A woman in her 20s presented with haematemesis, post-prandial abdominal pain, weight loss and anaemia. Imaging revealed a non-enhancing mass in the retroperitoneal space along the mesenteric plane, encasing the porto-mesenteric vasculature. Endoscopy showed oesophageal varices. She was diagnosed with sclerosing mesenteritis, causing extrinsic compression of the portal vein and superior mesenteric artery. She underwent endoscopic variceal ligation and received prednisolone and tamoxifen. After 3 months, her post-prandial pain improved, and she did not have further bleeding episodes.

BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis of 10 randomized prospective trials demonstrated a higher risk of postoperative bleeding from pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) compared with pancreatojejunostomy following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). This study evaluated the incidence, risk factors, and treatment of anastomotic bleeding from invaginated PG.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all consecutive PDs performed between April 1, 2011 and December 31, 2022 using invaginated PG by the double purse-string technique. Multivariate analysis identified risk factors for anastomotic PG bleeding.
RESULTS: During the study, 695 consecutive patients with a median age of 66 years underwent PD; the majority was performed for ductal pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Simultaneous vascular resections were performed in 328 patients. Postoperative mortality was 4.1%. Bleeding from PG occurred in 33(4.6%) patients at a median interval of 5 days (range, 1-14) from surgery, leading to reoperation in 21(63%). PG bleeding-related mortality was 9.0%. Multivariate analyses identified a soft pancreatic texture and Wirsung duct > 3 or ≤ 3 mm (Class C and D, respectively, of the ISGPS) (odds ratio [OR]: 2.17, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.38-3.44; P = 0.0009) and wrapping of the invaginated pancreas (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.17-0.84; P = 0.01) as independent risk factors for PG bleeding.
CONCLUSIONS: In a large volume setting, anastomotic bleeding from invaginated PG occurred in ~ 5% of patients and was associated with soft pancreatic parenchyma and small wirsung duct. The reduced rate of PG bleeding observed with wrapping of the invaginated pancreatic stump warrants further evaluation in a prospective randomized study.

Splenic venous hypertension or left-sided portal hypertension is a rare condition caused by an obstruction of the splenic vein. Usually, it presents with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the absence of liver disease. Etiologies can be classified based on the mechanism of development of splenic vein hypertension: compression, stenosis, inflammation, thrombosis, and surgically decreased splenic venous flow. Diagnosis is established by various imaging modalities and should be suspected in patients with gastric varices in the absence of esophageal varices, splenomegaly, or cirrhosis. The management and prognosis vary depending on the underlying etiology but generally involve reducing splenic venous pressure. The aim of this review was to summarize the etiologies of splenic venous hypertension according to the mechanism of development.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a known complication of COVID-19. There is still limited knowledge about this condition. Here, we report the case of a previously healthy toddler boy, who presented with acute liver failure and duodenal lesions resulting in severe haematemesis and haemorrhagic shock, requiring intensive care unit care. The patient had persistent transaminitis, a deranged coagulation profile, inflammatory markers were elevated, and laboratory tests were negative for common infectious hepatitis aetiologies as well as COVID-19 Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. His COVID-19 antibody was reactive. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a Forrest grade III duodenal ulcer. Looking into the constellation of symptoms and laboratory findings a confirmed diagnosis of acute viral hepatitis caused by MIS-C was made. Hence, he was given intravenous methylprednisolone along with intravenous immunoglobulins, after which he improved clinically and transaminitis resolved. The patient was discharged on clinical improvement and was doing fine on follow-up up to 6 months.

BACKGROUND: Due to rarity of duodenal GISTs, clinicians have few information about its clinical features, diagnosis, management and prognosis.
METHODS: We report a case of promptly diagnosed duodenal GIST in a 61-year-old Egyptian man presented shocked with severe attack of hematemesis and melena. Upper gastroduodenal endoscopy was done and revealed a large ulcerating bleeding mass at first part of duodenum 4 hemo-clips were applied with good hemostasis. An exploratory laparotomy and distal gastrectomy, duodenectomy and gastrojejunostomy were performed. The morphology of the mass combined with immunohistochemistry was consistent with duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) of high risk type. The patient is on amatinib one tablet daily and he was well with no evidence of tumor recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: despite being rare, emergency presentation with sudden severe, life-threatening hemorrhagic shock duodenal GISTs might be a cause of potentially lethal massive combined upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding which is the key feature of this rare and challenging tumor.

BACKGROUND: An aortoesophageal fistula can prove to be fatal. Salvage thoracic endovascular aortic repair as a bridging therapy and radical surgery with thoracotomy should be considered while treating aortoesophageal fistula without spontaneous closure. Moreover, it is essential to select a technique that reduces the risk of reinfection. Here we report a rare case of a ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm related to esophageal perforation by a fish bone that led to massive hematemesis and shock, and the surgical treatment of an aortoesophageal fistula that developed after salvage thoracic endovascular aortic repair.
METHODS: A 70-year-old Japanese female patient was admitted with hematemesis, thoracic pain, and shock related to esophageal perforation of a ruptured descending aortic aneurysm caused by fish bone aspiration and esophageal perforation 1 month previously. An emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed. Postoperatively, an aortoesophageal fistula that remained open and a food intake-related increase in the inflammatory response was noted. Radical blood-vessel prosthesis implantation and fistula closure were performed. The patient\'s postoperative course was favorable and the patient was discharged 22 days after the blood vessel prosthesis implantation.
CONCLUSIONS: Such a case of rupture of a descending aortic aneurysm related to perforation by a fish bone and an aortoesophageal fistula is considerably rare. Thus, we report the therapeutic strategy of this particular case and review the relevant literature.

A Dieulafoy lesion is an abnormal artery located in the gastric submucosa that represents a rare cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. These lesions typically present as massive hemorrhages in older patients, with multiple medical comorbidities. The lesions are diagnosed with endoscopy and treated with hemostasis by clip placement or coagulation. This case report is that of a rare presentation of this rare condition in a younger 18-year-old patient with no medical comorbidities. He presented with hematemesis, melena, and syncope in the setting of ibuprofen self-treatment for a recent upper viral illness. This medication use is a proposed inciting factor for the bleeding lesion, though he had a history of a splenic artery embolization following a remote motor vehicle accident, which could represent a mechanism for a rare acquired lesion. A gastroenterologist was consulted and assisted in the diagnosis and management of this patient. His lesion was identified and treated within 24 hours of his presentation.

Esophageal varices commonly affect cirrhotic patients as a result of elevated portal system resistance. Blood pools within esophageal portosystemic collateral vessels, which can eventually rupture, leading to life-threatening hemorrhage. To prevent this, cirrhotic patients without a history of varices undergo endoscopic surveillance for varices every 2-3 years. We present an unusual case of variceal hemorrhage in a patient who was seen to have no varices on endoscopic evaluation only a month earlier.

BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a condition commonly seen in the emergency department (ED). Therefore, it is important for emergency clinicians to be aware of the current evidence regarding the diagnosis and management of this disease.
OBJECTIVE: This paper evaluates key evidence-based updates concerning UGIB for the emergency clinician.
CONCLUSIONS: UGIB most frequently presents with hematemesis. There are numerous causes, with the most common peptic ulcer disease, though variceal bleeding in particular can be severe. Nasogastric tube lavage for diagnosis is not recommended based on the current evidence. A hemoglobin transfusion threshold of 7 g/dL is recommended (8 g/dL in those with myocardial ischemia), but patients with severe bleeding and hemodynamic instability require emergent transfusion regardless of their level. Medications that may be used in UGIB include proton pump inhibitors, prokinetic agents, and vasoactive medications. Antibiotics are recommended for those with cirrhosis and suspected variceal bleeding. Endoscopy is the diagnostic and therapeutic modality of choice and should be performed within 24 h of presentation in non-variceal bleeding after resuscitation, though patients with variceal bleeding may require endoscopy within 12 h. Transcatheter arterial embolization or surgical intervention may be necessary. Intubation should be avoided if possible. If intubation is necessary, several considerations are required, including resuscitation prior to induction, utilizing preoxygenation and appropriate suction, and administering a prokinetic agent. There are a variety of tools available for risk stratification, including the Glasgow Blatchford Score.
CONCLUSIONS: An understanding of literature updates can improve the ED care of patients with UGIB.

OBJECTIVE: Gastrointestinal bleeding is a major healthcare burden and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to assess the prevalence, clinical presentation, and risk factors of patients presenting with gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in two tertiary care hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The medical records of patients who presented to the emergency department with gastrointestinal bleeding between January 2010 and January 2020 were reviewed. Patients aged 18 years or older, with gastrointestinal bleeding (upper or lower) regardless of underlying cause, lifestyle, location of bleeding, health status, or medication use, were included. Demographic characteristics, initial vital signs, medical history, physical examination findings, comorbidities, medications, laboratory and radiological investigations, cause and stage of liver disease, management, and complications were recorded. Endoscopic findings and management of the bleeding site were collected according to the presenting symptoms.
RESULTS: A total of 760 patients were included. The mean age was 62.7 ± 17.8 years, and 61.4% were males. The most common comorbidities at presentation were hypertension (54.1%), diabetes mellitus (51.2%), and ischemic heart disease (18.2%). The origins of the bleeding were lower gastrointestinal in 52% and upper gastrointestinal in 48% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Lower gastrointestinal bleeding was found to be more common than upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Hemorrhoids, polyps, diverticular disease, and colonic ulcers were the major risk factors for lower gastrointestinal bleeding. In contrast, upper gastrointestinal bleeding was predominantly caused by esophageal varices, gastritis, and peptic ulcers.