Helicopter Emergency Medical services

直升机紧急医疗服务
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:紧急医疗服务(EMS)提供者暂时上升到高海拔,以进行无压力且没有氧气补充设施的直升机在山区的主要任务和次要运输。脑氧饱和度的降低会导致急性暴露于高原期间注意力和反应时间以及护理质量的损害。
    目的:本研究的主要目的是调查在急性暴露于高原期间补充氧气对直升机EMS(HEMS)提供者认知能力的影响。
    方法:这种介入,随机化,控制,双盲,交叉临床试验于2021年10月进行。每次试验都使用相当于4000米的模拟海拔场景,其中志愿者在受控的环境舱中以4m/s的恒定上升速率暴露于低压缺氧,可复制,和安全的条件。审判可以随时自愿终止。纳入标准是年龄在18至60岁之间的急诊医疗服务和搜救服务成员以及美国麻醉师协会的身体状况等级I。
    方法:每位参与者进行了2项试验,一种是在补充氧气的情况下暴露于高原(干预试验),另一种是在补充环境空气的情况下暴露于高原(对照试验)。
    方法:测量包括外周血氧饱和度(SpO2),脑氧合(ScO2),呼吸和心率,精神运动警觉测验(PVT)数字符号替换测试(DSST),n-Back测试(2-BACK),沟槽板测试,以及关于主观表现的问卷调查,压力,工作量,积极和消极的影响。配对t检验用于比较条件(干预与控制)。使用广义估计方程(GEE)进一步分析数据。
    结果:共有36名志愿者(30名男性;平均[SD]年龄,36[9]年;平均[SD]教育,17[4]年)接受了干预和对照试验。干预试验,与对照试验相比,具有较高的SpO2值(平均值[SD],97.9[1.6]%vs.86[2.3]%,t检验,p=0.004)和ScO2(平均值[SD],69.9[5.8]%与62.1[5.2]%,配对t检验,p=0.004)。与对照试验相比,干预试验在5分钟后对PVT的反应时间(RT)较短(平均值[SD],277.8[16.7]msvs.282.5[15.3]ms,配对t检验,p=0.006)和30分钟后(平均值[SD],276.9[17.7]msvs.280.7[15.0]ms,配对t检验,p=0.054)在高度。在控制其他变量的同时,SpO2每降低%,RT增加0.37ms.干预试验显示,正确反应的DSST数量明显较高(平均值[SD],1.2[3.2],配对t检验,p=0.035)。干预试验中的变量与对照试验中的DSST错误反应数相似,2-BACK,和沟槽板测试。
    结论:这项随机临床试验发现,在急性暴露于4000m海拔期间,补充氧气可以改善HEMS提供者的认知能力。补充氧气的使用可以允许在HEMS提供者中保持注意力和及时反应。同一天反复的海拔上升的影响,剥夺睡眠,和额外的压力源应该调查。试验注册NCT05073406,ClinicalTrials.gov试验注册。
    OBJECTIVE: Emergency medical services (EMS) providers transiently ascend to high altitude for primary missions and secondary transports in mountainous areas in helicopters that are unpressurised and do not have facilities for oxygen supplementation. The decrease in cerebral oxygen saturation can lead to impairment in attention and reaction time as well as in quality of care during acute exposure to altitude.
    OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of oxygen supplementation on cognitive performance in Helicopter EMS (HEMS) providers during acute exposure to altitude.
    METHODS: This interventional, randomized, controlled, double-blind, cross-over clinical trial was conducted in October 2021. Each trial used a simulated altitude scenario equivalent to 4000 m, in which volunteers were exposed to hypobaric hypoxia with a constant rate of ascent of 4 m/s in an environmental chamber under controlled, replicable, and safe conditions. Trials could be voluntarily terminated at any time. Inclusion criteria were being members of emergency medical services and search and rescue services with an age between 18 and 60 years and an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I.
    METHODS: Each participant conducted 2 trials, one in which they were exposed to altitude with oxygen supplementation (intervention trial) and the other in which they were exposed to altitude with ambient air supplementation (control trial).
    METHODS: Measurements included peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), cerebral oxygenation (ScO2), breathing and heart rates, Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT), Digit-Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), n-Back test (2-BACK), the Grooved Pegboard test, and questionnaires on subjective performance, stress, workload, and positive and negative affect. Paired t-tests were used to compare conditions (intervention vs. control). Data were further analyzed using generalized estimating equations (GEE).
    RESULTS: A total of 36 volunteers (30 men; mean [SD] age, 36 [9] years; mean [SD] education, 17 [4] years) were exposed to the intervention and control trials. The intervention trials, compared with the control trials, had higher values of SpO2 (mean [SD], 97.9 [1.6] % vs. 86 [2.3] %, t-test, p = 0.004) and ScO2 (mean [SD], 69.9 [5.8] % vs. 62.1 [5.2] %, paired t-test, p = 0.004). The intervention trials compared with the control trials had a shorter reaction time (RT) on the PVT after 5 min (mean [SD], 277.8 [16.7] ms vs. 282.5 [15.3] ms, paired t-test, p = 0.006) and after 30 min (mean [SD], 276.9 [17.7] ms vs. 280.7 [15.0] ms, paired t-test, p = 0.054) at altitude. While controlling for other variables, there was a RT increase of 0.37 ms for each % of SpO2 decrease. The intervention trials showed significantly higher values for DSST number of correct responses (with a difference of mean [SD], 1.2 [3.2], paired t-test, p = 0.035). Variables in the intervention trials were otherwise similar to those in the control trials for DSST number of incorrect responses, 2-BACK, and the Grooved Pegboard test.
    CONCLUSIONS: This randomized clinical trial found that oxygen supplementation improves cognitive performance among HEMS providers during acute exposure to 4000 m altitude. The use of oxygen supplementation may allow to maintain attention and timely reaction in HEMS providers. The impact of repeated altitude ascents on the same day, sleep-deprivation, and additional stressors should be investigated. Trial registration NCT05073406, ClinicalTrials.gov trial registration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景/目标:2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对使用直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)的患者在气管插管和患者管理方面的影响尚不清楚。因此,我们打算在日本调查这件事。方法:在这篇回顾性研究中,观察性研究,我们分析了2018-2022年在Tochigi地区使用HEMS的2277例患者.我们仅包括需要气管插管的患者。我们将2020年2月至2022年1月的患者分为大流行组,将2018年2月至2020年1月的患者分为对照组。我们比较了两组之间从到达现场到离开现场的间隔(现场时间)和次要变量。结果:将278例符合条件的患者分为大流行组(n=127)和对照组(n=151)。大流行期间的现场时间比以前少(25.64±9.19vs.27.83±8.74min,p=0.043)。使用咪达唑仑的患者比例较低(11.8%vs.22.5%,p=0.02),使用罗库溴铵的患者的比例更高(29.1%vs.6.0%,p<0.001)在大流行期间。相比之下,除气管插管外的其他干预类型和到医院的转运类型在两组之间没有差异.结论:COVID-19大流行与HEMS使用某些药物的任务时间和频率的变化有关。然而,干预类型和交通类型没有差异.由于COVID-19大流行的影响,需要进一步研究患者预后和病情的变化。
    Background/Objectives: The impacts of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on patients using helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) regarding tracheal intubation and patient management remain unclear. Thus, we aimed to investigate this matter in Japan. Methods: In this retrospective, observational study, we analyzed 2277 patients who utilized HEMS in Tochigi Prefecture during 2018-2022. We included only patients who required tracheal intubation. We categorized patients from February 2020 to January 2022 in the pandemic group and those from February 2018 to January 2020 in the control group. We compared the interval from arrival at the scene to leaving the scene (on-scene time) and secondary variables between the two groups. Results: A total of 278 eligible patients were divided into the pandemic group (n = 127) and the control group (n = 151). The on-scene time was lower during the pandemic than that before (25.64 ± 9.19 vs. 27.83 ± 8.74 min, p = 0.043). The percentage of patients using midazolam was lower (11.8% vs. 22.5%, p = 0.02) and that of patients using rocuronium bromide was higher (29.1% vs. 6.0%, p < 0.001) during the pandemic. In contrast, the type of intervention other than tracheal intubation and the type of transportation to the hospital did not differ between the groups. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with changes in the mission time of and the frequency of certain drugs administered by the HEMS. However, the type of intervention and the type of transportation did not differ. Further research is needed on changes in patient prognosis and condition due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:由于与地面急救医疗服务(EMS)相比,直升机急救医疗服务(HEMS)在单价方面是一种昂贵的资源,重要的是进一步研究哪些方法可以优化这些服务。这项研究的目的是评估医生配备HEMS与地面EMS相比在开发场景中的成本效益,并改进分诊,航空性能,并纳入缺血性卒中患者。
    方法:通过比较HEMS与地面EMS在六种不同情况下的健康结果和成本来评估增量成本效益比(ICER)。使用估计的30天死亡率和质量调整生命年(QALYs)来衡量健康益处。使用EuroQoL仪器评估生活质量(QoL),并对不同患者组进行了单向敏感性分析.生存估计来自国家FinnHEMS数据库,根据最近的财务报告进行成本分析。
    结果:在方案3.1中取得了最好的结果,包括减少了过度警报,航空性能提升,和缺血性卒中患者的评估。这种情况产生了1077.07-1436.09额外的QALY,ICER为33,703-44,937€/QALY。与目前的做法相比,这表示额外的QALY增加了27.72%,ICER减少了21.05%。
    结论:通过将卒中患者纳入派遣标准,HEMS的成本效益可以大大提高,由于总成本是固定的,成本效益是根据产能利用率确定的。
    OBJECTIVE: Since Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) is an expensive resource in terms of unit price compared to ground-based Emergency Medical Service (EMS), it is important to further investigate which methods would allow for the optimization of these services. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of physician-staffed HEMS compared to ground-based EMS in developed scenarios with improvements in triage, aviation performance, and the inclusion of ischemic stroke patients.
    METHODS: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was assessed by comparing health outcomes and costs of HEMS versus ground-based EMS across six different scenarios. Estimated 30-day mortality and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were used to measure health benefits. Quality-of-Life (QoL) was assessed with EuroQoL instrument, and a one-way sensitivity analysis was carried out across different patient groups. Survival estimates were evaluated from the national FinnHEMS database, with cost analysis based on the most recent financial reports.
    RESULTS: The best outcome was achieved in Scenario 3.1 which included a reduction in over-alerts, aviation performance enhancement, and assessment of ischemic stroke patients. This scenario yielded 1077.07-1436.09 additional QALYs with an ICER of 33,703-44,937 €/QALY. This represented a 27.72% increase in the additional QALYs and a 21.05% reduction in the ICER compared to the current practice.
    CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness of HEMS can be highly improved by adding stroke patients into the dispatch criteria, as the overall costs are fixed, and the cost-effectiveness is determined based on the utilization rate of capacity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    航空医疗运输(AMT)是全球医疗保健系统的组成部分。在这篇文章中,所需的人员和设备,相关的安全考虑,并审查了支持使用AMT的证据,重点是直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)。提出了由空气医疗院前分诊评分指导的HEMS适应症。最后,生理考虑,这对AMT工作人员和接收临床医生都很重要,被审查。
    Aeromedical transport (AMT) is an integral part of healthcare systems worldwide. In this article, the personnel and equipment required, associated safety considerations, and evidence supporting the use of AMT is reviewed, with an emphasis on helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS). Indications for HEMS as guideded by the Air Medical Prehospital Triage Score are presented. Lastly, physiologic considerations, which are important to both AMT crews and receiving clinicians, are reviewed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)在美国和全球范围内用于应对危重病患者和外伤受害者。在美国,相对有限的研究已经检查了它们在应对院外心脏骤停(OHCA)中的作用。在这项研究中,我们比较了HEMS治疗的OHCA与地面救护车治疗的心脏骤停.
    我们查询了美国紧急医疗服务(EMS)激活(NEMSIS)的大型国家级数据库。纳入标准为2022年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间由HEMS或地面救护车治疗的OHCA激活。然后比较两组的关键逮捕数据。EMS到达后的设施间转移和心脏骤停被排除。
    HEMS治疗的1,233例心脏骤停和地面救护车治疗的341,096例心脏骤停符合纳入标准。比较两组,有HEMS反应的心脏骤停更可能是男性(66.7%vs.62.8%,p<0.01),白色(50.2%与45.7%,p<0.01),18岁以下(10.9%vs.2.7%,p<0.001),与创伤性损伤相关(19.1%vs.5.7%,p<0.001),见证(72.7%与37.3%,p<0.001),并且最初可电击(24.7%与11.1%,p<0.001)。
    我们对HEMS治疗的心脏骤停与地面救护车治疗的心脏骤停的比较揭示了两组之间的显着差异。随着非创伤性和创伤性心脏骤停新的院前复苏技术的发展,需要进一步的研究来更好地描述HEMS在OHCA反应中的理想作用。
    UNASSIGNED: Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) are used in the United States and globally to respond to patients with critical illness and victims of traumatic injury. Relatively limited research has examined their role in responding to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) in the United States. In this study, we compared OHCA treated by HEMS units with cardiac arrests treated by ground ambulances.
    UNASSIGNED: We queried a large national-level database of emergency medical services (EMS) activations in the United States (NEMSIS). Inclusion criteria were OHCA activations between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022 treated by either HEMS or ground ambulance. Key arrest data from both groups were then compared. Interfacility transfers and cardiac arrests after EMS arrival were excluded.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 1,233 cardiac arrests treated by HEMS and 341,096 cardiac arrests treated by ground ambulances met inclusion criteria. Comparing the two groups, cardiac arrests with HEMS response were more likely to be male (66.7% vs. 62.8%, p < 0.01), White (50.2% vs. 45.7%, p < 0.01), under 18 years old (10.9% vs. 2.7%, p < 0.001), associated with traumatic injury (19.1% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.001), witnessed (72.7% vs. 37.3%, p < 0.001), and initially-shockable (24.7% vs. 11.1%, p < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: Our comparison of cardiac arrests treated by HEMS with cardiac arrests treated by ground ambulance reveals significant differences between the two groups. Further research is needed to better characterize HEMS\' ideal role in the response to OHCA as new prehospital resuscitative techniques for non-traumatic and traumatic cardiac arrest are developed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:在芬兰,急性卒中的机械性血栓切除术每年的数量在增加,更多的患者被运送超过100公里到综合卒中中心(CSC)接受明确的治疗.这使得农村乡镇数小时没有即时紧急医疗服务(EMS)。在这项研究中,我们比较了两种运输方法之间的血栓切除术候选者移交后EMS估计的返回时间:(1)使用地面运输与救护车到CSC或(2)使用hydid策略开始与救护车一起运输,并继续与直升机紧急医疗服务部门(HEMS)一起空运。
    方法:我们回顾性地回顾了所有血栓切除术的候选者,这些候选者是从南Ostrobothnia医院区到最近的CSC的明确治疗,坦佩雷大学医院,2020年6月至2022年10月。调度协议规定,血栓切除术候选者的运输立即从救护车开始,如果当地HEMS单元可用,则患者将在会合处移交给他们。如果不是,患者通过地面被运送到CSC。从CSC的EMS数据库中审查了患者交接的运输时间和位置,并使用Google地图估算了返回救护车站的驾驶时间。审查了HEMS部队飞行员的日志,以评估其任务参与时间。
    结果:从CSC到救护车站的中间距离为188公里(IQR149-204公里),从与HEMS单元会合的中间距离为70公里(IQR51-91公里,p<0.001)。与患者移交到HEMS单元53分钟(IQR38-68分钟,p<0.001)。HEMS单元在取栓候选者的转运任务中占据136分钟的中位数(IQR127-148分钟)。
    结论:用救护车和直升机运送血栓切除候选者的混合策略显著更快地将EMS资源重新分配回他们自己的地区。
    BACKGROUND: In Finland, the yearly number of mechanical thrombectomies for acute stroke is increasing and more patients are transported over 100 km to the comprehensive stroke centre (CSC) for definitive care. This leaves the rural townships without immediate emergency medical services (EMS) for hours. In this study we compare the EMS\' estimated return times to own station after the handover of a thrombectomy candidate between two transport methods: (1) using ground transportation with an ambulance to the CSC or (2) using a hydrid strategy starting the transportation with an ambulance and continuing by air with a helicopter emergency medical services unit (HEMS).
    METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively all thrombectomy candidates\' transportations from the hospital district of South Ostrobothnia to definitive care at the nearest CSC, Tampere University Hospital from June 2020 to October 2022. The dispatch protocol stated that a thrombectomy candidate\'s transport begins immediately with an ambulance and if the local HEMS unit is available the patient is handed over to them at a rendezvous. If not, the patient is transported to the CSC by ground. Transport times and locations of the patient handovers were reviewed from the CSC\'s EMS database and the driving time back to ambulance station was estimated using Google maps. The HEMS unit\'s pilot\'s log was reviewed to assess their mission engagement time.
    RESULTS: The median distance from the CSC to the ambulances\' stations was 188 km (IQR 149-204 km) and from the rendezvous with the HEMS unit 70 km (IQR 51-91 km, p < 0.001). The estimated median driving time back to station after the patient handover at the CSC was 145 min (IQR 117-153 min) compared to the patient handover to the HEMS unit 53 min (IQR 38-68 min, p < 0.001). The HEMS unit was occupied in thrombectomy candidate\'s transport mission for a median of 136 min (IQR 127-148 min).
    CONCLUSIONS: A hybrid strategy to transport thrombectomy candidates with an ambulance and a helicopter reallocates the EMS resources markedly faster back to their own district.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:为了获得最佳的院前创伤护理,必须充分认识到潜在的危及生命的伤害,以便正确分诊患者并采取挽救生命的措施。本研究的目的是确定直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)怀疑的院前诊断的准确性。
    方法:这项回顾性多中心研究纳入了瑞士创伤登记处ISS≥16或AIS头≥3的患者,这些患者由瑞士最大的HEMS运送,随后于2020年1月12日入住瑞士12个创伤中心之一。主要结果是使用每个身体区域的缩写损伤量表(AIS)将疑似院前损伤与在医院获得的最终诊断进行比较。作为次要结果,将院前干预措施与相应的相关诊断进行比较.
    结果:相关的头部创伤是最常见的受伤部位,在院前的病例中有96.3%(95%CI:92.1%;98.6%)。胸部有相关损伤,腹部,和骨盆也很常见,但在院前很少被发现[62.7%(95%CI:54.2%;70.6%),45.5%(95%CI:30.4%;61.2%),和61.5%(95%CI:44.6%;76.6%)]。总的来说,95例气胸患者中有7例(7.4%)接受了胸部减压,在39例不稳定的骨盆骨折患者中有22例(56.4%)在院前应用了骨盆粘合剂。
    结论:大约一半的严重胸部,腹部,在充满挑战的院前环境中,在医院进行的骨盆诊断未被发现。这突显了救援队面临的困难情况。潜在的挽救生命的干预措施,例如院前胸部减压和增加使用骨盆粘合剂被认为是院前护理的潜在改善。
    OBJECTIVE: For optimal prehospital trauma care, it is essential to adequately recognize potential life-threatening injuries in order to correctly triage patients and to initiate life-saving measures. The aim of the present study was to determine the accuracy of prehospital diagnoses suspected by helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS).
    METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included patients from the Swiss Trauma Registry with ISS ≥ 16 or AIS head ≥ 3 transported by Switzerland\'s largest HEMS and subsequently admitted to one of twelve Swiss trauma centers from 01/2020 to 12/2020. The primary outcome was the comparison of injuries suspected prehospital with the final diagnoses obtained at the hospital using the abbreviated injury scale (AIS) per body region. As secondary outcomes, prehospital interventions were compared to corresponding relevant diagnoses.
    RESULTS: Relevant head trauma was the most commonly injured body region and was identified in 96.3% (95% CI: 92.1%; 98.6%) of the cases prehospital. Relevant injuries to the chest, abdomen, and pelvis were also common but less often identified prehospital [62.7% (95% CI: 54.2%; 70.6%), 45.5% (95% CI: 30.4%; 61.2%), and 61.5% (95% CI: 44.6%; 76.6%)]. Overall, 7 of 95 (7.4%) patients with pneumothorax received a chest decompression and in 22 of 39 (56.4%) patients with an instable pelvic fracture a pelvic binder was applied prehospital.
    CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of severe chest, abdominal, and pelvic diagnoses made in hospital went undetected in the challenging prehospital environment. This underlines the difficult circumstances faced by the rescue teams. Potentially life-saving interventions such as prehospital chest decompression and increased use of a pelvic binder were identified as potential improvements to prehospital care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最近,挪威直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)开发了一种特殊类型的静态绳索救援行动的程序,称为偏移技术。在这项技术中,直升机偏离了事故现场,并且HEMS技术工作人员使用偏移投掷线来获得对场景的访问。今天,这种操作的实践经验很少,并且已经确定需要更多关于在这种类型的操作中遇到的潜在危险的知识。这种知识对于进一步开发用于偏移技术的程序是重要的。
    目的:使用静态绳索偏置技术识别直升机救援行动的潜在危险,因此,改进此类操作的程序。这可以导致在偏移救援操作期间改善患者和机组人员的安全性。
    方法:使用安全工作分析来确定补偿救援行动的危害。这些操作分为任务和子任务。对于每个子任务,我们发现了潜在的危害,并提出了预防这些危害的方法.
    结果:通过安全工作分析,我们建议对偏移技术的现有程序进行一些更改,使其对潜在危险更加强大。
    结论:我们已经证明了安全工作分析对改进静态绳索偏移疏散程序的价值。我们的分析导致抵消救援行动的程序发生了一些变化。这是两个投掷线并在过程中关注“为什么”的重要性。
    BACKGROUND: Recently, the Norwegian Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) has developed a procedure for a special type of static rope rescue operation, referred to as the offset technique. In this technique, the helicopter is offset from the accident site, and the HEMS technical crew member uses an offset throw line to gain access to the scene. Today, there is little practical experience of such operations, and a need has been identified for more knowledge on the potential hazards encountered during this type of operation. Such knowledge is of importance for further development of the procedure for the offset technique.
    OBJECTIVE: To identify potential hazards for helicopter rescue operations using the static rope offset technique and, thereby, to improve the procedure for such operations. This may lead to improved safety for patients and crew members during offset rescue operations.
    METHODS: A Safe Job Analysis was used to identify the hazards of offset rescue operations. Such operations are divided into tasks and sub-tasks. For each sub-task, we identified potential hazards and suggested ways of preventing these.
    RESULTS: Through the Safe Job Analysis, we suggest some changes in the existing procedure for the offset technique, to make it more robust against potential hazards.
    CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated the value of Safe Job Analysis for improving the static rope offset evacuation procedure. Our analysis has led to some changes in the procedure for offset rescue operations. This is the importance of having two throw lines and focusing on \"why\" in the procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    背景:院前环境中准确的血流动力学监测至关重要。无创血压测量易受振动和运动伪影的影响,特别是在低血压和高血压的极端情况下:有创动脉血压(IABP)监测是一种潜在的解决方案。这项研究描述了迄今为止最大的一系列医院前开始进行IABP监测的病例。
    方法:这项回顾性观察研究是在东英吉利航空救护车(EAAA)进行的,英国直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)。它包括2015年2月1日至2023年4月20日期间接受动脉导管插入和开始IABP监测的所有接受EAAA治疗的患者。检索到所有患者的以下数据:性别;年龄;病因(医疗心脏骤停,其他医疗紧急情况,创伤);动脉插管部位;操作员角色(医生/护理人员);插入时间,如果适用,院前急救麻醉的次数,和心脏骤停后自发循环的恢复。进行描述性分析以表征样品。
    结果:13,556例患者就诊:1083例(8.0%)患者开始进行IABP监测,平均年龄59岁,其中70.8%为男性。546例患者为医疗心脏骤停:在心肺复苏期间启动了这些IABP监测的22.4%。322例创伤病例,剩下的215个是医疗紧急情况。患者严重不适:981需要插管,其中789人接受了院前急诊麻醉;609人接受了血管活性药物治疗。在424例病例中,在去医院的途中建立了IABP监测。
    结论:这项研究描述了英国HEMS系统中1000多例院前动脉导管插入术和IABP监测,并已大规模证明了可行性。有创动脉血压监测的高保真性以及动脉血气分析的额外优势为医院重症监护提供了有吸引力的转化。
    BACKGROUND: Accurate haemodynamic monitoring in the prehospital setting is essential. Non-invasive blood pressure measurement is susceptible to vibration and motion artefact, especially at extremes of hypotension and hypertension: invasive arterial blood pressure (IABP) monitoring is a potential solution. This study describes the largest series to date of cases of IABP monitoring being initiated prehospital.
    METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted at East Anglian Air Ambulance (EAAA), a UK helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS). It included all patients attended by EAAA who underwent arterial catheterisation and initiation of IABP monitoring between 1st February 2015 and 20th April 2023. The following data were retrieved for all patients: sex; age; aetiology (medical cardiac arrest, other medical emergency, trauma); site of arterial cannulation; operator role (doctor/paramedic); time of insertion and, where applicable, times of pre-hospital emergency anaesthesia, and return of spontaneous circulation following cardiac arrest. Descriptive analyses were performed to characterise the sample.
    RESULTS: 13,556 patients were attended: IABP monitoring was initiated in 1083 (8.0%) cases, with a median age 59 years, of which 70.8% were male. 546 cases were of medical cardiac arrest: in 22.4% of these IABP monitoring was initiated during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. 322 were trauma cases, and the remaining 215 were medical emergencies. The patients were critically unwell: 981 required intubation, of which 789 underwent prehospital emergency anaesthesia; 609 received vasoactive medication. In 424 cases IABP monitoring was instituted en route to hospital.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study describes over 1000 cases of prehospital arterial catheterisation and IABP monitoring in a UK HEMS system and has demonstrated feasibility at scale. The high-fidelity of invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring with the additional benefit of arterial blood gas analysis presents an attractive translation of in-hospital critical care to the prehospital setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:使用从现场到紧急医疗服务(EMS)的旁观者视频直播越来越普遍,以帮助做出有关所需资源的决策。可能的好处包括更早,更合适的派遣和临床和财务收益,但证据很少.
    方法:一项具有嵌入式过程评估和探索性经济评估的可行性随机对照试验,其中六个试验周的工作班次以1:1的比例随机分配,以在符合条件的创伤事件(使用GoodSAM即时现场)或标准护理期间使用视频直播。预定义的进度标准是:(1)≥70%的呼叫者(旁观者)与智能手机同意并能够激活实时流;(2)≥50%的激活请求导致观看录像;(3)由于实时录像,直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)停顿率降低≥10%;(4)没有证据表明呼叫者或工作人员/调度员受到心理伤害。观察性子研究包括(i)市中心EMS,他们经常使用视频直播来探索不同人群的可接受性;(ii)EMS中不使用视频直播与试验地点进行比较的员工福祉。
    结果:62个班次是随机的,包括240个事件(132个控制;108个干预)。Livestreaming在干预部门的53起事件中取得了成功。患者招募(以确定派遣的适当性),和呼叫者招募(衡量潜在危害)较低(58/269,22%的患者;4/244,2%的呼叫者).符合两个进展标准:(1)86%的使用智能手机的呼叫者同意并能够激活直播;(2)85%的激活直播的请求导致获得了镜头;由于数据不足,两个不确定:(3)2/6(33%)HEMS由于直播而退出;(4)调查没有心理伤害的证据,观察或访谈,但来自呼叫者或比较EMS站点的调查数据不足,无法自信。在采访中,语言障碍和年龄增长是城市EMS调度员对视频直播的潜在挑战。
    结论:这些发现支持了最终RCT的进展。旁观者视频直播从场景实现是可行的,999名呼叫者和调度员都可以接受,并可能有助于调度决策。对意外后果的进一步评估,利益和伤害是必需的。
    背景:ISRCTN11449333(2022年3月22日)。https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11449333.
    BACKGROUND: Use of bystander video livestreaming from scene to Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is becoming increasingly common to aid decision making about the resources required. Possible benefits include earlier, more appropriate dispatch and clinical and financial gains, but evidence is sparse.
    METHODS: A feasibility randomised controlled trial with an embedded process evaluation and exploratory economic evaluation where working shifts during six trial weeks were randomised 1:1 to use video livestreaming during eligible trauma incidents (using GoodSAM Instant-On-Scene) or standard care only. Pre-defined progression criteria were: (1) ≥ 70% callers (bystanders) with smartphones agreeing and able to activate live stream; (2) ≥ 50% requests to activate resulting in footage being viewed; (3) Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) stand-down rate reducing by ≥ 10% as a result of live footage; (4) no evidence of psychological harm in callers or staff/dispatchers. Observational sub-studies included (i) an inner-city EMS who routinely use video livestreaming to explore acceptability in a diverse population; and (ii) staff wellbeing in an EMS not using video livestreaming for comparison to the trial site.
    RESULTS: Sixty-two shifts were randomised, including 240 incidents (132 control; 108 intervention). Livestreaming was successful in 53 incidents in the intervention arm. Patient recruitment (to determine appropriateness of dispatch), and caller recruitment (to measure potential harm) were low (58/269, 22% of patients; 4/244, 2% of callers). Two progression criteria were met: (1) 86% of callers with smartphones agreed and were able to activate livestreaming; (2) 85% of requests to activate livestreaming resulted in footage being obtained; and two were indeterminate due to insufficient data: (3) 2/6 (33%) HEMS stand down due to livestreaming; (4) no evidence of psychological harm from survey, observations or interviews, but insufficient survey data from callers or comparison EMS site to be confident. Language barriers and older age were reported in interviews as potential challenges to video livestreaming by dispatchers in the inner-city EMS.
    CONCLUSIONS: Progression to a definitive RCT is supported by these findings. Bystander video livestreaming from scene is feasible to implement, acceptable to both 999 callers and dispatchers, and may aid dispatch decision-making. Further assessment of unintended consequences, benefits and harm is required.
    BACKGROUND: ISRCTN 11449333 (22 March 2022). https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11449333.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号