Hospitalized adults

住院成人
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:抗病毒药物在控制COVID-19,减少并发症和死亡率方面已变得至关重要。Remdesivir已成为一种有效的治疗药物,用于有疾病进展风险的住院患者,特别是当替代疗法不可行时。而推荐的治疗持续时间的雷米西韦延长至7天的症状发作后,本研究探讨了早期雷米西韦给药对临床结局的影响.
    方法:我们使用连续PCR确诊的SARS-CoV-2成年患者(≥18岁)的临床数据进行了回顾性分析,这些患者在传染病科住院期间接受了雷德西韦治疗,在维也纳的KlinikFavoriten。数据涵盖了2021年7月1日至2022年4月31日期间。根据remdesivir给药时间将患者分为两组:早期组(症状发作后0-3天)和晚期组(症状发作后≥4天)。主要结果是院内疾病进展,使用WHOCOVID-19临床进展量表进行评估(增加≥1分)。多变量逻辑回归,根据年龄调整,性别,SARS-CoV-2变体,和COVID-19疫苗接种状况,用于评估临床结果。
    结果:共纳入219例患者,其中早期组148例(67.6%),晚期组71例(32.4%)。平均年龄66.5(SD:18.0)岁,68.9%的患者接种了疫苗,72.6%有Omicron病毒变种。调整混杂因素后,晚期使用雷米西韦与需要高流量氧疗(OR2.52,95%CI1.40-4.52,p=0.002)和入住ICU(OR4.34,95%CI1.38-13.67,p=0.012)的概率显著较高相关。在晚期组中,临床恶化的风险有更高的趋势(OR2.13,95%CI0.98-4.64,p=0.056),并且需要任何氧疗(OR1.85,95%CI0.94-3.64,p=0.074)。
    结论:与在症状发作后的前3天内接受雷德西韦治疗的患者相比,住院的COVID-19患者在第3天后服用雷德西韦与更高的并发症风险相关,如需要高流量氧疗和ICU入住。
    BACKGROUND: Antiviral drugs have become crucial in managing COVID-19, reducing complications and mortality. Remdesivir has emerged as an effective therapeutic drug for hospitalized patients at risk of disease progression, especially when alternative treatments are infeasible. While the recommended treatment duration of remdesivir extends up to 7 days post-symptom onset, this study examines how early remdesivir administration impacts clinical outcomes.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using clinical data from consecutively PCR confirmed SARS-CoV‑2 adult patients (≥ 18 years) who received remdesivir during their hospitalization at the department of infectious diseases, Klinik Favoriten in Vienna. The data covered the period from July 1, 2021, to April 31, 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on the timing of remdesivir administration: an early group (0-3 days since symptom onset) and a late group (≥ 4 days since symptom onset). The primary outcome was in-hospital disease progression, assessed using the WHO COVID-19 Clinical Progression Scale (≥ 1 point increase). Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, SARS-CoV‑2 variant, and COVID-19 vaccination status, was used to assess clinical outcomes.
    RESULTS: In total 219 patients were included of whom 148 (67.6%) were in the early group and 71 (32.4%) were in the late group. The average age was 66.5 (SD: 18.0) years, 68.9% of the patients were vaccinated, and 72.6% had the Omicron virus variant. Late remdesivir administration was associated with a significantly higher probability of needing high-flow oxygen therapy (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.40-4.52, p = 0.002) and ICU admission (OR 4.34, 95% CI 1.38-13.67, p = 0.012) after adjusting for confounders. In the late group there was a trend towards a higher risk of clinical worsening (OR 2.13, 95% CI 0.98-4.64, p = 0.056) and need for any oxygen therapy (OR 1.85, 95% CI 0.94-3.64, p = 0.074).
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared to patients who received remdesivir within the first 3 days after symptom onset, administering remdesivir after day 3 in hospitalized COVID-19 patients is associated with higher risk for complications, such as the need for high-flow oxygen therapy and ICU admission.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:营养不良在发达国家的住院患者中普遍存在,导致负面的健康结果和增加的医疗费用。及时识别和管理营养不良至关重要。缺乏普遍接受的营养不良定义和标准化诊断标准,导致各种筛查工具的发展,每个都有不同的有效性。这会使营养不良的早期识别变得复杂,阻碍有效的干预策略。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在确定最有效和最可靠的营养筛查工具,以评估住院成人营养不良的风险。
    方法:进行了系统的文献检索,以确定从开始到2023年11月发表的验证研究,在Pubmed/MEDLINE,Embase,和CINAHL数据库。该系统评价在INPLASY(INPLASY202090028)中注册。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估2版(QUADAS-2)评估纳入研究的偏倚风险和质量。使用对称分层汇总接收者操作特征模型对筛选工具的准确性进行了荟萃分析。
    结果:在检索到的1646篇文章中,60人符合纳入标准,被纳入系统评价,21例纳入荟萃分析.总共确定了51种营养不良风险筛查工具和9种参考标准。荟萃分析根据两个参考标准(主观全球评估[SGA]和欧洲临床营养与代谢学会[ESPEN]标准)评估了四种常见的营养不良风险筛查工具。营养不良通用筛查工具(MUST)与SGA的敏感性(95%置信区间)为0.84(0.73-0.91),特异性为0.85(0.75-0.91)。MUST与ESPEN的敏感性为0.97(0.53-0.99),特异性为0.80(0.50-0.94)。营养不良筛查工具(MST)与SGA的敏感性为0.81(0.67-0.90),特异性为0.79(0.72-0.74)。迷你营养评估简表(MNA-SF)与ESPEN的敏感性为0.99(0.41-0.99),特异性为0.60(0.45-0.73)。营养通用筛查工具-2002(NRS-2002)与SGA的敏感性为0.76(0.58-0.87),特异性为0.86(0.76-0.93)。
    结论:在检测住院成人的营养不良风险时,MUST证明了高准确性。然而,研究的质量参差不齐,可能会在结果中引入偏差。未来的研究应该使用有效和通用的黄金标准来比较特定患者人群中的工具,以确保改善患者护理和结果。
    OBJECTIVE: Malnutrition is prevalent among hospitalized patients in developed countries, contributing to negative health outcomes and increased healthcare costs. Timely identification and management of malnutrition are crucial. The lack of a universally accepted definition and standardized diagnostic criteria for malnutrition has led to the development of various screening tools, each with varying validity. This complicates early identification of malnutrition, hindering effective intervention strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify the most valid and reliable nutritional screening tool for assessing the risk of malnutrition in hospitalized adults.
    METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify validation studies published from inception to November 2023, in the Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases. This systematic review was registered in INPLASY (INPLASY202090028). The risk of bias and quality of included studies were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies version 2 (QUADAS-2). Meta-analyses were performed for screening tools accuracy using the symmetric hierarchical summary receiver operative characteristics models.
    RESULTS: Of the 1646 articles retrieved, 60 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review, and 21 were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 51 malnutrition risk screening tools and 9 reference standards were identified. The meta-analyses assessed four common malnutrition risk screening tools against two reference standards (Subjective Global Assessment [SGA] and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism [ESPEN] criteria). The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) vs SGA had a sensitivity (95% Confidence Interval) of 0.84 (0.73-0.91), and specificity of 0.85 (0.75-0.91). The MUST vs ESPEN had a sensitivity of 0.97 (0.53-0.99) and specificity of 0.80 (0.50-0.94). The Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) vs SGA had a sensitivity of 0.81 (0.67-0.90) and specificity of 0.79 (0.72-0.74). The Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) vs ESPEN had a sensitivity of 0.99 (0.41-0.99) and specificity of 0.60 (0.45-0.73). The Nutrition Universal Screening Tool-2002 (NRS-2002) vs SGA had a sensitivity of 0.76 (0.58-0.87) and specificity of 0.86 (0.76-0.93).
    CONCLUSIONS: The MUST demonstrated high accuracy in detecting malnutrition risk in hospitalized adults. However, the quality of the studies included varied greatly, possibly introducing bias in the results. Future research should compare tools within a specific patient population using a valid and universal gold standard to ensure improved patient care and outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Preprint
    患有囊性纤维化(CF)的个体通常由于功能失调的囊性纤维化跨膜传导调节蛋白(CFTR)蛋白而对胰腺组织造成损害,导致上皮表面氯化物转运改变,随后发生囊性纤维化相关糖尿病(CFRD)。维生素D缺乏与CFRD的发展有关。这项研究的目的是检查大剂量推注胆钙化醇(维生素D3)对血糖控制的影响。这是对多中心的二次分析,双盲,随机化,在因急性肺加重(APE)住院的CF成人中进行安慰剂对照研究。在研究干预前和研究干预后12个月,通过血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)和空腹血糖水平评估血糖控制。入院后72小时内,参与者被随机分配到单剂量口服维生素D3(250,000IU)或安慰剂,随后,每隔一周接受50,000IU的维生素D3或安慰剂,从第3个月开始,到第12个月结束。父母研究的91名参与者中有50名符合二次分析的条件。在随机接受维生素D或安慰剂治疗的患者中,HbA1c或空腹血糖的12个月变化没有差异。大剂量推注维生素D3,然后维持补充维生素D3并不能改善CF患者的血糖控制。
    Individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) often incur damage to pancreatic tissue due to a dysfunctional cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, leading to altered chloride transport on epithelial surfaces and subsequent development of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD). Vitamin D deficiency has been associated with the development of CFRD. This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in adults with CF hospitalized for an acute pulmonary exacerbation (APE), known as the Vitamin D for the Immune System in Cystic Fibrosis (DISC) trial (NCT01426256). This was a pre-planned secondary analysis to examine if a high-dose bolus of cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) can mitigate declined glucose tolerance commonly associated with an acute pulmonary exacerbation (APE). Glycemic control was assessed by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and fasting blood glucose levels before and 12 months after the study intervention. Within 72 hours of hospital admission, participants were randomly assigned to a single dose of oral vitamin D3 (250,000 IU) or placebo, and subsequently, received 50,000 IU of vitamin D3 or placebo every other week, beginning at month 3 and ending on month 12. Forty-nine of the 91 participants in the parent study were eligible for the secondary analysis. There were no differences in 12-month changes in HbA1c or fasting blood glucose in participants randomized to vitamin D or placebo. A high-dose bolus of vitamin D3 followed by maintenance vitamin D3 supplementation did not improve glycemic control in patients with CF after an APE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:压力性损伤风险评估工具有几个众所周知的局限性。因此,评估风险的新方法正在出现,包括使用表皮下水分测量来检测局部水肿。
    目的:评估5天内骶骨表皮下水分测量的每日变化,并确定年龄和预防性骶骨敷料的使用是否影响这些测量。
    方法:作为使用预防性骶骨敷料的较大随机对照试验的一部分,我们在有压力损伤风险的住院内科和外科成年患者中进行了一项纵向观察性子研究.这项子研究是在2021年5月20日至2022年11月9日连续招募的患者中进行的。使用SEM200(BruinBiometricsLLC),完成长达5天的每日骶骨下表皮测量.产生两个测量值,最近的表皮下水分测量和,经过至少三次测量,delta值,最高值和最低值之间的差异。delta测量是结果,δ≥0.60被认为是异常的,增加压力损伤发展的风险。进行协方差的混合分析,以确定五天内δ测量值是否有任何变化,并确定年龄和骶骨预防性敷料的使用是否影响表皮下水分δ测量。
    结果:本研究共纳入392名参与者;160名(40.8%)患者完成了连续五天的骶骨表皮下水分δ测量。总的来说,在5个研究日期间进行1324个delta测量。总的来说,392例患者中有325例(82.9%)经历过一个或多个异常δ。此外,191例(48.7%)和96例(24.5%)患者连续两天或更多天以及三天或更长时间经历异常三角洲。随着时间的推移,骶骨下表皮下水分增量测量值没有统计学上的显着变化;在五天内,年龄的增加和预防性敷料的使用不会影响表皮下水分增量。
    结论:如果仅使用一个异常delta作为触发因素,约83%的患者会接受额外的压力损伤预防策略.但是,如果采取更细致入微的方法来应对异常增量,25%至50%的患者可能会接受额外的压力损伤预防,代表一种更有效的时间和资源方法。
    结论:表皮下水分δ测量值在5天内没有变化;年龄增长和预防性敷料使用不影响这些测量值。
    BACKGROUND: Pressure injury risk assessment tools have several well-known limitations. As a result, new methods of assessing risk are emerging, including the use of sub-epidermal moisture measurement to detect localized edema.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the daily variation in sacral sub-epidermal moisture measurement over five days and establish if age and prophylactic sacral dressing use influenced these measurements.
    METHODS: As part of a larger randomized controlled trial of the use of prophylactic sacral dressings, a longitudinal observational substudy was undertaken in hospitalized medical and surgical adult patients at risk of pressure injury. The substudy was conducted in consecutively recruited patients from 20 May 2021 to 9 November 2022. Using the SEM 200 (Bruin Biometrics LLC), daily sacral sub-epidermal measurements for up to five days were completed. Two measurements were generated, the most recent sub-epidermal moisture measurement and, after at least three measurements, a delta value, the difference between the highest and lowest values. The delta measurement was the outcome, with a delta of ≥0.60 considered abnormal, increasing the risk of pressure injury development. A mixed analysis of covariance was undertaken to determine if there was any change in delta measurements over the five days and to determine if age and sacral prophylactic dressing use influenced sub-epidermal moisture delta measurement.
    RESULTS: A total of 392 participants were included in this study; 160 (40.8%) patients had completed five consecutive days of sacral sub-epidermal moisture delta measurements. In total, 1324 delta measurements were undertaken across the five study days. In total, 325 of 392 patients (82.9%) had experienced one or more abnormal delta. Furthermore, 191 (48.7%) and 96 (24.5%) of patients experienced abnormal deltas for two or more and three or more consecutive days. There was no statistically significant variation in sacral sub-epidermal moisture delta measurements over time; increasing age and prophylactic dressing use did not influence sub-epidermal moisture deltas over the five days.
    CONCLUSIONS: If only one abnormal delta was used as a trigger, about 83% of patients would have received additional pressure injury prevention strategies. But, if a more nuanced approach to responding to abnormal deltas is taken, between 25 and 50% of patients may receive additional pressure injury prevention, representing a more time and resource efficient approach.
    CONCLUSIONS: Sub-epidermal moisture delta measurements did not vary over 5 days; increasing age and prophylactic dressing use did not influence these measurements.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管艰难梭菌感染(CDI)在美国的发病率很高,标准护理(SOC)粪便收集和检测实践可能导致发病率高估或低估.我们在路易斯维尔50岁以上的住院患者中进行了腹泻监测,肯塔基,美国,在2019年10月14日至2020年10月13日期间;同时进行SOC粪便收集和CDI检测。一项研究CDI病例是伪膜性结肠炎患者的核酸扩增试验-/细胞毒性中和试验-阳性或核酸扩增试验-阳性粪便。研究发生率根据住院份额和标本收集率进行了调整,在敏感性分析中,没有研究测试的腹泻病例。SOC住院CDI发病率为121/100,000人口/年;研究发病率为154/100,000人口/年,在敏感性分析中,202/100,000人口/年。在75例SOCCDI病例中,12例(16.0%)未被研究诊断;在109例研究CDI病例中,44例(40.4%)未诊断为SOC。基于SOCCDI测试的CDI发病率估计可能被低估。
    Although Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) incidence is high in the United States, standard-of-care (SOC) stool collection and testing practices might result in incidence overestimation or underestimation. We conducted diarrhea surveillance among inpatients >50 years of age in Louisville, Kentucky, USA, during October 14, 2019-October 13, 2020; concurrent SOC stool collection and CDI testing occurred independently. A study CDI case was nucleic acid amplification test‒/cytotoxicity neutralization assay‒positive or nucleic acid amplification test‒positive stool in a patient with pseudomembranous colitis. Study incidence was adjusted for hospitalization share and specimen collection rate and, in a sensitivity analysis, for diarrhea cases without study testing. SOC hospitalized CDI incidence was 121/100,000 population/year; study incidence was 154/100,000 population/year and, in sensitivity analysis, 202/100,000 population/year. Of 75 SOC CDI cases, 12 (16.0%) were not study diagnosed; of 109 study CDI cases, 44 (40.4%) were not SOC diagnosed. CDI incidence estimates based on SOC CDI testing are probably underestimated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在根据共识指南确定无症状镜下血尿(AMH)非手术住院患者中符合泌尿外科检查资格的比例。
    方法:研究人群包括2014年至2017年期间以色列地区医院内科急性入院的所有患者。
    结果:在29,086次连续入院中,10,116(34.8%)进行了试纸尿液分析,8,389(28.8%)进行了反射显微镜尿液分析。排除导尿管或尿培养阳性的患者后,2206个高功率场有3个或更多的红细胞,多达2,052例(占整个队列的7.1%和所有接受尿液显微分析的患者的24.4%)符合泌尿外科检查的标准.
    结论:我们得出结论,根据共识指南,由于偶然发现AMH,非手术住院患者中比例过高的患者将被转诊至临床应用不确定的泌尿外科检查.
    This study sought to determine the proportion of nonsurgical inpatients with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria (AMH) who qualified for urologic investigation according to consensus guidelines.
    The study population included all patients acutely admitted to the internal medicine departments of Israeli regional hospitals between 2014 and 2017.
    Of 29,086 consecutive admissions, 10,116 (34.8%) underwent dipstick urinalysis and 8,389 (28.8%) underwent reflex microscopic urinalysis. After the exclusion of patients with a urethral catheter or a positive urine culture, 2,206 had 3 or more RBCs per high-power field, and as many as 2,052 (7.1% of the entire cohort and 24.4% of all patients undergoing microscopic urinalysis) met the criteria for a urologic workup.
    We conclude that according to the consensus guidelines, an unreasonably high proportion of hospitalized nonsurgical patients would be referred for a urologic workup of uncertain clinical utility because of an incidental AMH finding.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:进行了综合综述,以综合已发表的关于预防和治疗低血糖和患者危险因素的证据,在使用静脉注射胰岛素和葡萄糖治疗高钾血症的成年患者中。
    方法:这篇综述遵循了Whittemore和Knafl的框架。纳入的论文仅限于涉及18岁及以上住院急性护理和急诊科的参与者的英语语言研究。文献检索使用五个电子数据库(CINAHL,Embase,PubMed,Proquest和Cochrane)。
    结果:共纳入22项研究。两个主要主题是派生的患者危险因素和预防干预策略。5个主要的患者危险因素是降低治疗前血糖(<7mmol/L),较低的重量,肾功能不全,老年和非糖尿病。预防干预策略中的四个子主题包括(i)静脉注射胰岛素和葡萄糖的给药和给药方法,(二)血糖监测频率,(iii)对医疗保健专业人员的教育和(iv)救援人员。
    结论:标准化的计算机化订单集和综合决策工具,可以根据患者的危险因素建议适当地处方更高的葡萄糖量或更低的胰岛素剂量,定期监测和加强教育可以预防和减轻低血糖的风险。
    OBJECTIVE: An integrative review was conducted to synthesize published evidence on the prevention and treatment of hypoglycaemia and patient risk factors, in adult patients treated for hyperkalaemia with intravenous insulin and dextrose.
    METHODS: This review followed the framework by Whittemore and Knafl. Papers included were limited to English language studies involving participants who were aged 18 years and above and admitted in the inpatient acute care and emergency departments. The literature search was performed using five electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, Proquest and Cochrane).
    RESULTS: A total of 22 studies were included. Two main themes were derived-patient risk factors and prevention-intervention strategies. Five main patient risk factors were lower pretreatment blood glucose (<7 mmol/L), lower weight, renal insufficiencies, older age and nondiabetic. The four subthemes in the prevention-intervention strategies included (i) methods of administration and dosing of intravenous insulin and dextrose, (ii) frequency of blood glucose monitoring, (iii) education to healthcare professionals and (iv) rescue agents.
    CONCLUSIONS: Standardized computerized order sets and integrated decision tool that can advise appropriate prescription of a higher volume of dextrose or lower insulin dose according to patient risk factors, regular monitoring and reinforced education may prevent and mitigate the risk of hypoglycaemia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    住院是由于环境原因,老年人急性睡眠不足的时期,medical,和患者因素。虽然住院患者在急病期间需要充分的休息和恢复,由于住院期间的急性睡眠损失,老年患者面临独特的风险。医院睡眠不足与更糟糕的健康结果有关,包括心脏代谢紊乱和谵妄风险增加。因为老年患者有多重用药和药物副作用的风险,首先推荐多种非药物干预措施,以改善住院老年人的睡眠损失.
    Hospitalization is a period of acute sleep deprivation for older adults due to environmental, medical, and patient factors. Although hospitalized patients are in need of adequate rest and recovery during acute illness, older patients face unique risks due to acute sleep loss during; hospitalization. Sleep loss in the hospital is associated with worse health outcomes, including; cardio-metabolic derangements and increased risk of delirium. Because older patients are at risk of; polypharmacy and medication side effects, a variety of nonpharmacological interventions are recommended first to improve sleep loss for hospitalized older adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Influenza is difficult to distinguish clinically from other acute respiratory infections. Rapid laboratory diagnosis can help initiate early effective antiviral treatment and isolation.
    OBJECTIVE: Implementing a novel point-of-care test (POCT) for influenza in the emergency department (ED) could improve treatment and isolation strategies and reduce the length-of-stay (LOS).
    METHODS: In a prospective, controlled observational cohort study, we enrolled patients admitted due to acute respiratory illness to two public hospitals in Bergen, Norway, one using a rapid POCT for influenza (n=400), the other (n=167) using conventional rapid lab-based assay.
    RESULTS: The prevalence of influenza was similar in the two hospitals (154/400, 38% versus 38%, 63/167, p=0.863), and most patients in both hospitals received antiviral (83% versus 81%,p=0.703) and antibiotic treatment (76% versus 73%, p= 0.469). Isolation was more often initiated in the ED in the hospital using POCT (91% versus 80%, p=0.025). Diagnosis by POCT was associated with shorter hospital stay, while old age, diabetes, cancer, use of antibiotics, particularly broad-spectrum antibiotics, were associated with prolonged stay.
    CONCLUSIONS: POCT implementation in the ED resulted in improved targeted isolation and shorter LOS. Regardless of POCT-use, most influenza patients received antivirals (>80%) and antibiotics (>70%).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号