目标:尽管灾难性医疗支出是评估财政医疗保护的主要指标,它在方法论和实证方面差异很大,这阻碍了研究之间的比较。这项研究的目的是衡量2003年,2009年和2018年巴西灾难性卫生支出的患病率,其相关因素。以及根据社会经济地位的患病率分布差异。
方法:这是一项时间序列研究。
方法:使用家庭预算调查数据。灾难性卫生支出的患病率以预算和支付能力的百分比来衡量,考虑10%、25%和40%的阈值。确定家庭是否,家庭,和户主特征影响发生灾难性卫生支出的可能性。家庭按收入分位数分层,消费,和财富得分。
结果:2003年至2009年期间,巴西灾难性卫生支出的患病率有所增加,2018年略有下降。财富得分在穷人和富人之间显示出更明显的分配效应,前者受灾难性卫生支出影响最大。消费显示灾难性卫生支出患病率的百分比差异更大。灾难性卫生支出的患病率与老年人的存在呈正相关,年龄和女性户主,农村地区,收到政府福利,一定程度的粮食不安全。
结论:最贫穷的家庭受巴西灾难性医疗支出的影响最大,需要更有效和公平的政策来减轻金融风险。
OBJECTIVE: Although catastrophic health spending is the main measure for assessing financial healthcare protection, it varies considerably in methodological and empirical terms, which hinders comparison between studies. The aim of this study was to measure the prevalence of catastrophic health spending in Brazil in 2003, 2009, and 2018, its associated factors, and disparities in prevalence distribution according to socioeconomic status.
METHODS: This was a time series study.
METHODS: Data from the Household Budget Surveys were used. Prevalence of catastrophic health spending was measured as a percentage of the budget and ability to pay, considering thresholds of 10, 25, and 40%. It was determined whether household, family, and household head characteristics influence the likelihood of incurring catastrophic health spending. Households were stratified by income deciles, consumption, and wealth score.
RESULTS: There was an increase in prevalence of catastrophic health spending between 2003 and 2009 in Brazil and a slight reduction in 2018. The wealth score showed more pronounced distributional effects between the poor and the rich, with the former being the most affected by catastrophic health spending. Consumption showed greater percentage variations in the prevalence of catastrophic health spending. The prevalence of catastrophic health spending was positively associated with the presence of older adults, age and female household head, rural area, receipt of government benefits, and some degree of food insecurity.
CONCLUSIONS: The poorest families are most affected by catastrophic health spending in Brazil, requiring more effective and equitable policies to mitigate financial risk.