Homosexuality, Female

同性恋,Female
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    This study aimed to analyze the association between internalized homophobia and its domains and depression in homosexual and bisexual individuals and to quantify its results in depression. This is a cross-sectional online and anonymous study based on the LGBT+ health study conducted in Brazil from August to November, 2020, summing 926 respondents. Depression was self-reported. Internalized Homophobia was measured by the Brazilian Internalized Homophobia Scale for Gays and Lesbians, using 80% percentile to classify elevated total and by domain scores. Statistical analysis was based on Poisson Regression models with robust variance. Depression prevalence was 23.7%. The results revealed that internalized homophobia was positively associated with depression only among homosexuals (Prevalence Ratio (RP) = 1.80; 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.12-2.90). We found no statistical association for stigma and oppression domains. Population attributable fraction of depression was 2.3% (95%CI 0.1-4.5) in relation to internalized homophobia. Our findings highlight the need of controlling internalized homophobia to decrease the prevalence of depression among homosexuals.
    Objetivou-se analisar a associação entre homofobia internalizada e seus domínios e a depressão em indivíduos homossexuais e bissexuais e quantificar o resultado da sua diminuição na depressão. Trata-se de um estudo transversal baseado em dados do inquérito de saúde LGBT+, realizado no Brasil entre agosto e novembro de 2020, de forma on-line e anônima, totalizado 926 participantes. A depressão foi avaliada por autorrelato. A homofobia internalizada foi medida pela Escala de Homofobia Internalizada para Gays e Lésbicas Brasileiros, adotando-se como escores elevados total e por domínio os percentis de 80%. A análise estatística baseou-se na regressão de Poisson com variância robusta. A prevalência de depressão foi de 23,7%. Os resultados mostraram que a homofobia internalizada associou-se positivamente à depressão apenas entre os homossexuais (Razão de Prevalência (RP) = 1,80; intervalo de confiança de 95% (IC95%) 1,12-2,90). Não houve associação com os domínios isolados de estigma e opressão. A fração atribuível populacional de depressão foi de 2,3% (IC95% 0,1-4,5) em relação à homofobia internalizada. Esses achados destacam a importância do combate à homofobia que é internalizada para a diminuição da depressão em indivíduos homossexuais.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:描述应用模糊逻辑分析与女性发生性关系的女性对性传播感染/HIV/AIDS的脆弱性的可能性。
    方法:我们开发了一个具有17个输入变量和一个输出变量的模糊逻辑系统,使用与位于圣保罗州中西部地区的城市的脆弱性相关的数据,巴西。
    结果:具有最大积极影响的因素是确认对性传播感染/艾滋病毒/艾滋病的了解不足与较高的脆弱性有关。相反,声明“不向医疗保健专业人员披露性活动,“个人不承认与女性发生性关系,影响最小。
    结论:模糊逻辑有助于识别漏洞,通过分析各维度变量之间的相互作用来表示。这使其成为帮助分析特定人群脆弱性的有前途的方法。
    OBJECTIVE: To describe the possibility of applying Fuzzy Logic in analyzing the vulnerability of Women Who Have Sex with Women to Sexually Transmitted Infections/HIV/AIDS.
    METHODS: We developed a Fuzzy Logic system with 17 input variables and one output variable, using data related to vulnerability in a municipality located in the Midwest region of the State of São Paulo, Brazil.
    RESULTS: The factor with the greatest positive impact was the confirmation that a low understanding of Sexually Transmitted Infections/HIV/AIDS is associated with higher vulnerability. Conversely, the statement \"Not disclosing sexual activity to healthcare professionals,\" where individuals do not admit to having sex with women, had the least impact.
    CONCLUSIONS: Fuzzy Logic facilitates the identification of vulnerability, expressed through the analysis of interaction between variables in each dimension. This makes it a promising method to assist in analyzing the vulnerability of specific populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文探讨了中国同性恋女权主义者在应对网络民族主义攻击兴起时所面临的挑战。从作者参与中国的拉拉和女权运动中,活动家的著作,还有三次采访,本文讨论了拉拉激进主义者如何通过各种策略应对不断上升的中国网络民族主义,并重新概念化超越身份团体的激进主义。本文的第一部分阐述了中国网络空间民族主义的兴起与全球新法西斯主义的关系,识别重叠的网络监控基础设施,“古代超民族主义”的基本形式,以及新法西斯主义运动中的反性别/酷儿情绪超越了不同地区的意识形态和政治分歧。第二部分讨论了拉拉活动家在处理不平衡的问责制和审查制度时面临的困难,以及网络民族主义攻击中的“霸权男子气概”,显示,霸权男子气概不仅寻求加强传统的性别规范,但也控制每个人的个人生活。最后一部分认为,在加强网络民族主义和国家审查的情况下,中国拉拉积极分子的友谊联盟提供了一种有价值的战略。通过参与各种社会问题并与各种团体合作,这种基于友谊的团结优先考虑了关怀生活,并培养了活动家探索不同社会问题的情况,启动行动,并根据具体问题而不是身份寻求支持者。这种策略可以为黑暗时代的女权主义者/酷儿抵抗提供有价值的见解,当全球新法西斯主义的兴起及其对身份话语的占有越来越多地在国家身份和性别/性身份之间造成不通约性时。
    This article explores the challenges faced by Chinese queer feminist activists as they navigate the rise of cyber-nationalist attacks. Drawing from the author\'s involvement in China\'s lala and feminist movements, activists writings, and three interviews, the article discusses how lala activists cope with the rising Chinese cyber-nationalism through various strategies and reconceptualize activism beyond identity groups. The first part of the paper situates the rise of nationalism in Chinese cyberspace in relation to global neo-fascism, identifying the overlapping cyber-trolling infrastructures, the basic form of \"palingenetic ultra-nationalism\", and the anti-gender/queer sentiments in neo-fascist movements transcending ideological and political divisions in different regions. The second part discusses the difficulties faced by lala activists when dealing with imbalanced accountability and censorship, as well as the \"hegemonic masculinity\" in cyber-nationalist attacks, revealing that hegemonic masculinity seeks not only to reinforce traditional gender norms but also to control everyone\'s personal lives. The last part argues that Chinese lala activists\' friendship-based alliances provide a valuable strategy under intensifying cyber-nationalism and state censorship. By engaging in diverse social issues and collaborating with various groups, this friendship-based solidarity prioritizes a caring life and fosters a situation where activists explore different social issues, initiate actions, and seek supporters based on specific issues instead of identities. This strategy may offer valuable insights into feminist/queer resistance during dark times, when the rise of global neo-fascism and its appropriation of identity discourse increasingly creates incommensuration between national identities and gender/sexuality identities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:比利时的捐赠者受孕成年人是否有兴趣获得捐赠者信息,这些兴趣是否因家庭背景而异?
    结论:捐赠者受孕的成年人对获取捐赠者相关信息表现出极大的兴趣,与来自女同性恋夫妇或单亲家庭的后代相比,异性恋夫妇的后代的兴趣最高。
    背景:在比利时,精子捐赠主要是匿名的,但是直接面向消费者的基因检测的兴起对这种匿名性提出了挑战。
    方法:这是一项横断面研究,涉及2022年7月至2023年10月进行的全国在线调查。参与者,18岁及以上,并意识到他们的匿名精子捐赠者受孕状态,通过各种渠道招募。
    方法:共包括203名参与者:62.6%的人在父亲不育的异性恋家庭中长大,26.1%的女同性恋伴侣,8.4%的单亲父母,在不同或不同的家庭结构中占3.0%。这项调查有法语和荷兰语两种版本,包括43个问题,包括是/否问题和多项选择项目的混合。
    结果:披露的平均年龄为16.5岁,尤其是后来在异性恋夫妇父母家庭中披露。大量82.8%的捐赠者受孕个人对获取非个人身份捐赠者信息表示了浓厚的兴趣,而69%的人对个人身份捐赠者数据感到好奇。此外,61.6%的人表示希望与捐赠者进行个人接触,26.6%的人主张在出生证明上加上捐献者的名字。与其他家庭结构中的参与者相比,在女同性恋双亲家庭中长大的参与者对捐助者相关信息的兴趣最低。压倒性的90.1%的人想知道是否有来自同一精子捐赠者的同父异母兄弟姐妹。对DNA数据库注册的调查响应分析显示,55.2%的供体受孕后代已经注册,68.8%的人发现了相同的捐赠者后代,30.4%的人成功找到了捐赠者。与来自其他家庭结构的个人相比,那些在异性恋夫妇父母家庭中长大的人通过匿名精子捐赠对他们的受孕表现出不那么积极的态度。大约61.6%的捐赠者受孕个体报告说,与同龄人相比,他们经历了不同的情绪。而44.1%的人遇到了与匿名精子捐赠有关的心理困难,主要归因于后期披露。大多数人支持向捐赠者通报他促成怀孕的孩子数量的想法。最后,该研究强调,有21.2%的捐赠者受孕的成年人考虑自己成为捐赠者,31.3%的人表示愿意在面临生育挑战时使用匿名捐赠者。
    结论:我们的样本量可能无法完全代表比利时通过匿名精子捐赠受孕的所有成年人。参与偏见可能影响了结果,特别是由于异性伴侣的参与者人数过多。此外,异性恋夫妇抚养的个体与后期披露之间存在关联,通过引入混杂因素使分析复杂化。
    结论:这项研究的结果有助于更好地了解供体受孕成年人的需求和偏好,对患者教育和医疗保健政策具有重大潜在影响。
    背景:这项研究没有获得研究资金。没有利益冲突需要披露。
    背景:不适用。
    OBJECTIVE: Are donor-conceived adults in Belgium interested in obtaining donor information, and do these interests vary based on their family backgrounds?
    CONCLUSIONS: Donor-conceived adults express a significant interest in obtaining donor-related information, with the highest interest reported by offspring from heterosexual couples compared to those from lesbian couple-parented or single-parent families.
    BACKGROUND: In Belgium, sperm donation is mainly anonymous, but the rise of direct-to-consumer genetic testing challenges this anonymity.
    METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study involving an online nationwide survey conducted from July 2022 to October 2023. Participants, aged 18 years and older and being aware of their anonymous sperm donor-conceived status, were recruited through various channels.
    METHODS: A total of 203 participants were included: 62.6% grew up in heterosexual families with infertile fathers, 26.1% with lesbian couples, 8.4% with single parents, and 3.0% in various or diverse family structures. The survey was available in both French and Dutch and consisted of 43 questions, including a mix of yes/no questions and multiple-choice items.
    RESULTS: The average age of disclosure was 16.5 years, with notably later disclosure in heterosexual couple-parented households. A substantial 82.8% of donor-conceived individuals expressed a keen interest in obtaining non-personally identifiable donor information, while 69% were curious about personally identifiable donor data. Furthermore, 61.6% conveyed a desire for personal contact with their donors, and 26.6% advocated for the inclusion of the donor\'s name on their birth certificates. Participants raised in lesbian two-parent families exhibited the lowest level of interest in donor-related information compared with those raised in other family structures. An overwhelming 90.1% wondered about the possibility of having half-siblings from the same sperm donor. Analysis of survey responses on DNA database registration revealed that 55.2% of donor-conceived offspring were already registered, with 68.8% discovering the same donor offspring and 30.4% successfully locating their donors. Compared to individuals from other family structures, those raised in heterosexual couple-parented households exhibit a less positive attitude toward their conception through anonymous sperm donation. About 61.6% of donor-conceived individuals reported experiencing distinct emotions compared to their peers, while 44.1% encountered psychological difficulties related to anonymous sperm donation, primarily attributed to late disclosure. The majority supported the idea of informing the donor about the number of children he facilitated to conceive. Lastly, the study highlighted that 21.2% of donor-conceived adults considered becoming donors themselves, and 31.3% expressed willingness to use an anonymous donor whenever faced with fertility challenges.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our sample size may not fully represent all adults conceived through anonymous sperm donation in Belgium. Participation bias may have influenced the results, especially due to the overrepresentation of participants from heterosexual couples. Additionally, an association exists between individuals raised by heterosexual couples and late disclosure, complicating the analysis by introducing a confounding factor.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study contribute to a better understanding of the needs and preferences of donor-conceived adults, with significant potential impact on patient education and healthcare policy.
    BACKGROUND: Study funding was not obtained for this research. There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.
    BACKGROUND: N/A.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用小插图方法,这项研究调查了445名德国年轻成年人对同性和其他性别调情的反应:320名具有异性恋倾向的参与者和125名具有女同性恋或男同性恋(LG)倾向的参与者.即使在像德国这样对LG友好的社会中,从同一个性别的人那里得到进步可能仍然会唤起异性恋者的同质性。另一个可能影响异性恋者对同性调情的反应的因素是害怕被误认为是LG(社会传染问题)。与假设相反,结果几乎没有证据将异性恋参与者对同性调情者的反应归类为同源反应。首先,异性恋参与者在同性别调情条件下表现出与LG参与者在其他性别调情条件下相同程度的负面影响和回避行为。与其他性别调情条件下的LG参与者相比,在同性别调情条件下的异性恋参与者只有积极的影响得分要低一些。其次,当把反LG的态度和社会传染问题放在一起考虑时,只有社会传染问题有助于解释异性恋参与者对同性调情者反应的差异。具体来说,社会传染问题对异性恋参与者避免同性调情的影响是由(缺乏)积极影响介导的,但不是负面影响。
    Using a vignette methodology, this study examined reactions to same-gender versus other-gender flirtation in a sample of 445 German young adults: 320 participants with a heterosexual orientation and 125 participants with a lesbian or gay (LG) orientation. Even in LG-friendly societies as Germany, receiving advances from someone of the same gender might still evoke heterosexuals\' homonegativity. Another factor that might influence heterosexuals\' reactions to same-gender flirtation is the fear of being misidentified as LG (social contagion concerns). Contrary to hypothesis, results provided little evidence to classify heterosexual participants\' reactions to same-gender flirters as homonegative. Firstly, heterosexual participants showed the same degree of negative affect and avoidance behavior in the same-gender flirtation condition as LG participants did in the other-gender flirtation condition. Only positive affect scores were somewhat lower for heterosexual participants in the same-gender flirtation condition compared to LG participants in the other-gender flirtation condition. Secondly, when anti-LG attitudes and social contagion concerns were considered together, only social contagion concerns contributed to explaining variance in heterosexual participants\' response to same-gender flirters. Specifically, the impact of social contagion concerns on heterosexual participants\' avoidance of same-gender flirters was mediated by (lacking) positive affect, but not negative affect.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    正如已经广泛记录的那样,少数群体的压力会影响同性恋者的社会心理健康。最近,研究人员将注意力转向可能影响少数民族压力水平的心理因素,为了解释对近端少数民族压力源的个体差异。本研究旨在评估依恋回避和焦虑对感知的污名和内化的同质性水平的影响。招募了163名自我确定为女同性恋或男同性恋(Mage=32.56,SD=10.87)的参与者,并回答了自我报告问卷。应用两个多元回归模型来评估成人依恋与感知的污名和内化的同源性之间的关联。结果显示,依恋焦虑和回避与内化的一致性之间存在正相关,以及在依恋回避和感知的污名之间。新出现的结果证明了依恋焦虑和回避对近端少数民族压力源的影响,并为针对男女同性恋者的干预措施提供了有用的数据,这些干预措施旨在促进基于安全的情感调节策略以及对自我和他人的积极表示,这反过来可能会降低所经历的近端少数民族压力源的水平,并促进社会心理健康。
    As has been widely documented, minority stress affects the psychosocial well-being of gay and lesbian people. Recently, researchers have turned their attention to psychological factors that may influence the level of minority stress experienced, in order to explain individual differences in perceptions of proximal minority stressors. The present research aimed at assessing the effect of attachment avoidance and anxiety on levels of perceived stigma and internalized homonegativity. A total of 163 participants who self-identified as lesbian or gay (Mage = 32.56, SD = 10.87) were recruited and responded to the self-report questionnaires. Two multiple regression models were applied to assess the association between adult attachment and perceived stigma and internalized homonegativity. Results showed a positive association between attachment anxiety and avoidance and internalized homonegativity, as well as between attachment avoidance and perceived stigma. The emerging results demonstrate the impact of attachment anxiety and avoidance on proximal minority stressors and provide useful data for interventions addressing lesbian and gay people aimed at promoting security-based strategies of affect regulation and positive representations of self and others, which in turn may reduce the level of proximal minority stressors experienced and promote psychosocial well-being.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人类性取向的发展仍然是一个复杂和多方面的问题。它经常被研究,但它的起源仍然困扰着我们。在这项预先注册的研究中,我们的主要目标是证明兄弟出生顺序效应(FBOE),这假设男同性恋中哥哥的患病率高于异性恋者,最近在女同性恋女性中也有记录。我们的第二个目标是探索FBOE对肛交角色定位(AERO)的任何潜在影响,同性恋和异性恋。我们的研究样本包括693名男同性恋者,843个直男,265名女同性恋,和331名来自捷克和斯洛伐克的异性恋女性。采用常规参数化逻辑回归模型,我们证实了男同性恋者(母亲哥哥的OR=1.35)和女同性恋者(OR=1.71)的FBOE。Blanchard(2022)最近提出的更细微的参数化证实了这些结果。非母亲的哥哥对弟弟的性取向没有显着影响。与之前的一些报道相反,然而,我们的数据没有证明FBOE是具有接受AERO的男同性恋者独有的.此外,我们的观察表明,与异性恋男性的母亲相比,男同性恋者的母亲的后代数量较低。强调FBOE的积极成果,我们承认需要谨慎对待可用于估计家庭对性取向影响的各种选择。
    The development of human sexual orientation remains a complex and multifaceted subject. It is often studied but its origins continue to elude us. In this preregistered study, our primary objective was to demonstrate the fraternal birth order effect (FBOE), which assumes a higher prevalence of older brothers in gay men than in their straight counterparts and which has also been recently recorded in lesbian women. Our second aim was to explore any potential impact of the FBOE on anal-erotic role orientation (AERO), both in gay and straight men. Our study sample included 693 gay men, 843 straight men, 265 lesbian women, and 331 straight women from Czechia and Slovakia. Employing a conventionally parameterized logistic regression model, we substantiated the FBOE among both gay men (OR = 1.35 for maternal older brothers) and lesbian women (OR = 1.71). These outcomes were confirmed by a more nuanced parameterization recently proposed by Blanchard (2022). Nonmaternal older brothers did not exhibit a significant influence on their younger brothers\' sexual orientation. Contrary to some earlier reports, however, our data did not establish the FBOE as exclusive to gay men with the receptive AERO. Furthermore, our observations indicated a lower offspring count for mothers of gay men compared to mothers of straight men. Emphasizing the positive FBOE outcomes, we acknowledge the need for caution regarding the various options that can be used to estimate the familial influences on sexual orientation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    英国最近声名狼藉,成为反跨性别政治和“性别批判”女权主义的全球热点。但是,英国“性别批判”政治与跨国“反性别”运动之间的关系是什么?英国的性别批判女权主义是否直接与反性别动员的全球趋势保持一致,包括后者的专制和新法西斯主义倾向?这篇评论主张对英国的性别批判运动进行针对具体情况的分析,该运动关注其不同的政治取向。虽然一些性别批判政治与极右翼政治公开结盟,并明确反对女权主义者,其他包括左翼位置的杰出人物,包括左派女权主义者和女同性恋.在英国挑战性别批判政治,需要对其跨政治性质进行思考,并分析将这些不同方面在左右之间团结在一起的因素。
    Britain has recently gained notoriety as a global hotspot for anti-trans politics and \'gender critical\' feminism. But what is the relationship between British \'gender critical\' politics and the transnational \'anti-gender\' movement? Does Britain\'s gender critical feminism directly align with the global trends of anti-gender mobilisations, including the latter\'s authoritarian and neofascist tendencies? This commentary argues for a context-specific analysis of the British gender-critical movement which is attentive to its divergent political orientations. While some strands of gender-critical politics are openly allied with far-right politics and are explicitly anti-feminist, others include prominent figures from left-wing positions, including left feminists and lesbians. Challenging gender-critical politics in Britain requires a reckoning with its cross-political nature and an analysis of the factors that unite these different strands across left and right.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肌肉变形症(MD)及其对女性的心理影响,尤其是在性少数群体中,仍然相对缺乏研究。这项研究的目的是比较异性恋女性与女同性恋/双性恋女性之间MD症状与心理困扰的关系。我们的样本包括来自社区的479名巴西顺性妇女,年龄在18至70岁之间(M=32.78;SD=10.45)。其中,327(68.27%)被认定为异性恋,134(27.98%)为双性恋,18(3.76%)为女同性恋。为了确保没有因测量误差而产生的偏差,测试了样本中仪器的心理测量特性,并评估了组间的不变性。t检验,结构方程建模,并进行了潜在的概况分析,以了解两组之间的差异。结果表明,女同性恋/双性恋女性的MD症状和痛苦存在显着差异,并且严重程度更高。讨论了这些结果的含义,强调需要进一步探索性少数群体中的MD研究。
    Muscle Dysmorphia (MD) and its psychological impacts on women, especially within sexual minorities, are still relatively understudied. The objective of this study was to compare the relationship of MD symptoms and psychological distress between heterosexual women and lesbian/bisexual women. Our sample consisted of 479 Brazilian cisgender women from the community, aged between 18 and 70 years (M = 32.78; SD = 10.45). Among them, 327 (68.27 %) identified as heterosexual, 134 (27.98 %) as bisexual, and 18 (3.76 %) as lesbian. To ensure there was no bias due to measurement error, the psychometric properties of the instruments in the sample were tested, and invariance between the groups was assessed. t-tests, structural equation modeling, and latent profile analyses were conducted to comprehend the differences between the groups. The results indicated significant differences and a greater severity of MD symptoms and distress for lesbian/bisexual women. The implications of these results are discussed, emphasizing the need for further exploration of MD studies within sexual minorities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号