High-risk location

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然不常见,通过跳跃自杀几乎总是致命的,并且由于包括桥梁和其他高风险地点在内的高建筑物的可用性,可以在局部显着升高。经验证据表明,限制使用某些自杀方法对预防自杀非常有效,促使在许多高风险跳跃地点建造物理屏障。然而,一些人认为,这些措施成本太高,只会导致方法或地点替代。
    检查物理障碍是否有效防止跳跃自杀或方法或位置替代是否发生。
    对最具代表性的文献进行综合评述。
    结果清楚地表明,物理障碍在通过跳跃而几乎没有方法或位置替代发生时非常有效地预防自杀。此外,他们的成本远远超过了避免自杀的金钱利益。
    使用意大利前高山/高山地区作为范例,我们认为,当地的地形和社会经济的特殊性导致自杀率显著升高,尤其是跳桥自杀,特别是在年轻人中,他们更容易受到经济危机的影响,并且对冲动行为表现出更高的敏感性,与跳跃自杀有关的已知特征,这使得这个问题更加局部和临床相关。由于这些发现很容易推广到具有相似地形和/或经济特征的其他地区,我们以行动呼吁结束,敦促地方当局听取科学证据,并采取必要步骤改善自杀预防。
    UNASSIGNED: Although uncommon, suicide by jumping is almost always lethal and can be significantly elevated locally due to the availability of tall structures including bridges and other high-risk locations. Empirical evidence suggests that restricting access to certain suicide methods is highly effective at preventing suicide, prompting the construction of physical barriers in many high-risk jumping locations. However, some have argued that these measures are too costly and only lead to method or location substitution.
    UNASSIGNED: To examine whether physical barriers are effective at preventing suicide by jumping or whether method or location substitution occur.
    UNASSIGNED: An integrative review of the most representative literature.
    UNASSIGNED: Results clearly show that physical barriers are highly effective at preventing suicide by jumping with little to no method or location substitution occurring. Furthermore, their cost is far outweighed by the monetary benefits of averted suicides.
    UNASSIGNED: Using the Italian pre-alpine/alpine areas as a paradigm, we argue that local topography and socioeconomic particularities led to significantly elevated rates of suicide in general, and of suicide by jumping from bridges in particular, especially among young adults who are more vulnerable to economic crises and show elevated susceptibility to impulsive acts, a known characteristic associated with suicide by jumping, which makes the issue even more topical and clinically relevant. As these finding are easily generalized to other territories with similar topographical and/or economic characteristics, we end with a call to action, urging local authorities to heed the scientific evidence and take the necessary steps to improve suicide prevention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在评估125I近距离放射治疗联合经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)和微波消融(MWA)治疗高危部位不可切除肝细胞癌(HCC)的安全性和有效性。
    方法:在1:2倾向评分匹配(PSM)后,这项回顾性研究分析了49例接受TACE+MWA+125I近距离放射治疗的患者(A组)和98例仅接受TACE+MWA治疗的患者(B组).评估的结果是无进展生存期(PFS),总生存期(OS),和治疗并发症。采用Cox比例风险回归分析比较两组生存情况。
    结果:A组患者的PFS长于B组(7.9vs.3.3个月,P=0.007)。两组间中位OS差异无统计学意义(P=0.928)。客观反应率(ORR),高危地区肿瘤的疾病控制率,肝内肿瘤的ORR为67.3%,93.9%,51.0%,分别,A组,38.8%,79.6%和29.6%,分别,B组(P<0.001,P=0.025和P=0.011)。TACE-MWA-125I(HR=0.479,P<0.001)是影响PFS的重要有利预后因素。门静脉癌栓是影响PFS的独立预后因素(HR=1.625,P=0.040)。巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)分期(BCLCCvs.B)是影响OS的独立因素(HR=1.941,P=0.038)。两组并发症发生率相似,A组腹痛发生率降低(P=0.007)。
    结论:TACE-MWA-125I比TACE-MWA在高危部位不可切除的肝细胞癌患者中导致更长的PFS和更好的肿瘤控制。
    This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 125I brachytherapy combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and microwave ablation (MWA) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk locations.
    After 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM), this retrospectively study analyzed 49 patients who underwent TACE +MWA+125I brachytherapy (group A) and 98 patients who only received TACE +MWA (group B). The evaluated outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment complications. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis survival was used to compare the two groups.
    The patients in group A showed a longer PFS than group B (7.9 vs. 3.3 months, P = 0.007). No significant differences were observed in median OS between the two groups (P = 0.928). The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate of tumors in high-risk locations, and the ORR of intrahepatic tumors were 67.3%, 93.9%, and 51.0%, respectively, in group A, and 38.8%, 79.6% and 29.6%, respectively, in group B (P < 0.001, P = 0.025 and P = 0.011, respectively). TACE-MWA-125I (HR = 0.479, P < 0.001) was a significant favorable prognostic factor that affected PFS. The present of portal vein tumor thrombosis was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR = 1.625, P = 0.040). The Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage (BCLC C vs. B) was an independent factor affecting OS (HR = 1.941, P = 0.038). The incidence of complications was similar between the two groups, except that the incidence of abdominal pain was reduced in the group A (P = 0.007).
    TACE-MWA-125I resulted in longer PFS and better tumor control than did TACE-MWA in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk locations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    回顾性比较CT引导下经皮注射洛铂的临床疗效和安全性乙醇用于高危地区肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的化学消融联合射频消融(RFA)。2017年1月至2018年6月,共纳入41例高危部位肝癌患者,分为经皮洛铂注射(PLI+RFA)组和经皮乙醇注射(PEI+RFA)组。洛铂或乙醇的混合物被准确地注射到肿瘤的高风险部分,而RFA消融了非高风险部分。比较两组的疗效和安全性。41例患者在高危部位有51个病灶,PLI+RFA组24例30个病灶,PEI+RFA组17例21个病灶。PLI+RFA组完全消融率为93.3%(28/30),PEI+RFA组为90.5%(19/21)(P=1.000)。PLI+RFA组和PEI+RFA组2年局部肿瘤进展率分别为20.0%(6/30)和19.0%(4/21),分别为(P=1.000)。两组患者的进展时间和总生存期无显著差异(分别为P=0.501和P=0.424)。两组患者不良事件发生率及严重程度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组均无严重并发症发生。经皮注射洛铂联合RFA治疗高危部位HCC可达到与经皮注射乙醇联合RFA相似的完全消融率。但需要进一步的研究来证实。
    To retrospectively compare the clinical efficacy and safety of CT-guided percutaneous injection of lobaplatin vs. ethanol for chemical ablation combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) in high-risk locations. From January 2017 to June 2018, a total of 41 patients with HCCs in high-risk locations were enrolled and divided into two groups: percutaneous lobaplatin injection (PLI+RFA) group and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI+RFA) group. The mixture of lobaplatin or ethanol was accurately injected into the high-risk part of the tumors, while RFA ablated the non-high-risk part. The efficacy and safety were compared between the two groups. 41 patients had 51 lesions in high-risk locations, including 24 cases with 30 lesions in PLI+RFA group and 17 cases with 21 lesions in PEI+RFA group. The complete ablation rate was 93.3% (28/30) in PLI+RFA group and 90.5% (19/21) in PEI+RFA group (P=1.000). The 2-year local tumor progression rate of PLI+RFA group and PEI+RFA group was 20.0% (6/30) and 19.0% (4/21), respectively (P=1.000). No significant differences were found in time to progression and overall survival between the two groups (P=0.501 and P=0.424, respectively). The incidence and severity of adverse events between the two groups were similar (P > 0.05). No severe complications were observed in both groups. Percutaneous lobaplatin injection combined with RFA in the treatment of HCC in high-risk locations may achieve the complete ablation rate similar to percutaneous ethanol injection combined with RFA, but further research is needed to confirm.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    To investigate the outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) following artificial ascites (AA) and artificial pleural effusion (AP) creation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk locations.
    Eligible patients were divided into 2 study periods (non-AAAP and AAAP groups) with AAAP performed in the latter period. Local tumor progression, primary technique effectiveness and complications were compared between patients with and without AAAP. Cumulative probability of local tumor progression and overall survival were estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves.
    One hundred thirty-eight patients with 195 tumors were evaluated. AAAP was performed in 48 patients with 76 tumors. Local tumor progression rates at 12 and 24 months were 9.3% and 22.2% in the non-AAAP group versus 5.5% and 9% in the AAAP group (p < 0.0001). Primary technique effectiveness was achieved in 76.5% of the non-AAAP group versus 89.5% of the AAAP group (p = 0.046). Night (7.6%) major complications occurred in the non-AAAP group and 2 (2.6%) cases occurred in the AAAP group. Therapy-oriented severity grading system after RFA was lower in the AAAP group (p = 0.02). Overall survival rates at 12 and 24 months were 85.6% and 77.7% in the non-AAAP group versus 97.2% and 89.7% in the AAAP group (p = 0.033).
    RFA following AA and AP for high-risk located HCC may improve outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with percutaneous iohexol-ethanol injection (PIEI), compared with RFA plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients with primary liver cancer(PLC)in high-risk locations. Methods: From January 2012 to December 2014, 54 patients with PLC in high-risk locations were enrolled. They were divided into Group A (RFA combined with PIEI) and Group B (RFA plus TACE). The efficacy and adverse events were assessed. Results: 54 patients had 74 lesions in high-risk locations. There were 26 cases with 40 lesions in Group A, and 28 cases with 34 lesions in Group B. The complete ablation rate of Group A was significantly higher than that of Group B (92.5% vs 70.6%, P=0.014). The two-year local tumor progressionrateand two-year overall survival rate were similar between these two groups (Group A 20.0% vs Group B 38.2%, P=0.083; 90.3% vs 84.3%, P=0.523). Furthermore, the surgery-related severe adverse events of Group A (7.1%, one case of liver abscess and one case ofhematobilia) were more common than that of Group B (0%, P=0.491). No significant differences were found in common adverse events including fever, pain, elevation of aminotransferase and bilirubin. Conclusions: Compared with RFA plus TACE, RFA plus PIEI resulted inbetter complete ablation rate in patients with primary liver cancer in high risk locations. Prospective, randomized, controlled trials are warranted for further evaluation.
    目的: 探讨CT引导下经皮碘海醇混合无水乙醇注射(PIEI)联合射频消融(RFA)与肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)序贯RFA治疗高危部位肝癌的临床疗效和安全性。 方法: 收集2012年1月至2014年12月首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院收治的54例高危部位原发性肝癌患者的资料,分为PIEI联合RFA组和TACE序贯RFA组,观察疗效和不良反应。 结果: 54例高危部位原发性肝癌患者共有74个病灶,其中PIEI联合RFA组26例,共40个高危部位病灶;TACE序贯RFA组28例,共34个高危部位病灶。PIEI联合RFA组患者的肿瘤完全消融率为92.5%(37/40),明显高于TACE序贯RFA组的70.6%(24/34,P=0.014)。PIEI联合RFA组患者的2年肿瘤局部进展率为20.0%(8/40),TACE序贯RFA组患者的2年肿瘤局部进展率为38.2%(13/34),差异无统计学意义(P=0.083)。PIEI联合RFA组和TACE序贯RFA组患者的2年生存率分别为90.3%和84.3%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.523)。TACE序贯RFA组患者手术相关严重并发症的发生率为7.1%(2/28),有1例患者出现肝脓肿,1例出现胆道出血,而PIEI联合RFA组患者无手术相关严重并发症(0%,P=0.491)。两组患者的常见不良反应为发热、转氨酶升高、胆红素升高等,但发生率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。 结论: 与TACE联合RFA比较,PIEI联合RFA治疗高危部位原发性肝癌能进一步提高肿瘤的完全消融率,但尚需进一步证实。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective and real-time targeting modality for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). However, mistargeting may occur when the target tumor is confused with cirrhotic nodules or because of the poor conspicuity of the index tumor under ultrasonography (US). Real-time virtual sonography (RVS) can provide the same reconstruction computed tomography images as US images. The aim of this study is to investigate the usefulness of RVS-assisted RFA for HCCs that are inconspicuous or conspicuous under US. A total of 21 patients with 28 HCC tumors-divided into US inconspicuous and high-risk subgroup (3 tumors in 3 patients), US inconspicuous and nonhigh-risk subgroup (5 tumors in 4 patients), US conspicuous and high-risk subgroup (16 tumors in 14 patients), and US conspicuous and nonhigh-risk subgroup (4 tumors in 3 patients)-underwent RVS-assisted RFA between May 2012 and June 2014 in our institution. The mean diameter of the nodules was 2.0 ± 1.1 cm. The results showed that the complete ablation rate is 87.5% (7/8) in the US undetectable group and 75% (15/20) in the US detectable group. A comparison between six tumors with incomplete ablation and 22 tumors with complete ablation showed higher alpha-fetoprotein level (mean, 1912 ng/mL vs. 112 ng/mL) and larger tumor size (mean diameter, 26 mm vs. 16 mm) in the incomplete ablation nodules (both p < 0.05). In conclusion, RVS-assisted RFA is useful for tumors that are difficult to detect under conventional US and may also be useful for tumors in high-risk locations because it may prevent complication induced by mistargeting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号