Hospitalised

住院
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    南非的烟草死亡率很高,男性吸烟率为32.5%,女性吸烟率为25.6%。关于住院患者的吸烟率和戒烟意愿的数据有限,他们获得戒烟服务的机会有限。
    为了确定吸烟率和尼古丁戒断症状的程度,使用医院范围内的住院调查。
    在GrooteSchuur医院进行了为期1天的患病率调查,开普敦.所有病房除了血液隔离,评估了积极的劳动和精神科锁定病房。吸烟状况,戒断症状和戒烟欲望得以确立。
    85.8%的住院患者(n=501/584)确认了吸烟状态,其中31.9%(n=160)是当前吸烟者;43.5%(n=101/232)的男性和21.9%(n=59/269)的女性住院患者是吸烟者.在产科病房(100%)中,吸烟状况的记录和确认最高,在外科病房(79.6%)和重症监护病房(70.0%)中最低。吸烟率从男性手术患者的47.6%到产妇患者的15.2%不等。吸烟者中,54.5%的人表示有动机辞职,尼古丁依赖评分的中位数(四分位距)Fagerström测试为4(2-6),31.4%的人报告有中度至重度的吸烟欲望,在手术室最高。
    住院患者的吸烟率高于当地普通人群。许多住院病人对戒烟不感兴趣;然而,三分之一的人有明显的尼古丁戒断症状。应确定所有活跃吸烟者的住院患者,并给予普遍的简短戒烟建议。有严重戒断症状的病人应允许在室外吸烟,和尼古丁戒断药物治疗应提供给那些在当前入院期间卧床或表达戒烟愿望的人。
    这项研究补充了什么。GrooteSchuur医院活跃吸烟者的单数据点患病率研究,开普敦,进行了。住院患者的吸烟率高于一般社区,但并非所有吸烟者都由临床医生确认。尽管一些患者的尼古丁戒断症状很严重,戒烟动机与经历的戒断程度无关.许多患者没有戒烟的动力。对调查结果的影响。需要更好地识别住院吸烟者,所有人都应该得到戒烟建议。一些患者的戒断症状可能很严重,那些对戒烟不感兴趣的人应该被允许在外面吸烟,或者在医院接受尼古丁戒断药物治疗。那些愿意辞职的人应该尽可能得到支持,包括提供尼古丁替代疗法或伐尼克林,并在出院后跟进作为最佳做法。
    UNASSIGNED: South Africa has high tobacco-attributable mortality and a smoking prevalence of 32.5% in males and 25.6% in females. There are limited data on smoking prevalence and desire to quit in hospitalised patients, who have limited access to smoking cessation services.
    UNASSIGNED: To determine smoking prevalence and the extent of nicotine withdrawal symptoms, using a hospital-wide inpatient survey.
    UNASSIGNED: A 1-day point prevalence survey was conducted at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town. All wards except the haematology isolation, active labour and psychiatry lock-up wards were evaluated. Smoking status, withdrawal symptoms and desire to quit were established.
    UNASSIGNED: Smoking status was confirmed in 85.8% of inpatients (n=501/584), of whom 31.9% (n=160) were current smokers; 43.5% (n=101/232) of male and 21.9% (n=59/269) of female inpatients were smokers. Documentation and confirmation of smoking status was highest in the maternity wards (100%) and lowest in the surgical wards (79.6%) and intensive care units (70.0%). Smoking prevalence ranged from 47.6% in male surgical patients to 15.2% in maternity patients. Of the smokers, 54.5% reported being motivated to quit, with a median (interquartile range) Fagerström test for nicotine dependence score of 4 (2 - 6), and 31.4% reported moderate to severe cravings to smoke, highest in the surgical wards.
    UNASSIGNED: Smoking prevalence was higher in hospitalised patients than in the local general population. Many inpatients were not interested in quitting; however, a third had significant nicotine withdrawal symptoms. All inpatients who are active smokers should be identified and given universal brief smoking cessation advice. Patients with severe withdrawal symptoms should be allowed to smoke outside, and nicotine withdrawal pharmacotherapy should be provided to those who are bedbound or express a desire to stop smoking during the current admission.
    UNASSIGNED: What the study adds. A single data point prevalence study of active smokers at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, was conducted. The prevalence of smoking was higher in the hospitalised patients than in the general community, but not all smokers were identified by the clinicians. Although symptoms of nicotine withdrawal were severe in some patients, motivation to quit smoking was not related to the degree of withdrawal being experienced. Many patients were not motivated to quit smoking.Implications of the findings. Better identification of inpatient smokers is required, and all should be given smoking cessation advice. Withdrawal symptoms can be severe in some patients, and those who are not interested in stopping smoking should allowed to smoke outside or be provided with nicotine withdrawal pharmacotherapy while in hospital. Those who are willing to quit should be supported as well as possible, including provision of nicotine replacement therapy or varenicline, and followed up after discharge as best practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    长期缺勤是儿童和青少年时期的常见问题,并且在有躯体症状和相关疾病(SSRD)的患者中经常观察到。这项研究旨在确定缺勤的存在是否以及在多大程度上可能是住院患者中诊断SSRD的危险因素。这项匹配的队列研究包括8至17岁的儿童和青少年,从2021年到2023年被送往的里雅斯特的IRCCSBurloGarofolo儿科病房,他们分为两组,第一个包括因医疗原因缺课至少15天的儿童,第二个包括正常上学的儿童,按年龄和性别与前一组相匹配。我们连续招募了70名患者,缺席组35例,对照组35例。在缺席小组中,30/35(85.7%)患者被诊断为SSRD,而在对照组中,1/35(2.9%)被诊断为SSRD。缺席组被诊断为SSRD的风险比对照组高30倍(RR=30[95%CI=4.3-208];p<0.001)。这项研究表明,在住院儿童中,两周以上的学校缺勤史是诊断SSRD的重要危险因素.
    Chronic school absenteeism is a common problem in childhood and adolescence, and it is frequently observed in patients with somatic symptom and related disorders (SSRDs). This study aimed to determine whether and to what extent the presence of school absenteeism may be a risk factor for the diagnosis of SSRDs in hospitalised patients. This matched cohort study included children and adolescents aged between 8 and 17 years, admitted to the paediatric ward of the IRCCS Burlo Garofolo in Trieste from 2021 to 2023, who were divided into two groups, the first including children with at least 15 days of absence from school for medical reasons and the second including children with regular school attendance, matched to the former group by age and sex. We consecutively enrolled 70 patients, 35 in the absentee group and 35 in the control group. In the absentee group, 30/35 (85.7%) patients were diagnosed with an SSRD, while in the control group, 1/35 (2.9%) was diagnosed with an SSRD. The absentee group had a 30-fold higher risk of being diagnosed with SSRDs than the control group (RR = 30 [95% CI = 4.3-208]; p < 0.001). This study shows that in hospitalised children, a history of school absenteeism of more than two weeks is an important risk factor for the diagnosis of SSRDs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:全国各地的糖尿病住院专科服务各不相同,指导服务交付的证据有限。目前,糖尿病相关事件发生后,转诊给糖尿病住院专科医生通常是“反应性的”,与发病率/死亡率风险增加和住院时间增加相关。我们建议一种主动的糖尿病护理评估模式,由糖尿病住院专科护士提供,可能有助于预防此类糖尿病相关事件,并降低伤害风险。
    方法:我们将进行带有过程评估的集群随机可行性研究。主动糖尿病评估模型(PDRM)是一种复杂的干预措施,其重点是预防潜在的可改变的糖尿病相关危害。所有符合条件的患者将获得全面的,结构化的糖尿病审查,旨在通过使用标准化的审查结构来识别和预防潜在的可改变的糖尿病相关危害。糖尿病住院专科护士在入院后的一个工作日内进行审查。这与通常的护理不同,通常只有在发生与糖尿病相关的危害后才会看到患者。试验时间约为32周,全程干预交付。将会有一个为期8周的初始磨合阶段,接下来是24周的数据收集阶段。八个病房将同样随机分配给PDRM或常规护理。已知诊断为糖尿病的成年患者进入纳入病房将符合资格。数据收集将限于通常作为常规护理的一部分收集的数据。收集的数据将包括病房和患者水平的描述性数据以及血糖测量值,如毛细血管葡萄糖测试的频率和结果,酮症和低血糖事件。该分析旨在确定干预措施的保真度和可接受性以及未来确定性试验的可行性。虽然这项研究主要是关于试验的可行性,过程评估的结果可能导致试验过程的改变和干预措施的修改.定性过程评估将与试验并行进行。至少22名患者,护士,医生,和管理人员将被招募的方法包括直接非参与者观察和半结构化访谈。未来最终试验的可行性将通过评估招募和随机过程来评估。人力资源和可用数据的质量。
    结论:这项具有过程评估的整群随机可行性试验的目的是探索确定性试验的可行性并确定适当的结局指标。如果试验可行,并且可以评估PDRM的有效性,这可以为未来全国糖尿病住院服务的发展提供信息.
    背景:英国临床研究网络,51,167。ISRCTN,ISRCTN70402110。2022年2月21日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Diabetes inpatient specialist services vary across the country, with limited evidence to guide service delivery. Currently, referrals to diabetes inpatient specialists are usually \'reactive\' after diabetes-related events have taken place, which are associated with an increased risk of morbidity/mortality and increased length of hospital stay. We propose that a proactive diabetes review model of care, delivered by diabetes inpatient specialist nurses, may contribute to the prevention of such diabetes-related events and result in a reduction in the risk of harm.
    METHODS: We will conduct a cluster randomised feasibility study with process evaluation. The proactive diabetes review model (PDRM) is a complex intervention that focuses on the prevention of potentially modifiable diabetes-related harms. All eligible patients will receive a comprehensive, structured diabetes review that aims to identify and prevent potentially modifiable diabetes-related harms through utilising a standardised review structure. Reviews are undertaken by a diabetes inpatient specialist nurse within one working day of admission. This differs from usual care where patients are often only seen after diabetes-related harms have taken place. The trial duration will be approximately 32 weeks, with intervention delivery throughout. There will be an initial 8-week run-in phase, followed by a 24-week data collection phase. Eight wards will be equally randomised to either PDRM or usual care. Adult patients with a known diagnosis of diabetes admitted to an included ward will be eligible. Data collection will be limited to that typically collected as part of usual care. Data collected will include descriptive data at both the ward and patient level and glucose measures, such as frequency and results of capillary glucose testing, ketonaemia and hypoglycaemic events. The analysis aims to determine the fidelity and acceptability of the intervention and the feasibility of a future definitive trial. Whilst this study is primarily about trial feasibility, the findings of the process evaluation may lead to changes to both trial processes and modifications to the intervention. A qualitative process evaluation will be conducted in parallel to the trial. A minimum of 22 patients, nurses, doctors, and managers will be recruited with methods including direct non-participant observation and semi-structured interviews. The feasibility of a future definitive trial will be assessed by evaluating recruitment and randomisation processes, staffing resources and quality of available data.
    CONCLUSIONS: The aim of this cluster randomised feasibility trial with a process evaluation is to explore the feasibility of a definitive trial and identify appropriate outcome measures. If a trial is feasible and the effectiveness of PDRM can be evaluated, this could inform the future development of inpatient diabetes services nationally.
    BACKGROUND: UK Clinical Research Network, 51,167. ISRCTN, ISRCTN70402110. Registered on 21 February 2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在医院环境中确定儿童的最佳利益将理想地涉及儿童的综合观点,父母,和医疗保健专业人员。然而,很少有研究探索父母在参与医疗保健系统时对孩子最大利益的体验。因此,本研究旨在探讨父母在住院期间对孩子的最大利益的体验。使用面对面亲子组合访谈的描述性定性归纳设计,通过潜在内容分析进行分析,被使用。采访了从西澳大利亚州一家三级医院招募的16名父母。协作,发展可信赖的关系,和有效的沟通是必不可少的,以塑造父母的经验,他们的孩子在住院期间的最佳利益。
    Determining the child\'s best interests in a hospital setting will ideally involve the combined views of children, parents, and healthcare professionals. However, few studies have explored parents\' experiences of their child\'s best interests when they engage with the healthcare system. Therefore, this study aimed to explore parents\' experiences of their child\'s best interests during hospitalisation. A descriptive qualitative inductive design using face-to-face parent-child combined interviews, analysed by latent content analysis, was used. Sixteen parents recruited from a tertiary hospital in Western Australia were interviewed. Collaboration, development of trustworthy relationships, and effective communication were essential in shaping parents\' experiences of their child\'s best interests during hospitalisation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:早期支持放电(ESD)旨在将急性和社区护理联系起来,允许住院患者回家,继续从医疗保健专业人员那里获得必要的投入,否则他们将在医院接受。现有文献表明,该概念在中风住院患者和医疗老年人中的住院时间缩短。本系统评价旨在探讨在骨科投诉住院的老年人中使用ESD的全部证据。
    方法:对Cochrane库(CENTRAL)中的Cochrane对照试验中央登记册进行文献检索,EMBASE,CINAHL和MEDLINE在EBSCO于1月10日进行,2024.研究设计包括随机对照试验或准随机对照试验。对于质量评估,使用Cochrane偏差风险工具2.0,并应用GRADE评估证据的确定性。急性住院时间是主要结果。次要结果包括下降人数和功能。使用RevMan软件5.4.1进行汇总荟萃分析。
    结果:七项针对骨科手术后老年人群的研究符合纳入标准,5项研究纳入荟萃分析。研究质量主要是偏倚的高风险。有利于ESD干预的统计学显著影响仅在住院时间方面可见(FEM,MD=-5.57,95%CI-7.07至-4.08,I2=0%)。在次要结局中,没有统计学意义的影响有利于ESD干预。
    结论:在患有骨科疾病的老年人群中,ESD可以在减少住院时间方面具有统计学上显著的影响。这项审查确定了现有的证据基础不足,无法确定ESD对该人群的主要好处。该领域需要进一步开展更高质量的研究,使用标准化的干预措施和结果措施。
    BACKGROUND: Early supported discharge (ESD) aims to link acute and community care, allowing hospital inpatients to return home, continuing to receive the necessary input from healthcare professionals that they would otherwise receive in hospital. Existing literature demonstrates the concept having a reduced length of stay in stroke inpatients and medical older adults. This systematic review aims to explore the totality of evidence for the use of ESD in older adults hospitalised with orthopaedic complaints.
    METHODS: A literature search of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), EMBASE, CINAHL and MEDLINE in EBSCO was carried out on January 10th, 2024. Randomised controlled trials or quasi-randomised controlled trials were the study designs included. For quality assessment, The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 was used and GRADE was applied to evaluate the certainty of evidence. Acute hospital length of stay was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the numbers of fallers and function. A pooled meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan software 5.4.1.
    RESULTS: Seven studies with a population of older adults post orthopaedic surgery met inclusion criteria, with five studies included in the meta-analysis. Study quality was predominantly of a high risk of bias. Statistically significant effects favouring ESD interventions were only seen in terms of length of stay (FEM, MD = -5.57, 95% CI -7.07 to -4.08, I2 = 0%). No statistically significant effects favouring ESD interventions were established in secondary outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the older adult population with orthopaedic complaints, ESD can have a statistically significant impact in reducing hospital length of stay. This review identifies an insufficient existing evidence base to establish the key benefits of ESD for this population group. There is a need for further higher quality research in the area, with standardised interventions and outcome measures used.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项研究调查了:(1)与最大程度的高血糖相关的皮质类固醇的类型,使用床旁毛细血管血糖监测进行评估,(2)使用每种类型的皮质类固醇的全天高血糖模式。
    方法:这种单中心,回顾性研究使用了964例接受口服或静脉应用皮质类固醇治疗的成年住院患者的数据.收集毛细血管血糖浓度和7天所用时间的数据。应用用于重复测量的混合模型来研究使用四种不同的皮质类固醇的葡萄糖浓度随时间的变化。自回归协方差结构用于对重复测量之间的相关性进行建模。
    结果:在所有7天内,与氢化可的松相比,地塞米松的平均血糖浓度更高(平均差,16.6mg/dL[95%CI,8.1-24.8][0.92mmol/L(95%CI,0.45-1.38)])或泼尼松龙(平均差,20.0mg/dL[95%CI,14.2-25.7][1.11mmol/L(95%CI,0.79-1.43)])。与氢化可的松相比,甲基强的松龙的平均血糖浓度更高(平均差,23.9mg/dL[95%CI,11.3-36.4][1.33mmol/L(95%CI,0.63-2.02)]),甲基强的松龙与强的松龙(平均差,27.4mg/dL[95%CI,16.4-38.3][1.52mmol/L(95%CI,0.91-2.13)])。每种皮质类固醇在一天中的六个时间点的高血糖模式没有显着差异。
    结论:与泼尼松龙和氢化可的松相比,口服或静脉注射地塞米松或甲基泼尼松龙治疗与更高的高血糖相关。更有力的监测和干预,必要时,建议在接受皮质类固醇的成年住院患者中,特别是地塞米松和甲基强的松龙。
    This study investigated: (1) the type of corticosteroid associated with the greatest degree of hyperglycemia, assessed using bedside capillary blood glucose monitoring, in hospitalized patients; and (2) the pattern of hyperglycemia throughout the day with the use of each type of corticosteroid.
    This single-center, retrospective study used data from 964 adult inpatients receiving oral or IV corticosteroids. Data on capillary blood glucose concentrations and time taken over 7 days were collected. A mixed model for repeated measures was applied to investigate changes in glucose concentration over time with the use of four different corticosteroids. An autoregressive covariance structure was used to model correlations between repeated measurements.
    Across all 7 days, the mean blood glucose concentration was greater with dexamethasone compared to that with hydrocortisone (mean difference, 16.6 mg/dL [95% CI, 8.1-24.8] [0.92 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.45-1.38)]) or prednisolone (mean difference, 20.0 mg/dL [95% CI, 14.2-25.7] [1.11 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.79-1.43)]). The mean blood glucose concentration was greater with methylprednisolone compared to that with hydrocortisone (mean difference, 23.9 mg/dL [95% CI, 11.3-36.4] [1.33 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.63-2.02)]), and with methylprednisolone versus prednisolone (mean difference, 27.4 mg/dL [95% CI, 16.4-38.3] [1.52 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.91-2.13)]). There were no significant differences in the patterns of hyperglycemia at six time points of the day with each type of corticosteroid.
    Treatment with oral or IV dexamethasone or methylprednisolone was associated with greater hyperglycemia in comparison to prednisolone and hydrocortisone. More vigorous monitoring and intervention, when necessary, are suggested in adult inpatients receiving corticosteroids, in particular dexamethasone and methylprednisolone.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管全球文献表明与2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关的各种神经和/或神经精神表现(NNM)和并发症,非洲大陆感染住院患者中有关NNM的信息仍然有限.
    为了描述NNM的表现,并比较有和没有NNM的患者,考虑人口统计学和临床特征,治疗,和结果。
    Tygerberg医院,开普敦,南非。
    对前100名连续入院的COVID-19患者(64名女性,平均年龄47.6岁),在2020年3月至6月之间。
    在分析中纳入的98名患者中,56.1%的人至少有一个NNM。最常见的NNM是肌痛(32.7%),头痛(21.4%),气味和/或味道损失(15.3%),和谵妄(10.2%)。有和没有NNM的患者在人口统计学特征方面没有差异。NNM患者的体质症状明显增多(p=0.017),并且更有可能患有神经系统和/或神经精神合并症(10.9%vs.0.0%,p=0.033)比没有NNM的那些。没有记录NNM的患者比NNM的患者更可能在胸部X射线上有异常(p=0.009)。2019年冠状病毒疾病相关治疗和死亡率在组间没有差异。
    在COVID-19住院患者中,神经系统和/或神经精神表现很常见。结果表明,尽管患有NNM的COVID-19患者的呼吸表型可能较少,但他们的死亡率相当。
    这项研究强调了在大流行早期入住Tygerberg医院的COVID-19患者中常见的NNM,并增加了COVID-19NNM的越来越多的证据。
    UNASSIGNED: Although literature globally indicates varied neurological and/or neuropsychiatric manifestations (NNM) and complications associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), information about NNM in infected hospitalised patients on the African continent remains limited.
    UNASSIGNED: To describe the presentation of NNM and compare patients with and without NNM considering demographic and clinical profiles, treatment, and outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospective medical record review of the first 100 consecutively admitted COVID-19 patients (64 females, mean age 47.6 years) between March and June 2020.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 98 patients included in the analysis, 56.1% had at least one NNM. The most common NNM were myalgia (32.7%), headache (21.4%), loss of smell and/or taste (15.3%), and delirium (10.2%). Patients with and without NNM did not differ with respect to demographic characteristics. Patients with NNM had significantly more constitutional symptoms (p = 0.017) and were more likely to have neurological and/or neuropsychiatric comorbid conditions (10.9% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.033) than those without NNM. Patients without documented NNM were more likely to have abnormalities on chest X-ray (p = 0.009) than those with NNM. Coronavirus disease 2019 related treatment and mortality did not differ between the groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Neurological and/or neuropsychiatric manifestations were common in hospitalised patients with COVID-19. The results suggest that while COVID-19 patients with NNM may have less of a respiratory phenotype they nonetheless have equivalent mortality rates.
    UNASSIGNED: This study highlights the common NNM in patients with COVID-19 admitted to Tygerberg Hospital early in the pandemic and adds to the growing evidence of COVID-19 NNM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性病毒性呼吸道感染已被证明是一个主要的健康威胁,即使在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行之后。我们的目的是检查是否存在急性呼吸道感染,如COVID-19,是否会影响老年住院患者的身体活动。我们对年龄≥60岁的患者进行了横断面研究,大流行期间在大学医院的非COVID-19和COVID-19病房住院,克拉科夫,波兰。使用ActivPAL3®技术,我们评估了入院和出院时24小时的体力活动。此外,我们应用了肌肉减少症筛查工具(SARC-F);测量了手握力和小腿围;并评估了改良的早期预警评分(MEWS),年龄调整后的Charlson指数,SpO2%,和停留时间(LoS)。使用SAS9.4分析数据。均值(min,最大)31岁(58%女性,8例COVID-19)连续患者为79.0(分别为62、101)年。每日时间(activPAL3®,中位数[p5,p95],以小时为单位)入院时坐着或躺着的时间为23.7[17.2,24],出院时的时间为23.5[17.8,24]。入院时站立时间为0.23[0.0,5.0],出院时站立时间为0.4[0.0,4.6]。步行的相应值为0.0[0.0,0.4]和0.1[0.0,0.5]。SARC-F,入场手握力,小腿周长,LoS与入院和出院时的体力活动相关(所有p<0.04)。SARC-F每增加一个单位,出院时步行时间缩短了0.07h。上述结果在患有和不患有COVID-19的患者之间没有差异。大流行期间住院的老年患者的体育锻炼水平很低,入院时依赖于肌肉功能,但不依赖于COVID-19状态。这对大流行临床情景以外的情景有影响。
    Acute viral respiratory infections have proven to be a major health threat, even after the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We aimed to check whether the presence or absence of an acute respiratory infection such as COVID-19 can influence the physical activity of older hospitalised patients. We cross-sectionally studied patients aged ≥60 years, hospitalized during the pandemic in the non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 ward at the University Hospital, Kraków, Poland. Using activPAL3® technology, we assessed physical activity for 24 h upon admission and discharge. In addition, we applied the sarcopenia screening tool (SARC-F); measured the hand grip strength and calf circumference; and assessed the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), age-adjusted Charlson Index, SpO2%, and length of stay (LoS). Data were analysed using SAS 9.4. The mean (min, max) age of the 31 (58% women, eight with COVID-19) consecutive patients was 79.0 (62, 101, respectively) years. The daily time (activPAL3®, median [p5, p95], in hours) spent sitting or reclining was 23.7 [17.2, 24] upon admission and 23.5 [17.8, 24] at discharge. The time spent standing was 0.23 [0.0, 5.0] upon admission and 0.4 [0.0, 4.6] at discharge. The corresponding values for walking were 0.0 [0.0, 0.4] and 0.1 [0.0, 0.5]. SARC-F, admission hand grip strength, calf circumference, and LoS were correlated with physical activity upon admission and discharge (all p < 0.04). For every unit increase in SARC-F, there was a 0.07 h shorter walking time upon discharge. None of the above results differed between patients with and without COVID-19. The level of physical activity in older patients hospitalised during the pandemic was low, and was dependent on muscular function upon admission but not on COVID-19 status. This has ramifications for scenarios other than pandemic clinical scenarios.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    我们的研究旨在评估比较脊髓内侧支神经根阻滞干预与标准治疗椎体成形术治疗脆弱的疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体骨折的可行性结果。住院的老年患者。我们发现这项研究是可行的,现在提出了临床有效性,成本效益和安全性评估。
    背景:椎体成形术(VP)是一种关键孔程序,涉及将骨水泥注入骨折的椎体,减轻疼痛,增加椎体稳定性,尽管它与并发症的风险很小有关,特别是在虚弱的时候,老年住院患者。内侧支脊髓神经阻滞(MBNB)可能是缓解疼痛症状的替代治疗方法。并发症少;然而,没有研究前瞻性地比较临床有效性,MBNB至VP的成本效益和安全性,在脆弱的,老年住院患者。我们研究的目的是进行第一阶段的可行性研究,探索招聘,保留率和几个结果度量(均值和SDs),与定性访谈一起评估参与者和临床医生的观点,告知一个明确的更大的研究。
    方法:我们进行了一项双臂可行性随机对照试验,参与者被分配继续接受常规手术治疗-VP或MBNB治疗。进行嵌入式定性研究。数据是在基线时收集的,第1周、第4周和第8周。
    结果:在40名符合条件的患者中,30人(75%)同意参加研究。从随机分组到干预的总中位时间为3天,IQR1-7天,VP为5(1-7)天,MBNB为2(1-3)天。VP组的住院时间中位数(IQR)为20(8)天,MBNB为15(22)天。在第1周、第4周和第8周,结果数据收集的完整性比例至少为77%:14(100%),VP为12(85.7%)和11(78.9%),VP为13(100%),MBNB为12(92.3%)和10(76.8%),分别。两组的临床结局和不良事件无显著差异。
    结论:我们的研究在实现目标招聘方面是可行的,参与者坚持随机分组,8周结束时数据的完整性至少为77%(目标75%).我们现在计划进行明确的临床疗效,成本效益和安全性结果研究,将VP与MBNB进行比较,老年患者因急性椎体骨质疏松性骨折住院。
    Our study aimed to assess the feasibility outcomes comparing spinal medial branch nerve root block intervention to standard care vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures in frail, hospitalised older patients. We found the study to be feasible and now propose a clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and safety evaluation.
    Vertebroplasty (VP) is a key-hole procedure involving injection of bone cement into a fractured vertebral body, to reduce pain and increase vertebral body stability, although it is associated with a small risk of complications, particularly in frail, older hospitalised patients. Medial branch spinal nerve block (MBNB) may be an alternative treatment to alleviate pain symptoms, with less complications; however, no study has prospectively compared the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and safety of MBNB to VP, in frail, older hospitalised patients. The aim of our study was to conduct a 1st stage feasibility study, exploring recruitment, retention and several outcomes measures (means and SDs), together with qualitative interviews to assess participant and clinician views, to inform a definitive larger study.
    We conducted a two-arm feasibility randomised controlled trial with participants allocated to continue with routine surgical care-VP or MBNB treatment, with an embedded qualitative study. Data was collected at baseline, week 1, 4, and week 8.
    Out of 40 eligible patients, 30 (75%) consented to take part in the study. The overall median time from randomisation to intervention was 3 days, IQR 1-7 days, 5 (1-7) days for VP and 2 (1-3) days for MBNB. Median (IQR) length of hospital stay for the VP group was 20 (8) days and for the MBNB 15(22) days. The proportion of completeness of outcome data collection at weeks 1, 4 and 8 was at least 77%: 14 (100%), 12 (85.7%) and 11(78.9%) for VP and 13 (100%), 12 (92.3%) and 10 (76.8%) for MBNB, respectively. There were no significant difference in the clinical outcomes or adverse events between the two groups.
    Our study was feasible in achieving is target recruitment, participants adhered to the randomisation and at least 77% completeness of data at the 8 week end-point (target 75%). We now plan to conduct a definitive clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and safety outcome study, comparing VP to MBNB in frail, older patients hospitalised with an acute vertebral osteoporotic fracture.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:精神疾病会对孕妇和未出生的孩子产生负面影响。使用创造性艺术作为干预措施的研究已被证明对妇女的产前心理健康和福祉有益,然而,这些研究是有限和紧急的。音乐,绘画和叙事(MDN)是一种既定的音乐疗法干预,源于引导图像和音乐(GIM),有可能支持积极的心理健康和福祉。然而,到目前为止,对住院产前妇女使用这种疗法的研究有限。
    目的:描述产前住院妇女参与MDN课程的经历。
    方法:从12名住院孕妇的样本中收集定性数据,这些孕妇参加了MDN小组会议的音乐绘画。干预后访谈探讨了参与者的心理和情绪健康。对转录的访谈数据进行了主题分析。
    结果:通过反思,支持女性承认怀孕的积极和困难,并通过分享经验建立有意义的联系。这些专题调查结果强调,MDN使这组孕妇能够更好地表达自己的感受,验证情绪,积极分散注意力,发展更大的联系,提高乐观度,体验平静,向别人学习。
    结论:该项目表明MDN可能为支持高危妊娠妇女提供可行的方法。
    BACKGROUND: Mental illness can have negative effects on both the pregnant woman and her unborn child. Studies that use the creative arts as interventions have proven to be beneficial to women\'s antenatal mental health and wellbeing, however, these studies are limited and emergent. Music, drawing and narrative (MDN) is an established music therapy intervention, stemming from guided imagery and music (GIM), that has the potential to support positive mental health and wellbeing. Yet, to date, there have been limited studies on the use of this form of therapy with inpatient antenatal women.
    OBJECTIVE: To describe antenatal inpatient women\'s experiences of participating in a MDN session.
    METHODS: Qualitative data were collected from a sample of 12 inpatient pregnant women who participated in MDN group sessions of drawing to music. Post intervention interviews explored the mental and emotional health of participants. A thematic analysis of the transcribed interview data was performed.
    RESULTS: Through reflection women were supported to acknowledge both the positives and difficulties of pregnancy as well as establish meaningful connections through shared experience. These thematic findings highlighted that MDN enabled this group of pregnant women to better communicate their feelings, validate emotions, engage in positive distractions, develop greater connections, improve optimism, experience calmness, and learn from others.
    CONCLUSIONS: This project demonstrates that MDN may offer a viable method for supporting women experiencing high risk pregnancies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号