Hernia, Ventral

疝,腹侧
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    大型腹侧疝需要复杂的手术技术,如组件分离。我们正在介绍一例15×8厘米的切口疝。疝气覆盖有上覆的薄层皮肤和疝气囊。该层的皮肤紧密粘附在下面的疝囊上。由于薄的疝囊和皮肤的粘附性,保留了约3厘米的疝囊。我们使用这个疝囊作为前鞘“延伸”无张力闭合。进行腹横肌释放的后部组件分离,以在没有张力的情况下关闭后部层,并在直肌后平面上放置23×16cm的网格。通过使用疝囊修复,我们避免了前组件分离,实现了前层无张力闭合.
    Large ventral hernias require complex surgical techniques, such as component separation. We are presenting a case of an incisional hernia measuring 15×8 cm. The hernia was covered with an overlying thin layer of skin and hernia sac. The skin of this layer was densely adherent to the underlying hernial sac. Because of the thin hernial sac and adherent nature of the skin, approximately 3 cm of the hernial sac was preserved. We used this hernial sac as the anterior sheath \'extension\' for a tension-free closure. Posterior component separation with transverse abdominis muscle release was done to close the posterior layer without tension and to place a 23×16 cm mesh in the retrorectus plane. By using the hernial sac in repair, we avoided anterior component separation and achieved tension-free closure of the anterior layer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管缺乏机器人腹侧疝修补术(RVHR)在肥胖患者中的证据,机器人平台在疝气手术中的使用越来越频繁。肥胖对RVHR结果的影响尚未得到彻底研究。肥胖被认为是复发性腹侧疝和术后并发症发展的主要危险因素;然而,我们假设接受机器人修复的患者将有相似的并发症特征,尽管他们的体重指数(BMI).我们使用来自腹部核心健康质量协作登记的数据,对2013年至2023年期间接受RVHR的18-90岁患者进行了回顾性分析。术前,术中,比较非肥胖和肥胖组的术后特征,使用单变量和逻辑回归分析来比较短期结果。登记处确定了9742名患者;3666名非肥胖;6076名被归类为肥胖(BMI>30kg/m2)。肥胖患者发生手术部位的几率增加,主要是血清肿形成;然而,肥胖不是RVHR术后需要手术干预的并发症的重要因素.相比之下,所有患者手术后的疝气特异性生活质量评分显著改善,与肥胖患者相比,基线有更多的改善。肥胖确实以BMI依赖的方式增加RVHR后某些并发症的风险;然而,BMI并未显著增加需要程序性干预的几率.肥胖患者的生活质量有显著改善,在这一人群中,应仔细考虑RVHR。
    Despite the paucity of evidence on robotic ventral hernia repair (RVHR) in patients with obesity, the robotic platform is being used more frequently in hernia surgery. The impact of obesity on RVHR outcomes has not been thoroughly studied. Obesity is considered a major risk factor for the development of recurrent ventral hernias and postoperative complications; however, we hypothesize that patients undergoing robotic repairs will have similar complication profiles despite their body mass index (BMI). We performed a retrospective analysis of patients aged 18-90 years who underwent RVHR between 2013 and 2023 using data from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative registry. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics were compared in non-obese and obese groups, determined using a univariate and logistic regression analysis to compare short-term outcomes. The registry identified 9742 patients; 3666 were non-obese; 6076 were classified as obese (BMI > 30 kg/m2). There was an increased odds of surgical site occurrence in patients with obesity, mostly seroma formation; however, obesity was not a significant factor for a complication requiring a procedural intervention after RVHR. In contrast, the hernia-specific quality-of-life scores significantly improved following surgery for all patients, with those with obesity having more substantial improvement from baseline. Obesity does increase the risk of certain complications following RVHR in a BMI-dependent fashion; however, the odds of requiring a procedural intervention are not significantly increased by BMI. Patients with obesity have a significant improvement in their quality of life, and RVHR should be carefully considered in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:尽管腹侧疝修补术在全球范围内普遍存在,方法,解剖平面,缺陷闭合,网格的选择和放置层正在进行辩论。我们报道了手术技术的细节,机器人辅助经腹横肌筋膜和腹膜前修补术(R-TATFPP)治疗小腹侧疝的安全性和可行性。
    方法:本研究包括2018年至2023年通过机器人辅助腹侧疝修补术进行的22例病例中的5例R-TATFPP修补术,并获得圣卢克国际大学机构审查委员会和圣卢克国际医院临床伦理委员会的批准(19-R147,22-012)。
    结果:有4名男性和1名女性,平均年龄64.4±10.0岁,包括两个脐带疝和三个切口疝。平均身高,体重,体重指数(BMI),疝缺损长度,宽度,操作时间,控制台时间,住院时间为171.2±11.8厘米,82.4±13.4kg,28.0±2.1kg/m2,2.8±1.4cm,3.0±1.3cm,180分钟,133.8分钟,2.4天,分别。除一例急性尿潴留外,未观察到任何转换或并发症。
    结论:机器人辅助的横肌筋膜和腹膜前修补术对于小腹侧疝是安全可行的,对腹壁结构和结构的破坏最小。
    OBJECTIVE: Despite the widespread of ventral hernia repairs globally, the approach method, dissection planes, defect closure, and the choice and placement layer of mesh are an ongoing debate. We reported the details of surgical techniques, safety and feasibility for robot-assisted transabdominal transversalis fascial and preperitoneal repair (R-TATFPP) for small ventral hernia.
    METHODS: This study included 5 cases of R-TATFPP repair among 22 cases performed by robot-assisted ventral hernia repair from 2018 to 2023 with the approval of the Institutional Review Board at St. Luke\'s International University and clinical ethical committee at St. Luke\'s International Hospital (19-R147, 22-012).
    RESULTS: There were four males and one female, with mean age of 64.4 ± 10.0 years, inclusive of two umbilical and three incisional hernias. Mean height, weight, body mass index (BMI), hernia defect length, width, operation time, console time, and hospital stay were 171.2 ± 11.8 cm, 82.4 ± 13.4 kg, 28.0 ± 2.1 kg/m2, 2.8 ± 1.4 cm, 3.0 ± 1.3 cm, 180 min, 133.8 min, and 2.4 days, respectively. No conversion nor complication was observed except for one acute urinary retention.
    CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted transversalis fascial and preperitoneal repair was safe and feasible for small ventral hernia with the minimal disruption to the abdominal wall architecture and structures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:Spigelian疝是一种罕见的腹壁疝,通常在嵌顿时被诊断出来。这些疝通常在弓形线和腹直肌的外侧部分的交叉点处发展。
    方法:我们介绍了一名44岁女性患者的病例,该患者入院于我们的外科病房,原因是她的右纵隔有疼痛性肿块。根据已完成的影像学评估,怀疑右胸膜中存在非典型性疝。术前发现证实了Spigelian疝。有趣的是,患者在肿块部位应用干扰素(多发性硬化症治疗),这就是为什么脂肪营养不良的诊断被考虑。
    结论:一般来说,Spigelian疝的诊断很困难.从解剖学的角度来看,临床发现并不总是特定的。被监禁的风险相对较高,因此,即使是临床上沉默的发现也适用于手术。
    BACKGROUND: Spigelian hernia is a rare type of abdominal wall hernias which are often diagnosed when incarcerated. These hernias typically develop at the crossing point of the arcuate line and lateral portion of rectus abdominis muscle.
    METHODS: We present the case of a 44-year-old female patient admitted to our surgery unit for a painful lump in her right mesogastrium. Incarcerated atypical hernia in the right mesogastrium was suspected based on completed imaging assessments. Spigelian hernia was confirmed by preoperative findings. Interestingly, the patient applied interferon (multiple sclerosis therapy) at the site of the lump, which is why the diagnosis of lipodystrophy had been considered.
    CONCLUSIONS: In general, the diagnosis of Spigelian hernia is difficult. From the anatomical point of view the clinical finding is not always specific. The risk of incarceration is relatively high, and thus even clinically silent findings are indicated for surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:腹侧疝是开腹手术的常见并发症,构成挑战,特别是当原发性筋膜闭合无法实现时。尽管使用术前肉毒杆菌毒素A(BTX)注射进行化学成分分离已成为一种有希望的辅助手段,其疗效的客观证据仍然有限.本研究旨在客观评估术前BTX对腹侧疝修补术中牵引力的影响。
    方法:前瞻性,对肝移植术后中线切口疝患者进行了单盲研究。BTX是单方面给药,术中测量内侧推进前直肌鞘所需的牵引力。分析注射前和注射后CT扫描的疝大小和LAW肌肉测量值的变化。进行统计分析以评估BTX注射侧和未注射侧之间的牵引力差异。
    结果:10例患者接受了疝修补术,并在所有病例中实现了原发性筋膜闭合。注射前和注射后CT扫描的比较显示疝大小没有明显变化。LAW肌肉长度增加1.8厘米,而厚度减少了0.2厘米。术中牵引力测量显示,与未注射侧相比,BTX注射侧的牵引力显着降低(p<0.0001)。BTX注射到未注射侧的牵引力比平均为57%,表明BTX在降低张力方面的功效。
    结论:术前BTX显著降低腹侧疝修补术中的牵引力,强调其在复杂病例中作为辅助治疗的潜力。虽然在患者选择和结果评估方面仍然存在挑战,BTX为增强腹壁重建结果和减少手术并发症提供了有希望的途径。
    OBJECTIVE: Ventral hernias are a common complication of laparotomy, posing challenges particularly when primary fascial closure is unattainable. Although chemical component separation using preoperative botulinum toxin A (BTX) injections has emerged as a promising adjunct, objective evidence of its efficacy remains limited. This study aimed to objectively assess the effect of preoperative BTX on traction force during ventral hernia repair.
    METHODS: A prospective, single-blind study was conducted on patients with midline incisional hernias following liver transplantation. BTX was administered unilaterally, and the traction force required to medially advance the anterior rectus sheath was measured intraoperatively. Pre- and post-injection CT scans were analyzed for changes in hernia size and LAW muscle measurements. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate traction force differences between BTX-injected and uninjected sides.
    RESULTS: Ten patients underwent hernia repair with primary fascial closure achieved in all cases. Comparison of pre- and post-injection CT scans showed no significant changes in hernia size. LAW muscle length increased by 1.8 cm, while thickness decreased by 0.2 cm. Intraoperative traction force measurements revealed a significant reduction on the BTX-injected side compared to the uninjected side (p < 0.0001). The traction force ratio on the BTX-injected to the uninjected side averaged 57%, indicating the efficacy of BTX in reducing tension.
    CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative BTX significantly reduces traction force during ventral hernia repair, highlighting its potential as an adjunctive therapy in complex cases. While challenges remain in patient selection and outcome assessment, BTX offers a promising avenue for enhancing abdominal wall reconstruction outcomes and reducing surgical complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:使用术前计算机断层扫描(CT)成像的深度学习模型(DLM)在预测腹壁重建(AWR)后的结果方面显示出希望,包括组件分离,伤口并发症,和肺衰竭。本研究旨在将这些方法应用于预测疝复发,并评估纳入额外的临床数据是否会提高DLM的预测能力。
    方法:从前瞻性维护的单机构数据库中确定患者。那些接受AWR并有术前CTs的患者被包括在内,随访<18个月的患者被排除在外.将患者分成训练(80%)组和测试(20%)组。仅在图像上训练了DLM,另一个DLM只接受了人口统计学方面的培训:年龄,性别,BMI,糖尿病,和烟草使用的历史。混合值DLM合并了来自两者的数据。通过曲线下面积(AUC)评估DLM预测复发。
    结果:这些模型评估了190例AWR患者的数据,这些患者平均随访超过7年(平均±SD:86±39个月;中位数[Q1,Q3]:85.4[56.1,113.1]),复发率为14.7%。患者的平均年龄为57.5±12.3岁,大多数为女性(65.8%),BMI为34.2±7.9kg/m2。有28.9%的人患有糖尿病,16.8%的人有烟草使用史。成像DLM的AUC,临床DLM,合并DLM分别为0.500、0.667和0.604。
    结论:在预测复发方面,仅临床DLM优于仅图像DLM和混合值DLM。虽然这三个模型对复发的预测都很差,仅临床的DLM最具预测性.这些发现可能表明,成像特征对于预测复发不如其他AWR结果有用。进一步的研究应集中于理解这些DLM识别的成像特征,并扩展仅临床DLM中包含的人口统计信息,以进一步增强该模型的预测能力。
    BACKGROUND: Deep learning models (DLMs) using preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging have shown promise in predicting outcomes following abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR), including component separation, wound complications, and pulmonary failure. This study aimed to apply these methods in predicting hernia recurrence and to evaluate if incorporating additional clinical data would improve the DLM\'s predictive ability.
    METHODS: Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained single-institution database. Those who underwent AWR with available preoperative CTs were included, and those with < 18 months of follow up were excluded. Patients were separated into a training (80%) set and a testing (20%) set. A DLM was trained on the images only, and another DLM was trained on demographics only: age, sex, BMI, diabetes, and history of tobacco use. A mixed-value DLM incorporated data from both. The DLMs were evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) in predicting recurrence.
    RESULTS: The models evaluated data from 190 AWR patients with a 14.7% recurrence rate after an average follow up of more than 7 years (mean ± SD: 86 ± 39 months; median [Q1, Q3]: 85.4 [56.1, 113.1]). Patients had a mean age of 57.5 ± 12.3 years and were majority (65.8%) female with a BMI of 34.2 ± 7.9 kg/m2. There were 28.9% with diabetes and 16.8% with a history of tobacco use. The AUCs for the imaging DLM, clinical DLM, and combined DLM were 0.500, 0.667, and 0.604, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: The clinical-only DLM outperformed both the image-only DLM and the mixed-value DLM in predicting recurrence. While all three models were poorly predictive of recurrence, the clinical-only DLM was the most predictive. These findings may indicate that imaging characteristics are not as useful for predicting recurrence as they have been for other AWR outcomes. Further research should focus on understanding the imaging characteristics that are identified by these DLMs and expanding the demographic information incorporated in the clinical-only DLM to further enhance the predictive ability of this model.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:中重(40-60g/m2)聚丙烯(MWPP)网片已被证明在CDCII-III级后肌腹侧疝修复(RMVHR)中是安全有效的。然而,MWPP有可能断裂,在这种情况下,重量级(>75g/m2)聚丙烯网可能具有类似的结果。然而,在清洁污染和污染的情况下,关于HWPP网格性能的数据有限。我们旨在比较开放式RMVHR期间CDCII-III级伤口中的HWPP与MWPP网状物。
    方法:回顾性查询了腹部核心健康质量协作数据库中的一组患者,这些患者接受了2012年至2023年在CDCII/III级伤口中放置了MWPP或HWPP网状物的开放式RMVHR。使用3:1倾向评分匹配分析比较网格类型。匹配的协变量包括CDC分类,BMI,糖尿病,1年内吸烟,疝气,和网格宽度。感兴趣的主要结果包括伤口并发症。次要结果包括30天的再手术和再入院。
    结果:共有1496例患者接受MWPP或HWPP(1378例与118,分别)在受污染的RMVHR中。在倾向得分匹配后,351名患者保持中等体重,117名患者保持体重。手术部位感染(SSI)率无显著差异(13.4%vs.14.5%,p=0.877),包括深度SSIs(0.3%与0%,p=1),手术部位发生率(17.9%vs.22.2%,p=0.377),需要手术干预的手术部位(16%vs.17.9%,p=0.719),网格去除(0.3%与0%,p=1),重新手术(4.6%与2.6%,p=0.428),或再入院(12.3%与9.4%,p=0.504),30天。
    结论:HWPP网片与伤口发病率增加无关,网格切除,重新操作,在CDCII/III病例的开放RMVHR中,与MWPP网状物相比,术后早期再入院或再入院。需要进行更长时间的随访,以确定在受污染的情况下,HWPP网是否可以替代MWPP网。
    BACKGROUND: Mediumweight (40-60 g/m2) polypropylene (MWPP) mesh has been shown to be safe and effective in CDC class II-III retromuscular ventral hernia repairs (RMVHR). However, MWPP has the potential to fracture, and it is possible that heavyweight (> 75 g/m2) polypropylene mesh has similar outcomes in this context. However, there is limited data on HWPP mesh performance in clean-contaminated and contaminated scenarios. We aimed to compare HWPP to MWPP mesh in CDC class II-III wounds during open RMVHR.
    METHODS: The Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database was retrospectively queried for a cohort of patients who underwent open RMVHR with MWPP or HWPP mesh placed in CDC class II/III wounds from 2012 to 2023. Mesh types were compared using a 3:1 propensity score-matched analysis. Covariates for matching included CDC classification, BMI, diabetes, smoking within 1 year, hernia, and mesh width. Primary outcome of interest included wound complications. Secondary outcomes included reoperations and readmissions at 30 days.
    RESULTS: A total of 1496 patients received MWPP or HWPP (1378 vs. 118, respectively) in contaminated RMVHR. After propensity score matching, 351 patients remained in the mediumweight and 117 in the heavyweight mesh group. There were no significant differences in surgical site infection (SSI) rates (13.4% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.877), including deep SSIs (0.3% vs. 0%, p = 1), surgical site occurrence rates (17.9% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.377), surgical site occurrence requiring procedural intervention (16% vs. 17.9%, p = 0.719), mesh removal (0.3% vs. 0%, p = 1), reoperations (4.6% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.428), or readmissions (12.3% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.504) at 30 days.
    CONCLUSIONS: HWPP mesh was not associated with increased wound morbidity, mesh excisions, reoperations, or readmissions in the early postoperative period compared with MWPP mesh in open RMVHR for CDC II/III cases. Longer follow-up will be necessary to determine if HWPP mesh may be a suitable alternative to MWPP mesh in contaminated scenarios.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在几种类型的腹部腹腔镜手术后,ESPB可以减轻术后疼痛。关于ESPB在腹腔镜腹壁疝修补术中的作用的数据很少。这项研究的目的是测试ESPB在此过程中的术后镇痛效果。
    方法:在此前瞻性中,双盲,随机对照研究,接受腹腔镜腹侧疝修补术的成年患者被随机分配到双侧术前ESPB,导管水平为Th7(2×30ml,2.5mg/ml罗哌卡因或生理盐水),术后每6小时进行一次导管置管,持续24小时。主要结果是术后第一个小时内的抢救阿片类药物消耗。次要结果是4小时和24小时的阿片类药物总消费量,疼痛评分,恶心,镇静,以及第一周的恢复质量15(QoR-15)和EuroQol-5维度(EQ-5D-5L)。
    结果:总计,64例患者被纳入主要结局指标。在术后1小时的救援阿片类药物的消耗(口服吗啡当量(OME))没有显着差异,ESPB组26.9±17.1mg与安慰剂组32.4±24.3mg(平均±SD)(p=0.27)。在7天的观察期内,次要结局没有显着差异。七名病人在术后接受了抢救,为五名患者提供镇痛。
    结论:我们发现ESPB和安慰剂在腹腔镜腹侧疝修补术中的测量结果没有差异。未来的研究可能会评估使用更高浓度和/或不同胸腔水平进行的阻滞是否会提供更多的镇痛效果。
    背景:NCT04438369;18/06/2020。.
    BACKGROUND: The Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) reduces postoperative pain after several types of abdominal laparoscopic surgeries. There is sparse data on the effect of ESPB in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. The purpose of this study was to test the postoperative analgesic efficacy of an ESPB for this procedure.
    METHODS: In this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study, adult patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair were randomly assigned to either bilateral preoperative ESPB with catheters at the level of Th7 (2 × 30 ml of either 2.5 mg/ml ropivacaine or saline), with postoperative catheter top ups every 6 h for 24 h. The primary outcome was rescue opioid consumption during the first hour postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were total opioid consumption at 4 h and 24 h, pain scores, nausea, sedation, as well as Quality of Recovery 15 (QoR-15) and the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) during the first week.
    RESULTS: In total, 64 patients were included in the primary outcome measure. There was no significant difference in rescue opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalents (OME)) at one hour postoperatively, with the ESPB group 26.9 ± 17.1 mg versus 32.4 ± 24.3 mg (mean ± SD) in the placebo group (p= 0.27). There were no significant differences concerning the secondary outcomes during the seven-day observation period. Seven patients received a rescue block postoperatively, providing analgesia in five patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in measured outcomes between ESPB and placebo in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Future studies may evaluate whether a block performed using higher concentration and/or at a different thoracic level provides more analgesic efficacy.
    BACKGROUND: NCT04438369 ; 18/06/2020. .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号