BACKGROUND: Although mitral valve repair is the preferred surgical strategy in children with mitral valve disease, there are cases of irreparable severe dysplastic valves that require mitral valve replacement. The aim of this study is to analyze long-term outcomes following mitral valve replacement in children in a tertiary referral center.
METHODS: A total of 41 consecutive patients underwent mitral valve replacement between February 2001 and February 2021. The study data was prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, long-term survival, and long-term freedom from reoperation.
RESULTS: Median age at operation was 23 months (IQR 5-93), median weight was 11.3 kg (IQR 4.8-19.4 kg). One (2.4%) patient died within the first 30 postoperative days. In-hospital mortality was 4.9%. Four (9.8%) patients required re-exploration for bleeding, and 2 (4.9%) patients needed extracorporeal life support. Median follow-up was 11 years (IQR 11 months - 16 years). Long-term freedom from re-operation after 1, 5, 10 and 15 years was 97.1%, 93.7%, 61.8% and 42.5%, respectively. Long-term survival after 1, 5, 10 and 15 years was 89.9%, 87%, 87% and 80.8%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: If MV repair is not feasible, MV replacement offers a good surgical alternative for pediatric patients with MV disease. It provides good early- and long-term outcomes.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: There is limited data on the 2-year outcomes of transapical transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TA-TEER) using the ValveClamp in patients with severe primary mitral regurgitation (MR) and its impact on myocardial deformation.
METHODS: From July 2018 to March 2021, 53 patients with symptomatic severe primary MR underwent TA-TEER were enrolled. The endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent 3 + or 4 + MR, or need for mitral surgery.
RESULTS: Among the 53 patients who had successfully ValveClamp implantation, 8(15.1%) reached the composite endpoint. Significant improvement in left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume, pulmonary artery systolic pressure, NYHA functional class, and MR severity were observed (P < 0.05 for all). Univariate Cox\'s regression analysis revealed that LV end-diastolic volume index, LV end-systolic volume index, left atrial volume index, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure were associated with adverse events (P < 0.05 for all). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, left atrial volume index was independently associated with the endpoint (hazard ratio, 1.049; 95% CI, 1.009-1.091; P < 0.001) after adjustment for above echocardiographic parameters. LV global longitudinal strain and apical longitudinal strain in global and regional segments decreased at 30 days, but showed a recovery at 2 years with no significant difference compared to the baseline.
CONCLUSIONS: TA-TEER using the ValveClamp presented favorable safety and efficacy at 2-year. Myocardial deformation impairment was observed at 30 days post-procedure, but did not persist at 2 years.

BACKGROUND: Complete dislodgement of a mechanical valve is extremely uncommon as a long-term issue after getting a substitute mitral valve, and this report details an incident of complete detachment of a mechanical valve.
METHODS: A 50-year-old woman, who underwent mitral mechanical valve replacement 2 decades earlier at another facility, was urgently admitted due to sudden cardiogenic shock.
METHODS: Transthoracic echocardiograms revealed severe malfunction of the mitral valve prosthesis, characterized by significant mitral regurgitation and moderate pulmonary hypertension. Following the insertion of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and an intra-aortic balloon pump, the hemodynamics stabilized. Coronary angiography displayed the prosthetic mitral valve ring and leaflet floating in the left atrium, as confirmed by preoperative real-time 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. A complete separation of the prosthetic ring and leaflet from the suture ring was observed.
METHODS: The patient promptly underwent bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement.
RESULTS: The patient\'s postoperative course was uneventful, leading to discharge in good condition.
CONCLUSIONS: A crucial aspect is comprehending the structure of the prosthetic valve itself. The use of transthoracic echocardiography and real-time 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography provides additional structural and functional details, enhancing support for potential life-saving interventions. Echocardiography plays a significant role in evaluating the morphology and function of prosthetic valves.

OBJECTIVE: Prothesis choice in isolated mitral valve replacement for patients aged 75 years or younger remains debated as most studies comparing prothesis type have included large proportions of combined operations and benefits are influenced by concomitant procedures. This study compared long-term outcomes of isolated mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valves in different age groups of propensity-matched populations.
METHODS: This is a retrospective, multicentre, propensity-matched observational study. Baseline characteristics, operative details and long-term outcomes (mortality and freedom from surgical/transcatheter reintervention) were collected.
RESULTS: Totally, 1536 isolated mitral valve replacements (806 mechanical, 730 bioprosthetic) were performed between 2000 and 2017. Over 90% of eligible patients successfully underwent propensity matching, yielding 226 each of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves in patients aged <65 years and 171 each of bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in patients aged 65-75 years with median follow-up of 13 years (maximum 20 years). In matched patients <65 years, 10-year survival was superior with mechanical valves versus bioprosthetic valves (78.2% vs 69.8%, P = 0.029), as was 10-year freedom from reintervention (96.2% vs 81.3%, P < 0.001). For matched patients between 65 and 75 years, there were no differences between mechanical and bioprosthetic valves in 10-year survival (64.6% vs 60.8%, P = 0.86) or 10-year freedom from reintervention (94.0% vs 97.2%, P = 0.23). Rates of post-operative stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, renal failure and permanent pacemaker insertion were similar.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients requiring isolated mitral valve replacement, mechanical valves confer significantly better long-term survival and freedom from reintervention for patients <65 years, while no benefit is observed at age 65-75 years compared to bioprosthetic valves.

Intra-cardiac thrombosis is a potentially devastating complication of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) mechanical circulatory support. We present here a patient who suffered complete thrombosis of a fresh mitral prosthesis and left atrium in the setting of ECMO with aortic insufficiency who was treated with repeat valve replacement and thrombectomy. To our knowledge, she is the only patient in the reported literature to have survived this complication.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to summarise the existing knowledge regarding antithrombotic medications following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) using a biological valve prosthesis.
METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of studies that reported the results of using antithrombotic medication to prevent thromboembolic events after SAVR using a biological aortic valve prosthesis and recorded the outcomes 12 months after surgery. Since no randomised controlled trials were identified, observational studies were included. The analyses were conducted separately for periods of 0-12 months and 3-12 months after surgery. A random effects model was used to calculate pooled outcome event rates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: The search yielded eight eligible observational studies covering 6727 patients overall. The lowest 0- to 12-month mortality was observed in patients with anticoagulation (2.0%, 95% CI 0.4-9.7%) and anticoagulation combined with antiplatelet therapy (2.2%, 95% CI 0.9-5.5%), and the highest was in patients without antithrombotic medication (7.3%, 95% CI 3.6-14.2%). Three months after surgery, mortality was lower in anticoagulant patients (0.5%, 95% CI 0.1-2.6%) than in antiplatelet patients (3.0%, 95% CI 1.2-7.4%) and those without antithrombotics (3.5%, 95% CI 1.3-9.3%). There was no eligible evidence of differences in stroke rates observed among medication strategies. At 0- to 12-month follow-up, all antithrombotic treatment regimens resulted in an increased bleeding rate (antiplatelet 4.2%, 95% CI 2.9-6.1%; anticoagulation 7.5%, 95% CI 3.8-14.4%; anticoagulation combined with antiplatelet therapy 8.3%, 95% CI 5.7-11.8%) compared to no antithrombotic medication (1.1%, 95% CI 0.4-3.4%). At 3- to 12-month follow-up, there was up to an eight-fold increase in the bleeding rate in patients with anticoagulation combined with antiplatelet therapy when compared to those with no antithrombotic medication. Overall, the evidence certainty was ranked as very low.
CONCLUSIONS: Although this meta-analysis reveals that anticoagulation therapy has a beneficial tendency in terms of mortality at 1 year after biological SAVR and suggests potential advantages in continuing anticoagulation beyond 3 months, it is limited by very low evidence certainty. The imperative for cautious interpretation and the urgent need for more robust randomised research underscore the complexity of determining optimal antithrombotic strategies in this patient population.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。