Health literacy questionnaire

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    移民中的健康素养是公共卫生和社会正义的问题。来自不同背景的移民遇到诸如语言障碍等挑战,文化差异,获得医疗服务的机会受到限制,和异构迁移状态。应对这些挑战需要仔细考虑其独特的经验和需求,以促进公平的健康成果。这可能会阻碍他们在医疗系统中导航的能力,了解健康信息,从事促进健康的行为。然而,在移民社区中,我们对健康素养的理解仍然存在很大差距。这项研究有双重目的:确定里斯本大都市区葡语非洲国家(PALOP)移民的健康素养优势和需求,并研究人口社会经济,移民和健康状况特征以及健康素养领域。
    进行了横断面调查。使用健康素养问卷(HLQ)从506名PALOP移民中收集数据。我们还收集了人口统计信息,社会经济,迁移,和健康状况数据。我们采用多元线性回归来了解HLQ九个域与这些特征之间的关系。
    HLQ评分揭示了组间不同的健康素养模式。在与医疗保健提供者的理解和支持以及在医疗保健系统中导航有关的领域中,健康素养需求尤其明显。相反,在积极管理人的健康和了解足够的健康信息以做出明智的决定方面,观察到更高的分数和潜在的优势。然而,在这些中,平均分数表明,很大一部分人认识到困难。结果还表明,较高的教育水平与健康素养的提高有关。相比之下,自我感知的健康状况低,独自生活,在葡萄牙居住的时间较短,没有证件或正在获得法律地位的过程与较低的健康素养有关。
    我们的研究强调了移民相关变量和自我报告的健康状况在了解移民社区健康素养方面的重要性。住院时间长短和自我感知的健康状况低等因素与潜在的不利健康素养水平有关,这可能会加剧健康不平等。评估这些变量对于确定健康素养方面的差距并制定量身定制的干预措施以减少健康不平等至关重要。
    UNASSIGNED: Health literacy among migrants is a matter of public health and social justice. Migrants from diverse backgrounds encounter challenges such as linguistic barriers, cultural disparities, restricted access to health services, and heterogeneous migration statuses. Addressing these challenges requires careful consideration of their unique experiences and needs to promote equitable health outcomes. This can hinder their ability to navigate the healthcare system, understand health information, and engage in health-promoting behaviours. However, there is still a significant gap in our understanding of health literacy within migrant communities. This study has a dual aim: to identify health literacy strengths and needs among migrants from Portuguese-speaking African Countries (PALOP) countries in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area and to examine associations between demographic, socioeconomic, migration and health condition characteristics and the health literacy domains.
    UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional survey was conducted. Data were collected from 506 PALOP migrants using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). We also collected demographic, socioeconomic, migration, and health condition data. We employed multiple linear regression to understand the relationship between the HLQ nine domains and these characteristics.
    UNASSIGNED: The HLQ scores revealed distinct patterns of health literacy between the groups. Health literacy needs were particularly evident in the domains related to feeling understood and supported by healthcare providers and navigating the healthcare system. Conversely, higher scores and potential strengths were observed in actively managing one\'s health and understanding enough health information to make informed decisions. However, in these, the average scores suggest that a high proportion of people recognised difficulties. \'The results also indicated that a higher educational level was associated with increased health literacy. In contrast, low self-perceived health status, living alone, shorter duration of residence in Portugal, and being either undocumented or in the process of obtaining legal status were associated with lower health literacy.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study highlights the importance of migration-related variables and self-reported health status in understanding health literacy among migrant communities. Factors such as length of stay and low self-perceived health status are associated with potentially disadvantageous levels of health literacy, which could exacerbate health inequalities. Assessing these variables is critical to identify gaps in health literacy and develop tailored interventions to reduce health inequalities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:男性的预期寿命比女性短。男性不太可能寻求健康专业人士的建议或利用预防性健康服务和计划。这项研究旨在探索澳大利亚男性的健康素养及其影响特征。
    方法:4131名成年男性参与新南威尔士州农村消防局,完成了一项在线横断面调查,从2022年9月至11月进行。调查工具捕获了人口统计数据,健康状况和生活方式风险特征。使用44项健康素养问卷(HLQ)测量健康素养。描述性统计,频率,百分比,均值和标准差,用于描述样本。干扰统计,包括Mann-WhitneyU测试和Kruskal-Wallis测试,用于探索人口统计和HLQ量表之间的差异。
    结果:对于前5个量表(4分利克特量表),"健康信息评价"得分最低(平均2.81;SD0.52),"医疗保健提供者理解和支持的感觉"得分最高(平均3.08;SD0.64).对于其他4个量表(5点Likert量表),最低评分为“导航医疗保健系统”(平均值3.74;SD0.69).得分最高的是“充分了解健康信息以知道该做什么”(平均值4.10;SD0.53)。年龄,收入水平和生活在城市/农村地区与健康素养量表显著相关。
    结论:这项研究为男性的健康素养及其影响因素提供了新的见解。这些知识可以为未来的策略提供信息,以促进男性参与卫生服务和预防保健。
    BACKGROUND: Males have a shorter life expectancy than females. Men are less likely to seek the advice of a health professional or utilise preventive health services and programs. This study seeks to explore health literacy and the characteristics affecting this among Australian men.
    METHODS: Four hundred and thirty-one adult males engaged with the New South Wales Rural Fire Service, completed an online cross-sectional survey, undertaken from September - November 2022. The survey tool captured demographic data, health status and lifestyle risk characteristics. Health literacy was measured using the 44-item Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). Descriptive statistics, frequencies, percentages, means and standard deviations, were used to describe the sample. Interferential statistics, including the Mann-Whitney U Test and the Kruskal-Wallis Test, were used to explore differences between demographics and HLQ scales.
    RESULTS: For the first 5 scales (4-point Likert scale), the lowest score was seen for \'Appraisal of health information\' (Mean 2.81; SD 0.52) and the highest score was seen for \'Feeling understood and supported by healthcare providers \' (Mean 3.08; SD 0.64). For the other 4 scales (5-point Likert scale), the lowest score was seen for \'Navigating the healthcare system\' (Mean 3.74; SD 0.69). The highest score was seen for \'Understand health information well enough to know what to do\' (Mean 4.10; SD 0.53). Age, income level and living in an urban/rural location were significantly related to health literacy scales.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new insight into men\'s health literacy and the factors impacting it. This knowledge can inform future strategies to promote men\'s engagement with health services and preventive care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    健康素养对于医疗保健专业人员提供优质的患者护理至关重要。关于健康科学本科生的健康素养水平的研究有限。
    使用电子健康素养问卷(HLQ)确定新加坡健康科学专业学生的健康素养。
    对健康科学本科生进行了针对性抽样的横断面调查。
    本研究假设健康素养受性别影响,随着健康科学教育水平的提高,归因于随着本科生在多年的学习中进步,对医疗保健系统和医疗保健教育的接触增加。来自4年诊断射线照相入门级课程的合格学生,营养学,职业治疗,物理治疗,放射治疗和言语和语言治疗,年龄从21岁到50岁,被邀请。排除标准是由于辍学或立即从这些课程毕业而不再学习的学生,以及加速课程的学生,其学习将在不到4年的时间内完成。
    总共,111名受访者(72名女性和37名男性)完成了调查(回应率,7.7%)从物理治疗中返回(n=69),职业治疗(n=25),诊断射线照相术(n=12)和营养学(n=5),放射治疗和语言治疗的零。所有参与者都有英语水平。女性参与者表现出更高的HLQ,平均总分为30.67(标准差(SD)=0.61),而男性参与者为29.83(SD=0.53)。在所有9个HLQ量表中,2年级,3年级和4年级的学生得分通常高于1年级。总的来说,营养学学生在HLQ的总分最高,而诊断射线照相术的学生在所有9种HLQ量表中得分最低。
    本研究确立了新加坡健康科学专业学生的健康素养水平。性别和学习年限影响了健康素养水平,支持该假设。
    UNASSIGNED: Health literacy proficiency is essential for health care professionals to provide quality patient care. There is limited research exploring health literacy proficiency among undergraduate health science students.
    UNASSIGNED: To determine health literacy among health science students in Singapore using the electronic Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ).
    UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional survey using purposive sampling was conducted among undergraduate health science students.
    UNASSIGNED: This study hypothesises that health literacy is influenced by gender, and it increases with the level of health science education, attributed to the increased exposure to the health care system and health care education as undergraduates progress through the years of study. Eligible students from the 4-year entry-level programmes of diagnostic radiography, dietetics, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, radiation therapy and speech and language therapy, aged from 21 to 50, were invited. Exclusion criteria were students who were no longer studying due to dropping out or having immediately graduated from these programmes and students in the accelerated programmes whose studies would be completed in less than 4 years.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 111 respondents (72 females and 37 males) completed surveys (response rate, 7.7%) returned from physiotherapy (n = 69), occupational therapy (n = 25), diagnostic radiography (n = 12) and dietetics (n = 5), with nil from radiation therapy and speech and language therapy. All participants were English literate. Female participants demonstrated higher HLQ with a mean total score of 30.67 (standard deviation (SD) = 0.61) versus male participants 29.83 (SD = 0.53). Year 2, 3 and 4 students generally scored higher than Year 1 across all nine HLQ scales. Overall, dietetics students had the highest total score on the HLQ, while the diagnostic radiography students had the lowest scores for all the nine HLQ scales.
    UNASSIGNED: This study established the health literacy level of health science students in Singapore. Gender and years of study influenced health literacy levels, supporting the hypothesis.
    Survey on the level of health information understanding among the health science students in Singapore.
    UNASSIGNED: Health care professionals need to understand health information well to provide good patient care. There is little research on how well health science students understand health information.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to determine how well health science students in Singapore understand health information using a questionnaire known as the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ).
    UNASSIGNED: The study surveyed health science students.
    UNASSIGNED: The study explored if the understanding of health information is influenced by gender and increases with more years of health science education. This is because students get more exposure to the health care system and education as they continue their studies. Students from various health science programmes aged 21 to 50 were invited to participate. Students who had dropped out or just graduated and were in accelerated programmes were excluded.
    UNASSIGNED: The survey was completed by 111 students (72 females and 37 males) from physiotherapy, occupational therapy, diagnostic radiography and dietetics. No students from radiation therapy and speech and language therapy participated. All participants could read and write in English. Female participants scored higher on the questionnaire than male participants. Students scored higher in their second, third and fourth years than in their first year of study. Dietetics students scored the highest overall, while diagnostic radiography scored the lowest.
    UNASSIGNED: This study reported the level of understanding of health information among health science students in Singapore. The level of understanding was influenced by gender and years of study.
    UNASSIGNED: • Establishing the health literacy level of health science students in Singapore is important.• Senior students tend to have better health literacy compared with junior students.• Navigating the health care system and obtaining support from health care providers are areas where students can benefit from health literacy education.• Educational materials should be optimised to address potential health literacy deficits and ensure high literacy levels upon graduation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:健康素养是使人们能够管理健康并长寿的重要因素。监狱里的人经常来自边缘化社区,通常是传统的社区卫生组织无法触及的,健康状况较差。了解监狱中人们的健康素养状况至关重要,以及它对该人群公认的健康不平等和结果的贡献。这项研究旨在使用多维健康素养测量工具来描述新南威尔士州监狱中被监禁的成年人的优势和挑战。
    方法:对14所公立大城市监狱的监狱中的人进行了横断面调查。使用健康素养问卷(HLQ)从471名参与者中收集数据。还收集了参与者的特征和健康状况。数据采用描述性统计分析。均值标准化差异的效应大小(ES)用于描述参与者特征组之间的差异大小。
    结果:参与者的平均年龄为38.0岁(范围19-91岁)。男性占样本的81%,21%被确认为原住民和/或托雷斯海峡岛民,53%的人报告了健康问题。与澳大利亚总人口相比,监狱中的所有9种HLQ量表的得分较低。观察到大多数人口统计学群体之间的平均差异。与男性相比,女性在几个HLQ量表中得分较低,包括“拥有足够的信息来管理健康”(ES0.30[95%置信区间(CI)0.07,0.53]),“积极与医疗保健专业人员接触的能力”(ES0.30[95%CI0.06,0.53]),“导航医疗保健系统”(ES0.30[95%CI0.06,0.53]),and,“找到良好健康信息的能力”(ES0.33[95%CI0.10,0.57])。在按法律地位比较参与者时,发现健康素养量表得分与中小型ES不同。在比较其他参与者特征组时,主要是小ES。
    结论:这项研究为新南威尔士州监狱中的人们提供了健康素养优势和挑战的见解。这些发现突出了健康素养在解决这一弱势群体的健康差距方面的重要作用,并可以为监狱卫生服务提供信息。
    Health literacy is an important factor for enabling people to manage their health and live long fulfilling lives. People in prison are frequently from marginalised communities, often out of reach of conventional community based health organisations, and have poorer health outcomes. It is essential to understanding the health literacy profiles of people in prison, and its contribution to the well-established health inequities and outcomes of this population. This study aimed to use a multi-dimensional health literacy measurement tool to describe the strengths and challenges of adults incarcerated in NSW prisons.
    A cross-sectional survey was conducted for people in prison across 14 publicly operated metropolitan prisons. Data were collected from 471 participants using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). Participant characteristics and health conditions were also collected. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Effect sizes (ES) for standardised differences in means were used to describe the magnitude of difference between participant characteristic groups.
    Participants\' median age was 38.0 (range 19 - 91) years. Males comprised 81% of the sample, 21% identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander, and 53% reported a health problem. People in prison had lower scores for all nine HLQ scales when compared to the general Australian population. Small to medium ES were seen for mean differences between most demographic groups. Compared to males, females had lower scores for several of the HLQ scales including \'having sufficient information to manage health\' (ES 0.30 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.07, 0.53]), \'ability to actively engage with health care professionals\' (ES 0.30 [95% CI 0.06, 0.53]), \'navigating the healthcare system\' (ES 0.30 [95% CI 0.06, 0.53]), and, \'ability to find good health information\' (ES 0.33 [95% CI 0.10, 0.57]). Differing health literacy scale scores with small to medium ES were found when comparing participants by legal status. Mainly small ES were seen when comparing other participant characteristic groups.
    This study provides insights into the health literacy strengths and challenges for people in NSW prisons. These findings highlight the important role health literacy could have in addressing health disparities in this vulnerable population and can inform prison health services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:随着对设计健康素养组织和医疗保健系统的关注,了解包括医学生在内的医务人员的健康素养状况至关重要,因为医疗专业人员在这些系统中发挥着关键作用。医疗专业人员通过获得适当的医疗保健,为良好的患者健康结果做出贡献。提供高质量的健康信息和协作共享决策,这是基本的健康素养能力。这项研究的目的是确定参加澳大利亚医学博士课程的医学生的健康素养优势和劣势。
    方法:澳大利亚医学博士课程4年的学生被邀请完成匿名课程,2021年1月在线调查。使用9域确定了健康素养档案,44项多维健康素养问卷,一个经过验证的工具,可以从不同的角度全面评估健康素养的优势和劣势。还记录了人口特征和社会属性。将结果与澳大利亚统计局的数据进行比较。
    结果:86名参与者完成了调查。大多数参与者是女学生(57%),他们在家中说英语(88%),受过高等教育的父亲(60%),并居住在青春期与高社会经济地位相关的地区(61%)。男性在探索健康信息获取和评估的三个领域得分明显更高,以及积极与医疗保健提供者接触的能力。在第6域(积极与医疗保健提供者接触的能力)和第7域(导航医疗保健系统)中,学生的分数显着低于澳大利亚普通人群。
    结论:医学生的健康素养概况表明他们与医疗保健提供者接触和在卫生系统中导航的能力存在弱点。医学教育工作者将需要创造机会来解决医学课程中的这些弱点。在获取和评估健康信息的自我评估能力中发现的性别差异需要进一步探索。什么?:进一步了解医学生的健康素养状况可能会影响医学院课程的设计。
    OBJECTIVE: With the emerging focus on designing health-literate organisations and health care systems, it is essential to understand the health literacy profiles of the medical workforce including medical students, as medical professionals play a key role in within these systems. Medical professionals contribute to good patient health outcomes through enabling access to appropriate health care, provision of quality health information and collaborative shared decision-making, which are fundamental health literacy competencies. The aim of this study is to identify health literacy strengths and weaknesses of medical students enrolled in an Australian Doctor of Medicine programme.
    METHODS: Students from all 4 years of an Australian Doctor of Medicine programme were invited to complete an anonymous, online survey in January 2021. Health literacy profiles were identified using the 9-domain, 44-item multi-dimensional Health Literacy Questionnaire, a validated tool which comprehensively evaluates health literacy strengths and weaknesses from diverse perspectives. Demographic characteristics and social attributes were also recorded. The results were compared with Australian Bureau of Statistics data.
    RESULTS: Eighty-six participants completed the survey. Most participants were female students (57%) who spoke English at home (88%) with tertiary-educated fathers (60%) and resided in locations associated with high socioeconomic status during adolescence (61%). Males scored significantly higher in three domains which explored health information access and appraisal, and ability to actively engage with health care providers. Students\' scores were significantly lower than the Australian general population in Domain 6 (Ability to actively engage with health care providers) and Domain 7 (Navigating the health care system).
    CONCLUSIONS: Medical students\' health literacy profiles indicate areas of weakness in their ability to engage with health care providers and to navigate the health system. Medical educators will need to create opportunities to address these weaknesses within medical curricula. Gender differences identified in self-rated ability to access and appraise health information requires further exploration. SO WHAT?: Further understanding of health literacy profiles of medical students may influence design of medical school curricula.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:巴基斯坦移民是澳大利亚文化和语言多样性(CALD)增长最快的社区之一,但是目前缺乏关于他们健康素养的信息。本研究旨在调查居住在澳大利亚的巴基斯坦移民的健康素养。
    方法:使用横断面研究设计,使用乌尔都语版的健康素养问卷(HLQ)测量健康素养。描述性统计和线性回归用于描述受访者的健康素养状况,并检查其与人口统计学特征的关联。
    结果:包括202名巴基斯坦移民的答复。受访者的平均年龄为36岁,61.8%是男性,87.6%具有大学学历。大多数人在家中讲乌尔都语,近80%是澳大利亚永久居民或公民。巴基斯坦受访者在HLQ领域得分高;感觉被卫生提供者理解(量表1),医疗保健的社会支持(量表4),与医疗保健提供者接触(量表6)并了解健康信息(量表9)。受访者在HLQ领域得分较低;有足够的信息(量表2),积极管理健康(量表3),健康信息评估(量表5),导航医疗保健系统(量表7)和查找信息的能力(量表8)。在回归模型中,大学教育和年龄与几乎所有领域的健康素养都显著相关,但随着年龄的增长,效果很小。在家说英语和成为永久居民也与两到三个HLQ领域更好的健康素养有关。
    结论:确定了居住在澳大利亚的巴基斯坦移民的健康素养优势和劣势。卫生保健提供者和组织可以使用这些发现来定制健康信息和服务,以更好地支持该社区的健康素养。这项研究将为未来的干预措施提供信息,以更好地支持健康素养并减少居住在澳大利亚的巴基斯坦移民的健康差距。
    OBJECTIVE: Pakistani migrants are one of the fastest-growing culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities in Australia, but there is currently a lack of information regarding their health literacy. This study aimed to investigate the health literacy of Pakistani migrants residing in Australia.
    METHODS: Using a cross-sectional study design, health literacy was measured using the Urdu version of Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). Descriptive statistics and linear regression were used to describe the health literacy profile of respondents and to examine its association with their demographic characteristics.
    RESULTS: The responses of 202 Pakistani migrants were included. The median age of the respondents was 36 years, 61.8% were males and 87.6% had a university education. The majority spoke Urdu at home and almost 80% were Australian permanent residents or citizens. Pakistani respondents scored high on HLQ domains; feeling understood by health providers (Scale 1), social support for health care (Scales 4), engaging with health care providers (Scale 6) and understanding health information (Scale 9). The respondents scored low on HLQ domains; having sufficient information (Scale 2), actively managing health (Scale 3), appraisal of health information (Scale 5), navigating the health care system (Scale 7) and ability to find information (Scale 8). In the regression model, university education and age were significantly associated with health literacy in almost all the domains, but the effect size was small for age. Speaking English at home and being a permanent resident were also associated with better health literacy in two to three HLQ domains.
    CONCLUSIONS: Health literacy strengths and weaknesses of Pakistani migrants residing in Australia were identified. Health care providers and organisations may use these findings to tailor health information and services to better support health literacy in this community. SO WHAT?: This study will inform future interventions to better support health literacy and reduce health disparities in Pakistani migrants residing in Australia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:健康素养的自我报告措施通常包括一组概念上不同但相关的领域,这些领域被评分为单个量表或每个领域分别评分。44项健康素养问卷的心理测量研究,分为九个独立的量表,通常将相关因素验证性因素分析的结果报告为有效性证据。然而,一些尺度有很强的相关性,提出了一个问题,即是否有足够的判别有效性来保证单独评分。这项心理计量学研究旨在对比拟合高阶和双因素模型的结果,作为阐明问题的替代方案。
    未经批准:相关因素,使用贝叶斯验证性因子分析方法,将高阶和双因素验证性因子分析模型拟合到澳大利亚对健康素养问卷的回答样本(N=813).
    UNASSIGNED:所有代表九因素结构的健康素养问卷模型都很合适。相关因素模型复制了以前的发现,显示因素间相关性在0.19和0.93之间。高阶模型显示,所有九个一阶因子在二阶因子上的负载相对较高,三个因子的负载特别高(0.97)。两个双因素模型表明,大多数健康素养问卷项目是多因素的,每个都包含来自一般健康素养因素和特定领域因素的系统差异。四个量表中的七个项目被确定为与一般健康素养因素密切相关,项目内容表明,该因素在与健康相关信息和医疗保健提供者互动时具有广泛的代理和功效。
    未经批准:对比相关因素,适合健康素养问卷的高阶和双因素模型表明,自我报告健康素养问卷中的构成项目可能被预期代表至少两个可靠和实质性共同因素差异的来源:与一般健康素养相关的方差和与更具体领域相关的方差,这表明项目可能是“不可减少的”异类。讨论了对测试开发和验证实践的影响。
    UNASSIGNED: Self-report measures of health literacy frequently encompass a group of conceptually distinct but related domains scored as either a single scale or separately for each domain. Psychometric studies of the 44-item Health Literacy Questionnaire, scored as nine separate scales, typically report the results of correlated factors confirmatory factor analyses as validity evidence. However, some scales are quite strongly correlated, raising the question of whether there is sufficient discriminant validity to warrant separate scoring. This psychometric study aims to contrast the results of fitting higher-order and bifactor models as alternative options to illuminate the issue.
    UNASSIGNED: Correlated factors, higher-order and bifactor confirmatory factor analysis models were fitted to an Australian sample of responses to the Health Literacy Questionnaire (N = 813) using Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis methods.
    UNASSIGNED: All models representing a nine-factor structure for the Health Literacy Questionnaire fitted well. The correlated factors model replicated previous findings, showing inter-factor correlations between 0.19 and 0.93. A higher-order model showed relatively high loadings of all nine first-order factors on the second-order factor with particularly high loadings (⩾0.97) for three. Two bifactor models showed that the majority of Health Literacy Questionnaire items were multifactorial, each containing systematic variance from both a General Health Literacy factor and a domain-specific factor. Seven items from four scales were identified as strongly associated with the General Health Literacy factor, with item content suggesting that this factor indexes a broad sense of agency and efficacy in interacting with health-related information and healthcare providers.
    UNASSIGNED: Contrasting correlated factors, higher-order and bifactor models fitted to the Health Literacy Questionnaire suggest that constituent items in self-report health literacy questionnaires might be anticipated to represent at least two sources of reliable and substantive common factor variance: variance associated with General Health Literacy and variance associated with a more specific domain, suggesting that items may be \'irreducibly\' heterogeneous. Implications for test development and validation practice are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:从面对面通信到基于Web的源的健康信息的传输随着时间的推移而发生了变化。患者可以发现,理解,并使用他们的健康信息,而无需会见卫生保健提供者,并能够更多地参与他们的卫生保健管理。近年来,互联网已经成为健康信息的主要来源,尽管临床提供者仍然是最可靠的来源。访问的便利性,匿名,繁忙的日程安排可能是在网络上寻求健康信息的激励因素。社交媒体已经成为一种流行的健康信息来源,因为它可以实时提供新闻。网上卫生信息广度和深度的增加也导致了大量的误报,个人往往无法从小说中辨别事实。健康素养(HL)能力可以帮助个人更好地了解健康信息并增强患者决策,因为适当的HL是积极的健康信息寻求行为(HISB)的前兆。几个因素,如年龄,性别,已知社会经济地位会缓和HL和HISB之间的关联。
    目的:在本研究中,我们旨在通过考虑不同的人口统计学因素来研究生活在美国南部州的个人中HL和HISB之间的关系.
    方法:使用QualtricsResearchServices招募≥18岁的参与者,并进行分层以匹配种族和年龄的全州人口统计学特征。收集了人口统计数据以及健康信息的来源和频率。健康素养问卷用于收集自我报告的HL经验。SPSS(版本27;IBM公司)用于分析。
    结果:共有520名参与者符合标准并完成了调查(平均年龄36.3,SD12.79岁)。互联网被认为是最常用的健康信息来源(平均2.41,标准差0.93)。女性比男性更有可能向医生寻求健康信息(r=0.121;P=.006)。老年人不太可能从互联网上寻求健康信息(r=-0.108;P=0.02),社交媒体(r=-0.225;P<.001),和朋友(r=-0.090;P=0.045)比年轻个体。聚类分析表明,与HISB水平较低的人相比,HISB水平较高的人更有可能从多个来源寻求信息(平均范围为3.05-4.09,SD范围为0.57-0.66;P<.001)。
    结论:年龄和性别与HISB显著相关。老年人可以从基于网络的资源中受益,以监测他们的健康状况。较高的HL水平与较高的HISB显著相关。在HL水平较低的个人中改善HISB的针对性策略可能会改善他们的访问,理解,以及健康信息的使用。
    BACKGROUND: The transmission of health information from in-person communication to web-based sources has changed over time. Patients can find, understand, and use their health information without meeting a health care provider and are able to participate more in their health care management. In recent years, the internet has emerged as the primary source of health information, although clinical providers remain the most credible source. The ease of access, anonymity, and busy schedules may be motivating factors to seek health information on the web. Social media has surfaced as a popular source of health information, as it can provide news in real time. The increase in the breadth and depth of health information available on the web has also led to a plethora of misinformation, and individuals are often unable to discern facts from fiction. Competencies in health literacy (HL) can help individuals better understand health information and enhance patient decision-making, as adequate HL is a precursor to positive health information-seeking behaviors (HISBs). Several factors such as age, sex, and socioeconomic status are known to moderate the association between HL and HISBs.
    OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to examine the relationship between HL and HISBs in individuals living in a southern state in the United States by considering different demographic factors.
    METHODS: Participants aged ≥18 years were recruited using Qualtrics Research Services and stratified to match the statewide demographic characteristics of race and age. Demographics and source and frequency of health information were collected. The Health Literacy Questionnaire was used to collect self-reported HL experiences. SPSS (version 27; IBM Corp) was used for the analysis.
    RESULTS: A total of 520 participants met the criteria and completed the survey (mean age 36.3, SD 12.79 years). The internet was cited as the most used source of health information (mean 2.41, SD 0.93). Females are more likely to seek health information from physicians than males (r=0.121; P=.006). Older individuals are less likely to seek health information from the internet (r=-0.108; P=.02), social media (r=-0.225; P<.001), and friends (r=-0.090; P=.045) than younger individuals. Cluster analysis demonstrated that individuals with higher levels of HISBs were more likely to seek information from multiple sources than those with lower levels of HISBs (mean range 3.05-4.09, SD range 0.57-0.66; P<.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Age and sex are significantly associated with HISB. Older adults may benefit from web-based resources to monitor their health conditions. Higher levels of HL are significantly associated with greater HISB. Targeted strategies to improve HISB among individuals with lower levels of HL may improve their access, understanding, and use of health information.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    健康素养在赋予个人权力并使他们能够做出与健康相关的决策方面发挥着关键作用。尽管健康素养研究取得了进展,文献中存在需要进一步调查的空白,建立全面有效的衡量标准就是其中之一。因此,这项研究是为了检查阿拉伯健康素养问卷(HLQ)的心理测量特性,包括可靠性,有效性,和九个HLQ尺度的测量不变性。在这项研究中使用了横截面设计。招募了大学生样本(N=1011),平均年龄为21.1岁(SD=2.28)。参与者完成了阿拉伯语HLQ和人口统计问卷。对每个HLQ量表进行验证性因子分析(CFA)和测量不变性。所有HLQ量表的Cronbachα值和复合信度值均高于.70。CFA分析表明,所有HLQ量表均符合先验设定的标准:RMSEA≤.07,CFI≥.95,Chisq/df<5。此外,所有标准化因子负荷均在.50以上。关于测量不变性,结果支持所有HLQ量表的相等形式测量不变性。所有HLQ量表也支持跨性别的因子载荷测量不变性相等。部分支持因子载荷的测量不变性和指标截距的相等性。这些结果表明,内部一致性,收敛,和HLQ的因子结构都支持。阿拉伯语HLQ是一个可靠的,衡量阿拉伯语人群健康素养的有效工具。
    Health literacy plays a key role in empowering individuals and enabling them to make health-related decisions. Despite the advances in health literacy research, there are gaps in the literature that require further inquiry, and establishing comprehensive and valid measurements is one of them. Thus, this research was conducted to examine the psychometric properties of the Arabic Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ), including the reliability, validity, and measurement invariances of the nine HLQ scales. A cross-sectional design was used in this study. A sample of university students (N = 1011) was recruited, the mean of age was 21.1 years old (SD = 2.28). The Arabic HLQ and a demographics questionnaire were completed by the participants. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and measurement invariances were performed for each HLQ scale. The values of Cronbach\'s α and composite reliability were above .70 for all HLQ scales. The CFA analyses showed that all HLQ scales meet the criteria that were set a priori: RMSEA ≤.07, CFI ≥.95, and Chisq/df < 5. In addition, all standardized factor loadings were above .50. Regarding the measurement invariance, the results supported the equal form measurement invariance for all HLQ scales. The equality of factor loadings measurement invariance across gender was also supported for all HLQ scales. Measurement invariance of factor loadings and equality of indicator intercepts was partially supported. These results show that the internal consistency, convergence, and factor structure of the HLQ are all supported. The Arabic HLQ is a reliable, valid tool to measure health literacy among Arabic-speaking populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号