Ovarian tumors in the pediatric population are rare. The incidence and frequency of subtypes differ between children and adults. Although not all tumors are aggressive, they may still lead to morbidity. The goal of this study was a comprehensive review of malignant ovarian tumors in children and adolescents diagnosed and registered in Sweden.
Individuals were identified through a search in the National Cancer Register, limited for ages 0-19, years 1970-2014. Stored tumor diagnostic material from regional biobanks was retrieved and reviewed.
The study includes 345 individuals with ovarian tumors and 70.7% of them were between 15 and 19 years at time of diagnosis. No differences in incidence over time or geographic location were identified. The average follow-up time was 21.2 years and 5-year survival was 88.4%. Survival was similar in the different time periods, except for 1970-1979. Review was possible for 260 cases, resulting in 85 epithelial tumors, 121 GCTs, 47 SCSTs and 7 others. For age 0-4 years SCSTs dominated (85.7%), for 5-9- and 10-14-years GCTs dominated (70,8% and 75.0% respectively), and for age 15-19 years epithelial tumors dominated (43.8%). There was a strong agreement between review diagnosis and original diagnosis (Cohen\'s κ 0.944). Differentiating between entities within the sex cord-stromal group posed the biggest diagnostic challenge.
Ovarian tumors in children and adolescents are rare and distinct from their adult counterparts regarding incidence and frequency. There was a strong concurrence between original and review diagnoses. The greatest diagnostic difficulty was subtyping of epithelial tumors and differentiating between tumors within the SCST group.

Genomic technologies present a promising mechanism of resolving the clinical dilemma of distinguishing independent primary tumors from intrapulmonary metastases in NSCLC. We evaluated the utility of discordant mapping somatic junctions from chromosomal rearrangements in diagnosing metastatic disease compared to the current standard histologic review.
Mate-pair sequencing was performed on DNA extracted from 76 distinct tumors from 37 cases of multiple lung cancers. Discordant mapping junctions and chromosomal copy levels were assessed for each tumor. Blood-derived DNA was available on 22 of these cases for germline assessments. A lung cancer next-generation sequencing panel was additionally performed on tumor pairs from 17 patients.
Whereas mate-pair sequencing was able to classify lineage in all tumor pairs, histologic review appeared to misclassify lineage in 9 of 33 (27%) same-histology tumor pair comparisons. Based on disagreement between the reviewing pathologists, histopathologic lineage was classified as indeterminate in seven cases. In two cases where pathologists agreed on a metastatic call, no shared junctions were found suggesting independent primaries. Although germline junctions passing algorithmic filters were common, on average less than three were present and all had predictable structures of small focal rearrangements or transposons. Evaluation of shared chromosomal copy changes and driver mutations through a lung cancer next-generation sequencing panel, while informative, were nondefinitive in calling lineage in all cases.
The highly unique nature and prevalence of chromosomal rearrangement in lung cancers provide a useful and definitive technique for calling lineage in multifocal lung cancer.