暂无摘要。

In the intricate field of obstetrics and gynecology, few scenarios present as complex a diagnostic challenge as the differentiation between heterotopic pregnancy, hyperdecidual reaction, and ectopic pregnancy. These conditions, while distinct, often blur together in clinical presentation, necessitating a nuanced understanding to achieve accurate diagnosis and timely intervention. A heterotopic pregnancy is a rare and potentially life-threatening condition in which a woman simultaneously carries two pregnancies in different locations. One pregnancy is typically located within the uterus (an intrauterine pregnancy), while the other is located outside the uterus, most commonly in one of the fallopian tubes (an ectopic pregnancy). This condition is sometimes referred to as a combined intrauterine and extrauterine pregnancy. The diagnosis of heterotopic pregnancy can be challenging because the symptoms can mimic those of a normal intrauterine pregnancy or an ectopic pregnancy. A combination of clinical symptoms, physical examination, and imaging studies, such as transvaginal ultrasound, can help in the diagnosis. After surgical or medical treatment, close monitoring and follow-up with a healthcare provider are essential. The remaining intrauterine pregnancy will need careful observation to ensure it continues to develop normally. However, in some cases of ectopic pregnancy, there will be hyperdecidual reaction within the uterus, which may sometimes create confusion with intrauterine pregnancy. Here, a case of ectopic pregnancy that was radiologically misdiagnosed as heterotopic pregnancy is presented to highlight the possibility of ectopic pregnancies being misdiagnosed as heterotopic pregnancy due to the hyperdecidual reaction. The index case underwent laparoscopic salpingectomy for tubal ectopic and dilatation and evacuation for suspected failed intrauterine pregnancy. The histopathological report of the intrauterine products of conception confirmed it to be decidua without any trophoblastic tissue.

We herein report a rare case of simultaneous intrauterine molar pregnancy and tubal pregnancy. A woman of childbearing age who had never been pregnant underwent an ultrasound examination 70 days after the onset of menopause. She had a history of ovulation induction. The ultrasound findings suggested a partial hydatidiform mole. She was then pathologically confirmed to have a complete hydatidiform mole after uterine suction dilation and curettage. On postoperative day 4, an ultrasound examination before discharge showed an inhomogeneous mass in the left adnexal region with mild lower abdominal pain. On postoperative day 17, the blood human chorionic gonadotropin level did not drop as expected, and a follow-up examination still indicated a mass in the left adnexal region. We were unable to rule out an ectopic hydatidiform mole. Hysteroscopy with laparoscopic exploration of the left adnexal mass and salpingotomy suggested a diagnosis of intrauterine hydatidiform mole combined with left tubal pregnancy.

Heterotopic pregnancy (HP) is the coexistence of living or dead intrauterine pregnancy, single or multiple, and extrauterine pregnancy located in the oviduct, ovary, uterine corner, cervix or peritoneal cavity. This condition is very rare (1:30 000 pregnancies). HP constitutes a rare obstetric condition. Its occurrence after natural conception is sparsely documented in the literature. Here in, we present a case of a 27-year-old primeparous women who presented at 18 weeks with features of ruptured ectopic pregnancy. Initial ultrasonographic imaging showed an intrauterine pregnancy corresponding to 18 weeks. It also revealed a floating fetus with significant collection of fluid in the pouch of Douglas, retroceacal recess and both hepatocellular recess. An emergency explorative laparotomy was done where right salpingectomy was performed. She was later followed up to term and delivered by elective cesarean section successfully. A brief narrative of the challenges in the management, clinical presentation and limitation in the management is highlighted in the present case report. Key message: Heterotopic pregnancy can occur in natural conception irrespective of usage of ovulation induction. Routine early pregnancy ultrasound can promote early detection with prompt surgical intervention to mitigate its complications.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy can be complicated by nonspecific laboratory and radiographic findings. The multiple alternative diagnoses must be weighed against each other based on the entire clinical presentation.
METHODS: We present a case of a 20-year-old woman who arrived to the Emergency Department (ED) with abdominal pain and ended up being transferred for an Obstetrics evaluation of a possible heterotopic pregnancy. Her radiology-performed ultrasound had revealed an \"intrauterine gestational sac\" along with an adnexal mass near the right ovary. The patient was not undergoing assisted-reproductive fertilization, nor did she have meaningful risk factors for heterotopic pregnancy. The patient was managed expectantly over the ensuing week to see whether the intrauterine fluid was a true gestational sac. After multiple repeat ED visits, the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy was made. Ultimately, the patient elected for surgical management of her ectopic pregnancy. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: This case offers a reminder of the subtleties of radiographic identification of intrauterine pregnancies and the ever-present need to \"clinically correlate.\"

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic pregnancy is a rare form of pregnancy, defined by the coexistence of an ectopic and an intrauterine pregnancy. The diagnosis of heterotopic pregnancy remains one of the greatest challenges of the gynecological-obstetrical emergencies.
METHODS: We report a rare case of spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy of a 28-year-old woman, diagnosed with a heterotopic pregnancy by ultrasound and treated by laparotomy in emergency obstetrical department of Ibn Rochd University Hospital of Casablanca.
CONCLUSIONS: Heterotopic pregnancy is a rare form of pregnancy, defined by the coexistence of an ectopic and an intrauterine pregnancy. The most common functional signs are abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, pelvic mass and peritoneal irritation. The first-line paraclinical examination is suprapubic and transvaginal pelvic ultrasound. Therapeutic management of heterotopic pregnancies involves rapid intervention on the ectopic pregnancy, while respecting the intrauterine pregnancy if it has progressed, in order to preserve the patient\'s fertility.
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of heterotopic pregnancy is often difficult and management should be initiated as soon as possible given the risk of maternal mortality.

UNASSIGNED: Spontaneous heterotopic pregnancies, concurrently occurring intrauterine and ectopic pregnancies, pose a substantial risk to maternal health and are often misdiagnosed. This case report details the challenges in identifying and managing an exceptionally rare case of abdominal pregnancy without assisted reproduction. The patient\'s initial misdiagnosis underscores the complexities in diagnosis, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive imaging techniques.
METHODS: We present the case of a 36-year-old gravida 5, para 3, with a history of dilation and curettage, experiencing a heterotopic pregnancy involving delayed miscarriage in both uterine and abdominal cavities. Despite presenting symptoms of pelvic pain and abnormal vaginal bleeding, the abdominal pregnancy was initially overlooked in ultrasound examinations. The accurate diagnosis was only achieved post-miscarriage, leading to a timely intervention through laparotomy.
UNASSIGNED: The absence of identifiable risk factors, except for the patient\'s history of dilation and curettage, highlights the spontaneous nature of this non-assisted reproduction-related pregnancy. This case emphasizes the challenges in diagnosing and managing spontaneous heterotopic pregnancies, particularly when an abdominal pregnancy is involved. Vigilance and advanced imaging techniques are crucial for early recognition and appropriate intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: This unique case underscores the difficulties in diagnosing and managing spontaneous heterotopic pregnancies, especially when an abdominal pregnancy is present. Vigilance and advanced imaging are essential to identify rare occurrences like abdominal pregnancies that may go unnoticed in conventional ultrasound examinations. Early recognition and intervention are critical in averting potential life-threatening consequences associated with this uncommon condition.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of heterotopic pregnancy and the follow-up.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 50 cases of clinically diagnosed heterotopic pregnancy in our hospital was performed, the clinical characteristics and ultrasonographic manifestations of the patients were summarized, the reasons for initial ultrasound missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis were analyzed, and the pregnancy outcomes were followed up.
RESULTS: Among the 50 cases, the initial ultrasound diagnoses of intrauterine pregnancy were all gestational sac type, 32 cases of ectopic pregnancy were located in the fallopian tube, and 10 cases were located in the uterine horn, 1 case at cervix, and 1 case at caesarean section scar. Forty-one cases were consistent with surgery and/or pathology, representing initial ultrasound diagnosis coincidence rate of about 82%. Six cases were missed in the initial ultrasound examination (12%), and three cases were misdiagnosed (6%). The maximum diameter of the intrauterine gestational sac was 9-48 mm, the average was about 24.90 ± 9.56 mm, the maximum diameter of the ectopic pregnancy gestational sac or mass was 11-63 mm, and the average was about 31.45 ± 13.82 mm (p < 0.05). Intrauterine pregnancy outcomes were followed up, 45 patients with complete data and 5 patients were lost to follow-up. The follow-up rate was about 90%.
CONCLUSIONS: Combining the patient\'s medical history and clinical characteristics can reduce missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of heterotopic pregnancy. Ultrasonography has important value in the assessment of intrauterine pregnancy growth and development, and the integrity of maternal uterus.

Heterotopic triplet pregnancy, cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, and pregnancy following uterine ablation are all rare events that confer significant morbidity including spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal demise, preterm labor, abnormal placentation, and uterine rupture. A woman in her 30s, G6P4014, with a history of uterine ablation presented with delayed menses and vaginal spotting with imaging showing two intrauterine pregnancies (one with cardiac activity) and one live pregnancy at the cesarean scar. The patient was extensively counseled on risk to her and to the pregnancies; treatment options were discussed including expectant management and termination of pregnancy. The patient underwent an uncomplicated dilation and curettage with bilateral salpingectomy and was discharged home the day of the procedure in stable condition. This case highlights the potential compound effect of comorbid conditions that can pose difficulty in counseling and management. Key Points Patients undergoing endometrial ablation should be carefully selected and counseled extensively on highly effective contraception.Suspected cesarean scar pregnancies should be carefully evaluated early in gestation. Management should include thorough counseling and may be indivisualized.Many conditions pose a significant threat to maternal health and warrant a discussion of termination, which should be widely availaible and safe for all who need and/or desire it.