BACKGROUND: Vericiguat has demonstrated efficacy in improving the prognosis of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) following recent clinical deterioration. However, its real-world impact on reducing N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels and improving ventricular remodeling remains uncertain in stable HFrEF patients receiving guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) over the short term.
METHODS: This multicenter, observational cohort study included 200 HFrEF patients. Patients were grouped based on their preference for vericiguat use. We evaluated the impact of vericiguat on HFrEF patients by analyzing the difference in the proportion of patients with NT-proBNP levels ≤1000 pg/ml between two groups after a 6-month follow-up, using logistic regression and covariance analysis. Changes in echocardiographic parameters, left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) ratio, and safety outcomes were also evaluated.
RESULTS: During the 6-month follow-up, 105 patients (82.68 %) in the vericiguat group and 46 patients (63.01 %) in the control group reached the primary endpoint. Multivariate logistic regression confirmed vericiguat as a significant factor in reducing NT-proBNP levels (Model 2: odds ratio (OR) = 2.67, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.24-5.77, P = 0.013), but it showed no significant association with LVRR (Model 2: OR = 0.52, 95 % CI: 0.24-1.13, P = 0.097). The safety analysis indicated a higher incidence of mild to moderate gastrointestinal symptoms in the vericiguat group compared to the control group (23.62 % vs. 2.74 %, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Vericiguat significantly reduced NT-proBNP levels in patients with chronic HErEF under GDMT but was ineffective for LVRR during the 6-month follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a leading cause of death worldwide; thus, therapeutic improvements are needed. In vivo preclinical models are essential to identify molecular drug targets for future therapies. Transverse aortic constriction (TAC) is a well-established model of HFrEF; however, highly experienced personnel are needed for the surgery, and several weeks of follow-up are necessary to develop HFrEF. To this end, we aimed (i) to develop an easy-to-perform mouse model of HFrEF by treating Balb/c mice with angiotensin-II (Ang-II) for 2 weeks by minipump and (ii) to compare its cardiac phenotype and transcriptome to the well-established TAC model of HFrEF in C57BL/6J mice.
METHODS: Mortality and gross pathological data, cardiac structural and functional characteristics assessed by echocardiography and immunohistochemistry and differential gene expression obtained by RNA-sequencing and gene-ontology analyses were used to characterize and compare the two models. To achieve statistical comparability between the two models, changes in treatment groups related to the corresponding control were compared (ΔTAC vs. ΔAng-II).
RESULTS: Compared with the well-established TAC model, chronic Ang-II treatment of Balb/c mice shares similarities in cardiac systolic functional decline (left ventricular ejection fraction: -57.25 ± 7.17% vs. -43.68 ± 5.31% in ΔTAC vs. ΔAng-II; P = 0.1794) but shows a lesser degree of left ventricular dilation (left ventricular end-systolic volume: 190.81 ± 44.13 vs. 57.37 ± 10.18 mL in ΔTAC vs. ΔAng-II; P = 0.0252) and hypertrophy (cell surface area: 58.44 ± 6.1 vs. 10.24 ± 2.87 μm2 in ΔTAC vs. ΔAng-II; P < 0.001); nevertheless, transcriptomic changes in the two HFrEF models show strong correlation (Spearman\'s r = 0.727; P < 0.001). In return, Ang-II treatment in Balb/c mice needs significantly less procedural time [38 min, interquartile range (IQR): 31-46 min in TAC vs. 6 min, IQR: 6-7 min in Ang-II; P < 0.001] and surgical expertise, is less of an object for peri-procedural mortality (15.8% in TAC vs. 0% in Ang-II; P = 0.105) and needs significantly shorter follow-up for developing HFrEF.
CONCLUSIONS: Here, we demonstrate for the first time that chronic Ang-II treatment of Balb/c mice is also a relevant, reliable but significantly easier-to-perform preclinical model to identify novel pathomechanisms and targets in future HFrEF research.

UNASSIGNED: The association of prior to admission guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) use in patients hospitalized with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF, ejection fraction ≤40 %) and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) with in-hospital outcomes has not been well studied.
UNASSIGNED: Using the American Heart Association\'s Get With The Guidelines Heart Failure Registry, we identified HFrEF patients presenting with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and compared rates of GDMT prescription between those presenting prior to and during the pandemic. In a subgroup of patients with a concomitant COVID-19 diagnosis, we evaluated the association of prior to admission GDMT use with in-hospital mortality and severe COVID-19.
UNASSIGNED: 23,899 patients were admitted with HFrEF during the pandemic (2/16/20-3/24/21) and 26,459 patients were admitted in the year prior (2/16/19-2/15/20). In this overall cohort, prior to admission ACEI/ARB/ARNI (45.6 % vs 48.1 %, p < 0.0001) and BB (56.9 % vs 62.4 %, p < 0.0001) use was lower among admitted HFrEF patients during the pandemic when compared to the year prior. Rates of ACEI/ARB/ARNI, MRA, and triple therapy (ACE/ARB/ARNI + BB + MRA) prescription at discharge were higher during the pandemic compared to the year prior. Among a subgroup of those with HFrEF and COVID-19 (n = 333), prior to admission GDMT use was not associated with in-hospital mortality or severe COVID-19.
UNASSIGNED: We found no association between prior to admission GDMT use and in-hospital mortality or severe COVID-19 among HFrEF patients admitted with ADHF and COVID-19. GDMT prescription at discharge for HFrEF patients overall has remained either similar or improved during the pandemic.

UNASSIGNED: A polypill-based implementation strategy has been proposed to increase rates of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. This has the potential to improve mortality and morbidity in India and undertreated populations globally.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a convergent parallel mixed methods study integrating quantitative data from stakeholder surveys using modified implementation science outcome measures and qualitative data from key informant in-depth interviews. Our objective was to explore physician, nurse, pharmacist, and patient perspectives on a HFrEF polypill implementation strategy in India from January 2021 to April 2021. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated to develop an Implementation Research Logic Model.
UNASSIGNED: Among 69 respondents to the stakeholder survey, there was moderate acceptability (mean [SD] 3.8 [1.0]), appropriateness (3.6 [1.0]), and feasibility (3.7 [1.0]) of HFrEF polypill implementation strategy. Participants in the key-informant in-depth interviews (n = 20) highlighted numerous relative advantages of the HFrEF polypill innovation including potential to simplify medication regimens and improve patient adherence. Key relative disadvantages elucidated, include concerns about side effects and interruption of multiple GDMT medications due to polypill discontinuation for side effects or hospitalizations. Based on this data, the proposed implementation strategies in the Implementation Research Logic Model include 1) HFrEF polypills, 2) HFrEF polypill initiation, titration, and maintenance protocols, and 3) HFrEF polypill laboratory monitoring protocols for safety which we postulate will lead to desired clinical and implementation outcomes through multiple mechanisms including increased medication adherence to a single pill.
UNASSIGNED: This study demonstrates that a HFrEF polypill-based implementation strategy is considered acceptable, feasible, and appropriate among healthcare providers in India. We identified contextually relevant determinants, strategies, mechanism, and outcomes outlined in an Implementation Research Logic Model to inform future research to improve heart failure care in South Asia.

暂无摘要。

The conventional sequence of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) initiation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) assumes that the effectiveness and tolerability of GDMT agents mirror their order of discovery, which is not true. In this review, the authors discuss flexible GDMT sequencing that should be permitted in special populations, such as patients with bradycardia, chronic kidney disease, or atrial fibrillation. Moreover, the initiation of certain GDMT medications may enable tolerance of other GDMT medications. Most importantly, the achievement of partial doses of all four pillars of GDMT is better than achievement of target dosing of only a couple.

OBJECTIVE: Sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors (SGLT2-i) improve outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, evidence in patients with advanced HF is lacking. We aimed to determine the effect of SGLT2-i in advanced HFrEF compared to their effect on a non-advanced population.
METHODS: Consecutive HFrEF outpatients who started SGLT2-i were observed for 6-months. Patients were categorized as having advanced or non-advanced HFrEF. The primary outcome was the trend of NTproBNP in the two groups. Secondary outcomes included changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and ejection fraction (LVEF). The association between advanced HF diagnosis and including N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) reduction was tested using multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, 105 patients (45 advanced, 60 non-advanced) were included. Mean age was 56 ± 10 years, 22 % were female, and 35 % had ischemic heart disease. Median NTproBNP at baseline for advanced and non-advanced patients was 1672pg/ml (IQR 520-3320) vs. 481 pg/ml (IQR 173-917), respectively (p < 0.001). At follow-up, only non-advanced patients reduced their NTproBNP (-32 % (95 % CI -51 to -3), p < 0.001), while advanced patients had an increase in NTproBNP. LVEF and NYHA class improved only in non-advanced patients. GFR was stable in both subgroups. At multivariate analysis a diagnosis of advanced HF was independently associated with a reduced probability of NTproBNP reduction (OR 0.041 (95 % CI 0.002-0.752), p = 0.031). Only one patient discontinued the drug due to side effects.
CONCLUSIONS: In advanced HFrEF, SGLT2-i do not impact on NTproBNP, LVEF or NYHA class but are well tolerated.

UNASSIGNED: Evidence regarding the duration of anticoagulation (AC) therapy for left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is lacking. This study aims to evaluate the rate and risk factors for LVT recurrence in patients with Anterior ST-Segment elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) complicated by LVT.
UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with Anterior STEMI complicated by LVT and reduced ejection fraction (<35 %) from 2010 to 2020. Patients with atrial fibrillation and hypercoagulable state were excluded. Recurrence of LVT was defined as a new LVT on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) after interval resolution and AC discontinuation. Demographics, comorbidities, guideline directed medical therapy, TTE, and angiographic characteristics were assessed and compared in patients with and without LVT recurrence.
UNASSIGNED: 87 patients met the inclusion criteria. Nine (10.3 %) had LVT recurrence of which three (33.3 %) had cardioembolic events. More patients with recurrence had ventricular aneurysm/scarring (33 % vs 10.3 %) and multi-vessel disease (22.2 % vs 9 %).
UNASSIGNED: This study reveals that a portion of patients with Anterior STEMI complicated by LVT are at a higher risk of recurrence after initial resolution and AC discontinuation. Larger prospective trials are needed to re-address the appropriate duration of anticoagulation.

OBJECTIVE: Although body mass index (BMI) is the most commonly used anthropometric measure to assess adiposity, alternative indices such as the waist-to-height ratio may better reflect the location and amount of ectopic fat as well as the weight of the skeleton.
RESULTS: The prognostic value of several alternative anthropometric measures was compared with that of BMI in 1116 patients with non-ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) enrolled in DANISH. The association between anthropometric measures and all-cause death was adjusted for prognostic variables, including natriuretic peptides. Median follow-up was 9.5 years (25th-75th percentile, 7.9-10.9). Compared to patients with a BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2 (n = 363), those with a BMI ≥25 kg/m2 had a higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death, although this association was only statistically significant for a BMI ≥35 kg/m2 (n = 91) (all-cause death: hazard ratio [HR] 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-2.48; cardiovascular death: HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.69-3.58). Compared to a BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2, a BMI <18.5 kg/m2 (n = 24) was associated with a numerically, but not a significantly, higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death. Greater waist-to-height ratio (as an exemplar of indices not incorporating weight) was also associated with a higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death (HR for the highest vs. the lowest quintile: all-cause death: HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.53-2.92; cardiovascular death: HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.49-3.15).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non-ischaemic HFrEF, there was a clear association between greater adiposity and higher long-term mortality.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00542945.

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a commonly seen clinical entity in the family physician\'s practice. This clinical review focuses on the pharmacologic management of chronic HFrEF. Special attention is paid to the classification of heart failure and the newest recommendations from the American Heart Association concerning the use of guideline-directed medical therapy. β blockers, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are discussed in detail. The new emphasis on sacubitril-valsartan and SGLT2i\'s as therapies for HFrEF are reviewed, followed by a brief discussion of more advanced therapies and comorbidity management.