Lymphedema is a progressive lymphatic disease that potentiates physical and psychosocial distress. Despite its impact, patients reportedly encounter lymphatic ignorance throughout the healthcare system. This cross-sectional study aims to summarize clinical characteristics and interactions of lymphedema patients within the healthcare system. Two lymphedema patient cohorts were included: The Global Registry Analysis Cohort included lymphedema patients who contributed to an international digital lymphatic registry and the Interactions Cohort included patients who initiated a questionnaire about interactions with the medical system. The global registry was used to obtain demographic and clinical characteristics from affiliated lymphedema patients. A 23-item online questionnaire on healthcare experiences and satisfaction with lymphatic healthcare was then distributed to the Interactions Cohort. Complete responses were obtained from 2474 participants. Participants were a mean age of 57.5 ± 16.1 years and 51.4% had a cancer history. Participants reported substantial delays in diagnosis and treatment. Cancer-related and non-cancer-related lymphedema patients reported similar levels of perceived physician disinterest in their lymphedema; however, non-cancer-related lymphedema patients reported more care dissatisfaction. Ultimately, patients continue to face delays in lymphedema diagnosis and treatment. We developed an evidence-based model highlighting areas of reform needed to improve lymphatic education and healthcare.

Indian healthcare system is in immediate need of a new healthcare delivery model to increase healthcare accessibility and improve the health outcomes of the marginalized. Inaccessibility and underutilization of Primary Health Centers (PHCs) disproportionately affect people living in remote areas. It is thus imperative for the designers, engineers, health professionals, and policymakers to come together with a collaborative mindset to develop innovative interventions that sustainably manage the accessibility of PHCs at large, promote preventive health, and thus improve the health outcomes of hard-to-reach communities. This article examines the available literature on barriers to primary healthcare in Indian context, the reason of failure of PHCs and the way forward. The article further analysis literature on existing Mobile Medical Units (MMUs) as an alternate solution to conventional PHCs and attempt to extract the major lessons to propose a mobile Primary Health Center (mPHC) in contrast to the existing conventional static PHCs. The intention is to find out the research gaps in the existing literature and try to address the same for future researchers, designers, engineers, health professionals and policy makers to think forward to make this idea of a mobile Primary Health Center (mPHC), as the main delivery model to cater basic healthcare services to the underserved communities.

The present healthcare scenario is still in its compromised state, whether it is the lack of infrastructure, medicines and human resources, especially in rural India. Moreover, the condition worsens in rural areas due to several reasons like lack of awareness, proper roads to access, and lack of proper delivery of healthcare model. The state government of Delhi, India, set up the \"Mohalla\" Clinics to provide essential healthcare to residents of Delhi and the surrounding areas, focusing on the urban poor. Essential health services, such as vaccinations, family planning, and counselling, are available at the Mohalla Clinics, where a doctor, a nurse, a pharmacist, and a lab technician are staffed. Despite a strong start and low operating costs, the Mohalla Clinic initiative still struggles to cover all Delhi state as envisioned. This study analyses the operational challenges of Delhi\'s \"Mohalla\" Clinics and proposes lessons to be implemented for other primary healthcare infrastructure services for remote areas. The analysis is based on the systems (infrastructure, facilities, and services) strengths and limitations from a literature review and qualitative interview conducted among 55 respondents, including doctors, nurses, and patients among 11 Mohalla Clinics using the SUTD-MIT (Singapore University of Technology and Design-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Industrial Design Centre) interview template for Product Service System (PSS). The results show that there are lessons to learn from the model of Delhi Mohalla Clinics for other states to implement in their primary healthcare sectors. To achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC), the Delhi Mohalla Clinic falls short due to several limitations. Thus, to achieve UHC, the Indian healthcare system needs a new healthcare delivery model. Hence, we ought to propose a new healthcare delivery model based on the gained insights from the study. One such delivery model proposed is a mobile Primary Health Center (mPHC). This collapsible system can be taken to far-flung regions, deployed for some hours, run the Out-Patient Department (OPD), collapsed, and returned to base.