上,将制定一项有证据的堕胎预防计划。这项研究的结果可以为政策制定者和人口/生殖健康专家提供信息,最终旨在减轻与堕胎相关的负面健康和社会后果的负担,导致成本降低和改善妇女的健康结果,家庭,和社会。
    BACKGROUND: In countries where abortion laws are stringent, induced abortions are prevalent. The limited availability of abortion services within these regions amplifies the likelihood of maternal complications and mortality. Induced abortions represent a significant public health concern in Iran and are characterized by a multitude of intricate factors that remain largely unexplored. Gaps in knowledge persist pertaining to the influences driving induced abortion within the Iranian context. To adequately address the issue of induced abortion, it is imperative to discern the determinants that shape the decision-making process. The primary objective of this study was to design an intervention program focused on mitigating the occurrence of induced abortion within couples, with an emphasis on identifying the key factors that contribute to this phenomenon.
    METHODS: This study comprises three phases. In the first phase, a qualitative approach based on the I-change model will be employed to identify the factors influencing induced abortion. The second phase involves a systematic review to identify the determinants of induced abortion and strategies to prevent induced abortion. In the third phase, the outcomes of the qualitative approach and systematic review will be shared with experts and specialists using the Delphi method to categorize and prioritize strategies. Subsequently, based on the final consensus, a comprehensive program will be developed to prevent induced abortion.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study introduces an I-change model-based program for the prevention of induced abortion. The prevention of induced abortion holds great significance in mitigating maternal morbidity and mortality, curtailing healthcare expenses, and fostering population growth rates. The research findings will be disseminated via reputable peer-reviewed journals and communicated to the academic and medical communities. This dissemination aims to provide valuable insights that can contribute to the advancement of induced abortion and abortion prevention programs.
    Induced abortion is restricted in Iran, and many married women with unintended pregnancies resort to clandestine procedures, resulting in adverse health outcomes. Induced abortion contributes to 2.3% of maternal mortality rates in the country. Understanding the factors influencing abortion is crucial for designing effective preventive interventions. Due to cultural and political sensitivities, reliable data on the determinants of induced abortion in Iran, particularly from the perspective of male partners, remain scarce. Existing research primarily focuses on women’s views, neglecting the potential influence of men on abortion-related decisions. This study aims to bridge this gap by investigating the determinants of induced abortion in couples and developing a comprehensive couple-based abortion prevention program in Iran. Employing a mixed-methods approach, this study explored the factors associated with couples’ decisions regarding abortion. Subsequently, a systematic review will identify existing knowledge on abortion determinants and preventive strategies. On the basis of this comprehensive understanding, an evidence-informed abortion prevention plan will be devised. The findings of this study can inform policymakers and population/reproductive health experts, ultimately aiming to reduce the burden of negative health and social consequences associated with abortion, leading to cost reductions and improved health outcomes for women, families, and society.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    数字金融服务的快速增长,特别是在COVID-19爆发期间,是加速使用在线贷款应用程序的一个因素,这不可避免地需要数字金融的知识。本研究使用行为变化理论和数字金融素养来识别相关和相关变量,以确认数字金融技能和能力的积极动机因素。应用结构方程模型(SEM)和路径分析来找到相关性并确认提出的假设。有400个来自不同省份的小企业家样本,并使用在线问卷进行数据收集。结果表明,知识和动机变量是相关的,并且具有积极的影响。它有助于不断提高小型企业家的技能和能力,这些企业家需要根据COVID-19爆发后业务和技术的变化充分发展数字金融素养的能力。这个概念可以适用于接受数字金融素养有用性培训的小型企业家的在线贷款政策。
    The rapid growth of digital financial services especially during the COVID-19 outbreak, is a factor accelerating the use of online loan applications that inevitably require the knowledge of digital finance. This study used the behavior change theory and digital financial literacy to identify relevant and correlated variables to confirm positive motivational factors on digital financial skills and capability. Structure equation modeling (SEM) and path analysis were applied to find the correlation and confirm the proposed hypotheses presented. There were 400 samples of small entrepreneurs from different provinces, and online questionnaires were used for data collection. The findings showed that the knowledge and motivation variables were related and had a positive effect. It contributes to continuously building up the skills and capabilities of small entrepreneurs who need to develop their capabilities in digital financial literacy adequately in line with the changes in business and technology after the outbreak of COVID-19. This concept can apply to online loan policy for small entrepreneurs trained with motivating courses who accepted digital finance literacy\'s usefulness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:了解青少年非消费者和常规大麻使用者对大麻使用的经验和看法以及决定其使用的因素,以I-Change解释模型为基础。
    方法:使用了带有内容分析的定性方法。焦点小组是针对非正规大麻使用者的青少年(那些没有尝试过大麻或以前只尝试过大麻的青少年)进行的,并对处于戒毒计划中的青少年和年轻成年人进行了半结构化访谈。对录音和转录的访谈进行了演绎分析,使用I-Change模型的域作为参考。
    结果:个人问题,社会问题或家庭问题可能导致使用大麻。对这种药物的消费缺乏知识和低风险认知。还有其他影响消费的因素,对优势的感知,例如自由的感觉和同龄人群体的影响。女孩对这种物质的消费正在发生变化,变得越来越等于男孩。家庭在预防吸毒方面发挥着重要作用。
    结论:了解这些因素对于制定有效的干预措施以适应已确定的需求和人口特征至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: To learn about the experiences and opinions of adolescent non-consumers and regular cannabis users about cannabis use and the factors that determine its use, using the I-Change explanatory model as a basis.
    METHODS: Qualitative methodology with a content analysis was used. Focus groups were conducted with adolescents who were non-regular cannabis users (those who had not tried cannabis or had only experimented with it before) and semi-structured interviews were conducted with adolescent and young adult in recovery who were in a detoxification program. A deductive analysis of the audio-recorded and transcribed interviews was performed, using the domains of the I-Change Model as a reference.
    RESULTS: Personal problems, social problems or family problems can lead to cannabis use. There was a lack of knowledge and low risk perception about consumption of this drug. There are other factors that influence consumption, the perception of advantages, such as the feeling of freedom and the influence of the peer group. The consumption of this substance in girls is changing, becoming more and more equal to that of boys. The family has an important role to play in preventing drug use.
    CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of these factors is of vital importance as a prior step to the development of efficient intervention measures adjusted to the needs identified and the characteristics of the population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在苏丹的大学生中,无保护的性行为很普遍,从而增加性传播疾病(STD)和人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的风险。由于对该人群持续使用避孕套的社会心理决定因素知之甚少,这项研究旨在识别它们.在横断面设计中应用了综合变化模型(ICM),以识别来自喀土穆的218名学生(年龄在18-25岁之间),这些项目将避孕套使用者与非避孕套使用者区分开。避孕套使用者与非避孕套使用者在拥有更多的艾滋病毒和避孕套使用相关知识方面存在显著差异,对艾滋病毒易感性的更高感知,报告更多接触避孕套使用线索,对使用避孕套持不那么消极的态度(态度缺点),经历社会支持和规范有利于安全套的使用和具有较高的安全套使用自我效能。二元逻辑回归显示,除了与HIV相关的知识外,同伴规范还支持使用安全套,避孕套使用提示,在苏丹大学生中,消极态度和自我效能感是与持续使用安全套相关的唯一因素.旨在促进性活跃学生持续使用安全套的干预措施可以受益于增加有关艾滋病毒传播和预防的知识,提高对艾滋病毒风险的认识,使用避孕套使用提示,解决感知到的安全套缺点,提高学生的自我效能,避免无保护的性行为。此外,这种干预措施应提高学生对同龄人偏爱安全套使用的信念和行为的看法,并寻求医疗保健专业人员和宗教学者对安全套使用的支持。
    Unprotected sex is common among university students in Sudan, thus increasing risks for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). As little is known about the psychosocial determinants of consistent condom use among this population, this study was designed to identify them. The Integrated Change Model (ICM) was applied in a cross-sectional design to identify in 218 students (aged 18-25 years) from Khartoum which items distinguish condom users from non-condom users. Condom users differed significantly from non-condom users in having more HIV and condom use-related knowledge, higher perception of susceptibility to HIV, reporting more exposure to condom use cues, having a less negative attitude towards condom use (attitude cons), experiencing social support and norms favouring condom use and having higher condom use self-efficacy. Binary logistic regression showed that peer norms favouring condom use in addition to HIV-related knowledge, condom use cues, negative attitude and self-efficacy were the factors uniquely associated with consistent condom use among university students in Sudan. Interventions seeking to promote consistent condom use among sexually active students could benefit from increasing knowledge about HIV transmission and prevention, raising HIV-risk perception, using condom use cues, addressing perceived condom disadvantages and enhancing students` self-efficacy to avoid unprotected sex. Moreover, such interventions should raise students` perceptions of their peers` beliefs and behaviours favouring condom use and seek health care professionals` and religious scholars` support for condom use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项横断面问卷调查研究调查了保健提供者在产前共享医疗预约(CenteringPreglying©)和产前个人预约中支持患者教育中自我管理的程度是否存在差异。它还调查了Centering妊娠@和个人约会中的医疗保健提供者在支持自我管理方面关注行为变化综合模型(I-Change)因素的程度是否存在差异。
    方法:邀请荷兰的产前保健提供者填写问卷。在Centering妊娠©中提供护理的受访者组成了Centering妊娠©组,其他人被归类为个人预约组。在定义了自我管理并引入了I-Change模型之后,受访者被问及他们是否支持自我管理,以及他们是否关注17个产前患者教育主题的I-Change模型。进行Pearson卡方检验和Fisher精确检验以比较两组。
    结果:我们包括133名受访者。与个人预约组相比,CenteringPregness@组中的医疗保健提供者对自我管理的支持程度更高。这种差异在八个主题(身体姿势和练习,口腔健康,家庭暴力,出生机制和早产,产后期间,从怀孕过渡到为人父母,照顾婴儿和新生儿的安全)。在这两组中,医疗保健提供者最关注信息或意识因素,而不是动机因素。
    结论:我们发现首次证明,CenteringPregness@的医疗保健提供者比个人预约的医疗保健提供者更支持自我管理。这可以用时间因素来解释,安全感和纽带,护理的连续性和对未来健康行为变化的重视。对于有效的自我管理支持,注意动机因素很重要。然而,我们发现,与动机相比,两组的医疗保健提供者更关注信息或意识因素.
    结论:产前个人预约的卫生保健提供者应该意识到,他们可能比CenteringPregness的卫生保健提供者更不支持自我管理。这两种类型的产前护理的卫生保健提供者应该意识到他们很少关注动机因素。他们可能需要一些技能来改变他们的角色,从教学专业到支持领导者。
    This cross-sectional questionnaire study investigates if there a difference in the extent to which health care providers in prenatal Shared Medical Appointments (CenteringPregnancy©) and in prenatal individual appointments support self-management in patient education. It also investigates if there is a difference in the extent to which health care providers in CenteringPregnancy@ and in individual appointments pay attention to the factors of the Integrated Model for Behavioral Change (I-Change) in supporting self-management.
    Dutch health care providers in prenatal care were invited to fill out a questionnaire. Respondents who provided care in CenteringPregnancy© formed the CenteringPregnancy© group, the others were categorized in the individual appointments\' group. After a definition of self-management and an introduction of the I-Change model, respondents were asked if they supported self-management and if they paid attention to the I-Change model for each of 17 themes of prenatal patient education. Pearson\'s chi-squared tests and Fisher\'s Exact tests were performed to compare both groups.
    We included 133 respondents. Health care providers in the CenteringPregnancy@ group supported self-management to a higher extent compared to the individual appointments group. This difference was statistically significant for eight themes (body position and exercises, oral health, domestic violence, birth mechanism and premature birth, postnatal period, transition from pregnancy to parenthood, taking care of the baby and newborn\'s safety). In both groups, health care providers paid most attention to information or to awareness factors instead of motivation factors.
    We found a first prove that health care providers in CenteringPregnancy@ support self-management to a higher extent than health care providers in individual appointments. This could be explained by factors as time, feelings of safety and bonding, continuity of care and emphasis on future health behaviour changes. For effective self-management support, attention to motivation factors is important. However, we found that health care providers in both groups paid more attention to information or to awareness factors than to motivation.
    Health care providers in prenatal individual appointments should be aware of the fact that they possibly support self-management less than health care providers in CenteringPregnancy@ . Health care providers in both types of prenatal care should be aware of the fact that they pay little attention to motivation factors. They might need some skills to change their role from teaching professional to supportive leader.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    荷兰主办,和许多其他欧洲国家一样,三个基于人群的癌症筛查计划(CSP)。这些CSP的总体吸收很高,但近年来有所下降。特别是在高度城市化的地区,吸收率往往低于世界卫生组织设定的最低有效率70%。了解公民决定参加CPS的原因对于优化当前的筛查参与率至关重要。这项研究的目的是探索海牙居民中有关癌症筛查的各种观点,荷兰的一个高度城市化的地区。
    进行了Q方法研究,以提供有关参与CSP的主流观点的见解。所有受访者都是海牙市的居民,荷兰。在一份在线申请中,他们对一组31条语句进行了排名,基于当前可用的文献,并通过集成变更模型进行聚类,根据协议级别分为9列强制排名网格,接下来是一个简短的调查。受访者被要求参加随后的面试,以解释他们的排名。通过个人因素分析来确定不同的观点,这些数据是使用排名和访谈中的数据进行解释的。
    确定了三个不同的观点:1)。“关于参与的积极”,2).“对参与的思考”,and3).\"恐惧驱动参与\"。这些观点提供了对潜在受访者如何,生活在荷兰的城市化地区,决定参与CSP。
    由于CSP只有在参与率足够高时才有效,必须深入了解潜在受访者之间关于参与CSP的不同观点。这项研究增加了有关这些观点的新见解,并为将来的CSP优化提出了一些想法。
    The Netherlands hosts, as many other European countries, three population-based cancer screening programmes (CSPs). The overall uptake among these CSPs is high, but has decreased over recent years. Especially in highly urbanized regions the uptake rates tend to fall below the minimal effective rate of 70% set by the World Health Organization. Understanding the reasons underlying the decision of citizens to partake in a CPS are essential in order to optimize the current screening participation rates. The aim of this study was to explore the various perspectives concerning cancer screening among inhabitants of The Hague, a highly urbanized region of the Netherlands.
    A Q-methodology study was conducted to provide insight in the prevailing perspectives on partaking in CSPs. All respondents were inhabitants of the city of The Hague, the Netherlands. In an online application they ranked a set of 31 statements, based on the current available literature and clustered by the Integrated Change model, into a 9-column forced ranking grid according to level of agreement, followed by a short survey. Respondents were asked to participate in a subsequent interview to explain their ranking. By-person factor analysis was used to identify distinct perspectives, which were interpreted using data from the rankings and interviews.
    Three distinct perspectives were identified: 1). \"Positive about participation\", 2). \"Thoughtful about participation\", and 3). \"Fear drives participation\". These perspectives provide insight into how potential respondents, living in an urbanized region in the Netherlands, decide upon partaking in CSPs.
    Since CSPs will only be effective when participation rates are sufficiently high, it is essential to have insight into the different perspectives among potential respondents concerning partaking in a CSP. This study adds new insights concerning these perspectives and suggests several ideas for future optimization of the CSPs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:移动技术(mHealth)的应用具有减少健康不平等的潜力,让病人更好地控制自己的健康,并提高医疗保健的成本效益。手机的广泛使用为我们提供了一种预防宫颈癌的新途径。该研究的目的是设计和开发一个手机应用程序(app),旨在对女性进行行为干预,并评估基于app的干预措施的有效性。
    方法:本研究涉及5个阶段。在第一阶段,理解女性的观点将使用基于I-Change模型的定性方法来确定。在第2阶段,将通过提供专家观点来完成定性方法和需求优先级排序的结果。这一阶段的主要产出将导致优先考虑I-Change模型的主要可测量有效变量。将处理第3阶段,以开发和心理测量有关选定构造的评估工具。在第4阶段,将执行应用程序框架和内容开发。在第五阶段,三臂,将对女性进行平行设计的随机对照试验.200名妇女将被随机分为三组,包括两个干预组和一个对照组。干预组包括以下内容:(1)移动应用程序和(2)数字图书。在3个月的随访评估中,将使用在研究的第3阶段中设计和构建的工具对数据进行评估。然后将评估两种干预措施通过基于移动的教育干预对宫颈癌预防行为的影响。
    结论:将在伊朗首次实施基于理论的健康教育计划,该计划使用移动应用程序来改善宫颈癌预防行为。通过有效的基于健康移动的教育设计,确定伊朗妇女是否有动力坚持与CC相关的预防行为非常重要。
    背景:伊朗临床试验注册IRCT20181205041861N3。于2021年10月26日注册V2.0。
    BACKGROUND: Applications of mobile technologies (mHealth) have the potential to reduce health inequalities, give patients more control over their health, and improve health care\'s cost-effectiveness. The widespread use of mobile phones offers us a new way to prevent cervical cancer. The objective of the study was to design and develop a mobile phone application (app) that aims to conduct a behavioral intervention for women and to evaluate the efficacy of the app-based intervention.
    METHODS: This study involves 5 phases. In the first phase, understanding women\'s perspectives will be identified using a qualitative approach based on the I-Change model. In phase 2, the results from the qualitative approach and requirement prioritization through providing experts\' perspectives will be done. The main outputs of this phase will be resulted in prioritizing the main measurable effective variables of the I-Change model. Phase 3 will be processed for the development and psychometric of an assessment tool regarding selected constructs. In phase 4, the App framework and content development will be performed. In phase 5, a three-armed, parallel-design randomized controlled trial will be conducted on women. Two hundred ten women will be randomly assigned to three groups including two intervention groups and one control group. The intervention groups included the following: (1) a mobile application and (2) a digital book. The data will be evaluated using tools designed and constructed in phase 3 of the study at baseline in 3-month follow-up assessments. The impact of the two interventions on cervical cancer prevention behaviors through mobile-based educational intervention will then be evaluated.
    CONCLUSIONS: A theory-based health education program using a mobile app to improve cervical cancer-preventive behaviors will be implemented for the first time in Iran. With an effective health mobile-based educational design, it is very important to determine whether Iranian women will be motivated to adhere to preventive behavior related to CC.
    BACKGROUND: Iranian Clinical Trial Register IRCT20181205041861N3. Registered V2.0 on 26 October 2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:安达卢西亚青少年的大麻使用量正在增加,造成健康,社会和金融问题。学校护士访问学校,并为安达卢西亚的青少年提供健康促进。为了更好地量身定做健康促进方案,了解与安达卢西亚青少年使用大麻相关的社会人口统计学和动机因素非常重要.
    方法:在这项横断面研究中,安达卢西亚中学的369名学生(15-18岁)参与其中。在上课时间自行进行了基于I-Change模型的匿名问卷。在社会人口统计学和动机因素方面,将大麻使用者与非大麻使用者进行了比较。应急表,均值比较测试,并进行了logistic回归分析。
    结果:去年使用大麻的患病率为21.6%。非大麻使用者对使用大麻有一些积极的信念(例如放松或医疗福利的能力),以及用户。用户认识到使用大麻的一些缺点,但淡化了它们的重要性,并提到了更多的优点。此外,社会影响力,尤其是同龄人,在大麻使用中起着至关重要的作用。特定的社会情况和情绪似乎是使用大麻的特殊风险因素,比如参加庆祝活动或感觉良好。回归分析结果显示,大麻的使用主要与年龄有关,家庭功能低,家庭富裕程度低,高额的零用钱,察觉到使用大麻的缺点很少,大量使用大麻的社会模型,社会规范和压力有利于大麻,自我效能低,抵制使用大麻和使用大麻的积极意图。
    结论:根据我们的结果,由护士领导的预防计划可以针对预防大麻使用的重要因素进行调整,重点概述使用大麻的缺点,感觉良好时使用大麻的替代品,建议增加健康的社会影响和增强自我效能以抵制使用大麻的诱惑。
    结论:护士需要了解与青少年使用大麻相关的社会人口统计学因素和动机,以便在学校建立有效的预防干预措施。
    Cannabis use is increasing among Andalusian adolescents, causing health, social and financial problems. School nurses visit schools and provide health promotion to adolescents in Andalusia. In order to better tailor health promotion programs, it is important to understand the sociodemographic and motivational factors related to cannabis use in Andalusian adolescents.
    In this cross-sectional study, 369 students (aged 15-18 years) from secondary schools in Andalusia were involved. An anonymous questionnaire based on the I-Change Model was self-administered during school hours. Cannabis users were compared with non-cannabis users regarding sociodemographic and motivational factors. Contingency tables, mean comparison tests, and logistic regression analyses were conducted.
    The prevalence of cannabis use in the last year was 21.6%. Non-cannabis users had a few positive beliefs toward cannabis use (e.g. the ability to relax or medical benefits), as well as users. Users recognized some disadvantages of cannabis use but played down their importance and mentioned more advantages. Moreover, social influence, especially from peers, plays a critical role in cannabis use. Specific social situations and moods seemed to be special risk factors for cannabis use, such as being at a celebration or feeling good. Results of regression analysis showed that cannabis use is mainly associated with age, low family function, low family affluence, high pocket money, perceiving few disadvantages of cannabis use, much social modeling of cannabis use, social norm and pressure favoring cannabis, low self-efficacy to resist using cannabis and positive intentions to use cannabis.
    Based on our results, prevention programmes lead by nurses can be tailored to the factors important to prevent cannabis use, focusing on outlining the disadvantages of cannabis use, alternatives for using cannabis when feeling good, increasing salience of healthy social influences and reinforcing self-efficacy to resist temptations to use cannabis are recommended.
    Nurses need to know the sociodemographic factors and motivations associated with the use of cannabis in adolescents in order to establish effective preventive interventions at school.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19疫苗的犹豫可能被视为阻碍消除或应对COVID-19的新流行病。这项研究通过考虑信息和心理社会因素的作用,使用I-Change模型(ICM)评估了COVID-19疫苗犹豫的原因。在荷兰成年人(n=240)中使用便利样本进行了横断面在线调查。问卷评估了信息因素,诱发因素,意识因素,动机因素,准备行动,和疫苗接种意向。疫苗犹豫的参与者(n=58,24%)的教育水平较低,更经常有报酬的工作,倾向于有天主教以外的宗教。他们使用书面媒体的频率较低,并且倾向于访问公共卫生组织的网站的频率较低,但更频繁地使用WhatsApp等消息传递服务。所有参与者对检查信息可信度都有中立的意图。对疫苗犹豫不决的受访者对疫苗接种的了解较少,认为COVID-19患病和死亡的严重程度较低,并且报告的关于COVID-19疫苗优势的线索暴露较少。他们不太相信接种COVID-19疫苗的情感和理性优势,并对此表达了更多的负面情绪。他们还报告了更多关于COVID-19疫苗接种的负面社会规范,接种疫苗和应对潜在副作用的自我效能较低。回归模型解释了58%的疫苗接种意图方差。结果表明,需要采取以下策略:1.减少假新闻并刺激信息检查,以促进明智的决策;2.除了优化知识水平的策略外,还针对COVID-19的理性和情感后果。宣传活动应承认人们对COVID-19疫苗接种的情绪劣势的看法,并增加人们对情绪优势的看法,比如减少后悔的感觉,增加自由和安慰的感觉。
    COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy may be regarded as a new pandemic hindering the elimination of or coping with COVID-19. This study assessed reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy using the I-Change Model (ICM) by considering the role of informational and psychosocial factors. A cross-sectional online survey using a convenience sample was conducted among Dutch adults (n = 240). The questionnaire assessed information factors, predisposing factors, awareness factors, motivational factors, preparatory actions, and vaccination intention. Vaccine hesitant participants (n = 58, 24%) had lower levels of education, more often paid work, and tended to have a religion other than Catholicism. They used written media less often and tended to visit websites of public health organizations less often, but used messaging services like WhatsApp more frequently. All participants had neutral intentions towards checking information credibility. Vaccine hesitant respondents had less knowledge about vaccination, lower perceived severity of getting sick and dying of COVID-19, and reported fewer exposures to cues about the advantages of COVID-19 vaccination. They were less convinced of the emotional and rational advantages of COVID-19 vaccination and expressed more negative feelings about it. They also reported more negative social norms concerning COVID-19 vaccination, and lower self-efficacy to get vaccinated and to cope with potential side-effects. The regression model explained 58% of the variance in vaccination intention. The results suggest that strategies are needed to: 1. Reduce fake news and stimulate information checking to foster well-informed decision-making; 2. Target both rational and emotional consequences of COVID-19, in addition to strategies for optimizing levels of knowledge. Campaigns should acknowledge the perceptions of the emotional disadvantages and increase perceptions of emotional advantages of COVID-19 vaccinations, such as reducing feelings of regret, and increasing feelings of freedom and reassurance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:以前的研究表明,定期运动对激发癌症幸存者的益处;然而,大多数幸存者不够活跃,显示不遵守体育锻炼指南的比率很高。使用I-Change模型,这项研究试图确定运动的决策平衡和自我效能感之间的关系,规划,和自我领导与胃癌患者运动行为的阶段性变化。
    方法:这项横断面研究于2021年2月进行,包括145名在韩国通过配额抽样诊断为原发性胃癌的患者。社会人口统计学,合并症,锻炼的决策平衡,锻炼的自我效能感,规划,自我领导,并评估了运动行为变化的阶段。
    结果:在参与者中,4%的人处于运动行为的预想阶段,10%的沉思,37%的制剂,23%的行动,27%的维护。男性(p=0.043),抵抗复发的自我效能更高(p<0.0001),较高的应对计划(p=0.029),和更高的自我领导的行为意识和意志(p=0.023)与更多的准备改变运动行为相关。
    结论:从使用I-Change模型获得的结果来看,抵抗以前习惯复发的自我效能感,应对计划,行为意识和意志与运动行为改变的准备程度有关。这些发现可能有助于减少胃癌幸存者对体力活动指南的不遵守。
    OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have suggested the benefits of regular exercise in motivating the survivors of cancer; however, most survivors are insufficiently active, showing high rates of nonadherence to physical activity guidelines. Using the I-Change model, this study sought to determine the association of decisional balance and self-efficacy for exercise, planning, and self-leadership with the stages of change in exercise behavior among patients with stomach cancer.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in February 2021 and included 145 patients diagnosed with primary stomach cancer via quota sampling in South Korea. Sociodemographics, comorbidity, decisional balance for exercise, self-efficacy for exercise, planning, self-leadership, and stages of change in exercise behavior were assessed.
    RESULTS: Of the participants, 4% were in the precontemplation stage of exercise behavior, 10% contemplation, 37% preparation, 23% action, and 27% maintenance. The male sex (p = 0.043), higher self-efficacy for resisting relapse (p < 0.0001), higher coping planning (p = 0.029), and higher self-leadership for behavior awareness and volition (p = 0.023) were associated with more readiness for changes in exercise behavior.
    CONCLUSIONS: From the results obtained using the I-Change model, self-efficacy for resisting relapse to previous habits, coping planning, and behavior awareness and volition were associated with more readiness for changes in exercise behavior. These findings may help reduce stomach cancer survivors\' nonadherence to physical activity guidelines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号