Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Clinical symptoms that patients may present with include: hematemesis, coffee-ground emesis, melena, and hematochezia. Clinical signs can range from tachycardia to shock. The anatomical landmark that differentiates upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeds from lower bleeds is the ligament of Treitz. The first steps of treating a patient who presents with signs of UGIB are resuscitation with appropriate fluids and blood products as necessary. The consideration of endoscopy and the urgency at which it should be performed is also vital during initial resuscitation. Endoscopic therapy should ideally be performed within 24 hours of presentation after initial stabilization with crystalloids and blood products. Intravenous proton pump inhibitors are the mainstay in the initial management of upper GI bleeding from a non-variceal etiology, and they should be administered in the acute setting to decrease the probability of high-risk stigmata seen during endoscopy. Pro-kinetic agents can be given 30 minutes to an hour before endoscopy and may aid in the diagnosis of UGIB. There are 3 broad categories of endoscopic management for UGIB: injection, thermal, and mechanical. Each endoscopic method can be used alone or in combination with others; however, the injection technique with epinephrine should always be used in conjunction with another method to increase the success of achieving hemostasis. In this review article, we will review the steps of triage and initial resuscitation in UGIB, causes of UGIB and their respective management, several endoscopic techniques and their effectiveness, and prognosis with a primary focus limited to non-variceal bleeding.

暂无摘要。

Dieulafoy\'s lesions (DLs) are a rare cause of acute gastrointestinal bleeds (GIBs). Here we describe Over-the-Scope Clip Padlock System (OTSC-P) use to treat a gastric fundus DL with recurrent bleeding despite other interventions. The OTSC-P was created for full-thickness defect closure in the event of a perforation, but use has expanded to treatment of GIB. They consist of metal clips mounted on transparent caps, delivered via endoscope. Their size allows control of larger bleeding lesions, provides enhanced tissue stability and the firmer clip grasp reduces rebleeding or clip dislodgement.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of scheduled second-look endoscopy in patients with acute peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB).
METHODS: We systematically search in four databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the usefulness of scheduled second-look endoscopy vs. single endoscopy in patients with PUB. Our primary outcome was rebleeding. Secondary outcomes were surgery, mortality, and the number of units of blood transfused (NUBT). All meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD), with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for categorical and continuous outcomes, respectively. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool, and the quality of evidence (QoE) was rated with the GRADE approach.
RESULTS: Eight full-text RCTs and two RCT abstracts were included (n=1513). We did not find differences in rebleeding (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.53-1.14, moderate QoE), surgery (RR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.29-1.15, moderate QoE), mortality (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.46-1.71, moderate QoE) or NUBT (MD, -0.01 units; 95% CI, -0.3 to 0.28, low QoE) between second-look and single endoscopy. Sensitivity analyses had similar results to the main analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine second-look endoscopy was not more efficacious than single endoscopy in patients with PUB.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Over 300 000 hospital admissions in the United States each year are due to patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (UGIB). Common etiologies of nonvariceal UGIB include peptic ulcers, mucosal erosions of the esophagus, stomach or duodenum, Mallory-Weiss tears, Dieulafoy lesions, upper GI tract malignancy, or other etiology.
RESULTS: Peptic ulcers classified as Forrest Ia, Ib, or IIa require endoscopic hemostasis, while IIb ulcers may be considered for endoscopic clot removal with endoscopic treatment of any underlying major stigmata. Endoscopic hemostasis for ulcers classified as Forrest IIc or III is not advised due to the low risk of recurrent bleeding. Endoscopic hemostasis in ulcer bleeding can be achieved using injection, thermal, and/or mechanical modalities.
CONCLUSIONS: This review focuses on the currently recommended endoscopic therapies of patients presenting with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

暂无摘要。