Hospital Mortality

医院死亡率
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在西方,与广泛的肺炎严重程度指数(PSI)不同,国家早期预警评分2(NEWS2)通常仅使用床旁变量来预测疾病的严重程度。这项研究的目的是比较这些得分作为社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者的死亡率预测因子。这项横断面研究是在Jinnah研究生医学中心进行的,卡拉奇,巴基斯坦,2020年对116例CAP患者进行了6个月的随访。吸入性肺炎病例,医院获得性肺炎,肺结核,肺栓塞,排除肺水肿。院内死亡率作为这项研究的结果。参与者的平均年龄为46.9±20.5岁。住院死亡率为45例(38.8%)。NEWS2在预测结果方面的敏感性为97.8%,但特异性仅为15.5%。而PSI较不敏感(68.9%)但更具体(50.7%),这表明与PSI相比,NEWS2是住院CAP患者中更敏感的死亡率预测评分。
    In the West, National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) is commonly applied to predict the severity of illness using only bedside variables unlike the extensive Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI). The objective of this study was to compare these scores as mortality predictors in patients admitted with community acquired pneumonia (CAP). This cross-sectional study was conducted in Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan, for six months in 2020 on 116 patients presenting with CAP. Cases of aspiration pneumonia, hospital acquired pneumonia, pulmonary tuberculosis, pulmonary embolism, and pulmonary oedema were excluded. In-hospital mortality was taken as the outcome of this study. The mean age of the participants was 46.9±20.5 years. The in-hospital mortalities were 45(38.8%). NEWS2 was 97.8% sensitive but only 15.5% specific in predicting the outcome, whereas PSI was less sensitive (68.9%) but more specific (50.7%), which showed that in comparison with PSI, NEWS2 is a more sensitive mortality predicting score among hospitalised CAP patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19大流行构成了全球挑战,导致外科服务发生根本性变化。该研究的主要目的是评估COVID-19对巴西大都市地区择期手术和紧急手术的影响。次要目标是比较大流行之前和期间的术后住院死亡率。
    时间序列队列研究,包括在联邦区公共卫生系统医院接受择期或急诊手术的所有患者的数据,巴西,2018年3月至2022年2月,使用2022年9月30日从巴西卫生部医院信息系统(SIH/DATASUS)提取的数据。使用因果影响分析来评估COVID-19对择期和急诊手术以及医院死亡率的影响。
    在研究期间有174,473例手术。总体下降(每周绝对效果:-227.5;95%CI:-307.0至-149.0),选修(每周绝对效果:-170.9;95%CI:-232.8至-112.0),COVID-19期间的急诊手术(每周绝对效果:-57.7;95%CI:-87.5至-27.7)。比较COVID-19发病前后的手术,急诊手术增加了(53.0%对68.8%,P<0.001),住院时间无统计学意义(P=0.112)。COVID-19大流行对术后住院死亡率的影响无统计学意义(每周绝对效应:2.1,95%CI:-0.01至4.2)。
    我们的研究表明,在COVID-19大流行期间,选择性手术和紧急手术减少,可能是由于手术服务中断。这些发现强调,实施有效的策略以防止危机时期手术等待名单的积累并改善手术患者的预后至关重要。
    UNASSIGNED: The COVID-19 pandemic posed a worldwide challenge, leading to radical changes in surgical services. The primary objective of the study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 on elective and emergency surgeries in a Brazilian metropolitan area. The secondary objective was to compare the postoperative hospital mortality before and during the pandemic.
    UNASSIGNED: Time-series cohort study including data of all patients admitted for elective or emergency surgery at the hospitals in the Public Health System of Federal District, Brazil, between March 2018 and February 2022, using data extracted from the Hospital Information System of Brazilian Ministry of Health (SIH/DATASUS) on September 30, 2022. A causal impact analysis was used to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on elective and emergency surgeries and hospital mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 174,473 surgeries during the study period. There was a reduction in overall (absolute effect per week: -227.5; 95% CI: -307.0 to -149.0), elective (absolute effect per week: -170.9; 95% CI: -232.8 to -112.0), and emergency (absolute effect per week: -57.7; 95% CI: -87.5 to -27.7) surgeries during the COVID-19 period. Comparing the surgeries performed before and after the COVID-19 onset, there was an increase in emergency surgeries (53.0% vs 68.8%, P < 0.001) and no significant hospital length of stay (P = 0.112). The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on postoperative hospital mortality was not statistically significant (absolute effect per week: 2.1, 95% CI: -0.01 to 4.2).
    UNASSIGNED: Our study showed a reduction in elective and emergency surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic, possibly due to disruptions in surgical services. These findings highlight that it is crucial to implement effective strategies to prevent the accumulation of surgical waiting lists in times of crisis and improve outcomes for surgical patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用评分系统有助于更快地识别败血症患者,尤其是那些有致命危险的人.最佳评分系统不存在,所以寻找最优的总是当前的。这项研究的目的是评估六个评分系统在预测急诊科败血症患者24小时死亡率方面的预后价值。
    方法:在贝尔格莱德塞尔维亚大学临床中心(UCCS)急诊中心(EC)的急诊分诊室(ETR)进行了一项观察性回顾性研究。连续败血症患者,根据脓毒症-3的定义,不管有没有休克,本研究将患者提交给ETR,然后在重症监护病房住院。从医院信息系统或国家死亡率数据库中提取24小时内和第28天的死亡率数据。评分系统包括序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA),快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA),全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS),国家预警评分(NEWS),急诊脓毒症患者评估(SPEED),并利用现有数据对所有患者的急诊脓毒症(MEDS)死亡率进行分析.这项研究的主要结果是在分诊后24小时内死亡。使用接收器操作特征(ROC)分析来确定最有效的评分系统。然后将乳酸盐添加到该系统中以提高其预测准确性。
    结果:纳入研究的120例患者中有19例(15.8%)在分诊后24小时内死亡。28天死亡率为55%。SOFA评分对24小时死亡率的预测价值最高,但总体上只有中等程度的预测。受试者工作曲线下面积(AUC)为0.755(95%CI0.625-0.885)。速度,MEDS,和NEVS表现出适度的辨别能力[0.673(95%CI0.543-0.803),0.665(95%CI0.536-0.794),0.630(95%CI0.528-0.724)],而SIRS和qSOFA在预测24小时死亡率方面仍然微不足道。添加乳酸可提高SOFA评分的预测值(AUC0.865,95%CI0.736-0.995;p=0.0081)。所有评分对28天死亡率表现出更好和令人满意的预测能力。
    结论:SOFA,加入乳酸,是一种复杂但可靠的工具,用于对急诊科就诊的败血症患者进行早期分层。
    OBJECTIVE: The use of scoring systems contributes to the faster identification of septic patients, especially those at a high risk of a fatal outcome. The best scoring system does not exist, so the search for the optimal one is always current. The aim of this study is to estimate the prognostic value of the six scoring systems in predicting 24-hour mortality among septic patients presented at the emergency department.
    METHODS: An observational retrospective study was conducted in the Emergency Triage Room (ETR) of the Emergency Center (EC) at the University Clinical Center of Serbia (UCCS) in Belgrade. Consecutive septic patients, according to the Sepsis-3 definition, with or without shock, presented to the ETR and then hospitalized in Intensive Care Units were included in the study. Mortality data within 24 h and on the 28th day were extracted from the Hospital information system or the National mortality database. Scoring systems including sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), National early warning score (NEWS), sepsis patient evaluation in the emergency department (SPEED), and mortality in emergency department sepsis (MEDS) were analyzed for all patients utilizing the available data. The primary outcome of this study was death within 24 hours of triage. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the most effective scoring system. Lactate was then added to this system to enhance its predictive accuracy.
    RESULTS: Nineteen out of 120 patients included in the study (15.8%) experienced death within 24 hours of triage. The twenty-eight-day mortality rate was 55%. SOFA score demonstrated the highest predictive value for 24-hour mortality but was only moderately predictive overall, with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.755 (95% CI 0.625-0.885). SPEED, MEDS, and NEVS exhibited modest discriminatory power [0.673 (95% CI 0.543-0.803), 0.665 (95% CI 0.536-0.794), 0.630 (95% CI 0.528-0.724)], while SIRS and qSOFA remained insignificant in predicting 24-hour mortality. The predictive value of the SOFA score was increased by the addition of lactate (AUC 0.865, 95% CI 0.736-0.995; p=0.0081). All scores demonstrated better and satisfactory predictive power for 28-day mortality.
    CONCLUSIONS: SOFA, with the addition of lactate, is a complex but reliable tool for the early stratification of septic patients who are presenting at an emergency department.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者中使用无创通气仍存在争议。由于高患者量和全球资源紧张,COVID-19大流行带来了挑战。
    目的:确定在因SARS-CoV-2肺炎引起的中度至重度ARDS的成年患者中使用无创通气之间的关系,进展到插管,医院死亡率。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了机构COVID-19注册的患者。如果成年患者在2020年3月1日至2022年3月31日期间因COVID-19入院,并发展为中度至重度ARDS,则将其包括在内。主要结果是接受无创通气或机械通气患者的插管进展和住院死亡率。次要结果是无插管无创通气治疗成功。
    结果:在823名符合纳入标准的患者中,454例(55.2%)未接受无创通气,369例(44.8%)接受无创通气。接受无创通气的患者比未接受无创通气的患者更可能需要机械通气。在需要气管插管的患者中,接受无创通气的患者死亡的可能性较高.与未接受无创通气的患者相比,接受无创通气的患者在没有插管的情况下出院的严重程度调整后的生存几率较低。
    结论:接受无创通气治疗的SARS-CoV-2肺炎导致的中度至重度ARDS患者进展为气管插管和住院死亡率的可能性增加。
    BACKGROUND: Use of noninvasive ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is debated. The COVID-19 pandemic posed challenges due to high patient volumes and worldwide resource strain.
    OBJECTIVE: To determine associations between use of noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with moderate to severe ARDS due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, progression to intubation, and hospital mortality.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients in an institutional COVID-19 registry. Adult patients were included if they were admitted for COVID-19 between March 1, 2020, and March 31, 2022, and developed moderate to severe ARDS. Primary outcomes were progression to intubation and hospital mortality in patients who received noninvasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation. A secondary outcome was successful treatment with noninvasive ventilation without intubation.
    RESULTS: Of 823 patients who met inclusion criteria, 454 (55.2%) did not receive noninvasive ventilation and 369 (44.8%) received noninvasive ventilation. Patients receiving noninvasive ventilation were more likely to require mechanical ventilation than were patients not receiving noninvasive ventilation. Among patients requiring endotracheal intubation, those receiving noninvasive ventilation had a higher likelihood of mortality. Patients receiving noninvasive ventilation had lower severity-adjusted odds of survival to discharge without intubation than did patients not receiving noninvasive ventilation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with moderate to severe ARDS due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treated with noninvasive ventilation had increased likelihood of progression to endotracheal intubation and hospital mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估最初进入麻醉科和重症监护病房的院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的死亡率和预后,并与最初进入心脏中心(CC)的患者进行比较。
    背景:全球急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)登记通常会忽略最初进入麻醉科和重症监护病房的OHCA患者。这种排除可能导致全球急性MI后患者死亡率被低估。
    方法:对2014年在单中心(麻醉科和重症监护室)住院的患者进行了回顾性分析,普雷索夫的J.A.Reiman教学医院,斯洛伐克。在医院评估生存率,在30天,在五年内每年。分别对STEMI和NSTEMI患者进行分析,特别是在医院早期阶段。
    结果:在OHCA组中,52%的STEMI患者经历了院内死亡,而CC组仅报告3%的死亡率。STEMI患者的总住院死亡率为6.69%。在OHCA组的NSTEMI患者中,住院死亡率达到50%,CC组为4.33%。所有NSTEMI患者的中心总死亡率为6.09%。
    结论:尽管OHCAMI患者的短期预后不良,30天死亡率为54.9%,对于那些在心脏骤停后存活了最初30天并成功出院的人,长期预后与无OHCA的MI患者一致。根据这些发现,将所有MI患者(来自OHCA组和CC组)纳入全球ACS登记可显著提高院内死亡率和30日死亡率(表.3,图。4,参考。21).
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the mortality and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) initially admitted to Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care in comparison with patients initially admitted to Cardiac Centre (CC).
    BACKGROUND: Global acute coronary syndrome (ACS) registries often omit patients with OHCA initially admitted to anaesthesiology and intensive care units. This exclusion may lead to underestimated mortality rates in patients following acute MI worldwide.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted in patients admitted in 2014 to the (Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care) at a single center, J.A. Reiman Teaching Hospital in Presov, Slovakia. Survival rates were evaluated in-hospital, at 30 days, and annually over a five-year period. Patients with STEMI and NSTEMI were analyzed separately, particularly during the early in-hospital phase.
    RESULTS: In the OHCA group, 52% of STEMI patients experienced in-hospital mortality, whereas the CC group reported only 3% mortality. The total hospital mortality for STEMI patients was 6.69%. Among NSTEMI patients in the OHCA group, in-hospital mortality reached 50%, compared to 4.33% in the CC group. The total center mortality for all NSTEMI patients was 6.09%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although the short-term prognosis for MI patients with OHCA is unfavorable, with a 30-day mortality rate of 54.9%, for those who survive the initial 30 days following cardiac arrest and are successfully discharged from the hospital, the long-term prognosis aligns with MI patients without OHCA. In light of these findings, the inclusion of all patients with MI (from both OHCA and CC groups) in global ACS registries could significantly raise in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates (Tab. 3, Fig. 4, Ref. 21).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)被认为是死亡率和其他主要心脏事件的预后生物标志物。这项研究调查了NLR在预测接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的院内和长期预后方面的功效。
    方法:电子数据库(PUBMED,科克伦中部,ERIC,Embase,奥维德,和GoogleScholar)一直搜索到2022年6月,以确定接受PCI的STEMI患者的研究。风险比和平均差异(MD),以及它们相应的95%置信区间(Cis)和标准偏差(SD),使用随机效应模型进行汇总。该荟萃分析已在Prospero上注册(ID:CRD42022344072)。
    结果:共纳入35项研究,共28,756名患者。汇总估计显示主要结局的发生率增加;院内全因死亡率(RR=3.52;95%CI=2.93-4.24),长期全因死亡率(HR=1.07;95%CI=1.00-1.14),(RR=3.32;95%CI=2.57-4.30);院内心血管死亡率(RR=2.66;95%CI=2.04-3.48),长期心血管死亡率(RR=6.67;95%CI=4.06-10.95);院内主要不良心血管事件(MACE)(RR=1.31;95%CI=1.17-1.46),长期MACE(RR=2.92;95%CI=2.16-3.94);NLR高患者与NLR低患者相比的住院时间(WMD=0.60天;95%CI=0.40-0.79).
    结论:NLR可能是对接受PCI的STEMI患者进行预后(院内)和分层的有价值的工具。
    BACKGROUND: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been considered a prognostic biomarker of mortality and other major cardiac events. This study investigates NLR\'s efficacy in predicting in-hospital and long-term outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
    METHODS: Electronic databases (PUBMED, Cochrane CENTRAL, ERIC, Embase, Ovid, and Google Scholar) were searched till June 2022 to identify studies having STEMI patients who underwent PCI. Risk ratios and mean differences (MDs), along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (Cis) and standard deviations (SDs), were pooled using a random-effect model. This meta-analysis has been registered on Prospero (ID: CRD42022344072).
    RESULTS: A total of 35 studies with 28,756 patients were included. Pooled estimates revealed an increased incidence of primary outcomes; in-hospital all-cause mortality (RR = 3.52; 95% CI = 2.93-4.24), long-term all-cause mortality (HR = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.00-1.14), (RR = 3.32; 95% CI = 2.57-4.30); in-hospital cardiovascular mortality (RR = 2.66; 95% CI = 2.04-3.48), long-term cardiovascular mortality (RR = 6.67; 95% CI = 4.06-10.95); in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (RR = 1.31; 95% CI = 1.17-1.46), long-term MACE (RR = 2.92; 95% CI = 2.16-3.94); length of hospital stay (WMD = 0.60 days; 95% CI = 0.40-0.79) in patients with high NLR compared to those with a low NLR.
    CONCLUSIONS: NLR might be a valuable tool for prognostication (in-hospital) and stratification of patients with STEMI who underwent PCI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    很少有研究检查与慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重患者急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)类型相关的危险因素。本研究根据ARF类型评估COPD急性加重住院患者的临床特征和预后。回顾性分析2016年至2021年COPD急性加重住院患者的病历。我们将ARF分为2种类型:室内空气中PaO2<60mmHg或动脉分压与吸入氧气分数之比<300的1型ARF,以及PaCO2>45mmHg且动脉pH<7.35的2型ARF。共有435名患者被纳入研究,包括没有ARF的170名参与者,具有1型ARF的165,和100,2型ARF。与非ARF组相比,高流量鼻插管的频率,无创通气,重症监护室入院,ARF组的住院死亡率高于非ARF组.ARF组的1年死亡率较高(风险比[HR],2.809;95%置信区间[CI],1.099-7.180;P=0.031)和1年内再入院率(HR,1.561;95%CI,1.061-2.295;P=0.024)比非ARF组。1型ARF组有较高的1年死亡率风险(HR,3.022;95%CI,1.041-8.774;P=0.042)和1年内再入院(HR,2.053;95%CI,1.230-3.428;P=.006)与非ARF组相比。1型和2型ARF组之间的死亡率和再入院率没有差异。总之,1型ARF患者比2型ARF患者的死亡率和再入院率高于无ARF患者.1型和2型ARF患者的预后相似。
    Few studies have examined the risk factors associated with the type of acute respiratory failure (ARF) in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study evaluated the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients hospitalized for acute exacerbation of COPD based on the type of ARF. The medical charts of hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of COPD between 2016 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. We classified ARF into 2 types: type 1 ARF with PaO2 < 60 mm Hg in room air or a ratio of arterial partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen < 300, and type 2 ARF with PaCO2 > 45 mm Hg and arterial pH < 7.35. A total of 435 patients were enrolled in study, including 170 participants without ARF, 165 with type 1 ARF, and 100 with type 2 ARF. Compared with the non-ARF group, the frequency of high-flow nasal cannula, noninvasive ventilation, intensive care unit admissions, and in-hospital deaths was higher in the ARF group compared with the non-ARF group. The ARF group had higher 1-year mortality group (hazard ratio [HR], 2.809; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.099-7.180; P = .031) and readmission within 1-year rates (HR, 1.561; 95% CI, 1.061-2.295; P = .024) than the non-ARF group. The type 1 ARF group had a higher risk of 1-year mortality (HR, 3.022; 95% CI, 1.041-8.774; P = .042) and hospital readmission within 1-year (HR, 2.053; 95% CI, 1.230-3.428; P = .006) compared with the non-ARF group. There was no difference in mortality and readmission rates between the type 1 and type 2 ARF groups. In conclusion, patients with type 1 ARF rather than type 2 ARF had higher mortality and readmission rates than those without ARF. The prognoses of patients with type 1 and type 2 ARF were similar.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    红细胞分布宽度(RDW)升高可能与疾病严重程度有关。然而,目前尚缺乏RDW对老年非创伤性昏迷(NTC)患者预后的研究。本研究旨在研究老年NTC患者RDW与预后之间的关系。这项观察性队列研究包括2022年1月至2022年12月期间患有NTC的老年患者(年龄≥65岁)。我们在患者到达急诊科(ED)时测量了RDW。我们使用相关协变量的逻辑回归进行了多变量分析,以预测住院死亡率。使用Kaplan-Meier方法设计基于30天死亡率的存活曲线。主要结果是住院死亡率,次要结局是30日死亡率.共有689名患者被纳入研究,住院死亡率为29.6%(n=204).我们的结果发现,非幸存者的RDWs明显高于幸存者(14.6%vs13.6%)。多变量分析表明,ED到达时的RDWs与住院死亡率独立相关(比值比,1.126;95%置信区间,1.047-1.212;P<.001)。Kaplan-Meier曲线表明,低RDW患者的生存概率大于高RDW患者。ED到达时RDW高与老年NTC患者的住院死亡率相关。
    Elevated red blood cell distribution width (RDW) can be associated with disease severity. However, studies on RDW for the prognosis of elderly patients with non-traumatic coma (NTC) are lacking. This study aims to examine the relationship between RDW and outcomes in elderly patients with NTC. This observational cohort study included elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) with NTC between January 2022 and December 2022. We measured RDW upon patient arrival at the emergency department (ED). We conducted a multivariable analysis using logistic regression of relevant covariates to predict in-hospital mortality. Survival curves based on 30-day mortality were designed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and the secondary outcome was 30-day mortality. A total of 689 patients were included in the study, and in-hospital mortality was 29.6% (n = 204). Our results found that the RDWs of non-survivors were significantly greater than those of survivors (14.6% vs 13.6%). Multivariable analysis showed that RDWs at ED arrival were independently associated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 1.126; 95% confidence interval, 1.047-1.212; P < .001). The Kaplan-Meier curve indicated that the survival probability of patients with a low RDW was greater than those with a high RDW. Having a high RDW at ED arrival was associated with in-hospital mortality in elderly patients with NTC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Cardiovascular surgery risk prediction models are widely applied in medical practice. However, they have been criticized for their low methodological quality and scarce external validation. An additional limitation added in Latin America is that most of these models have been developed in the United States or Europe, which present marked geographical differences. The objective of this study is to characterize the postoperative clinical events of cardiovascular surgeries with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass pump in a local setting and to evaluate the prediction of postoperative mortality using the EuroSCORE II predictive model.
    Cross-sectional study in an urban university hospital in Buenos Aires. Patients ≥21 years of age were included, with a clinical indication for on-pump cardiovascular surgery. Patients with incomplete clinical data regarding EuroSCORE II variables or in-hospital survival, ≥95 years of age, or undergoing heart transplantation were excluded.
    195 patients were enrolled. Postoperative mortality estimated by EuroSCORE II presented a clear underestimation of risk (3.0% vs 7.7%). Discrimination (AUC = 0.82; 95% CI 0.74-0.92) and goodness of fit of the model were adequate (χ2 = 7.91; p = 0.4418). The most frequent postoperative complications were postoperative heart failure (35.9%), vasoplegic shock (13.3%), and cardiogenic shock (10.26%).
    The EuroSCORE II is an appropriate tool to discriminate between different risk categories in patients undergoing on-pump cardiovascular surgery, although it underestimates the risk.
    Los modelos de predicción de riesgo de cirugías cardiovasculares se aplican ampliamente a la práctica médica. Sin embargo, han sido criticados por su baja calidad metodológica y escasa validación externa. En América Latina se agrega la limitación de que la mayoría de estos modelos fueron desarrollados en Estados Unidos o Europa, existiendo diferencias geográficas marcadas.
    El objetivo de este estudio es caracterizar los eventos clínicos postoperatorios de cirugías cardiovasculares con uso de bomba de circulación extracorpórea en un escenario local y evaluar la predicción de mortalidad postoperatoria del modelo predictivo EuroSCORE II.
    Corte transversal en un hospital universitario urbano de Buenos Aires. Se incluyeron a pacientes ≥21 años de edad, con indicación de cirugía cardiovascular con uso de bomba. Se excluyeron a pacientes con datos clínicos incompletos respecto a las variables del EuroSCORE II o respecto a la sobrevida intrahospitalaria, con ≥95 años de edad o sometidos a trasplante cardíaco.
    Se enrolaron 195 pacientes. La mortalidad postoperatoria estimada por el EuroSCORE II presentó una clara subestimación del riesgo (3,0% vs 7,7%). La discriminación (AUC = 0,82; IC95% 0,74-0,92) y la bondad del ajuste del modelo fueron adecuadas (χ2 = 7,91; p = 0,4418). Las complicaciones postoperatorias más frecuentes fueron insuficiencia cardíaca postoperatoria (35,9%), shock vasopléjico (13,3%) y shock cardiogénico (10,26%).
    El EuroSCORE II es una herramienta apropiada para discriminar entre diferentes categorías de riesgo en pacientes sometidos a cirugías cardiovasculares con uso de bomba, si bien subestima el riesgo.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究确定是否与常规机械通气(MV)相比,体外膜氧合(ECMO)与COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者住院死亡率降低或纤维化改变相关.分析了72例接受ECMO治疗的患者和390例接受常规MV治疗的患者(2020年2月至2021年12月)。模拟一项目标试验,比较了PaO2/FiO2<80或PaCO2≥60mmHg的患者在MV后7天内启动ECMO与无ECMO的治疗策略。共有222名患者符合模拟试验的资格标准,其中42人发起了ECMO。ECMO与较低的住院死亡率风险相关(危险比[HR],0.56;95%置信区间[CI]0.36-0.96)。年轻患者(年龄<70岁)的风险较低,合并症较少(Charlson合并症指数<2),在ECMO之前进行俯卧定位,夹杂物驱动压力≥15cmH2O。此外,ECMO与纤维化改变的风险较低相关(HR,0.30;95%CI0.11-0.70)。然而,由于患者数量相对较少以及ECMO组和常规MV组之间的可观察性差异,这一发现有限.
    This study determined whether compared to conventional mechanical ventilation (MV), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is associated with decreased hospital mortality or fibrotic changes in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. A cohort of 72 patients treated with ECMO and 390 with conventional MV were analyzed (February 2020-December 2021). A target trial was emulated comparing the treatment strategies of initiating ECMO vs no ECMO within 7 days of MV in patients with a PaO2/FiO2 < 80 or a PaCO2 ≥ 60 mmHg. A total of 222 patients met the eligibility criteria for the emulated trial, among whom 42 initiated ECMO. ECMO was associated with a lower risk of hospital mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-0.96). The risk was lower in patients who were younger (age < 70 years), had less comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index < 2), underwent prone positioning before ECMO, and had driving pressures ≥ 15 cmH2O at inclusion. Furthermore, ECMO was associated with a lower risk of fibrotic changes (HR, 0.30; 95% CI 0.11-0.70). However, the finding was limited due to relatively small number of patients and differences in observability between the ECMO and conventional MV groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号