Hereditary Angioedema Types I and II

遗传性血管性水肿 I 型和 II 型
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:遗传性血管性水肿(HAE)是一种罕见的遗传性疾病,其特征是疼痛且经常使人衰弱的肿胀发作。对I型或II型HAE患者的预后差异知之甚少(I型:C1酯酶抑制剂缺乏引起的HAE;II型:C1酯酶抑制剂功能障碍引起的HAE),C1酯酶抑制剂(C1-INH)减少或功能失调,和那些有正常C1-INH(nC1-INH-HAE)。目的:比较I/II型HAE患者与nC1-INH-HAE患者的医师和患者报告的真实世界结果。方法:数据来自真实世界的AdelphiHAE疾病特异性程序TM,2021年7月至11月对美国HAE治疗医生及其患者进行的横断面调查.医生报告患者疾病活动和严重程度,和最近的攻击历史。收集患者报告的结果。使用的双变量检验是学生t检验,费希尔精确检验,或曼-惠特尼U测试。结果:医师(N=67)提供了368例患者(92.4%I/II型HAE和7.6%nC1-INH-HAE)的数据。医生报告说,与I/II型HAE患者相比,nC1-INH-HAE患者在诊断和数据收集时具有中度或高度疾病活动性以及中度或重度疾病严重程度的比例更高。nC1-INH-HAE患者与I/II型HAE患者相比,在最近一次发作期间,发作严重程度(34.6%对4.4%)和住院率(39.3%对6.6%)增加,报告的健康状况和生活质量较低,通过欧洲生活质量5维5级(美国关税)和血管性水肿生活质量,分别。平均而言,25%的nC1-INH-HAE患者报告因HAE而缺勤,工作或活动障碍,而I/II型HAE患者为2.7%。两组患者均报告了从诊断到数据收集时疾病活动性和严重程度的改善。结论:这些真实世界的研究结果表明,nC1-INH-HAE患者的疾病活动性和严重程度增加,并对他们的生活质量造成更大的损害,工作,和日常功能高于I/II型HAE患者。需要动力统计分析来确认这些发现。
    Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic condition characterized by painful and often debilitating swelling attacks. Little is known about the differences in outcomes between patients with HAE types I or II (type I: HAE caused by C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency; type II: HAE caused by C1 esterase inhibitor dysfunction), with decreased or dysfunctional C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH), and those with normal C1-INH (nC1-INH-HAE). Objective: To compare physician- and patient-reported real-world outcomes in patients with HAE types I/II versus patients with nC1-INH-HAE. Methods: Data were drawn from the Adelphi HAE Disease Specific ProgrammeTM a real-world, cross-sectional survey of HAE-treating physicians and their patients in the United States conducted between July and November 2021. Physicians reported patient disease activity and severity, and recent attack history. Patient-reported outcomes were collected. Bivariate tests used were either the Student\'s t-test, the Fisher exact test, or Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Physicians (N = 67) provided data on 368 patients (92.4% HAE types I/II and 7.6% nC1-INH-HAE). Physicians reported that a higher proportion of patients with nC1-INH-HAE had moderate or high disease activity and moderate or severe disease severity both at diagnosis and at data collection versus those with HAE types I/II. Patients with nC1-INH-HAE versus patients with HAE types I/II experienced increased attack severity (34.6% versus 4.4%) and hospitalization rate during the most recent attack (39.3% versus 6.6%), and reported lower health status and quality of life, via the European Quality of Life 5 Dimension 5 Level (US tariff) and Angioedema Quality of Life, respectively. On average, 25% of the patients with nC1-INH-HAE reported absenteeism and work or activity impairment due to HAE compared with 2.7% of patients with HAE types I/II. Both patient groups reported improvements in disease activity and severity from diagnosis to the time of data collection. Conclusion: These real-world findings suggest that patients with nC1-INH-HAE have increased disease activity and severity, and experience greater impairment to their quality of life, work, and daily functioning than patients with HAE types I/II. Powered statistical analyses are required to confirm these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:批准的按需治疗遗传性血管性水肿发作需要肠胃外给药,与延迟治疗或停止治疗相关的给药途径。
    方法:在此阶段3,双盲,三向交叉试验,我们将至少12岁的1型或2型遗传性血管性水肿参与者随机分配至最多2次口服剂量的sebetalstat(300mg或600mg)或安慰剂治疗血管性水肿.主要终点,在事件发生时间分析中评估,是症状缓解的开始,定义为在第一次给药试验药物后12小时内的两个或多个连续时间点,患者总体变化印象量表上的“稍好”评级(评级范围从“差得多”到“好得多”)。关键次要终点,在事件发生时间分析中评估,发作严重程度降低(患者整体严重程度印象[PGI-S]量表评分提高,评分范围从“无”到“非常严重”)在12小时内的两个或多个连续时间点,并在24小时内完成攻击解决(PGI-S量表上的“无”评级)。
    结果:总共136名参与者被分配到六个试验序列之一,110人治疗264次袭击。使用300mg剂量和600mg剂量的症状开始缓解的时间比使用安慰剂的时间更快(对于两个比较,P<0.001和P=0.001,分别),中位时间为1.61小时(四分位数间距,0.78至7.04),1.79小时(1.02至3.79),和6.72小时(1.34至>12),分别。使用300mg剂量和600mg剂量减少发作严重程度的时间比使用安慰剂更快(P=0.004和P=0.003),中位时间为9.27小时(四分位数间距,1.53至>12),7.75小时(2.19至>12),超过12小时(6.23至>12)。300-mg和600-mg剂量的完成解决时间比安慰剂更快(P=0.002和P<0.001)。在300毫克剂量下,24小时内完全缓解的发作百分比为42.5%,600mg剂量的49.5%,和27.4%的安慰剂。Sebratalstat和安慰剂具有相似的安全性;没有报告与试验药物相关的严重不良事件。
    结论:口服给症状缓解提供了更快的时间,降低攻击严重程度,和完全的攻击分辨率比安慰剂。(由KalVista制药公司资助;KONFIDENTClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT05259917;EudraCT编号,2021-001226-21。).
    BACKGROUND: Approved on-demand treatments for hereditary angioedema attacks need to be administered parenterally, a route of administration that is associated with delays in treatment or withholding of therapy.
    METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, three-way crossover trial, we randomly assigned participants at least 12 years of age with type 1 or type 2 hereditary angioedema to take up to two oral doses of sebetralstat (300 mg or 600 mg) or placebo for an angioedema attack. The primary end point, assessed in a time-to-event analysis, was the beginning of symptom relief, defined as a rating of \"a little better\" on the Patient Global Impression of Change scale (ratings range from \"much worse\" to \"much better\") at two or more consecutive time points within 12 hours after the first administration of the trial agent. Key secondary end points, assessed in a time-to-event analysis, were a reduction in attack severity (an improved rating on the Patient Global Impression of Severity [PGI-S] scale, with ratings ranging from \"none\" to \"very severe\") at two or more consecutive time points within 12 hours and complete attack resolution (a rating of \"none\" on the PGI-S scale) within 24 hours.
    RESULTS: A total of 136 participants were assigned to one of six trial sequences, with 110 treating 264 attacks. The time to the beginning of symptom relief with the 300-mg dose and the 600-mg dose was faster than with placebo (P<0.001 and P = 0.001 for the two comparisons, respectively), with median times of 1.61 hours (interquartile range, 0.78 to 7.04), 1.79 hours (1.02 to 3.79), and 6.72 hours (1.34 to >12), respectively. The time to reduction in the attack severity with the 300-mg dose and the 600-mg dose was faster than with placebo (P = 0.004 and P = 0.003), with median times of 9.27 hours (interquartile range, 1.53 to >12), 7.75 hours (2.19 to >12), and more than 12 hours (6.23 to >12). The time to complete resolution was faster with the 300-mg and 600-mg doses than with placebo (P = 0.002 and P<0.001). The percentage of attacks with complete resolution within 24 hours was 42.5% with the 300-mg dose, 49.5% with the 600-mg dose, and 27.4% with placebo. Sebetralstat and placebo had similar safety profiles; no serious adverse events related to the trial agents were reported.
    CONCLUSIONS: Oral sebetralstat provided faster times to the beginning of symptom relief, reduction in attack severity, and complete attack resolution than placebo. (Funded by KalVista Pharmaceuticals; KONFIDENT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05259917; EudraCT number, 2021-001226-21.).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由C1抑制剂缺乏症(HAE-C1-INH)引起的遗传性血管性水肿是一种罕见的遗传性疾病,由SERPING1基因的致病性变异引起,其特征是肿胀和高度可变的临床表型。我们旨在确定易感临床症状的新型修饰遗传因素。我们对HAE-C1-INH的有症状和无症状(三个二组)家族成员进行了全外显子组测序(WES)和综合生物信息学分析。使用Sanger测序确定使用WES鉴定的选定变体(存在于所有无症状患者中,不存在于有症状患者中)。我们纳入了来自东南欧的88例临床特征良好的HAE-C1-INH患者(9例无症状),来自42个无关家庭。我们在23个基因中鉴定出39个变异体(ANKRD36C,ARGFX,CC2D2B,IL5RA,IRF2BP2,LGR6,MRPL45,MUC3A,NPIPA1,NRG1,OR5M1,OR5M3,OR5M10,OR8U3,PLCL1,PRSS3,PSKH2,PTPRA,RTP4,SEZ6,SLC25A5,VWA3A,和ZNF790)。我们选择了CC2D2B和PLCL1中的变体,其在HAE-C1-INH的整个组中使用Sanger测序进行分析。我们发现有症状和无症状患者之间CC2D2Bc.190A>G(rs17383738)变异的频率存在显着差异,其中杂合子在无症状HAE-C1-INH患者中比有症状患者更常见(55%vs23%;P=0.049,OR=4.24,95%CI1.07-14.69).我们的研究确定了改变HAE-C1-INH临床变异性的新遗传因素。我们进一步证明,在一大群人中,CC2D2B基因作为疾病修饰因子的重要性。基于连锁不平衡分析,CCNJ和ZNF518A基因也可能参与HAE-C1-INH的临床变异。
    Hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1-INH) is a rare genetic disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the SERPING1 gene and characterised by swelling and a highly variable clinical phenotype. We aimed to identify novel modifying genetic factors predisposing to the clinical symptoms. We performed whole exome sequencing (WES) and comprehensive bioinformatic analysis in symptomatic and asymptomatic (three duos) family members with HAE-C1-INH. Selected variants identified using WES (present in all asymptomatic and absent in symptomatic patients) were determined using Sanger sequencing. We included 88 clinically well-characterised HAE-C1-INH patients from south-eastern Europe (nine asymptomatic) from 42 unrelated families. We identified 39 variants in 23 genes (ANKRD36C, ARGFX, CC2D2B, IL5RA, IRF2BP2, LGR6, MRPL45, MUC3A, NPIPA1, NRG1, OR5M1, OR5M3, OR5M10, OR8U3, PLCL1, PRSS3, PSKH2, PTPRA, RTP4, SEZ6, SLC25A5, VWA3A, and ZNF790). We selected variants in CC2D2B and PLCL1, which were analysed using Sanger sequencing in the entire group of HAE-C1-INH. We found significant differences in the frequencies of the CC2D2B c.190A>G (rs17383738) variant between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, where heterozygotes were more common in asymptomatic HAE-C1-INH patients in comparison to symptomatic patients (55 % vs 23%; P = 0.049, OR = 4.24, 95% CI 1.07-14.69). Our study identified novel genetic factors that modify the clinical variability of HAE-C1-INH. We further demonstrated, in a large cohort, the importance of the CC2D2B gene as a disease-modifying factor. Based on linkage disequilibrium analysis, the CCNJ and ZNF518A genes might also be involved in the clinical variability of HAE-C1-INH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于SARS-CoV-2感染的病理机制与C1抑制剂缺乏(C1-INH-HAE)引起的遗传性血管性水肿之间的相似性,出现C1-INH-HAE可能恶化感染过程的可能性,或感染可能会影响C1-INH-HAE患者血管性水肿(HAE)发作的严重程度。我们的研究旨在评估COVID-19大流行对匈牙利C1-INH-HAE患者生活质量(QoL)的影响,调查感染的急性过程,后COVID症状(PCS),该患者人群的疫苗接种覆盖率和疫苗的副作用。在2021年7月1日至2021年10月31日期间,93名患者完成了我们的问卷。在同一时期,2019年3月至2020年3月,63例患者完成了血管性水肿生活质量问卷(AE-QoL)。在检查期间感染SARS-CoV-2的患者中(18/93患者;19%),5%需要住院治疗,28%的人在感染的急性期经历过HAE发作,44%有经验的PCS。总共向患者施用142剂疫苗。在任何情况下都没有发生严重的疫苗反应,73名接种疫苗的患者中有4名(5%)经历HAE发作。在AE-QoL总分的中位数中没有发现显着差异(p=0.59),或在大流行之前和期间的HAE发作次数。根据我们的研究,HAE患者没有经历更严重的SARS-CoV-2感染,也没有加重HAE的病程。QoL的变化不显著,疫苗在HAE患者中是安全的。
    Due to the similarity between the pathomechanism of SARS-CoV-2 infections and hereditary angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE), a possibility emerged that C1-INH-HAE may worsen the course of the infection, or that the infection may influence the severity of angioedema (HAE) attacks in C1-INH-HAE patients. Our study aimed to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of life (QoL) of Hungarian C1-INH-HAE patients, and to survey the acute course of the infection, post COVID symptoms (PCS), vaccination coverage and the side effects of vaccines in this patient population. 93 patients completed our questionnaire between 1st July 2021 and 31st October 2021. In this same period and between March 2019 and March 2020, 63 patients completed the angioedema quality of life questionnaire (AE-QoL). Out of those patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the examined period (18/93 patients; 19%), 5% required hospitalization, 28% experienced HAE attacks in the acute phase of the infection, and 44% experienced PCS. A total number of 142 doses of vaccines were administered to the patients. Serious vaccine reactions did not occur in any case, 4 (5%) out of the 73 vaccinated patients experienced HAE attacks. No significant difference (p = 0.59) was found in the median of the AE-QoL total score, or in the number of HAE attacks prior and during the pandemic. Based on our study, HAE patients did not experience more serious SARS-CoV-2 infection, and it did not aggravate the course of HAE either. Changes in the QoL were not significant, and vaccines were safe in HAE patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase III
    背景:遗传性血管性水肿(HAE)是一种罕见且可能危及生命的遗传性疾病,其特征是血管性水肿反复发作。I型和II型HAE由缺陷或功能失调的C1-酯酶抑制剂(C1-INH)产生。这项3期研究评估了疗效,药代动力学(PK),日本HAE患者皮下(SC)C1-INH的安全性。
    方法:前瞻性,开放标签,多中心,单臂3期研究招募I型或II型HAE患者至初始磨合期,随后是16周的治疗期,患者每周两次接受60IU/kgC1-INH(SC)。两个主要终点是每月HAE发作的时间归一化次数和第16周时的C1-INH功能活性。
    结果:9名患者进入治疗期并完成研究。用C1-INH(SC)治疗显着降低了治疗期间的平均每月发作率从3.7降低到治疗期间的0.3(患者内部比较的探索性p值=0.004)。在第16周最后一次C1-INH(SC)后,C1-INH的平均谷浓度为59.8%,到给药期结束和最后一次样品的血浆浓度-时间曲线下平均面积分别为5317.1和13,091.5h•%,分别。在研究期间,没有死亡,严重不良事件,或导致研究中断的不良事件。
    结论:C1-INH(SC)(60IU/kg,每周两次)作为日本I型或II型HAE患者预防HAE发作的有效且耐受性良好,这得到了增加和保持的C1-INH功能活性的支持。EudraCT编号2019-003921-99;JapicCTI-205273。
    BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare and potentially life-threatening genetic disorder characterized by recurrent attacks of angioedema. HAE types I and II result from deficient or dysfunctional C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH). This Phase 3 study assessed the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety of subcutaneous (SC) C1-INH in Japanese patients with HAE.
    METHODS: The prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm Phase 3 study recruited patients with HAE types I or II to an initial run-in period, followed by a 16-week treatment period where patients received 60 IU/kg C1-INH (SC) twice weekly. The two primary endpoints were the time-normalized number of HAE attacks per month and C1-INH functional activity at Week 16.
    RESULTS: Nine patients entered the treatment period and completed the study. Treatment with C1-INH (SC) significantly reduced the mean monthly attack rate from 3.7 during the run-in period to 0.3 during treatment (exploratory p value of within-patient comparison = 0.004). After the last dose of C1-INH (SC) at Week 16, the mean trough concentration of C1-INH was 59.8%, and the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve to the end of the dosing period and to the last sample were 5317.1 and 13,091.5 h•%, respectively. During the study, there were no deaths, serious adverse events, or adverse events leading to study discontinuation.
    CONCLUSIONS: C1-INH (SC) (60 IU/kg twice weekly) was efficacious and well tolerated as a prophylaxis against HAE attacks in Japanese patients with HAE types I or II, which was supported by the increased and maintained C1-INH functional activity. EudraCT Number 2019-003921-99; JapicCTI-205273.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    复发性腹痛是胃肠病学咨询的常见原因。鉴别诊断包括遗传性血管性水肿(HAE),一种罕见的以血管性水肿反复发作为特征的疾病,没有荨麻疹或瘙痒,最常影响皮肤,还有胃肠道的粘膜组织,由感染等多种因素引发,创伤,手术,毒品,或压力。由于其异质性和短暂的临床特征,它是一种诊断困难的疾病,因此,在适当的情况下进行临床怀疑将允许进行特定的治疗并避免不必要的检查。我们介绍了一个19岁男性复发性腹痛的随访案例,在众多微生物之后,内窥镜,和放射学检查,需要进行补体测试,获得低水平的C4,C1抑制剂水平增加,功能活性降低,被诊断为II型HAE。
    Recurrent abdominal pain is a common reason for consultation in Gastroenterology. The differential diagnosis includes hereditary angioedema (HAE), a rare disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of angioedema, without urticaria or pruritus, which most often affects the skin, but also mucosal tissues of the gastrointestinal tract, triggered by diverse factors such as infections, trauma, surgery, drugs, or stress. It is a disease with a difficult diagnosis due to its heterogeneous and transitory clinical features, so having a clinical suspicion in the appropriate context would allow the administration of a specific treatment and avoid unnecessary examinations. We present the case of a 19-year-old male followed-up for recurrent abdominal pain that, after numerous microbiological, endoscopic, and radiological examinations, complement tests were requested, obtaining low levels of C4 with increased levels of C1 inhibitor and reduced functional activity, being diagnosed with HAE type II.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号